HOG
Harley-Davidson, Inc.
stock NYSE

Look at HOG and Dynatrace.

lol, WGO just came up on one of my screens. I think those big retail ticket item companies with super strong brands and lots of cash (HOG too) all seem to have a lot of debt. I dunno about debt with a wildcard like Warsh in the fed

Hi, I wanted to bring some new stocks upon the table. As of recently, this subreddit hasn't come up with many diverse ideas apart from megacaps or adobe (not that they are bad companies at all), but as a freshner. These won't be long writeups since I will covering 3 companies (part 1), and people don't like long texts. If people do ask for a longer write up for a particular one here, I am more than willing (like digging deep into financials and accounting). I will do a part 2 (ESEA FISV FUN and potentially HOG) if people want it.

NTES: Chinese gaming company with the healthiest financials I've seen. PT: $178.54 via DCF using rather conservative inputs (around 30% upside from current valuations). GARP play.
* Shareholder-aligned management with patient and good buyback timings and stable dividends supported by robust cash flow is always a great in my books.
* Very high ROIC (140% with a 5 year average ROIC of 80%). FCF is very higj
* Ntes has a fortress-like balance sheets with high quality assets (which are cash in this case) in a paradoxical manner due to their capital-light business which is gaming. From my view, ntes has been using their cash very well along with their recent investment in deepseek ipo.
* Very cheap valuation multiples for a company with almost zero weaknesses. P/B 3.23x, P/FCF is 10.17x, P/CASH 3.04x
* Gaming portfolio is getting stronger by the day (Marvel rivals, new upcoming Ananta, pirate gacha).
* I do not think anyone can argue that this company has bad financials, this company has the most solid financials I've seen out of any company.
* Risks are that its a chinese company.
FINV: Highly shareholder-based, cutting edge, very fast diversification to overseas market FINTECH leader. PT: 8.5 (around 80% upside). Chinese fintech.
* Beaten down recently due to china regulations, however they are quickly diversifying to international markets which the numbers are already proving great (30%+ YOY growth in overseas market) with a goal of 50:50 china:overseas split by 2030. However, at this rate, this can be accomplished by end 2028.
* Oversea growth is super healthy and their forecasts are usually highly accurate.
* Another chinese company, but their management team is loaded (basically all top-tier resumes from companies like google and ivy-league universities). Multiple awards for being one of the best tech-utilziing companies in China.
* P/TB is 0.5x. And most of their assets are high quality, good FCF generation, dividends of 6% (backed by good cash flows), sharerepurchases of 10% of total marketcap per year, almost 0 debt.
* risks: China further regulations. Not that worried due to their diversifying speed which we have a good estimate of. I know many people don't like chinese stocks and would avoid buying chinese stocks just for the sake of being chinese but I dont think thats a good practice. If you do due-dilligience you realize many of the chinese companies aren't as risky as you think. There are risks for sure, but my point is, just dont have the fixed-mindset of saying no. Research then conclude.

CALM: A company in an ugly trough phase of an egg cycle however with a crazy healthy balance sheet and using their cycle high profits to channel into diversifying away from eggs (to speciality eggs and other streams) and very good acquisitions (good price bought --> low goodwill) that bolster its future revenue. PT of 95. Not that high, people may say, but once we get better light into the revenue that the acqusitions bring in, the PT would most likely be higher. As of now this is conservativae.
* It has a variable dividend policy which matches the company's cyclical nature. Good buybacks supported by cash flow not debt.
* TANK balance sheet. By now, you should know what I look at. Companies in temporary ugly sitautions of ugly industries with a tank-like balance sheet, aiming for price reevaluation when normalization happens.
* Doing very well to diversify to other parts of revenue stream instead of only relying on eggs.
* A lot of acquisitions (which I do NOT usually like), however all of them have very good integration and were bought very cheap with almost little to no premium.
* Eggs are at an all-time low which I believe it cannot persist. Although, it looks ugly, when buying cyclical companies you want to buy at the most lowest points of the cycle which I believe it is right now. If eggs normalize, the company would be better off. Check this site: [https://tradingeconomics.com/commodity/eggs-us](https://tradingeconomics.com/commodity/eggs-us)
* Risks: Cyclical, eggs are all time low however not worrying because their balance sheet can easily tank this.

Look at HOG and Dynatrace.

lol, WGO just came up on one of my screens. I think those big retail ticket item companies with super strong brands and lots of cash (HOG too) all seem to have a lot of debt. I dunno about debt with a wildcard like Warsh in the fed

Hi, I wanted to bring some new stocks upon the table. As of recently, this subreddit hasn't come up with many diverse ideas apart from megacaps or adobe (not that they are bad companies at all), but as a freshner. These won't be long writeups since I will covering 3 companies (part 1), and people don't like long texts. If people do ask for a longer write up for a particular one here, I am more than willing (like digging deep into financials and accounting). I will do a part 2 (ESEA FISV FUN and potentially HOG) if people want it.

NTES: Chinese gaming company with the healthiest financials I've seen. PT: $178.54 via DCF using rather conservative inputs (around 30% upside from current valuations). GARP play.
* Shareholder-aligned management with patient and good buyback timings and stable dividends supported by robust cash flow is always a great in my books.
* Very high ROIC (140% with a 5 year average ROIC of 80%). FCF is very higj
* Ntes has a fortress-like balance sheets with high quality assets (which are cash in this case) in a paradoxical manner due to their capital-light business which is gaming. From my view, ntes has been using their cash very well along with their recent investment in deepseek ipo.
* Very cheap valuation multiples for a company with almost zero weaknesses. P/B 3.23x, P/FCF is 10.17x, P/CASH 3.04x
* Gaming portfolio is getting stronger by the day (Marvel rivals, new upcoming Ananta, pirate gacha).
* I do not think anyone can argue that this company has bad financials, this company has the most solid financials I've seen out of any company.
* Risks are that its a chinese company.
FINV: Highly shareholder-based, cutting edge, very fast diversification to overseas market FINTECH leader. PT: 8.5 (around 80% upside). Chinese fintech.
* Beaten down recently due to china regulations, however they are quickly diversifying to international markets which the numbers are already proving great (30%+ YOY growth in overseas market) with a goal of 50:50 china:overseas split by 2030. However, at this rate, this can be accomplished by end 2028.
* Oversea growth is super healthy and their forecasts are usually highly accurate.
* Another chinese company, but their management team is loaded (basically all top-tier resumes from companies like google and ivy-league universities). Multiple awards for being one of the best tech-utilziing companies in China.
* P/TB is 0.5x. And most of their assets are high quality, good FCF generation, dividends of 6% (backed by good cash flows), sharerepurchases of 10% of total marketcap per year, almost 0 debt.
* risks: China further regulations. Not that worried due to their diversifying speed which we have a good estimate of. I know many people don't like chinese stocks and would avoid buying chinese stocks just for the sake of being chinese but I dont think thats a good practice. If you do due-dilligience you realize many of the chinese companies aren't as risky as you think. There are risks for sure, but my point is, just dont have the fixed-mindset of saying no. Research then conclude.

CALM: A company in an ugly trough phase of an egg cycle however with a crazy healthy balance sheet and using their cycle high profits to channel into diversifying away from eggs (to speciality eggs and other streams) and very good acquisitions (good price bought --> low goodwill) that bolster its future revenue. PT of 95. Not that high, people may say, but once we get better light into the revenue that the acqusitions bring in, the PT would most likely be higher. As of now this is conservativae.
* It has a variable dividend policy which matches the company's cyclical nature. Good buybacks supported by cash flow not debt.
* TANK balance sheet. By now, you should know what I look at. Companies in temporary ugly sitautions of ugly industries with a tank-like balance sheet, aiming for price reevaluation when normalization happens.
* Doing very well to diversify to other parts of revenue stream instead of only relying on eggs.
* A lot of acquisitions (which I do NOT usually like), however all of them have very good integration and were bought very cheap with almost little to no premium.
* Eggs are at an all-time low which I believe it cannot persist. Although, it looks ugly, when buying cyclical companies you want to buy at the most lowest points of the cycle which I believe it is right now. If eggs normalize, the company would be better off. Check this site: [https://tradingeconomics.com/commodity/eggs-us](https://tradingeconomics.com/commodity/eggs-us)
* Risks: Cyclical, eggs are all time low however not worrying because their balance sheet can easily tank this.