BTCUSDT
Bitcoin / Tether USD
crypto Composite

You dont need to guess. Its already happened. Its not the shiniest new thing anymore, with AI taking that mantle in spades. AI has also taken the mantle as the best way for data centres to make money. BTC is on a slow path to obscurity.

I’m glad you retain your BTC, just on high alert after the recent losses

That’s just not true my BTC is on my cold card

the BTC cartel

The fact that BTC just tracks the rest of the stock market 80% of the time invalidates the core belief of bitcoin true-believers that it's some sort of anti-inflation store of value and not some speculative stock that doesn't do anything.
The remaining 20% of the time it moves sharply up or down depending on what scam is running at the time.

He's waiting for BTC to hit $1 mill before selling anything. He's the new Warren Buffet (drives a sensible car) style crypto Billionaire.

Greg Abel is gonna buy $100 billion in BTC + ETH the day after Buffett passes

It's always good time to buy BTC!

There is a true story that when BTC first came out, a man ordered pizza to be delivered. He tipped the delivery person 2 BTC! One expensive pizza!!

I learn from one of my best friends who is one of the top executives of a very large investing firm that is a household name. He guided me in choosing 3 ETFs that cover American markets, World markets and the Asian markets. He is purchasing the same ETFs for his children’s future weekly as well as I have been doing.
The only difference in our portfolios is he purchases IBIT and I purchase BTC.
He has 38 yrs investing behind him!

Repeat after me: software nodes are not economical nodes.
Some dude with 0.01 BTC can run 500 software nodes in his basement, while a single software node can represent 100,000 BTC (eg. an exchange or large business representing large transaction volume and thousands of people). Software nodes are basically meaningless to judge community or economical support.
The truth is BIP110 never had community support outside a tiny minority of poorly informed plebs. BIP110 didn't even actually solve the problem it set out to solve. It just made spam slightly more expensive and impossible to prune. A problem which is actually not even a problem. Bitcoin has had data transactions for 15+ years and is doing just fine.
Please stop getting your information from delusional and disingenuous people like Luke.

Quantum only, govs banning it does nothing, china has banned BTC several times and it was a nothing burger 

Just remember. No ONE controls BTC. As long as that is the case it will be decentralized.

I'm not sure what you are asking or what you think i said
I didn't say the American market wasn't an influence just that it not the only influence, the market is world wide, there isn't just America,
BTC was doing just fine when America was disinterested
The clarity act is not about BTC but about strengthening the US dollar for trade before it becomes just another currency
It's all about slowing BRICs

Hahahaha I bought weed on the Silk Road for a depressing amount of BTC.

I did the same but with a peak of 700 BTC in 2011 :'(

But literally every other blockchain has 100x more block space than BTC. So BTC is precisely the worst for messages. And precisely the opposite of what Satoshi said is the purpose of Bitcoin. Furthermore there are things like IPFS and immutable social media blockchains that excel at storing data.
Whoever fed you this crap about messages on BTC is a Maxi retard. They're just trying to keep the BTC fees high when hardly anyone is using it. I suppose you like ordinals and rare sats too? It's for dummies.

Go look at the BCH/BTC chart and cry

Good that both confirmed. The SPY-blind BTC calibration is the worse of the two — using borrowed noise floors means you've been running a hidden apples-to-oranges comparison the whole time, and the 0.995 to 0.244 drop on 1h shows exactly how much that was distorting things.
The degenerate 5m and 15m floors are worth digging into before you trust any BTC results at those timeframes. If the noise floor is literally zero it probably means the sample distribution is degenerate in some other way — not enough variance in the signal, or the feature set is returning near-constant values for BTC at those resolutions. Worth checking what the features look like on raw BTC 5m data before assuming the gate is the right place to fix it.
The shadow-evidence pilot sounds like the right call over patching the comparison. Interested to see what the live evidence requirement does to promotion rates when it goes in.

>**Blockchain remedy,**
>**Knowing your identity,**
>**Crypto pedigree.**
~Daily haiku until we’re at least at 0.178 on the ETH/BTC ratio or highest market cap