AEHR
Aehr Test Systems
stock NASDAQ

I will share my results in phases. I used Grok, integrated with my account and this is my original prompt:
Evaluate my trades based on @RealDayTrading and @1OptionsTrading trading strategies.
I then added your questions.
a) How well do my trades follow the teachings in the Wiki and/or The System?
Overall adherence: Low to Moderate (roughly 3–4 out of 10).
What aligns:
• You occasionally take profits on stronger names (NVDA, WMT, TSLA, ANGX, etc.).
• You sell some premium (short puts on SOFI, PENG, SMR) — this is consistent with OneOption’s preference for selling OTM puts on stronger stocks when conditions allow.
• You scale into liquid names like NVDA and MU in small size.
What does not align well:
• Market First is weak. Trades appear driven more by individual stock ideas than by a clear, daily assessment of SPY bias and key levels.
• Relative Strength filter is inconsistently (or rarely) applied. Many positions are in speculative / high-volatility / lower-priced names (SMR, ANGX, BFLY, AMPG, RDW, AEHR, etc.) that often lag the market. Large open losses in these names show they either never had strong RS or lost it and were not cut.
• Exit discipline is the biggest gap. The System is very strict about cutting losers quickly once Relative Strength disappears or structure breaks. Positions like SMR (avg cost \~$26.8 vs \~$8.5), AMPG, RDW, and ORCL show significant bag-holding.
• Position construction leans toward many small speculative buys rather than fewer, high-conviction RS setups.
You are following pieces of the System but not the full process in the required order or with the required discipline.

I will share my results in phases. I used Grok, integrated with my account and this is my original prompt:
Evaluate my trades based on @RealDayTrading and @1OptionsTrading trading strategies.
I then added your questions.
a) How well do my trades follow the teachings in the Wiki and/or The System?
Overall adherence: Low to Moderate (roughly 3–4 out of 10).
What aligns:
• You occasionally take profits on stronger names (NVDA, WMT, TSLA, ANGX, etc.).
• You sell some premium (short puts on SOFI, PENG, SMR) — this is consistent with OneOption’s preference for selling OTM puts on stronger stocks when conditions allow.
• You scale into liquid names like NVDA and MU in small size.
What does not align well:
• Market First is weak. Trades appear driven more by individual stock ideas than by a clear, daily assessment of SPY bias and key levels.
• Relative Strength filter is inconsistently (or rarely) applied. Many positions are in speculative / high-volatility / lower-priced names (SMR, ANGX, BFLY, AMPG, RDW, AEHR, etc.) that often lag the market. Large open losses in these names show they either never had strong RS or lost it and were not cut.
• Exit discipline is the biggest gap. The System is very strict about cutting losers quickly once Relative Strength disappears or structure breaks. Positions like SMR (avg cost \~$26.8 vs \~$8.5), AMPG, RDW, and ORCL show significant bag-holding.
• Position construction leans toward many small speculative buys rather than fewer, high-conviction RS setups.
You are following pieces of the System but not the full process in the required order or with the required discipline.

$AEHR