TD
Toronto Dominion Bank
stock NYSE

I personally like anything that's a real bank backed by FDIC
Etrade (Morgan Stanley), Fidelity, TD Ameritrade, and others
Something that's just an app holding all my money sketches me out even though i haven't heard of any problems occurring

This is not a 2020–23 style bull run. It’s a selective rally where liquidity is flowing only into specific themes like Data Centers, Pharma, Power & Healthcare Infra.
Stocks linked to these sectors like HFCL, Sterlite, Black Box, TD Power and many pharma names are showing strong momentum.
Focus where liquidity is flowing, otherwise even good stocks may stay slow.

Cert doesn’t matter ang legal sense is kung anong naka sulat sa TD

As has been explained to you specifically multiple times, TD is buying shares to hedge off the exposure GameStop is giving them.
The board of directors said no. eBay is institutionally owned, they do what the board says. The board actually said that the offer was a joke. I’ve never seen a corporate denial so strong. They correctly called out that he has no way to fund the fucking thing.
ALSO, TD said they would only finance the deal IF the new company was INVESTMENT GRADE. You do not get investment grade by holding billions and billions of dollars worth of debt that the new company you are buying is supposed to pay off.

Nicht nur das ETF damals nicht in aller Munde waren, war es steuerlich auch komplizierter vor der Investmentsteuerreform 2018. Man hatte jedes Jahr das Vergnügen im Bundesanzeiger die ausschüttungsgleichen Erträge des Fond zu prüfen. Die Planung welchen ETf man wählt, hat man dann auch weniger mit der TD und mehr nach der Holzmaier Tabelle im Wertpapier Forum gemacht.

The most used currency for those is still the USD and the known assistants of those laundry-schemes are the biggest banks in the world. TD, HSBC, Credit Suisse, Deutsche Bank,...
The fact that Bitcoin is easier to trace and allows the FBI to convict them easier, does not mean that there is more.
It's a common bias, that any area that has a lot of crime-fighting, with a lot of arrests, will always look more criminal in the statistics, than an area where the police is asleep all the time and people don't even report crimes anymore. So when you read about crypto-crime being prosecuted, it should tell you that it only means that prosecutors can find them and gather enough data to do their job properly.
Meanwhile you listen to SEC insiders and they tell you that they always settle cases with the companies because actually doing a trial would exceed their capacity, financially and personell wise. Or how they usually do not have the right to access data inside of companies without judge approval, that they would need to get that judges approval...
All in all, this leads to the image of crypto being criminal and the USD not, when the opposite is the case globally. the USD is the crime currency no1 on earth. No competition. Part of why the dollar is considered strong. Criminals want it.

No institutionS, but AN institution which turns out to be TD.
This "takeover" smells like shit to be honest.

It's really just TD in general, even in America. Even if they haven't started it yet they will be soon. My guess is if they don't bother doing it in some area's maybe those area's will not be part of the "15 minute city" or the surveillance grid

Bank with SoFi now. They continue to make big advancements in their trading and transfers. Still miss TD but hate Schwabs UI. SoFi is getting there. Buying also.

By buying eBay, GameStop relinquishes all the cash that's been propping up GME's earnings by collecting investment interest.
Up till now, the share price floor has been set by the monetary value of the cash reserves. Without that cash, where's the floor?
Instead of having cash on hand to secure the stock price, GameStop would be *going into debt* to TD. Stock price becomes uncertain, as the ability to pay off the debt depends on the company's future performance.
On top of these factors, I'm not convinced that the shrinking fraction of the company my share represents is fully offset by the increased market cap, particularly when so many shares are being given to eBay holders and sold to the public.
That said, I think it would be extremely cool for eBay to become the Amazon of used and new goods sold peer-to-peer. If I could walk into an eBay store and walk out with more cash than a pawn shop could give me, leaving it to the store to price, list, and sell the items, that would be incredible. If Cohen announced a more specific vision for what the partnership would look like, he could still earn my vote.

If the merger is accretive why does the math say otherwise??
eBay cap: 51b
Gme cap: 10b
Post merger:51b+10b-20b(TD debt)=41b
Price per share: 41b/2b shares(post dilution)= 20$/share
The price per share post dilution would be lower than it currently is, and gme owners lose ownership of the merged entity.
Clearly this is a bad deal for both sides, which is why it for turned down already and always will.
If any gme investor truly cares about the merger and absolutely believes Cohen will get it done, then sell your gme and buy eBay now because you get more gme shares for every eBay shares than you do by straight up holding gme.

"No account linked". What if you bought a warrant with your broker (TD), and sent it to CS? that might linked them and allow you to transfer both ways?
Just an idea, cheap one at that. Let me know if it works that'd be cool!!

Schwab with ThinkOrSwim acquired from acquisition of TD Ameritrade. Has everything I need and more. Although these days strictly a swing trader but have been known to day trade including futures and the ability to use Active Trader to see different interval charts of that traded is crucial or 9 plus charts to gauge macros such as yields and along with that traded or several items at once is key to my success.

Yes. There are insurance products that give you guaranteed 4.5% p.a. tax free. Payout siya yearly. Like TD and MP2, locked in din yung fund mo for 7 years. The good thing is, when you pass, that won’t be included as part of your estate unlike in TD.

I'm trying to get my warrants sent from Computershare to my broker in Canada so I can exercise them. Been trying for months and for some reason they just haven't moved them.
I can't exercise them from Computershare (no account linked) so if they don't send them, they'll have to be sold. But I want to exercise them.
I've been on the phone more than I want and TD just can't get them no matter how many times they try.
I'm pissed but all I can do is keep trying. It sucks.

Just sharing his post. Delete or whatever if not allowed. Changed company name from his post. Obviously use your own judgement in everything but good to see some people digging
"Wise words"
That's what @ryancohen replied to Jeff Bezos on X this week. Two words. His direct competitor since the “dog woof” days.
While his company files for 2.5 billion authorized shares, a comp package that vests at $100B, and a $55.5B bid for $EBAY sits on the public record.
Cohen has stated he's building a Berkshire, and every move this year has pushed towards that.
But there are a few open questions left to be answered that $GME has not addressed.
CREDIT
The highly confident letter TD Securities signed for the eBay bid (filed as Exhibit 99.1 in eBay's DEFA14A, Project Sling) requires investment grade credit ratings from at least two of S&P, Moody's, or Fitch. Condition one of nine in the letter. GameStop is not investment grade. How does it get there?
TAX OFFSETTING
GameStop has $700M in NOLs. A $55.5B acquisition generating $2B+ in cost reductions creates massive taxable income day one. $700M is a partial shield. A Berkshire needs to zero out taxes at scale, and a holdco can deploy NOLs from multiple sources without triggering 382 limitations. So where do the additional NOLs come from?
CAPITAL STACK
$9.4B + $20B = $29.4B. Bid is $55.5B. Cohen told the WSJ he may seek backing from Middle Eastern sovereign wealth funds. On the record. Who is the partner, and is that commitment already in place?
ACQUISITION ORDER
Collectibles at 29.2% of GME sales, 47.7% growth. Nat Turner on the board running Collectors Holdings. The vertical integration thesis is already seated at the table. Why lead with the biggest, hardest acquisition unless everything that follows depends on it?
FINANCING PATTERN
TD was sole initial purchaser on both convertible offerings. $1.5B after full greenshoe (March 2025). $2.7B after full greenshoe (June 2025). Both at 0% coupon. $4.2B in notes. Zero yield. Only return is equity conversion at a premium.
Back-to-back 0% converts totaling $4.2B is not standard. Sole bookrunner both times is not standard. Then Larry Wieseneck, Head of Corporate and Investment Banking at TD, the person who runs the entire CIB division, personally signed that letter.
Why would TD sole-run $4.2B in zero-yield converts and then have its top dealmaker personally back a $20B raise unless he had already seen the full plan?
—
None of this is accidental.
Comp package in January.
Converts through one bank.
HCL signed before the bid went public.
Bid timed.
Rejection received.
Proxy filed at the earliest window.
eBay position increased the same week. Every step has landed exactly on schedule.
Now look at the runway Cohen built for himself:
May 22 — definitive proxy filed. Empty. No strategic disclosure
May 26 — proxy materials mail. Voting opens
June 9-12 — Q1 earnings and 10-Q. Mandatory. The quarter ended May 3 — the same week as the eBay bid and the HCL. Every material development from that quarter has to be disclosed in the 10-Q by law.
July 7 — annual meeting. Vote closes.
Cohen compressed his own timeline to the floor and placed a mandatory disclosure event right in the center of his voting window.
The 10-Q isn't optional. It covers the quarter where everything happened.
Only one structure resolves every open question above: a holding company.
Cohen is shackled by his own chains - and the runway to break them is already laid.
The project is named Sling.
As in David's.
Cohen has been telling you who Goliath is since the day he launched “dog woof” in Amazon's shadow.
He loaded the sling with the HCL.
Sent the stone with the bid.
Got the rejection he needed.
Filed the proxy.
Built the eBay position to 6.55% through derivatives.
And replied to Bezos.
Wise words.

I bought them many years ago on TD Ameritrade, which is now Schwab. You can get them on Fidelity as well, which actually might be a better choice since they don't charge a fee to trade OTC.

MP2, TD's & ETF's

Meron. It’s not TD though. But ask your BPI relationship manager.

Didn’t TD increase their eBay stake too?