RR
Richtech Robotics Inc. Class B Common Stock
stock NASDAQ

Look like you dont have a target, if you had a meaningful target and RR for the trade, once you put the trade on, slow or fast would not matter much

i personally became profitable watching his entire bootcamp, he trades ICT with a 1:4 RR and a 54% winrate, shows every single trade he takes, and livestreams entries and exits.

$HIMS and $RR both extremely oversold and perfectly primed for #shortsqueeze and have tremendous long term upside potential

RR

Yeah this is honestly what most beginners completely underestimate.
People obsess over winrate or RR but ignore that costs scale with frequency. The more you trade, the more your edge gets taxed.
I think this is why so many retail traders believe they have a working strategy in backtests or demo, but once live execution + spread + commissions kick in, expectancy just slowly dies.
Especially in FX/CFDs where people try to scalp 3–5 pip moves… you're basically fighting friction more than market direction.
Took me way too long to realize that sometimes trading less is actually the edge.

to be honest it looks really small compared to the moves that we got , its not a wide stop but its reasonable i believe , ur absolutely right , but its gona hurt my RR ..

RR will continue to rise after big ER.

Hiya!
6 year trader here

I checked out the notion journal you shared in the comments:
You're tracking the basics well but there's no data about the WHY behind each trade. Session, asset, RR, result, that tells you what happened. It doesn't tell you why you took the trade, how confident you were, whether you hesitated on entry, or whether this was your A+ setup vs a B setup you talked yourself into. With only sub 10 trades a month, every single one needs to be documented deeper than that or you wont have enough data to find the pattern
Few questions to consider: are you tracking which specific setups within your strategy are winning vs losing? Because "smart money / FVG / liq pools" is kinda broad. If you can isolate which setups are actually working and cut the ones that aren't, your win rate goes up without changing anything about your approach
I know you said emotions aren't the issue but I'd push back on that a little. Not the obvious stuff like revenge trading or panic closing. But are you being slightly more selective on entries than your system says? Or slightly different in how you manage the trade vs how you backtested? The subtle stuff is the hardest to catch because it feels like discipline
One thing that might help: start tracking more than just entries, exits, and RR. Log things like how confident you felt in the trade, whether you hesitated on entry, whether you almost didn't take it. Over 50+ trades those patterns reveal a lot. I built a journal called **MetriNote** that tracks this kind of stuff specifically (and calls you out if you break your rules) because spreadsheets and Notion don't surface these patterns easily. But even adding a few columns to what you're already doing in Notion could help
You're clearly doing a lot right, the fix is probably smaller than you think
Manifesting success for you!

RTX, LH, RR. Do some research, I’m not offering FA.

what kind of commision are you paying my bro? sorry i have never traded with prop firms so i have no idea, i only have a small spread
you have positive RR, so thats good
you said you miss out on profits compared to your friends
what is the reason you get stopped out?
you enter too early hits SL and goes your way?
you close too early due to fear?
you raise SL too soon?
you just miss and it goes the other way?
?
Could you share some of your trades?

statistics for whole 2025:
57 trades
42% winrate
11.3 Gained RR
AVG RR - 2.0
Statistics say i made 11RR but its without commissions and a little bit spread so the real result close to breakeven or even negative

sounds like your issue isn’t bias — it’s expecting a perfect entry.
price rarely gives all three at once: confirmation, liquidity sweep and ideal RR.
what helped me was separating entries into phases instead of trying to nail one spot:
• small probe entry when bias is clear
• add only if liquidity gets taken or structure confirms
• accept that the first entry isn’t meant to be perfect
most traders either enter too early with full size or wait for perfection and miss the move.
once i stopped trying to predict the exact turning point and focused on managing participation, getting wicked out became way less frequent.

5 years grinding across scalping to indices without breakeven breakouts is brutal - props for sticking with 1% risk discipline. The silent gap even pros miss: SL hits sync because signals align, but TP misses signal execution drift or sizing asymmetry under compounding drawdowns.
Audit your last 50 trades for one pattern - did you scale out early on winners (fear) while riding losers to SL? Fixed 1:2 RR with no adjustments fixed that for me over similar slogs. Prop longevity proves process; variance kills though—simplify to 1 setup max.

Bro.. My believe is this strategy works buy you have to use fibonachi and liquidity both together

I use a similar strategy and mainly I dont use RR in my opinion its a worst thing you can just plan that 200 or 300 pips a day thats really good

I trade a similar framework on ES/NQ futures and crypto, so I'll give you what actually works for me after about 2 years of refining this.
\*\*Sequence:\*\* Don't overthink the CHoCH → BOS order. What matters is context. On the HTF, I want to see a clear directional bias — either trending (BOS confirming) or a fresh reversal (CHoCH). Then on the LTF, I'm looking for price to retrace into a HTF FVG and give me a LTF BOS in the direction of my HTF bias. That's the entry. CHoCH on the LTF is just my early warning that the pullback might be ending.
\*\*Timeframes:\*\* I use 1H for structure and bias, 15m for entry refinement. I tried 4H/5m and it's too much of a gap — you end up with way too many false signals on the 5m. The 1H/15m combo gives you enough resolution without drowning in noise. I mark structure on both, but the 1H structure is what I actually trust for directional bias.
\*\*Defining structure objectively:\*\* This is where most people fail. My rule: a swing high needs at least 3 candles on each side (on the timeframe I'm marking it). If it doesn't have that, it's not structure — it's just a wick. This removes about 70% of the subjectivity. You'll still have some gray areas, but way fewer.
\*\*FVG quality filters:\*\* The single biggest filter is displacement. If the FVG was created by 2-3 large-bodied candles with minimal wicks, that's institutional. If it's a tiny gap in a choppy range, ignore it. Other filters I use: FVG must be near a HTF level (previous day high/low, session open, weekly level), and ideally price swept liquidity before creating the FVG. Stacked imbalances (FVG inside a previous FVG) are A+ setups.
\*\*Entry trigger:\*\* Never enter on first touch blind. I wait for price to enter the FVG zone, then need a 15m candle that shows rejection — either a strong wick or a BOS on a lower timeframe (5m). Blind limit orders in FVGs will work maybe 55% of the time. Adding that confirmation bumps it to \~65% in my experience.
\*\*Stops and targets:\*\* Stop goes beyond the FVG. Not at the edge — beyond it. I add 2-3 ticks of buffer on futures. If the FVG is completely filled and closes through it, the thesis is dead. For targets, I use the opposing liquidity pool (equal highs/lows, previous swing). I don't do fixed RR — I let the structure tell me where the target is, but I won't take a trade unless the structure gives me at least 2R.
\*\*Sessions:\*\* London and NY open only. I've backtested this extensively — the win rate drops significantly in Asia and during the NY afternoon chop. Also, I don't trade within 15 minutes of high-impact news. The structure will still be there after the spike settles. Let the amateurs get chopped up.
\*\*Backtesting:\*\* Use replay mode on TradingView. Go to a random date, hide future candles, and mark your levels in real time. Log every potential setup in a spreadsheet: date, session, setup grade (A/B/C), entry, stop, target, result. Do 100 setups minimum before trading live. The hindsight bias disappears when you can't see what happens next.
\*\*On indicators:\*\* Keep it clean. The only thing I add is VWAP as a general sentiment gauge — if price is above VWAP, I lean long, below I lean short. Everything else (RSI, MACD) just adds noise to this style. The structure IS your indicator.
Honestly, you're asking all the right questions. The fact that you want it mechanical puts you ahead of 90% of people trading this style. Just make sure you actually backtest before going live — most people skip that part and wonder why it doesn't work.

Problem w silver right now is yes it will spike but u don’t know if for a day or a month and the split second a peace treaty or absolute victory is announced silver prices will collapse again so fast and so will your trade. Better play to hoard shares in $RR and $HIMS for long term hold bc both so extremely oversold and have tremendous upside.

This is good advice IF you’ve been trading a strategy for a while and you know when to get out of a trade. For people starting out the right way, eg have a defined, backtested strategy, a take profit is just one less thing to have to think about and is a fail safe for a good RR.

I’m trying to build a rule-based day trading strategy using FVG + BOS + CHoCH and I need feedback from people who actually trade this consistently.
My current understanding (correct me if I’m wrong):
• BOS = continuation confirmation (structure break in trend direction)
• CHoCH = possible shift in control / reversal signal
• FVG = imbalance zone price may retrace to for cleaner entries
What I’m struggling with:
1. Sequence: Should it be CHoCH → BOS → entry on FVG retrace? Or BOS → FVG? What order works best and why?
2. Timeframes: Best HTF/LTF combo? (4H/15m, 1H/5m, etc.) Do you mark structure on HTF only or both?
3. Defining structure: How do you objectively define swing highs/lows so BOS/CHoCH isn’t subjective? Any strict rules?
4. FVG quality: Which FVGs matter most (displacement size, stacked imbalances, near key levels, after liquidity sweep, etc.)? What filters stop random FVG fills?
5. Entry trigger: Enter on first touch of FVG, or wait for reaction + LTF CHoCH/BOS, or require candle close/mitigation?
6. Stops & targets: Where is invalidation exactly (last swing, below/above FVG, beyond sweep)? Do you target liquidity highs/lows, equal highs/lows, or fixed RR?
7. Sessions/news: Only trade London/NY? How do you avoid getting smoked by news spikes messing with structure?
8. Backtesting: Best way to backtest this without hindsight bias? Any checklist/template?
Also — should I add extra confirmations/indicators or keep it clean?
If yes, what actually helps and doesn’t just add noise? Examples:
• volume / VWAP
• ATR for stop sizing
• HTF trend filter (MA/market bias)
• RSI/MACD (or is that pointless here?)
• orderflow/footprint (if you use it)
• simple “session + HTF level” confluence only
If you trade this style, I’d appreciate an example of a full trade plan with rules (markups, entry criteria, invalidation, TP logic). I’m trying to make it mechanical, not vibes.

100%. I was kicking myself for those huge losses from revenge trading. Really wrecked my day to day RR. I'll definitely focus on trying to stop myself from spiraling.

time frame 30sec 1min 5 min RR 2-1 use RSI and bol band and the Doji to enter