S
SentinelOne, Inc.
stock NYSE

This is low key good advice. Since OP is so young it makes sense to buy and hold.
Imagine if you purchased 5 shares of Apple in 2000 and did nothing or even a couple of shares of Nvidia? But also an ETF following the S&P would be an excellent choice to buy gold and leave it.

I run a quant bot, in order to improve my edge I wanted to include form 4 insider transactions to monitor positions held by members of the stock company. When an insider buy/ sells shares, they have a 48h period in which they must submit a form 4 to EDGAR. This is publically avalable and I have just added form scraping to my personal API.
The problem is across 216k Form 4 rows and 553 tickers, 19.3% are open-market decisions. 2.6% buys, 16.7% sells. The residual 80.7% is noise irrelevant to my signals (stuff the insider didn't choose to do).
The fix is to filter to transaction codes P (open-market buy) and S (open-market sell) only, this removes all the noise and filters true insider selling that I want to act upon. I plug this info into one of my Z-score metrics to influence entry and exit signals and have since had good experiences.
I also embedded this to my personal API which allows me to interface this with an MCP server. This works great as a quick "any clusters where multiple officers bought the same week". MCP calls my API and pulls straight from the DB without writing a query each time.
Happy to share ingestion architecture/ API if anyone is interested.

Quite honestly my buying if I do would only be for flipping it on hype. I used to flip TSLA here and there. Never liked or believed in the company. I haven't touched it in well over a year, and won't again now.
I had no idea on those impacts, so thanks for taking care of my doom scrolling this morning.
I'd assume as climate change progresses that the space business is contributing to daily those interruptions would be more frequent.
That's a pretty solid thesis though, without the satellite component I don't see much demand for spacex.
I'm sure Elon will continue his Mars B.S. just like his robotaxis and self driving he was snake oiling for a decade to keep the valuations high. But I don't believe in that pipedream, at least for my investing lifetime.
Ronald Reagon style star wars projects? I don't see how it's possible since the U.S. is underwater in debt and spending the farm on military as it is.

I'm going to assume you mean S&P 500? S&P has many different indexes that cover different things (such as 400 and 600 for different parts of the US market, plus international indexes, etc), the 500 being their most famous.
Nasdaq is basically the 100 largest non-financial (and non-REIT?) companies that happen to be listed on the Nasdaq exchange.
S&P 500 is 500 of the largest US companies no matter what exchange they're listed on (Nasdaq 100 isn't allowed to hold Coca-Cola because it is listed on the NYSE, but S&P 500 does for example) and doesn't discriminate against sectors.

In practice the S&P 500 is 500 biggest profitable U.S. companies (more or less - removal and addition from/to the index is a committee decision).
Nasdaq-100 is the 100 biggest non-financial companies listed on the Nasdaq exchange. There is minimal screening.

Proof and Album: https://imgur.com/a/DHrQjx3
\* 1994 1/2 oz American Gold Eagle - $2,100
\* 10 oz Fine Mint Silver Bar - $585
Please note one of the tabs on the back of the fine mint bar case is broken
Shipping is free to CONUS
Payment to Venmo or PayPal F&F. Add 3% for PayPal G&S

S&P 500 / VT and don’t think about it for 20 years.

Like what do you mean? S&p 500 tracks the 500 target companies and nasdaq focuses on the top 100 companies the are non-financial and is heavily weighted toward tech.

It’s pretty easy to Google this, but I assume you mean specifically the S&P 500 and NASDAQ 100? First is the top 500 companies in the US by market cap, the second is the top 100 non-financial companies that are listed on the NASDAQ exchange only.

If you're already going to stock-pick US tech stocks (I personally wouldn't, but I digress), I wouldn't double down on an index that already gives them a lot of weight. If you want exposure to the rest of the S&P you can buy an ETF that omits them or an equal-weight ETF, and put the rest into your existing VWCE, which is a pretty small slice as it stands. For the sake of commenting I personally don't see the argument for SNAP, but given that it's less than 2% of your portfolio you can write it off as a gamble if you think otherwise.

Tweet Mirror:[FirstSquawk](https://twitter.com/FirstSquawk/status/2083210183736734094)
>TOTAL US SUPPLY OF CRUDE OIL AND PETROLEUM DROPPED IN MAY TO LOWEST LEVEL SINCE MARCH 2025, REPORTS EIA\.
Tweet Mirror:[FirstSquawk](https://twitter.com/FirstSquawk/status/2083210195514372292)
>DISTILLATE FUEL OIL SUPPLY IN THE US DROPPED IN MAY TO THE LOWEST LEVEL SINCE JUNE 2020, AS REPORTED BY EIA\.
Tweet Mirror:[FirstSquawk](https://twitter.com/FirstSquawk/status/2083210207564582989)
>U\.S\. CRUDE OIL EXPORTS HIT A RECORD HIGH IN MAY, ACCORDING TO EIA\.

S&P vs NASDAQ

Nasdaq100 steht auf Jahressicht besser da als S&P500 und ist (laut KI) technologielastiger.
Ich hab tatsächlich noch nirgendwo eine echte Einstufung anhand von Firmen gesehen, wo was welchem Sektor zugeordnet wird, nur allgemeine Annahme lol.
Wenn Tech schlecht läuft, hat die KI unrecht, wenn sie recht hat, war die Tech-Rally nur so groß, dass die Leute komplett den Überblick verloren haben.

Another bear market signal inside this bull market. S&P 500 $SPX rose over 1.5% while the equal weighted RSP finished negative.
That split has only happened twice before, both during the 2008 crash. Bull markets don't end in pessimism.

The most common reasons are:
# 1. Identity verification (KYC/AML)
Financial institutions must comply with **Know Your Customer (KYC)** and **Anti-Money Laundering (AML)** regulations. An application may be rejected if:
* Identity documents cannot be verified.
* The address cannot be confirmed.
* There are inconsistencies between the application and official records.
* The applicant is on a sanctions or watch list.
This is one of the most common reasons.
# 2. Country of residence
IBKR cannot open accounts for residents of every country because of:
* Local regulations.
* International sanctions.
* Licensing restrictions.
* Internal business policies.
Some countries are only eligible for limited account types, while others may not be supported at all.
# 3. Incomplete or inconsistent information
Examples include:
* Different birth dates across documents.
* Employment information that conflicts with other disclosures.
* Missing tax information.
* Incorrect tax identification numbers.
* Unexplained discrepancies in financial information.
These often lead to requests for additional documentation rather than outright rejection, but unresolved issues can result in denial.
# 4. Regulatory suitability
For complex products such as:
* Options
* Futures
* Margin accounts
* Leveraged ETFs
* Forex
IBKR assesses whether the applicant has sufficient:
* Trading experience
* Financial knowledge
* Financial resources
If the requirements are not met, IBKR may:
* Deny access to specific products, or
* Offer only a cash account instead of rejecting the entire application.
# 5. Compliance risk
As a regulated broker, IBKR may decline clients it considers to present elevated compliance risk, such as applications involving:
* Unclear source of funds.
* Suspicious transaction patterns.
* Connections to sanctioned jurisdictions.
* Unverifiable business activities.
IBKR generally does not disclose detailed reasons in these cases.
# 6. Tax documentation issues
Examples include:
* Missing or invalid W-8BEN (for non-U.S. persons).
* Invalid tax identification numbers.
* Inability to determine tax residency.
# 7. Age or legal capacity
Applicants must meet the legal age requirements and have the legal capacity to enter into financial contracts in their jurisdiction.
# 8. Internal business decision
Like most financial institutions, IBKR reserves the right to refuse to open or maintain an account based on its internal risk policies. It is generally not required to provide a detailed explanation beyond stating that the application did not meet its requirements.
# Does IBKR reject many applicants?
Most legitimate retail investors who:
* provide accurate information,
* successfully verify their identity,
* meet local regulatory requirements, and
* disclose a reasonable source of funds,
are able to open an account. Many initial issues are resolved after supplying additional documents.

I was reading today's news that the U.S. government now has a portfolio of investments in 30 companies. There is not yet an existing ETF that tracks this portfolio. Maybe that is something that Fidelity could develop. It would seem that an ETF that tracks the same companies that the U.S. government has equity stakes in would be a very popular fund.

I run a quant bot, and in order to improve my edge I wanted to include Form 4 insider transactions to monitor positions held by members of the stock's company.
When an insider buys or sells shares, they have a 48-hour period in which they must submit a Form 4 to EDGAR. This is publicly available and I have just added Form 4 scraping to my personal API.
The problem: across 216k Form 4 rows and 553 tickers, only 19.3% are actual open-market decisions — 2.6% buys, 16.7% sells. The remaining 80.7% is grants, option exercises and tax withholding. Stuff the insider didn't choose to do.
The fix: filter to transaction codes P (open-market buy) and S (open-market sell) only. This cuts the noise and isolates the true insider activity you actually want to be aware of. I plug this into one of my Z-score metrics to influence entry and exit signals and have since had good results.
I also embedded this into my personal API which allows me to interface with an MCP server. This works great for quick queries like "any clusters where multiple officers bought the same week" — MCP calls my API and pulls straight from the DB without writing a query each time.
Happy to share the ingestion architecture/ API if anyone is interested.

Weil ich stattdessen im S&P500 und MSCI Emerging Markets investiert bin und nicht im MSCI World.
Ich habe ca. 150k Depotvolumen, das vorhin war nur ein Beispiel.

**Premarket**
The indices are set to continue to move higher today with a solid start coming fro the Nasdaq indicating up \~.85% with a modest green start on the S&P of \~.17%.  The VIX is nearly flat, up just 7 cents to 17.16 this morning.  The big earnings last night from AMZN and AAPL are much of the reason with APPL dropping hard this morning over 7$ to the 307ish level.  The fireworks came from AMZN who posted some impressive numbers especially noting the fastest growth in AWS in the past 18 quarters and an outlook forecasting strong investment this year and next year with a peak into 2028 suggesting the growth could continue.  AMZN is set to open up over 11% today.  
AMD is benefitting from the AMZN results and is up over 4% and back over the $500 mark today.  There is plenty of upside room for AMD to run as the 20DMA is up at 517 and the 50DMA is up at 510.97. 
NVDA is up modestly indicating the 197-198 area this morning.  MU is set to open up 4.50% after the massive gains yesterday when it closed up over 18%.   We do have the challenge of following such a large gain as some may take profits and it is the final day of the month.   So we will have to see if the good news can carry the semis again today,
 

Why would you add more S&P when they already have 60% in VTI and 20% in SPMO