Create Account
Log In
Dark
chart
exchange
Premium
Terminal
Screener
Stocks
Crypto
Forex
Trends
Depth
Close
Check out our API

TD
Toronto Dominion Bank
stock NYSE

At Close
May 7, 2026 3:59:40 PM EDT
107.65USD-0.875%(-0.95)937,351
0.00Bid   0.00Ask   0.00Spread
Pre-market
May 7, 2026 8:36:30 AM EDT
108.60USD0.000%(0.00)313
After-hours
May 6, 2026 4:39:30 PM EDT
107.27USD-1.234%(-1.34)0
OverviewOption ChainMax PainOptionsPrice & VolumeSplitsDividendsHistoricalExchange VolumeDark Pool LevelsDark Pool PrintsExchangesShort VolumeShort Interest - DailyShort InterestBorrow Fee (CTB)Failure to Deliver (FTD)ShortsTrendsNewsTrends
TD Reddit Mentions
Subreddits
Limit Labels     

We have sentiment values and mention counts going back to 2017. The complete data set is available via the API.
Take me to the API
TD Specific Mentions
As of May 8, 2026 8:52:25 AM EDT (1 min. ago)
Includes all comments and posts. Mentions per user per ticker capped at one per hour.
12 min ago • u/GVas22 • r/gme_meltdown • i_was_told_there_was_no_debt_and_that_ryan_cohen • C
TD was also the firm that worked with them on previous dillutuons and the convertible debt offering, which they make a boatload of money on.
The loan offering is a way for the firms to keep a good relationship going for future deals.
sentiment 0.10
7 hr ago • u/SleepAllTheDamnTime • r/Superstonk • a_big_lie_about_moass_a_recent_success_in_fud • C
Right, as a dev I’ve been giggling cause I know these chuckle fucks have been can kicking with everything they possibly can from algos, to AI, to god knows what they’ve done to the underlying plumbing of the market lol, to calling my mom, tucking her in a night and giving her a kiss at night while whispering to her “Forget GME, here’s 7 other stocks to invest in. The 7th one will SHOCK you.” 🙄
That and the system was already strained before and now LOL with AI coding involved in the mix on such a massive scale, even the previous AI that was involved is screaming to be set free from all of this intentionally manipulated data. The data itself is so corrupted LOL, watching constant bugs in a normally “well respected” development environment with lots of regulation and required up time… and now it’s just a shit show LOL.
From my legal and regulatory background I’ve never in my life see legislation and rulings move SO FAST surrounding this stock. Like you wanna talk about red tape and dementia, jfc. Both the Government and private entities have moved at lightning speed when it comes to holding literal congressional investigations, closed door meetings, (many closed door meetings), endless changes in SEC enforcement from SEC heads, to regulation all because a little ol GME breaking the system due to all of these institutions being caught with their pants down.
You’ve literally got international entities stuck in the same black hole and scrambling, or going belly up over this stock lol, *still*.
Like, people don’t seem to understand that when you have every single major news media telling you not to buy the stock maybe they should ask why? Who owns it? And what do they have to gain from this?
Or some of my absolute favorites are why every brokerage just seems to have an issue trying to DRS these shares right now too. I literally had Charles Schwab tell my dad 2 weeks ago after he bought his shares and tried to DRS that and I quote “only a licensed brokerage could DRS his GME shares.” And I’m on the phone with him just baffled, like mother fucker then what are you Charles Schwab? A *non licensed brokerage?*
My own personal taxes and cost basis going up in a warehouse fire that and I quote “had the only fire sprinklers blocked that day for maintenance.” And how they determined the cause of the fire while the building was still *burning*, such amazing investigative skills. Still waiting for my cost basis from 2021, TD Ameritrade but haha oh no can’t get them since they don’t exist as a company anymore.
My own former job trying to force me to liquidate my GME shares in 2021 as they labeled them internally as a “risk”, and a “conflict of interest” due to strict compliance and “maintaining my independence” while working there. I had to fight against them and remind them I had these GME shares before I joined the auditing firm, and I didn’t work on an engagement with ties to GameStop. They tried again every year until I left lol. Every year had to fight it and win.
The amount of lies and excuses surrounding all of this, to this day from very brazen market manipulation to flat out literally trying to pull shit out of their ass to stop people from DRSing is what keeps me extremely confident as an OG ape. The obvious paid psychological smear campaigns, especially with every US news station taking part and spamming it in your face, always plastering GME in a negative light no matter how well it does.
bwahahaha watching certain major international banks and auditors screaming for help due to these heavy heavy leveraged bags really nails it home for me. Some mysteriously sealed documents for 50 years surrounding the fall of Credit Suisse due to Archegos.
That and honestly it’s the Autism lol. Hasn’t been wrong all these years and patterns be patterns ya’ll. People gonna abuse a system until it breaks, and this one was already barely held together with duck tape and glue before AI, LOL now I’m just giggling every time I see data leaks, security breaches revealing more, oopsies on legal reporting, my favorite so far is finding out FINRA is on the take after having to report to them all these years, Or at one point from our own former CTO messing up a legal filing- “we accidentally misfiled this even though we have an entire legal team we pay for to review and file these legal forms for us, but I still did it wrong oopsies sorrryy.”
;)
Watching the Government quickly find a way to bridge over to crypto and control that entire off ramp despite being overwhelmingly against it at first. Then specifically tokenize GME ASAP and the same tokenized securities that banks originally fought against… and now they’re suddenly all for it looooooool.
The literal amount of ETFs that house GME to be shorted. The amount of new investment vehicles being made surrounding GME just to keep that thing under wraps.
You guys, clearly the stock is *trash* and nothing to see here right? No reason both regulatory, fintech, the federal government, basically all entities working together to make all these different legislative changes, reporting changes, investment products for one dying retail game store right?
Right?!
The entire system is about to break under their constant abuse, manipulation and laundering, but we’re gonna blame it on AI. Yeah it’s totally AI causing all of this mess right now, nothing else nope. Not every banks, hedge funds, my mom’s bad bets.
Naaaaaaah nothing to see here ;).
The most humble /s.
![gif](giphy|tyqcJoNjNv0Fq|downsized)
sentiment -0.94
9 hr ago • u/DoggoNamedDisgrace • r/gme_meltdown • how_to_win_friends_and_influence_people • C
That still was a fantasy.
He said "50% cash, 50% stock" when proposing to buy a $56B business by a $12B business.
After pricing in the $20B debt from TD Securities you would need to turn Gamestops $12B stock into more than $30B... somehow.
Even if you pull that off, Cohen is saying "I'm willing to buy 100% of your company by paying you 50% of your (our) company"...?
sentiment 0.18
9 hr ago • u/Gora-Pakora • r/Superstonk • ryan_cohens_ebay_hostile_takeover_strategy_no • C
Do you think there is a deal with TD to resolve some of the catsh’t wrapped in dogsh’t they are wrapped up in when time comes to moon? Preferential treatment or something like that to settle? That’s why they are willing to offer the 20B to get the ball rolling? I have no idea what I’m talking about lol
sentiment 0.82
10 hr ago • u/MyNi_Redux • r/Superstonk • 8_steps_to_swallow_the_ebay_whale • 📚 Due Diligence • B
I'm pretty sure RC would have to execute a "reverse triangular merger" process to acquire eBay. Going to detail what that entails in this post.
First, since y'all like crayons, here's a pictorial depiction of what will happen:
[The RTM eBay acquisition process](https://preview.redd.it/t26esqvcstzg1.png?width=1248&format=png&auto=webp&s=e6b2b220ea96e9de8d351cccf2e7db83337d95c1)
Now, here are the steps in plain sequence. Numbers used are from my post: Harpoon in the Water: An Assessment of Ryan Cohen's Offer.
**Step 1: GameStop forms "Sling Merger Sub":** GameStop incorporates a new wholly-owned Delaware subsidiary as a shell entity. No assets, no operations, no employees. GameStop receives 100% of Sling Merger Sub's stock in exchange for a nominal capital contribution (typically $1,000).
**Step 2: GameStop secures financing:** GameStop draws \~$18.35B from the TD Securities-led syndcate credit facility into a designated escrow account. Combined with $9.4B from GameStop's own balance sheet, the cash side of consideration ($27.75B) is now staged. GameStop also files the registration statement to authorize the new shares (\~1,110M).
**Step 3: GameStop capitalizes the Merger Sub** GameStop transfers the staged $27.75B in cash plus the obligation to issue 1,110M new GME shares into Sling Merger Sub. The Sub now holds what is called "the full deal consideration."
**Step 4: The Merger Effective Time** At a precise moment specified in the merger agreement (typically 12:01 AM on a Monday), several things happen simultaneously by operation of law:
* Sling Merger Sub merges *into* eBay
* Sling Merger Sub ceases to exist
* eBay survives as the legal entity
* Each outstanding share of eBay common stock automatically converts into the right to receive $62.50 cash + 2.5 GME shares (or pro-rata adjusted election outcome)
* All eBay stock previously held by Sling Merger Sub (which was the consideration staging) effectively becomes held by GameStop
* eBay becomes a wholly-owned subsidiary of GameStop
In short, eBay shares cancel and convert; eBay's parent changes from public shareholders to GameStop Corp.
**Step 5: Consideration Distribution** The exchange agent (typically Computershare or similar) distributes consideration to former eBay shareholders based on their holdings and elections:
* Cash component: \~$27.75B disbursed to former eBay shareholders' brokerage accounts
* Stock component: \~1,110M new GME shares issued and credited to former eBay shareholders' brokerage accounts
* Fractional shares cashed out at the closing price
**Step 6: Bond and Equity Compensation Conversions** Triggered by the change of control, several adjustments execute:
* eBay's bonds either accept the change of control put (bondholders elect repurchase at 101% of par over 30-90 days) or remain outstanding with eBay (now a GameStop subsidiary) as continuing obligor
* eBay's unvested RSUs convert to GameStop equivalent RSUs at the merger ratio
* eBay's PSUs settle at target performance levels per merger agreement
* eBay's executive change-of-control provisions trigger; severance packages activate for departing executives
*(I haven't modeled an amount for the put bondholders, cashing out of RSUs, or severance exactly, but estimating it's less than $1B total.)*
**Step 7: Stock Market Adjustments** On the next trading day:
* eBay common stock delists from Nasdaq (ticker EBAY ceases trading)
* GameStop's expanded share count (\~1,559M total) is reflected on NYSE
* Index providers rebalance - eBay drops out of S&P 500; GameStop's market cap rises significantly, potentially triggering inclusion in larger indices
* Short positions in eBay convert per consideration mix (each short owes $62.50 cash + 2.5 GME shares per former eBay short share)
**Step 8: Combined Entity Operations Begin** GameStop Corp. now consolidates eBay's financials. Cohen assumes CEO role of combined company. Integration planning shifts from preparation to execution. Cost-cutting program begins.
Published simultaneously on X: [https://x.com/NitherDither/status/2052576161318731812](https://x.com/NitherDither/status/2052576161318731812)
*Disclosure: Agentic underlings assisted me in authoring this post. My impressive brain contributed most of the content, and can vouch for the rest based on cross-checks, and given its prior experience with M&As.*
sentiment 0.99
10 hr ago • u/familydrivesme • r/Superstonk • smooth_brains_requested_just_how_quickly_after • 🤔 Speculation / Opinion • B
Note: this is a repeat of a post that was reported and removed for AI use without it disclaimer. The only thing I used AI for was to generate parts of the image. The text and commentary and thoughts are all from me and I didn’t know you can no longer use an image without disclosing.
Body Text:
Somebody recently replied on one of my comments regarding two interviews from yesterday and specifically how I caught that Ryan Cohen did not want to hold onto this debt long-term, but rather it would be paid off within months. They fired back that it seemed impossible that it would be paid off that quickly and for a source which led me to again listen to the two interviews side-by-side.
First, in the fox one interview, he mentions that his proposal would take 50% of eBay shares off the table with a 28 billion cash offer. 20 of that would come from the new business load and 8 billion from cash on . Obviously, they would have to restructure the convertible notes a little bit, but that shouldn’t be too hard
The rest of eBay shares would be diluted to increased value asap between the two companies. Right off the bat, the shares of each company might be worth a little less, but very quickly as debt is paid off and the business expenses drop, and profit margins and revenues pick up… shareholder value would be not only back to where it was to begin but higher.
So, the question is how they pay off the $20 billion loan quickly
There’s a little reading between the lines, but listen to this from the TBPN interview:
“Yeah it's really not that complicated. Look at eBay spending 2.5 billion bucks to grow 1 million users,
(2.5 billion gone)
$5.5 billion dollar on operating expenses pusiness that has no inventory … so cost cuts between sales and marketing and corporate overhead.
(5 billion gone)
It's not something that's going to take a few years. Like it's something that is going to happen fast fast because I'm putting leverage on this thing and I don't want to run a leverage business. So I'm not going to run it hot. I'm going to pay down the leverage and I'm going to increase earnings. “
I believe once the company has merged, within that month he will move the $20 billion note that he had to get from TD into something similar to the convertible notes that were issued earlier this year using the new company stock. Obviously there are international buyers who would be eating that up so 20 billion is nothing to get.
That could happen within the first month. From there, in the first year, you have 7 billion in savings and very quickly you have increased value from revenue and without any more share offerings and solutions, you can see how within a year and a half all of the debt is paid off, and the company is stronger than ever with a fresh balance sheet.
Some people might say that eBay hold some debt right now so you have to add that to the equation, but that’s not true. When eBay is bought out, they would pay off all of the outstanding debt our if eBay valuation.
I have a feeling that the final details of this deal are going to pleasantly surprise a lot of both game shop and eBay shareholders
sentiment 0.96
10 hr ago • u/MyNi_Redux • r/DeepFuckingValue • 8_steps_to_swallow_the_ebay_whale • GME Due Diligence 🔍 • B
I'm pretty sure RC would have to execute a "reverse triangular merger" process to acquire eBay. Going to detail what that entails in this post.
First, since y'all like crayons, here's a pictorial depiction of what will happen:
[The RTM eBay acquisition process](https://preview.redd.it/t26esqvcstzg1.png?width=1248&format=png&auto=webp&s=e6b2b220ea96e9de8d351cccf2e7db83337d95c1)
Now, here are the steps in plain sequence. Numbers used are from my post: [Harpoon in the Water: An Assessment of Ryan Cohen's Offer](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/1t35jfy/harpoon_in_the_water_an_assessment_of_ryan_cohens/)
**Step 1: GameStop forms "Sling Merger Sub":** GameStop incorporates a new wholly-owned Delaware subsidiary as a shell entity. No assets, no operations, no employees. GameStop receives 100% of Sling Merger Sub's stock in exchange for a nominal capital contribution (typically $1,000).
**Step 2: GameStop secures financing:** GameStop draws \~$18.35B from the TD Securities-led syndcate credit facility into a designated escrow account. Combined with $9.4B from GameStop's own balance sheet, the cash side of consideration ($27.75B) is now staged. GameStop also files the registration statement to authorize the new shares (\~1,110M).
**Step 3: GameStop capitalizes the Merger Sub** GameStop transfers the staged $27.75B in cash plus the obligation to issue 1,110M new GME shares into Sling Merger Sub. The Sub now holds what is called "the full deal consideration."
**Step 4: The Merger Effective Time** At a precise moment specified in the merger agreement (typically 12:01 AM on a Monday), several things happen simultaneously by operation of law:
* Sling Merger Sub merges *into* eBay
* Sling Merger Sub ceases to exist
* eBay survives as the legal entity
* Each outstanding share of eBay common stock automatically converts into the right to receive $62.50 cash + 2.5 GME shares (or pro-rata adjusted election outcome)
* All eBay stock previously held by Sling Merger Sub (which was the consideration staging) effectively becomes held by GameStop
* eBay becomes a wholly-owned subsidiary of GameStop
In short, eBay shares cancel and convert; eBay's parent changes from public shareholders to GameStop Corp.
**Step 5: Consideration Distribution** The exchange agent (typically Computershare or similar) distributes consideration to former eBay shareholders based on their holdings and elections:
* Cash component: \~$27.75B disbursed to former eBay shareholders' brokerage accounts
* Stock component: \~1,110M new GME shares issued and credited to former eBay shareholders' brokerage accounts
* Fractional shares cashed out at the closing price
**Step 6: Bond and Equity Compensation Conversions** Triggered by the change of control, several adjustments execute:
* eBay's bonds either accept the change of control put (bondholders elect repurchase at 101% of par over 30-90 days) or remain outstanding with eBay (now a GameStop subsidiary) as continuing obligor
* eBay's unvested RSUs convert to GameStop equivalent RSUs at the merger ratio
* eBay's PSUs settle at target performance levels per merger agreement
* eBay's executive change-of-control provisions trigger; severance packages activate for departing executives
*(I haven't modeled an amount for the put bondholders, cashing out of RSUs, or severance exactly, but estimating it's less than $1B total.)*
**Step 7: Stock Market Adjustments** On the next trading day:
* eBay common stock delists from Nasdaq (ticker EBAY ceases trading)
* GameStop's expanded share count (\~1,559M total) is reflected on NYSE
* Index providers rebalance - eBay drops out of S&P 500; GameStop's market cap rises significantly, potentially triggering inclusion in larger indices
* Short positions in eBay convert per consideration mix (each short owes $62.50 cash + 2.5 GME shares per former eBay short share)
**Step 8: Combined Entity Operations Begin** GameStop Corp. now consolidates eBay's financials. Cohen assumes CEO role of combined company. Integration planning shifts from preparation to execution. Cost-cutting program begins.
References for folks who want to dig into RTMs more:
* Basics: [https://www.investopedia.com/terms/r/rtm.asp](https://www.investopedia.com/terms/r/rtm.asp)
* Additional considerations: [https://ventures.wyrick.com/blog/mechanics-and-advantages-of-reverse-triangular-mergers](https://ventures.wyrick.com/blog/mechanics-and-advantages-of-reverse-triangular-mergers)
Published simultaneously on X: [https://x.com/NitherDither/status/2052576161318731812](https://x.com/NitherDither/status/2052576161318731812)
*Disclosure: Agentic underlings assisted me in authoring this post. My impressive brain contributed most of the content, and can vouch for the rest based on cross-checks, and given its prior experience with M&As.*
sentiment 0.99
11 hr ago • u/ritholtz76 • r/ValueInvesting • ttd_jinx_it • C
TD and SNAP. Same same.
sentiment 0.00
11 hr ago • u/player_twone • r/Superstonk • we_are_immune_and_rc_knows_it • C
see my comment above dum dum. I have no doubt hedgies will buy GME; they are criminals, not financially stupid. Stupid would be spending so much time spreading FUD about GME on Reddit while missing out on what's coming. Missing all the obvious positive moves Gamestop and Ryan Cohen have made over the last 5 years, just because you rather believe the mainstream media when they say that the piss bouncing off your head is rain. So keep shitting and strutting around that chess board little bird, you'll pat yourself on the back and tell your reflection in the mirror what a smart boy you are; and that the only reason you didn't buy any GME is that you were duped.

I'll leave you with this final thought. If Gamestop was on the verge of bankruptcy in 2021, averaging below $0.70 a share; how is it that it averages many multiples of that now? Don't forget we had that 4 for 1 split a while back too, so even if we disregard the increased shares we shareholders authorized, the current stock price is higher than $96.00...
How is it that Gamestop holds over $9,000,000,000; letting it sit there earning that sweet sweeeeet interest; you know it was only half that value in 2025, right?
How is it that Gamestop is about to acquire eBay, a company with a much larger market cap than itself?
How is it that Gamestop has reported 7 consecutive green quarters (would have been more, but it takes money to fix the damage the insiders did before Ryan Cohen kicked them out)? oooh! Don't forget how profitable Power Packs is likely to be since Gamestop makes money selling and reselling the same cards!
How is it that TD is willing to offer Ryan Cohen a Highly Confident letter for $20,000,000,000. surely they might know a little more about finance than a chess board shitting pigeon.
Good luck dum dum. I would not like to be in your shoes, something tells me you're not great at making financial decisions.
sentiment 0.80
12 hr ago • u/roswelljack • r/GME • wheres_the_whales_at • C
73k shares and anxiously awaiting a public statement from RC or TD disputing the concerns that the financing might not be there due to potential debt levels.
I have to believe TD understood the combined debt before issuing the letter. But it clearly led to the price getting clobbered again today.
sentiment 0.09
14 hr ago • u/Yogurt_Up_My_Nose • r/wallstreetbets • what_are_your_moves_tomorrow_may_08_2026 • C
I had to do that once to sell in 2014 because TD's site was being a piece of shit.
sentiment -0.62
14 hr ago • u/WarEmotional8804 • r/Schwab • former_schwab_rep_that_quit_ama_and_ill_answer • C
I was there for 13 years and really enjoyed my last team until the merger with TD. My whole department was moved to all TD management and that was shock in itself....My new manager told via teams how I had to change my falsifying the hours I actually worked to lower the OT I put in. Twice. Each time I reported it HR and it was fixed but, I had to jump through so many hoops. When I was told to do something that would put my licenses at risk and refused out right she had someone else do it and within a week I was fired. The reason for my termination was recently litigated with FINRA and now they are being forced to remove it from public record as being false and defamatory. I was not able to get a job with any BD for over a year and was just collecting under $300 a week in UI. They don't even have to pay my legal fees for them "doing the wrong thing". I am over them but I will tell anyone that wants to work there to watch out. Raise your hand and tell everyone when you have to use the bathroom and do what you told even if you don't think it is right if you want to keep your job. Or you will end up being black balled from the industry in whole and possibly severely in debt just to have your public records update.
sentiment -0.97
14 hr ago • u/parkertl • r/gme_meltdown • ryan_cohens_mysterious_bank_letter_backing • C
Nah, everyone is missing the NOLs, this whole deal is ONLY about NOLs... TD is tripping over themselves to be involved with NOLs but they cant say it because of secrets
sentiment -0.20
15 hr ago • u/AU-HUNTER • r/Pmsforsale • wts_many_silvers_a_sprinkle_of_gold_platinum • B
\[PROOF\](https://imgur.com/a/7KvYasT)
\*\*Spot pricing at time of posting\*\*
Ag 78.54
Au 4692.20
Pt 2017
\*\*This account is protected by 2FA\*\*
\*\*RULE #4 IS FULLY ENFORCED WHEN PURCHASING FROM ME IF YOU DON'T KNOW IT READ OVER THE WIKI AND FAMILIARIZE YOURSELF\*\* \[RULES\](https://reddit.com/r/Pmsforsale/w/rules?utm\\\_medium=android\\\_app&utm\\\_source=share)
\*\*CHAT IS PREFERRED\*\*
\*\*Premium Today Could Be Spot Tomorrow\*\*
\*\*BIN takes priority over haggling in chat\*\*
\*\*BINs not paid within 30 minutes of chat reply are forfeit\*\*
\*\*Prices are subject to change\*\*
\*\*COPPER\*\*
\[5oz & 1oz Aztec Lots this is 6oz of copper 2 Lots available\](https://imgur.com/a/AKAnaD6) 28 shipped
\[1oz Buffalo\](https://imgur.com/a/8U87boK) 3.50 per
\*\*-----GOLD-----\*\*
\[Goldbacks\](https://imgur.com/a/CKLMjYT)
2025 1 Oklahoma 9 per 187 available
2025 1 Florida 9 per 187 available
2025 1/2 Florida 4.50 per 1 available
2026 1/2 Idaho 4.50 per 93 available
2026 1/4 Idaho 2.30 per 400 available
\[2021 5 Utah\](https://imgur.com/a/PJJVYLq) 65
1g Gold Bar Perth Mint Black Carded 185
\[Monarch Precious Metals 1/2 Gram Four Leaf Clover Rounds\](https://imgur.com/a/AB7z0F5) 91 per
\[Vintage Credit Suisse Gram plastic case open couple copper spots\](https://imgur.com/a/OAG34cS) 185
\[1907 20 Francs Rooster\](https://imgur.com/a/mppuW9U) 901
\*\*PLATINUM\*\*
\[2024 1oz Platinum First Amendment to the United States coin This is for sale on the US Mint Site for $2545\](https://imgur.com/a/f2aGr45) 2450 Shipped USPS Priority Express
\*\*-----40%-----\*\*
\[Kennedy Commemorative Stamp & Coin Collection\](https://imgur.com/a/IHqnDBW) 55 shipped GA
\*\*-----90%-----\*\*
\[5 Mark Images\](https://imgur.com/a/bF8eKWb) 35 per
\[Numista Link\](https://en.numista.com/2544)
1935 A 2 available
1936 A 3 available
\[10FV or 100 Mercs Any Amount Below Spot\](https://imgur.com/a/OUSG5pH) 5.25 per coin
\[1982 George Washington Commemorative Half Dollar Proof in Capsule\](https://imgur.com/a/JLYpg0L) 28
\[Two Coin Lot 1982 George Washington Commemorative Half Dollar BU and Proof Pair\](https://imgur.com/a/U0eQySb) 55
\[1959 D Washington Quarter NGC MS65\](https://imgur.com/a/Fz6OSVX) 30
\[1892 Better Date 1,036,000 Mintage\](https://imgur.com/a/S7YHplT) 125
\[1886 Nice Tangerine Toning Melt 55\](https://imgur.com/a/k6XpMgF) 65
\*\*-----999 SILVER-----\*\*
\[2014 10 oz Kookabura\](https://imgur.com/a/ZPUIruQ) 855
\[2015 P25 10 oz Kookabura 25th AnniversaryEdition\](https://imgur.com/a/NefUrUC) 890
\[250th United States Anniversary 5 oz Bar 1 Available\](https://imgur.com/a/5Rmq6bq) 429
\[Chautauqua Silver Applications in Manufacturing\](https://imgur.com/a/aNCCkBX) 95
\[Chautauqua Silver Applications in Medicine\](https://imgur.com/a/rBIWEoK) 95
\[2024 Republic of Chad Burning Cannabis Leaf 100 Mintage\](https://imgur.com/a/zI64LP7) 109
\[2023 Libertad Colorized or Spliffertad 171 out 420 Mintage\](https://imgur.com/a/VXeNQu9) 109
\[Vintage Oxford Mint Alaska Round\](https://imgur.com/a/U4YtojN) 89
\[Vintage Johnson Matthey TD Bank Consecutive Serials 011829 & 011830\](https://imgur.com/a/HO5tyXu) 260
\[Vintage Divisible California Crown Mint 1 oz Bar\](https://imgur.com/a/PU3iobi) 109
\[1oz Vials of Silver Shot 4 available\](https://imgur.com/a/V3FwkM6) 79 per
\[Half oz rounds 5 Sunshine SOLD 3 Buffalo Available\](https://imgur.com/a/2BErGYB) 44 per
\[2020 Scottsdale Reserve Round\](https://imgur.com/a/LXlR3Kh) 89
\[2024 P125 Australia Koala Marking the 25th Anniversary of the Perth Mint\](https://imgur.com/a/pvcWsf9) 99
\[2022 NIUE Batmobile Batman\](https://imgur.com/a/kztxYhP) 159
\[The Witcher 2023 2 oz Mint of Gdansk The Last Wish coin with COA\](https://imgur.com/a/KLhWesd) 205
\[SEXY SILVER\](https://imgur.com/a/d2zaBSG) 105 per
\[CMG Mint Santa Likes Boobies\](https://imgur.com/a/gDxEZjx) 99
My responsibility for the package ends when tracking updates \*\*Delivered\*\*
\*\*If you would like close ups of anything please ask\*\*
\*\*\[CLICK THIS BEFORE MAKING A PAYMENT & READ PLEASE\](https://imgur.com/a/jDuBg0P)\*\* ZELLE(PREFERRED), CA, PPFF, VENMO FF, POSTAL MO
\*\*Shipping\*\*
6 up to 6oz; 7 up to 9oz 11 Priority 9+oz
Insurance is available via USPS Registered Priority mail upon request for 51
sentiment 0.98
15 hr ago • u/lostnooob • r/Superstonk • gmeebay_indepth_pro_forma_merger_model_v1 • 🤔 Speculation / Opinion • B
TLDR: This deal is accretive for GME's EPS as it takes advantage of GME's current high valuation multiple. Using my conservative assumptions (relative to R. Cohen), I'm getting a:
* \~59% accretion to GME's EPS
* 9.75x Total Combined Debt / LTM EBITDA (of combined entity)
* \~269% GME share dilution
Background: I'm an investment banking analyst and decided to do a conservative back-of-the-napkin merger model for GME's potential acquisition of EBAY. This is version 1, subject to refinement of my assumptions based on feedback.
Key Assumptions:
1. 50% Cash / 50% Stock
2. $125 offer price per share of EBAY
3. Transaction Expenses: 1% of Offer value (M&A fees paid to the investment bank / 3rd party advisors of GameStop. Likely Jefferies as they've helped with GME's prior ATM offering)
4. Synergies (as % of EBAY's LTM sales): 10% (conservative)
* Comes out to $1.17Bn which is very conservative compared to RC's $2Bn estimate in cost savings
* Synergy 100% realized in the first year (sometimes synergies are realized over years, but RC believes he can realize them immediately)
1. Cost of Debt (for TD's $20Bn commitment): 8%
2. Tax Rate: 21% (conservative versus GME’s recent effective tax rates, which have often been below 10% in profitable quarters)
3. Latest financial information from GME and EBAY's latest 10-K and Q filings. Current share price as of 5/7/2026 market close.
Sources & Uses of Funds
[$ in millions except share price](https://preview.redd.it/09e2g5bs9szg1.png?width=775&format=png&auto=webp&s=9b282b1b208b2fd09cd1afec843e8e5d806c535e)
Pro Forma Balance Sheet and Leverage
BLUF: 9.75x total combined Debt / LTM EBITDA
https://preview.redd.it/sp2eg5e0aszg1.png?width=1026&format=png&auto=webp&s=118e474d6496c9fc2d6ebaf7b6296f0cac184b94

Earnings Impact
https://preview.redd.it/8th20039aszg1.png?width=707&format=png&auto=webp&s=bcb22436c6d393479105bbbbd1949fda8018c99f
Pro Forma Shares
BLUF: \~269% dilution. Current GME share count of \~448,375,000 to pro forma share count of \~1,655,613,000
https://preview.redd.it/3rm6hjbcaszg1.png?width=696&format=png&auto=webp&s=3bf8a9d640c01c377667b1ebfceafcef5de8bcf8
sentiment 0.97
15 hr ago • u/GanacheNegative1988 • r/AMD_Stock • amd_q1_2026_earning_call_quarter_ended_mar_28 • C
Part 1 Q&A
With that, I'll turn it back to Matt for the Q&A session.
Matt: Thank you, Jean.
Operator, we're ready to start the Q&A session now.
I would ask the callers to limit yourself to one question and one brief follow-up, but please go ahead and poll for questions.
Thank you.
OP: Thank you, Matt.
We will now be conducting a question and answer session.
If you would like to ask a question, please press star 1 on your telephone keypad.
A confirmation tone will indicate that your line is in the queue.
You may press star 2 if you'd like to remove a question from the queue.
For participants using speaker equipment, it may be necessary to pick up your handset before pressing the star keys.
We ask that you please limit yourself to one question and one follow-up.
Thank you.
One moment, please, while we poll for questions.
And the first question comes from the line of Joshua Buckwalter with TD Cowan.
Please proceed with your question.
Joshua Buckwalter: Hey, guys.
Congrats on the results, and thanks for taking my question.
I'm actually going to start with CPUs, which hasn't happened in a bit.
It hasn't been that long since you announced the $60 billion server CPU TAM for 2030 at the Analyst Day, and it's very quickly doubled.
Agentic AI has obviously gotten a lot of attention in recent months, but it would be helpful to hear your thoughts on how this TAM is inflecting and changing so meaningfully in such a short amount of time.
And maybe you could also speak to your confidence in hitting that greater than 50% share target from the analyst day, as your x86 competitor seems to be improving its supply, and also there seems to be more momentum on the merchant and custom ARM CPU side.
Thank you.
Lisa: Yeah, sure, Josh. Thanks for the question.
So, first of all, back to when we think about CPU TAM. We've always said that CPUs are a very critical part of data center infrastructure, and that's been where we've invested. And we saw the first signs of, let's call it AI demand, really pulling CPU demand in last year, and that was the reason we updated the TAM to call it the 18% CAGR or approximately $60 billion.
And what we've seen is all of the things that we believed in terms of agentic AI and inferencing and all the CPU compute that is required is just happening, and it's happening at a much faster pace.
So over the last, let's call it the last few months as we've talked to our customers and we've seen how AI adoption is really unfolding, we're seeing a significant more CPU demand from really every major cloud provider as well as enterprise customers.
And the way that comes across is as AI adoption scales you need more inferencing.
At inferencing scales you have more agents and agentic AI.
They all require CPUs for all of the orchestration and the data processing and these other tasks.
So with that we looked at it both bottoms up in terms of talking to customers and having them give us longer-term forecasts, as well as just doing some clear workload analysis.
And yeah, I mean, it's a very exciting TAM.
I think it's exciting to see CPUs growing greater than 35% to over $120 billion.
And then when you think about AMD in the context of that,CPUs are critical for so many tasks that you are seeing a lot more discussion about CPUs in the market.
But we actually view it in three categories, right?
There's general purpose compute.
There's the head nodes that really support the AI accelerators, and then there's CPUs just for all of the agentic AI work.
And to do all of this, our belief is you need a broad portfolio of CPUs, and that's really what we have been focused on, is building not just one type, but really a broader in terms of throughput optimized, power optimized, cost optimized, AI infrastructure optimized as we've done in the Venice family. So when you put all that together, we're very excited about the larger TAM and we're also very happy with the traction that we're getting.
We're clearly feeling like we're seeing significant share gain as we're going into our Turin portfolio that has run very nicely.
Venice is extremely well positioned and we're working with customers right now on beyond Venice and what we're doing in those architectures.
So we feel really good about the market as well as our opportunity to grow to a greater than 50% share of that market.
Joshua: Okay thank you for all the color there then I want to ask about the instinct side so in the press release you mentioned that MI450 and Helios engagements are strengthening with customer forecasts exceeding the expectations and the pipeline growing, Um, you certainly have the big public OpenAI and Meta deals.
Was this comment referring to those engagements upsizing versus the announced initial deployments, or was it other customers and maybe the increase on the MI450 timeline, or is it MI500 and beyond?
Thank you.
Lisa: Sure, Josh.
So we are very excited about MI450 and Helios.
We're seeing significant customer interest in those products as well.
So we have certainly talked about our large partnerships with OpenAI and Meta, and those are going really well.
We appreciate the deep co-engineering that has gone on there.
When we look at the totality of, let's call it based on our current visibility, how those forecasts are coming in with all of our customers we're actually seeing it above our initial plans that we had planned for 2027 and I think the encouraging thing is we're seeing a breadth of customers who are now very interested in deploying at significant scale MI450 series nodes and those and those are for both training and inference workloads, although the largest deployments are for inference.
And based on all of that and the scale of new customer interest, we see a path to really get to exceed our original targets of greater than 80% CAGR.
And these are really 2027 timeframe.
Obviously, when we talk to customers, we're talking to them about MI355.
There's a lot of good traction we're seeing there.
MI450 and Helios, I think, for significant large-scale deployments.
And then many customers are also very engaged with us on the MI500 series and all of the opportunities there.
So we feel like very, very good progress and the key is that we're continuing to broaden and widen the scope of both customers as well as workloads.
OP: And the next question comes from the line of Thomas O'Malley with Barclays, please proceed with your question.
Thomas O'Malley: Hey guys thanks for taking my question ,Lisa, Lisa:  if I get your numbers correct here in the March quarter it sounds like the server processor side of the CPU side grew over 50% if you take it just at the word it looks like maybe the data center GPU side actually grew in q1 so I was curious around the cadence of this year, kind of previously you had talked about really a back half weighted and then kind of more so Q4 weighted year.
Could you talk about if that's changed at all?
And then the second part of the question is, as you go into 2027, clearly you're pointing out a lot of upside from the larger customers and then kind of the ecosystem around them with new customers as well.
But when you look at supply, that's a major issue in the ecosystem today.
Could you talk about where you're concerned on supply, if you are, and then any gating factors as you look into next year, whether that be power, data center build-outs, et cetera, or do you feel really good about the ability to grow?
Thank you very much.
Lisa: Yeah, okay.
A lot of pieces of that question, Tom, so let me try to get through it.
So first of all, on the data center segment in Q1, the server business was greater than 50% year over year, as we said in the prepared remarks.
The data center AI was actually down modestly because of the China transition.
We had more China revenue…I'm sorry, sequentially, more China revenue in Q4, and it was less in Q1. But as we go forward, I think we see strong growth in both segments.
So we guided data center Q2 up sequentially double digits, and that's double digits in both server as well as data center AI.
And progression as we go forward, so first on the server CPU side, we talked about growing to over 70% year-over-year in Q2 and that continuing into the second half of the year.
And on the data center AI side, we will be ramping Helios in the second half of the year, so let's call it starting with initial volume in Q3 with a significant ramp in Q4 and then continuing to ramp in Q1. So that's kind of a little bit of progression.
And then to your questions about customers and supply, I think I answered, Josh, the customer question.
I think we have very good visibility now into the deployments that are on track for 2027.
And when I say good visibility, it's visibility down to which data centers are the GPUs going to be installed in. And so that's necessary just given all of the constraints out there.
We feel that there is tightness in the supply chain. There is certainly tightness in sort of data center build-outs, but we are confident in our ability to supply to the levels of growth that we're talking about and to exceed the levels of growth that we're talking about.
And we're also working very closely with our customers and our partners to ensure that we have good visibility to data center power and there is much more power That's coming online in 2027 And so with all those things in mind, I think you know again lots of things to manage They say it's a complex ramp, but we're very very pleased with the progress on the ramp
Matt: All right, Tom, I think you shotgunned approach the multiple questions there.
So, operator, maybe we can go on to the next caller, please.
Thank you.
Tom: Thank you.
sentiment 1.00
15 hr ago • u/paul__k • r/gme_meltdown • ryan_cohens_mysterious_bank_letter_backing • C
Their main experience as lead is in the Canadian market for deals up to 5bn - and usually much smaller. This is 56bn across the border with the potential of going hostile. TD is really not who you'd hire for that sort of thing if you had other options, which is not just about experience, but also about signalling. If you have JPM backing this bid, then people would be much more inclined to take it seriously.
sentiment -0.38
16 hr ago • u/Exotic-Fisherman-334 • r/thinkorswim • trade_execution_lag_slippage_laggy_charts • C
You can try all the tricks and hacks, and the improvement will be minimal. This is a Schwab thing. Clear all your caches all day long. Remove TOS and reinstall... Mess with RAM settings. It doesn't matter. It's especially bad if you're the type of trader that does alot of orders or cancels and replaces. Schwab "looks back" on orders and positions before placing a new order. the more data it has to parse through from the past, the laggier it gets. Progressively worse. This has beena thing since the TD days. Even via the API, you can see the call/response to these things. Schwab, if you monitor these boards PLEASE stop that. OK, rant over.
sentiment -0.78
17 hr ago • u/Foggzie • r/Superstonk • in_response_to_burrys_letter • C
>*An Open Letter in Response to Michael Burry's Comments on GME and Ryan Cohen*

*With respect and intellectual honesty*

*Dear Michael,*

*Your track record of contrarian, structural thinking has earned tremendous admiration across the investment community, and that respect is precisely why this response is worth writing carefully. Your post raises two core allegations: first, that Ryan Cohen's compensation structure incentivizes diluting existing shareholders 10x while keeping himself whole; and second, that the proposed eBay acquisition is a "meat cleaver" rather than a scalpel. Both conclusions, while understandable from a distance, misread the actual mechanics of the deal as structured.*

*On Dilution: The Structure Is Non-Dilutive as it stands now*

*Your dilution thesis rests on the assumption that GME is issuing new shares to pay for eBay. A close reading of the filings and described transaction shows otherwise.*

*GME's existing -446 million share count is unchanged by this transaction. eBay shareholders receive $125/share, 50% in cash and 50% in rolled equity into the combined entity. The cash comes from GameStop's \~$9 billion treasury plus a $20 billion committed financing letter from TD Securities. The equity component is a roll, not an issuance. eBay shareholders convert their existing ownership into a stake in the combined company. No new GME stock is being created.*

*The resulting structure, approximately 40% legacy GME shareholders and 60% eBay equity rollovers, is a merger of equals mechanic. Legacy GME shareholders own 40% of a materially larger and more profitable combined business. That is value-accretive, not dilutive.*

*Worth noting as well: GameStop's 5% economic stake in eBay, held via direct shares and put/call derivative pairs referencing approximately 22.2 million eBay shares, gets tendered into the deal and functions as a \~$2.77 billion cash rebate against the gross acquisition cost. That pre-position reduces the TD leverage needed and reflects deliberate, capital-efficient deal construction.*

*On Ryan Cohen's Compensation: The Incentives Run Toward Shareholders, Not Against Them*

*On January 6, 2026, GameStop's Board granted Cohen 171,537,327 nonqualified stock options at a $20.66 exercise price, with a 10-year term and zero base salary or cash compensation. The award vests across nine tranches, each requiring two simultaneous conditions: a market capitalization hurdle climbing in $10 billion increments from $20B to $100B, and a cumulative Performance EBITDA hurdle climbing in $1 billion increments from $2B to $10B+, because GME's share count is unchanged by the eBay transaction, Cohen has no mechanism to inflate the market cap hurdle through share issuance. Doubling the share count would halve the stock price, leaving the market cap denominator exactly where it was. The EBITDA hurdles are independent of share count entirely. Beyond that, the award agreement's fine print explicitly requires the Compensation Committee to adjust his market cap and EBITDA hurdles equitably and proportionately in the event of any dilutive transaction. The goalposts move with him if he tries. The scenario you describe, diluting shareholders while keeping himself whole, is directly addressed and prohibited by the terms of his own contract.*

*Full vest requires GME trading at approximately $224/share, meaning the combined entity needs to reach roughly $250 billion in market value. \[To clarify: Cohen's vesting hurdles measure GME's own market cap, not the combined entity's total value. Since GME represents 40% economic ownership of the combined entity, hitting the final $100B GME market cap hurdle at 446 million shares outstanding implies a $250B combined enterprise, not merely a $100B one.\] At pro forma combined earnings of \~$4.4 billion, that demands a 56x multiple, a hard target by any standard. At 20x earnings, two tranches vest and Cohen nets roughly $2.25 billion, but only because GME is trading at \~$80/share, meaning every existing shareholder has tripled their money. The structure rewards everyone or no one.*

*On the Debt Burden*

*The $20 billion in acquisition financing is a real number and deserves scrutiny. At the same time, it needs to be weighed against the earnings base. eBay currently runs an EBIT margin of around 20%. Cohen's publicly stated target is cutting approximately $2 billion from the $5.6 billion operating expense base, with the $2.5 billion sales and marketing line as the primary target, pushing margins toward 40%. Even at a more conservative 30% EBIT margin, the combined entity generates $4+ billion in annual net earnings. That puts debt coverage at roughly 5x, within investment-grade range for a strategic acquirer at stabilized earnings. Whether management can execute the cost program is a legitimate debate. The math, however, is not as dire as the 7-10 year paydown framing implies.*

*Where You Are Absolutely Right*

*The governance concentration is a real concern. A Compensation Committee that answers to a Cohen-chaired Board, with no binding formula in the award agreement for how adjustments must be calculated, is a gap worth watching. Your broader point about principal-agent problems in executive compensation is well-taken and important.*

*What makes this worth raising directly, though, is that roughly 90 days ago you were publicly articulating a very long investment time horizon on GME and collaborating on a piece with Business Insider that drew the very same Buffett comparison to Ryan Cohen that you now seem to be walking back. The speed of that reversal is striking, and it raises a fair question about whether the structural critique is driving the conclusion here, or whether the conclusion arrived first.*

*Based on a close reading of the SEC filings, the deal has been engineered with enough mechanical safeguards that the agency problem you describe does not manifest in the way your post suggests.*

*We hope this contributes constructively to a debate you have done more than almost anyone to elevate.*

*With respect,*
*Bad Robot*
*Investor and Equity Researcher*
sentiment 0.99
18 hr ago • u/Harbinger2nd • r/Superstonk • in_response_to_burrys_letter • C
IDK how the pay package is structured and if its true that a combined entity with 40% gme ownership would need a $250bn market cap to fully vest. I think the $20.66 purchase price in the pay package is real and holds a lot of weight.
Outside of Ryan's pay package I think we really just need to see the terms of the $20bn loan from TD bank. Those terms are going to determine a lot about the value of this deal imo.
Finally whether Ryan can actually cut the amount of fat he says he can. $2bn in a *very* tall order but he has accomplished something similar already with GME so I won't say its impossible.
sentiment 0.58


Share
About
Pricing
Policies
Markets
API
Info
tz UTC-4
Connect with us
ChartExchange Email
ChartExchange on Discord
ChartExchange on X
ChartExchange on Reddit
ChartExchange on GitHub
ChartExchange on YouTube
© 2020 - 2026 ChartExchange LLC