PR
Permian Resources Corporation
stock NYSE

https://preview.redd.it/tewlm1z06rih1.png?width=387&format=png&auto=webp&s=b128cbf2bdf66ef66467af51e8a405b769459a0f
Right after PR

What's the history re: Aurora and Cronos? Just that they are both OG LPs and so prob know each other or something else?
I think Cura made an unsolicited bid for Cronos a few years ago too. And Cronos either didnt respond or said no based on the PR they put out IIRC. But i think pretty easy for Cronos to defend against a hostile because of Altria.

Good morning, SqueezeFinders!
Yesterday's price action on the $QQQ tech index was relatively insignificant after a close of 720.87 (-0.3%) left us still very much in the bullish-leaning directional sentiment region of the medium-term chart. Until we risk retesting the 700 psychological level, we can remain optimistic about market conditions for squeeze candidates. If we can reclaim 728.6 area, we are likely looking at a resumption of short-term momentum. The main directional sentiment determinants today are a mix of the below-detailed economic data releases, and a few large earnings reports ($SMCI and $CRWV in AH). This market is very dynamic and has been unpredictable as far as risk-tolerance goes, as one day we're running, and the next we're crashing. Stay tuned for what's squeezy. Regardless of broader market sentiment, you can always locate relative strength by checking SqueezeRadar to track irregularities in our data, and find winners you may not have spotted before without our scanners.
🥇 Gold: \~$4,400/oz (+0.3%)
🥈 Silver: \~$66/oz (+0.3%)
🪙 Bitcoin: \~$64.0k/coin (-1.0%)
🛢️ Oil: \~$79.50/barrel (+0.5%)
Today's economic data releases are:
🇺🇸 ADP Employment Change Weekly @ 8:15AM ET
🇺🇸 Existing Home Sales (Jul) @ 10:00AM ET
🇺🇸 EIA Short-Term Energy Outlook @ 12:00PM ET
🇺🇸 3-Year Note Auction @ 1:00PM ET
🇺🇸 API Weekly Crude Oil Stock @ 4:30PM ET
📙Breakdown point: BELOW this price, the move will lose momentum significantly in the short-term, as shorts will gain confidence encouraging them to short more. Reducing probability of a squeeze without a catalyst.
📙Breakout point: ABOVE this price, the move will gain momentum significantly in the short-term, as shorts losses will increase pressuring them to cover. Increasing the probability of a squeeze occurring, especially if with a catalyst.
4. $RIOT
Squeezability Score: 36%
Juice Target: 38.9
Confidence: 🍊 🍊
Price: 19.40 (-5.46%) / 22.48 (+\~17% in AH on ER)
Breakdown point: 20.0
Breakout point: 25.2
Mentions (30D): 0 🆕
Event/Condition: Q2 revenue of $174 million beating estimates with data center and engineering growth offsetting softer bitcoin mining results while hash rate expanded and power optimization generated significant credits + landmark 20-year 191-megawatt data center lease with a leading frontier AI lab expected to generate approximately $9.1 billion in contracted revenue with extension options potentially reaching $16 billion + completed initial capacity delivery to AMD and advanced vertical integration supporting faster large-scale data center build-outs + Recent price target 🎯 of $25 from Cantor Fitzgerald + Recent price target 🎯 of $28 from H.C. Wainwright + Recent price target 🎯 of $22 from B. Riley
5. $FRMI
Squeezability Score: 36%
Juice Target: 14.0
Confidence: 🍊
Price: 5.88 (-4.85%) / 7.02 (+\~19.39% in AH after PR)
Breakdown point: 6.0
Breakout point: 10.2
Mentions (30D): 0 🆕
Event/Condition: First binding customer lease at Project Matador campus with TensorWave for a 222-megawatt turnkey data center expected to generate about $6.5 billion in contracted revenue over 15 years with expansion rights potentially exceeding 650 megawatts + continued construction progress with Siemens turbines on site over $1.5 billion invested and 6 gigawatts permitted toward the larger 17-gigawatt AI-focused campus + ongoing discussions with additional hyperscale customers positioning the site for phased deliveries beginning in the second half of 2027 + Recent price target 🎯 of $17 from consensus analysts + Recent price target 🎯 of $11 from Mizuho + Recent price target 🎯 of $20 from Needham
Gain access to all our cutting-edge research tools, live watchlists, alerts, and more: [https://www.squeeze-finder.com/subscribe](https://www.squeeze-finder.com/subscribe)
HINT: Use code RDDT to get your first month for just $10!
NOT FINANCIAL ADVICE, THESE POSTS ARE FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY

https://preview.redd.it/ish3ko4auqih1.png?width=733&format=png&auto=webp&s=d2e429c89a7e5c552233ac4fe740109f9da6ef5a
Everyone is gonna post the 1.67% Cu from today's NRED release.
Fair enough. That's a damn good number to see at surface. The 9 grab samples averaged 0.639% Cu, with results reaching 1.67% Cu + 0.433 g/t Au. But the part that got me digging through the PR was what they're targeting underneath those surface results.
NRED has now defined interpreted exploration targets roughly 650-1,800 ft below surface. At Lamont, AMT has already imaged roughly 4,900 ft deep and management interprets the data as showing 2 parent magmas with multiple pipe-like features extending upward. Add porphyry-style alteration, AB-type veins, stockwork and multiple intrusive phases at surface and there's finally a pretty clear reason for going deeper.
And all of this is happening roughly 6.2 miles from Hudbay's producing Copper Mountain mine, which hosts about 345 Mt @ 0.26% Cu + 0.12 g/t Au in P&P reserves. NRED interprets Wilmac as potentially sitting within a fault-offset portion of that broader intrusive complex. That interpretation still needs to survive drilling, obviously.
For me the 1.67% Cu gets attention. The 650-1,800 ft targets underneath it are what make me want to see the drill results.
Story is becoming more and more interesting with each release.

Yep.
The price of an error, in combinationatoric terms, is exponential with the number of chained events that need to go right all at once to prevent disaster.
Any horse gambler knows this: predicting a chain of events all ahead of time is worth much more money than all of them singly with no extra penalty for a zero outcome.
Let's say that the error rate of a typical software engineer, before chatGPT and friends, for just an arbitrary PR, was (averaged however you want to weigh experience and topic) 25% for a non-critical error, 10% for a critical error that existing tests don't find, and 75% for a critical error that tests find. (The remaining are false positives and false negatives).
Choose which step of this process you'd like to replace with a chatbot.
Imagine that any single one or two (error) steps gets more likely to happen, all else being equal.
Even if there's only one point of failure that gets worse, if it's dropped into an existing chain that needs to work with, say, maximum \alpha probability of being incorrect, (unless all of the modified steps are new steps) it will make the failure rate exponentially worse.
In simpler terms, going from a 20% failure rate to a 25% failure rate (under the advice of an AI engine) will be much much worse than expected.
Put this on any critical system (for instance, a part in a NASA build) and forget about reliability altogether.

Tesla got rid of their customer service, and PR teams- they beefed up their legal and media teams to handle all of their legal problems and suppress all of their problems in the main/social media.
Elon is a fraud on every level imaginable. He bought trumps presidency to doge all of the regulatory agencies that were investigating him. He uses mergers and acquisitions to bail out his failed businesses and uses fraudulent accounting practices to make his losses look like profits. His Ponzi scheme will eventually collapse.

[WTS] [WTT] 🔥 📈 🪙📉 MARKET MONDAY 📈 🪙📉 🔥 5oz Libertad PR's, Libertad 🔑 Year, 2oz Libertad, 1oz Libertad's, ASE’s (tube & singles), Maple’s (some unique backs & 25TH ANNIVERSARY), Roo’s, Valcambi, Engelhard, Krugerand, slabbed silver, 5 & 10oz Bars, UNDER SPOT deals, and more!! 🔥 🪙 🔥

the silence is the worst part. not even a half decent explanation for what happened just empty PR words and then disappear..7 btc is a lot to lose like that sorry you're in this mess

when you build something that holds people's money you got a responsibility that goes way beyond normal business. a bridge collapses and the engineer hides in office refusing to speak that's exactly what this feels like

The part most people leave out is politics. Some mention “bailouts”, but it could just as easily be public pushback for policy that would make them unprofitable.
But the nature of this technology to reshape humanity makes that so nebulous. Seems very likely that key powerbrokers on the inside will do well, like Elon with X, while shareholders and speculators will get played.
This has been pretty well foreshadowed by these AI CEOs who’ve already said investing in AI should be seen as a social good like Philanthropy than speculation. Also the long forgotten “no moat” warnings. The moat I see is from authenticity, trust and transparency built by people like Dario and Mo Gawdat and others at times. I think these AI executives in general have actually been a lot more authentic and transparent than they get credit for. Every thing they say that isnt self serving is twisted and seen as PR lies. It may be PR, they have incentives and are humans, but they’re doin a lot to sound warning alarms every week to let everyone know we’re playing with fire
My prediction and hope is that power and talent will gravitate toward whoever seems like the best stewards of this technology, along with public consent

We've published the source code for the GeroWallet browser extension:
[https://github.com/Gero-Labs/gerowallet](https://github.com/Gero-Labs/gerowallet)
**What's in there**
The full extension. Key derivation and encrypted storage, the transaction signing
path, staking, governance and dApp flows, and the whole UI. Multi-chain across
Cardano, Bitcoin, Midnight and Apex Fusion.
Also in the repo: an architecture overview, a contributor guide, a security policy
with private vulnerability reporting enabled, and issue and PR templates.
Build and run instructions are at [https://gerowallet.io/docs](https://gerowallet.io/docs) if you want to run
your own build rather than the store version.

A little confused what you are asking here. This is a market replay simulator, not a live paper simulator. So it’s not really a matter of speed in terms of news, but a matter of data on-hand, and when I choose to display the data. I already have all the news data from major PR firms like GlobeNewswire, BusinessWire, PRNewswire, and Access Newswire. Each press release is dated and timestamped, so the individual PR is only displayed when the timestamp corresponds with the replay clock.

SKYX issued the PR for their upcoming earnings call. [SKYX Announces Corporate Update Call](https://www.globenewswire.com/news-release/2026/08/10/3341842/0/en/skyx-announces-corporate-update-call.html)

Genuinely what would be the purpose? Do you think they need to run PR like in the west it’s a dictatorship. Clearly the regimes still functioning by the fact they control the strait

This is a good example of why it's dangerous to use AI for technical comparisons.
The PR you posted explicitly says that the overall microvision system draws 17 W.

I think most people realized long ago that the initial non-binding proposal by GameStop was stillborn.
When the offer was made, GameStop did not even have the authorization to issue the needed shares. It was not a serious, credible offer.
Then when EBay responded they included a copy of the TD HDL, which showed that the financing had a contingency of investment grade ratings, and any serious look at the deal with 9X leverage showed that the deal would not be investment grade.
So the 50% cash, 50 stock deal being dead is not a surprise. A couple of weeks ago Ryan Cohen stopped his PR campaign of personal attacks on EBay management and board.
Then back just before the GAmestop annual meeting GameStop said that further details in the offer and the expected financials of the comb7bed company would be forthcoming "shortly", but then nothing was published,
One does not have to excel in reading tea leaves to see that the deal was not going to be made.
That still leaves the possibility of Ryan Cohen (not necessarily GameStop) attempting a proxy battle.
At this point it is important to recognize that Ryan Cohen's motivations may be different than GameStop's. He wants to run EBay, not GameStop.

the registry part is what matters here, not the codebase itself. means anyone can PR a fix for a wrong logo or a duped symbol instead of waiting on the foundation to notice. that mismatch has been a recurring headache for wallets pulling token metadata.

I don't think you understand what ouster is able to do vs what microvision is doing.
Microvision has correctly identified a need in this market, namely that point clouds be fused with RGB information for better interpretability (or, alternatively, that RGB images be encoded with depth for greater utility). To accomplish this, they need to acquire RGB images and lidar separately, and then fuse the data using an algorithm pipeline running on a separate computer at the control station (the PR notes that microvision is running this fusion on the control station and not on the on board orin).
Ouster seems to have also identified this need sometime ago and has set up their optical path and firmware such that the lidar natively outputs point clouds with RGB information. There is no "proprietary compute" needed, and they can provide the same type of information microvision is providing but with less power, less required compute resources, no calibration alignment errors, and no parallax problems at close ranges, which any system with a separate camera and lidar will have.
I'm not arguing that microvisionnshould develop proprietary compute or anything. I am saying that their architecture is fundamentally less capable than Ouster's in this regard, and they are probably just solving this as well as they can.

Booking things, running apps, coding, responding to customer service requests instead of toll-free numbers, digital therapy, digital adult entertainment, posting on comments, influencing politics, creating social media posts of people, crafting Bill Gates' PR profile, ....
And my list is not even 1/80th of what might eventuate.

It’s literally from PR play books

I have been really struggling with small cap momentum trading for some time now, and I realized that I just need more reps in the game. Kobe Bryant was one of the greats not just because he practiced, but he practiced exactly how he would play in the game.
So I built this market replay app for myself to be able to practice my skills at scale over years of historical data. My goal was to emulate every aspect of day trading that would determine with my success or failure, and these are all the features I created to emulate live trading:
\- tick level replay with charts that emulate TradingView’s chart refresh algorithm
\- NBBO and level 2 depth of market to walk every simulated order down the book to emulate order routing and not fill any order that wouldn’t be filled in live trading
\- timeframes down to the 10 second chart with indicators like VWAP, EMA, and MACD
\- point in time float data to understand supply and demand at that point in history
\- News headline data from major PR firms like GlobeNewswire and PRNewswire
\- HOD momentum scanners and top leading gainers scanners for each day
\- custom pop outs to drag windows across monitors
\- custom hotkeys with customizable limit prices and share sizes
I built this for myself but after showing my app to other traders, it seems like the small-cap community might really benefit from this.
So below is a screenshot of what the trading desk looks like, and the site is here: https://dasreplay.com
It is a free beta version while I see if there is a market for something like this.
If you could try it out and give me some feedback on whether traders would actually use this, and what other features you would want to see, I would greatly appreciate it.