V
VISA Inc.
stock NYSE

The longer we go sideways, the less likely we will have a big downturn, since earnings will catch up to valuations eventually. But I do think we will drop a bit, followed by another V recovery

It will be more about the long term scaling down most likely, not so long term anymore either it's 2026 and with 10 times the budget the private industry has still failed to even reproduce a Saturn V equivalent, let alone landers, or a future station.

V Prem Watsa (ceo of fairfax financial holdings) bought $138 million worth of shares a couple weeks ago, probably a pretty safe play
source: https://financhle.com/company/UA/employees insider trade history section

BOCA.V full send YOLO - 01/08 update

Here are today's top after-hours performers showing the biggest moves after regular trading hours.
## 📈 After-Hours Gainers:
| Symbol | Company | After-Hours | Regular Hours | Change | %Change |
|:-------|:--------|:----------:|:-------------:|:------:|:-------:|
| [RVMD](https://marketrodeo.com/asset/RVMD) | Revolution Medicines, Inc. | 123.29 | 107.39 | +15.90 | +14.81% |
| [GRMN](https://marketrodeo.com/asset/GRMN) | Garmin Ltd. | 227.97 | 213.24 | +14.73 | +6.91% |
| [RKT](https://marketrodeo.com/asset/RKT) | Rocket Companies, Inc. | 22.64 | 21.24 | +1.40 | +6.59% |
| [NLY](https://marketrodeo.com/asset/NLY) | Annaly Capital Management, Inc. | 23.94 | 23.26 | +0.68 | +2.92% |
| [DRS](https://marketrodeo.com/asset/DRS) | Leonardo DRS, Inc. | 39.90 | 38.84 | +1.06 | +2.73% |
## 📉 After-Hours Losers:
| Symbol | Company | After-Hours | Regular Hours | Change | %Change |
|:-------|:--------|:----------:|:-------------:|:------:|:-------:|
| [VONG](https://marketrodeo.com/asset/VONG) | Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth Index Fund | 94.72 | 121.73 | -27.01 | -22.19% |
| [EMXC](https://marketrodeo.com/asset/EMXC) | iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF | 59.65 | 75.65 | -16.00 | -21.15% |
| [TCOM](https://marketrodeo.com/asset/TCOM) | Trip.com Group Limited | 73.55 | 76.82 | -3.27 | -4.26% |
| [RACE](https://marketrodeo.com/asset/RACE) | Ferrari N.V. | 355.75 | 370.85 | -15.11 | -4.07% |
| [UNP](https://marketrodeo.com/asset/UNP) | Union Pacific Corporation | 222.53 | 229.85 | -7.32 | -3.19% |
Source: [Market Extended Hours](https://marketrodeo.com/market-extended-hours)

this is just fairly tale economics.
There are plenty of points in US history where the money supply was being shrunk year over year yet inflation only continued to spike. Take a look at this graph and you'll find that inflation change doesn't correlate at all with money suppply change. In fact, it appears to be the opposite at some points.
https://fred.stlouisfed.org/graph/?g=1QdzU
Milton Friedman's claim that inflation was a money supply problem cones from the equation MV = PY.
M is money supply (M1 or M2, I personally use M2 but it doesn't matter a whole lot)
V is velocity of money, how quickly the money trasfers through the economy.
P is price (or really GDP deflator)
Y is real GDP
One assumption he made is that Velocity is stable in the short term. That's just wrong. https://fred.stlouisfed.org/graph/?g=1QdzU. You can see it dop rapidly and go down over time.
Another is that GDP can fluctuate over time, but always return to a general predictable path. This is also wrong. There's this thing called "scarring" that happens in real life. https://www.nber.org/papers/w20185
All of this fairy tales about what happens in an economy is the fault of neoclassical "economists". This PragerU nonsense video is neoclassical nonsense.
Finally, I'd like to say that MV = PY is bullshit anyways. V is generalized as V = PY/M, so MV = PY is just a rewriting of how V is defined. V should be how fast spenders spend, not a made up number to justify arelationship between PY and M.
It's also contradictory. When people take out loans at the bank (spending more, buying more through loans), the money supply increases. V = PY/M says that since the money supply increased, velocity would be less, but the consumer just bought something, and velocity is supposed to be a measure of how fast money circulates from buyer to seller.
Milton Friedman's nonsense that velocity is stable in the short term and GDP always returns to a normal path is built off of the nonsense of how velocity is defined. It's nonsense^2

But after all that, they made RDR online and almost no one gave a shit.
I’m not saying GTAVI won’t make money or won’t be profitable, but from a corporate/game investment standpoint, it needs to come out of the gate looking like it can *outperform* GTA V to really be seen as a hit. As you said, it’s the last one was most successful game of all time, which sets the bar very high for this one.

YES YES YES $AAPL
We're coming back, the V has started

Nive V from PLTR

We're gonna V, in the next 35 minutes!

Apple had gone only down for a month after a coworker got awarded 40 shares at 290 at a Christmas party lmao. Matt deserves a V.

V cancelled yet again!!

Bought in at the bottom of the V, been watching like a hawk all day long

Is this just a fakeout bounce or a legitimate V hmmm

10 minute dip = 30 second V absurd

Omg the V to let me sell +0% for the day. How nice 🙂 

Mighty V come and redeem us

Nein, niemals, die böse Bank ist Schuld. Ich hätte nätürlich die vollen 15€ im Monat gezahlt, damit alles abgesichert ist und ganz bestimmt nicht gesagt....
"Wer sollte denn genau diese Bank ausrauben. Das ist doch unwahrscheinlich! Die wollen mir nur das Geld aus der Tasche ziehen!"
Diese Vollkaskomentalität i.V. mit null Kosten und dem Abweisen von Verantwortung bei erwachsenen Mitbürger ist schlicht beeindruckend.
Und weil diese ganzen Opfer einen Helden brauchen (und ein Politiker Stimmen), wird demnächst das Bankschließfachversicherungsregelungsschutzgesetz eingeführt, welches diese armen, betrogenen Mitmenschen schützen wird.

Sick V

Here comes the V baby let’s goo time to leverage