JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
stock NYSE

JPM and SNAP

fortunately I trimmed my big aristocrats, like JPM ,WMT, WM, unfortunately I didn't trim CSCO. This was just due to size of holdings in the portfolios a couple were in the 7-9% of portfolio. I wasn't predicting a Thurday rout.

A simple 10% annual return will double every 7.5 years. In 2 years you would have around $7mil. JPM and Adams Funds have safe ETFs that can give you that.

JPM and Meta be like

JPM was just lying in wait for your next move

BlackRock is not a retail trader. It is not a swing fund. It is the largest asset manager in the world, managing trillions in capital across ETFs, index products, and institutional mandates.
So when BlackRock increases its stake in a sub-1 dollar small cap by 92.2 percent, moving from about 757.4k shares to roughly 1.46M shares, valued near 2.1M dollars as of Dec 31, that is not noise.
It is exposure.
Large asset managers do not randomly double positions in microcaps. Even small allocations go through internal screening, compliance review, and mandate filters. Especially when the name sits in a volatile, small-cap bucket.
Now look at the broader context.
* Geode up 57.2 percent.
* Goldman up 196.6 percent.
* Nuveen up 433.4 percent.
* Deutsche up 240.1 percent.
* JPM up 45.3 percent.
* BlackRock up 92.2 percent.
That is not one pocket of capital. That is banks, quant allocators, pension-linked managers, and now the largest global asset manager all increasing exposure within a compressed window.
Overlay that with the strategic shift. The NeutronX MOU positions NXXT as Lead Contractor and Project Manager for government, defense, and critical infrastructure energy projects. That moves the story into infrastructure and federal budget territory, themes that large asset managers actively allocate around.
When a name transitions from being seen as a niche small-cap energy play to potentially sitting inside infrastructure, defense-adjacent, or AI-energy themes, large managers care about exposure optionality.
That is the key difference.
This is not a day trade signal. It is a structural ownership signal. And structural ownership tends to matter more over time than short-term volatility.

There’s a price where those that are short can acquire long positions from holders via fiat. Now what that price is isn’t clear and it’s higher than 76 or whatever it is right now, but there’s a price.
Not all institutions desiring delivery are industrial, there are those like JPM or central banks or whomever that are just getting it to hold. So if you’re a central bank with an intention to stack it, keeping the price lower and stable (while you’re looking to add metal) is in your best interests; taking a percentage of what you thought you were getting and taking some cash along with it to ease the shortage makes perfect sense.
There won’t be a default situation until the supply cannot meet the demand of those who can’t be persuaded to close for cash instead of metal. What level that is isn’t known but I can’t see it being in March.
JMO

If you want to understand what is happening, stop looking for a single headline and look at the structure of ownership changes. This is starting to look like an institutional wall being built in layers.
The sequence matters.
First, positioning was already underway as of Dec 31, 2025. Geode increased by 57.2 percent to about 869k shares, valued near 1.3M dollars. Goldman increased by 196.6 percent to roughly 97.3k shares.
Then the strategic catalyst hits on Feb 9. NXXT signs the NeutronX MOU, positioning itself as Lead Contractor and Project Manager for government, defense, and critical infrastructure energy projects. That shifts the narrative into federal budget pipelines.
Then the second wave of institutional stacking shows up in filings. Nuveen increases by 433.4 percent to around 123.9k shares. Deutsche increases by 240.1 percent to about 45.8k shares. JPM increases by 45.3 percent to roughly 33.8k shares.
Now the biggest layer lands. BlackRock increases by 92.2 percent to about 1.46M shares, valued near 2.1M dollars as of Dec 31.
That is not one institution buying. That is a cross-category build.
Quant allocator tied to index architecture.
Pension-linked asset manager.
Tier-1 global banks.
Largest asset manager in the world.
Different mandates, different models, same directional move.
This is how institutional walls form. Not with one huge day, but with multiple independent firms scaling exposure over reporting cycles while price remains compressed and supply gets absorbed.
Retail usually notices after price expands. Institutions position before that happens.

STO JPM 285/280p 03/20 1.02

Overall, great post. I would like to get your deeper thoughts on the ROI of buying NVIDIA GPUs today similar to your comment about A100s. This feels like one of the biggest disconnects in the market right now. And then another key question is how long can those unit economics last vs NVIDIA having a limited amount of time commanding this sort of power before demand tapers down?
My advice on your positions is that you have too many of them. Personally I like to hyper focus on my best ideas and put the rest of the portfolio in an index as my hedge.
E.g. Can you really say you’re a bank expert (JPM) and a healthcare expert and a tech expert and a china market expert (BABA)? Even BRK alone takes awhile to truly understand. Feels like you’re trying to be smarter than the market on way too many fronts, which should usually be a -EV battle for you.

Average price target for JPM and GS unloading to bagholders yea

Copy JPM's moves

Navarro calls Dimon a criminal. JPM tanking!

**10% Healthcare**
* LLY - 6%
* ISRG - 2%
* VEEV - 1%
* HIMS - 1%
**10% Energy**
* FSLR - 3%
* GEV - 2%
* ETN - 2%
* VST - 2%
* PWR - 1%
**10% Defense & Materials**
* SHLD - 6%
* XLB - 4%
**10% Financial**
* BRK.B - 4%
* MA - 3%
* JPM - 3%

Slv thought it was safe but JPM just left to get more lube

The primary issue with these funds is they all have pretty high expense ratios….at least the first few I checked. You can get very similar exposure to markets at a much lower cost. I’d sell all of these and just create a low cost 3 fund index portfolio. If that feels overwhelming, then select a low cost target date fund based on your target retirement age. I’m not a fan of JPM, if it were me, I’d roll these over to someone like a Fidelity or Vanguard, but that’s a personal decision.

JPM, master manipulator and rug puller extraordinaire

JPM and other banks committing sudoku for 3 straight days.

One institution increasing a position can be routine. Five unrelated global institutions increasing around the same window is something else.
Here is what was disclosed.
Geode Capital increased its stake by 57.2 percent to about 869k shares, valued around 1.3M dollars. Goldman Sachs increased by 196.6 percent, moving from roughly 32.8k shares to 97.3k shares, valued near 141k dollars as of Dec 31.
Then, immediately after the NeutronX catalyst, a second wave appears.
Nuveen increased by 433.4 percent, expanding from about 23.2k shares to 123.9k shares, valued around 180k dollars. Deutsche Bank increased by 240.1 percent to about 45.8k shares. JPMorgan increased by 45.3 percent to roughly 33.8k shares.
These firms are not running the same strategy.
Geode is a large quant allocator tied closely to index architecture. Nuveen is connected to TIAA and manages institutional long-duration capital. Goldman, Deutsche, and JPM represent global banking and institutional platforms with very different mandates.
Different geographies. Different mandates. Different capital structures.
Yet all increased exposure around the same time NXXT upgraded its narrative through the NeutronX MOU, positioning itself as Lead Contractor and Project Manager for government, defense, and critical infrastructure energy projects.
Retail hype creates loud price spikes. Institutional stacking shows up quietly in filings. When multiple top-tier firms expand positions in the same compressed window, that suggests independent thesis convergence.
That pattern doesn't look like noise. But Positioning? Could be.

JPM Chase is worse, alas