JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
stock NYSE

You deserve zero credit. Nobody went bankrupt. A hedge fund shutting down is very different than bankruptcy and ultimately wasn’t material to GME. Hedge funds come and go all the time. System isn’t corrupt at all, no exchanges blocked anything a tiny tiny fraction of extremely poorly run brokerages couldn’t afford the deposit to allow customers to buy more shares because they used the cheapest clearing system because they were poorly run. The vast majority of market infrastructure doesn’t operate anywhere near this stuff and most brokers and every institutional broker had no problems transacting. No corruption when Morgan Stanley/JPM/UBS/BAML are all open for business and represent the 4 largest holders of retail wealth. You’ll get suckered by something else soon enough.

JPM, MSFT, WMT

GOOGL, JPM and ZIM

Put money in monthly as well as cash gifts from grandparents. She started working at 15. I opened a Roth and pulled what she made out of her taxable and deposited to the Roth. I bought a handful of stocks of companies she was familiar and could track, ie KO, APPL, SBUX, MSFT, MCD…. SWPPX is her largest holding and dividends allow monthly automatic investment. Her best long term performers are JPM and AVGO.

I developed an FX paper trading learning platform with 2 profs at Johns Hopkins University several years ago using real-time feeds. While that was an academic exercise, I recently applied those neural-network principles to a proprietary directional model for high-liquidity Large-Caps (NVDA/IBM/JPM).
I just wrapped a 6-week **out-of-sample forward test**. Here is the performance at a glance:
* **Sample Size:** 39 trades (Fixed 100-share sizing)
* **Win Rate:** 69.2%
* **Profit Factor:** 3.6
* **Max Drawdown:** 8.1% (Peak-to-trough)
* **Strategy:** **Intraday Long-Only bias** (Zero overnight exposure)
The equity curve is a steady "staircase" with very tight risk control. The model architecture is configurable, allowing me to tighten the threshold to increase Win Rate at the expense of trade frequency.
**Question:** For those in the systematic space, would you prioritize scaling the current frequency with a 3.6 PF, or would you further optimize for a higher Win Rate to appeal to institutional "alpha-license" requirements?

I've been the same for JPM, Meta, Nvidia, AMD & fucking Oracle i lost 1000€

Read about JPM Vs Lehman. Nothing is protected except the protected class of TBTF banks.

60 retired. Roughly 1/3growth, 1/3cash (SGOV) and 1/3 high income dividends: this includes 4-5 stocks and about 10 CC funds from JPM. GS. NEOS. AMPLIFY

I don't understand buying these... There's 100 analysts watching these guys and they are huge...
If you have the wealth, throw into vxus or if you're feeling spicy some voo/qqq...
If you don't have the wealth and need to grow it, this will not 5x or probably even 3x you on any meaningful timeframe.... Even merely throwing your money into big players like blackrock, Brookfield, and JPM would probably beat this...

I've been using Fidelity for almost a year, and I have a solo 401k, Roth and traditional IRAs, and a CMA. I've used other brokers for a long time (including Merrill, JPM, TIAA, Empower, TD Ameritrade), and Fidelity often compares favorably, but here's what I see that could improve.
1. Wait times on deposits. This is well known, so no need to belabor it. It's especially painful with a new CMA, where you want to move recurring payments over.
2. App bugs. There are several with alignment and other weirdness. It would also be nice to have more information (e.g., streaming quotes even if every few seconds) without it being a "trading" interface.
3. Beneficiary designation. Copying from another account helps, but it falls off badly when you need some of the same beneficiaries in a different configuration. For example, our CMA is joint, so I don't want to copy my IRA where my wife is a beneficiary (because she's already a joint owner), but I do want my kids. It would be nice if beneficiaries could be specified once and selected from a list.
4. Beneficiary records. It would be really nice to have an on demand, dated, printable/PDF statement of beneficiaries. I'd personally like it for all accounts in one document, but could see how others may like selectable or single account versions. I keep a spreadsheet of our beneficiary designations and when I last checked them, along with documents in PDF to match. I try to check these annually, but I'm rarely changing them, so the change document is only rarely useful.
5. Clear fee reimbursement rules. We have two small Roth IRAs we'd move to Fidelity today (each under 25k; roughly that total), but it's not clear that we'd get the $75 exit fees reimbursed. We wouldn't move them if we had to eat the fee ourselves, and the lack of upfront clarity keeps us at the status quo.
6. Asset value tracking. You can manually add assets (I care mostly about our house and vehicles), but it would be better to capture the cost, use third-party APIs to pull current values (monthly would be fine for me), allow the selection of the lower of cost or market for net worth calculations, and allow excluding these values from portfolio value calculations.
7. Website dark mode. Everyone else is terrible at this, too, but it could be a differentiator. You also have the color scheme worked out in the app already.
8. Full View Rounding. I know Full View has its share of issues (and is being reworked), but the rounding to the nearest dollar is kind of a bizarre choice. Among other things, this makes it hard to see if Fidelity's data is truly in sync with the original sites or my own spreadsheet tools.
9. Setup steps. I keep seeing prompts for setup steps. When I click, I see beneficiaries (already set up) or things like text alerts that I have all turned off on purpose. Capture the decision and consider it completed. Some of them seem to drop off over time, not on completion.
10. Account groups for non-Fidelity accounts. It would be really nice to group non-Fidelity accounts and allow both in the same groups. For example, I'd like to group my 457b accounts separately, because they're available before 59.5. It would be nice to have my taxable Fidelity and non-Fidelity accounts in a group together, too.
11. Better account type detection. Many accounts are flagged as taxable that are not, and they often don't have their own types listed when you go to change it (and end up as Other). Those include 401a, 457b, and so on. From Merrill the IRA accounts are correct, but the IRRA (their rollover IRA designation) accounts are grouped as taxable. I'm not sure how much of this is available feed data versus hard-coded detection, but it could be better either way.
I hadn't quite planned on having a list this long, but I've been collecting things, since you all are solidly responsive here. Maybe these are concrete/actionable enough to end up in an issue tracker (or +1-ed on known things).
There's a lot to like, which is why we're here. Big ones for us are instant-ish Roth conversions (instant but EOD pricing), TIPS availability, Treasury auction access, and just generally more sensible design (e.g., dividend adjusting returns on ex-div days) for people who actually use their accounts (cf. Merrill, JPM).

They've held very large physical holdings in the past. They're custodian for SLV, and if anyone would ever hold such a legendary hoard, it's JPM. Question is more about custodianship vs real ownership. The original Indian Times article that reported the 750m oz was withdrawn... Birth of a legend.

Watched a few minutes before I couldn't take it anymore. What a dumb video. Let's dissect the few minutes I saw.
So the first thesis of the video is the new managers are doing a bad job. His argument? Their subsidiary KO's bad investment in 2018. Except, in 2018 Buffett was still fully in charge. And, while Berkshire does own a significant share of KO, it's only 10% so they're not the ones who are deciding whether to buy Costa or not. Maybe Buffett should have sold KO, that's a fair point to raise. But that's on Buffett, not on Greg or anyone else. So it's ludicrous to say the new managers are doing bad while pointing to a decision made by Buffett as evidence to that.
Next point is about the manager turnover, and specifically about Todd leaving and giving JPM the secrets to Berkshire. Well first of all, there are no secrets at Berkshire. Buffett tells you all the sauce. It's to read an insane amount and be smart. The first everyone can do, the second pretty much no one can do. Either way, there's nothing Todd can tell JPM that they don't already know. "Oh hey Jamie, did you know Warren reads 10ks for 12 hours a day?" "Oh shit, thanks Todd, now I know what I need to do to be better".
Second, I think most of us are in agreement that Todd was not doing well for Berkshire and are happy to see him go. I would bet a lot of money that Warren had a say in this decision, but Warren is crafty and plays the PR game better than everyone else. He would never make it seem like he fired him, even though it's clear that him leaving during Warren's last month is not a coincidence. I also wouldn't buy Todd leaving because he really loves Warren and only wanted to stay as long as Warren was there. No, Warren leaving gives Todd more opportunity for future power at Berkshire, so if anything he'd have more interest in staying and trying to position himself as a potential successor. It's clear to me that Warren did not want Todd in such a position and found a solution that everyone was happy with.
Anyways, I stopped there because it's such a stupid video. Maybe the rest was better. I doubt it.

My reaction when Jamie Dimon says JPM has 750 million ounces

Hey man, fellow vet here. You should be fine as long as you remember to tailor your skills, background, & expertise into relevant civilian terminology. This way, you can really highlight your value in a way for others to understand. Im not saying to add fluff but figure out how to translate the military background into what you want to do.
You can definitely do it and I think it would be great. In fact, I hope you do get hired and go all the way to being an advisor or investment consultant. It would be nice to see some other veterans as advisors.
If for some reason that doesn't work out and you still want to pivot into finance, some of the other large firms have programs for you to do so. UBS, Blackrock, & JPM have programs to transition veterans into the finance sector.

although there WAS an article in the Economic Times that stated JPM had no shorts remaining (that would include the shorts inherited from Bear Sterns) and 750 mill ounces of Physical. I did read the article. However, when i went back to my history to find it, it was in my history but the article was taken down ---404 error.

Good day All. I have a Core and Satellite portfolio with 10 individual companies consisting of AAPL, JNJ, JPM, MCD, MSFT, PG, PM, TXN, VZ, and WMT. 4 covered call ETFs from largest to smallest that consist of JEPI, JEPQ, SPYI, and QQQI... but the heaviest lifting is done via BITO.
With the recent volatility in BTC, I decided to sell a longterm collar on my BITO position and roll at expiration until I've made my money back from the distributions.
Selling a collar is the best option to have in place when dealing with volatile to eroding funds considering the long put acts as a floor in the event the underlying drops out.

Which of these I have (we’re talking 0.2-2% of my portfolio each) are most likely to fall behind: AMZN MU NVDA TSLA AVGO VZ GOOG AMD FBTC MSTR PLTR MSFT META JPM RDDT

FYI, there are a bunch of AI videos on YouTube spreading a false rumor claiming that COMEX is having an emergency meeting to put new rules in place designed to drive down the price of silver to protect the banks, similar to what happened to the Hunt Brothers. There is no such meeting.
The other rumor is that JPM Bank has quietly cornered the silver market by slowly and clandestinely accumulating hundreds of millions of ounces of physical. JPM is also now supposedly demanding delivery on paper contracts that normally would get settled, thus further squeezing some European banks who got caught short. I have no idea if this second rumor is true but it might explain the precipitous spike in price we've seen lately.

Thanks for the answer, what do you mean with significantly more interesting?
Moreover is it more likely to start from JPM risk management team and end as quantitative researcher in a buy side found, instead of starting in a small but buy side fund?

JPM, unless the work for the hedge fund is significantly more interesting