MITT
TPG Mortgage Investment Trust, Inc.
stock NYSE

ARCC and TRIN are business development companes. They loan money to companes. these are indifvidual US companes. They are not funds. MITT is a rest and I don't know much about it. but probably similar. Yield are great but the dividned is taxed at the ordinary income tax rate. Also you want deverisification and 3 companies are not deversified. For for BDC there are only 2 funds that I know of that rust invest in them. PBDC 11%, and BIZD 13%. Now due to a SEC rule that only applies to BDCs these funds must list the expenses of the BDC plus the expenses of the fund. As a result both fund list a combined expense ratio of 13%. But the funds never pay the expenses of the BDC so the real expenses oo.75% for PBDC and 0.4% for BIZD. BIZD might look like the best choice but when you look at total return PBDC has better performance. I have PBDC for its better total returns and diversification with about 25 BDC in its portfolio.

Assuming you live in the US With 300K to invest it will have togo into taxable account. So you need to take into account taxes on the dividend income. Dividends are taxed at 3 rates:
* regular dividends are taxed at the same rate as your work income. This is the highest tax rate.
* Qualified Dividned are taxed at the long term capital gains tax rate. Worst case only 20% of your dividends are considered taxable income. best cash you will owe zero tax
* there is a ROC dividneds. ROC dividend are subtracted from fate cost basis of the shares you own. If the cost basis is above or you owe no tax on the dividneds. Now most funds that generate ROC dividned will produce some ROC, some qualified, or some regular dividends. So it is rarely 100 % ROC dividend a fully tax free. Once the cost basis reaches zero Which Takes years you dividned income is taxed at the long term capital gains tax rate.
So if you pay attention to the type of tax generated by the dividned income you could end up owing close to zero tax on the income.
* JEPQ, JEPI, TRIN, ARCC and possibly MITT(I am not failure with it) are exaples of funds the produce regular dividends. The income is great but the tax is high. Also TRIN and ARCC arebisness development companes not funds so they have no fund expenses.
* SCHD and PFF, EMO, UTF, UTG are all examples of funds that produce qualified dividends
* SPYI, QQQI are NEOS funds. which are popular do to the90% of the dividend being classified as ROC. Sp ,minimal taxes. These are covered call funds. The covered call process converts price volatility of the asset it holds into income. So capital gains is converted cash. If you are looking for income you don't really need growth. Although NEOS funds do retain a little bit of grwoth to avoid NAV erosion which is bad for investors. And GPIX and GPIQ are similar to NEOSretain more growth. But when a covered call fund retrains more growth you get a lower yield and ROC portion of the dividend is reduced. So there is a trade off for CC funds involving yield, Growth and tax efficiency. So if you want maximum growth invest in the index these funds fallow and live with the 1% dividned. Or if you want inocme use a cover call find that will have low ergrowth and high dividned.
You can always get maximum growth from growth index funds. And Mximum dividends from dividned fund. Funds that try to do both like SCHD often have a very low dividend and less gowth then growth index funds.
Now you could invest your 150K in VOO (S\*P500 index fund and 150Kin SPYI (CC fund using S&P500 index) and get a combined portfolio with an average growth of 5% and and combined dividend of about 6% of the S&P index. and pay very low taxes.
OR you could with 300K in covered call funds like QQQI and get 14% yield with minimal growth and tax efficiency.
I woudlpersonally recomend QQQI, 13% yield, EMO 9% yield, UTF 7%, UTG 6.4% and PFF All produce qualified or ROC dividneds so the entire portfolio is tax efficient and would is each funds had an equal ammount of money the combined yield would be 8.28% which would generate about 24,840 per year of income.

Those are mortgage reits. ARCC, MITT, TRIN
With raising interest rates they will not perform.

BDCs like TRIN and ARCC or mortgage REITs like MITT don't show an expense ratio, but they aren't fee-free. They charge high internal management fees, usually 1.5% to 2% of assets, plus leverage interest costs. Their total operating expenses often run between 4% and 8% of assets, which is much higher than JEPQ or SPYI. Also, their payouts are ordinary income. If you're investing the property sale cash in a taxable account and fall in the 24% bracket, a 10% yield on $300k drops to 7.6% after taxes. You lose $7.2k of your $30k annual payout. Are you putting this in a taxable account, or do you have space in a retirement wrapper?

for MITT symbol I found
TPG Mortgage Investment Trust Inc, would not touch this one
TRIN ,is decent but cyclical might consider at $15.65 but payout is 104% so would wait for a pull back

MITT's a real estate trust and trades of the nyse. Trinity Capital (trin) is on nasdaq. Not sure what OP is referring to as 'arc'.

I am looking to invest after selling an investment property. I generally always see people talk about JEPQ/JEPI, SPYI, QQQI, SCHDetc which can cap upside and have higher volatility. However, I hardly see people mentioning MITT, TRIN, ARC which also gives around 10% returns with no expense ratio. Why not buy those as opposed CC funds? Any thoughts?

ARCC and TRIN are business development companes. They loan money to companes. these are indifvidual US companes. They are not funds. MITT is a rest and I don't know much about it. but probably similar. Yield are great but the dividned is taxed at the ordinary income tax rate. Also you want deverisification and 3 companies are not deversified. For for BDC there are only 2 funds that I know of that rust invest in them. PBDC 11%, and BIZD 13%. Now due to a SEC rule that only applies to BDCs these funds must list the expenses of the BDC plus the expenses of the fund. As a result both fund list a combined expense ratio of 13%. But the funds never pay the expenses of the BDC so the real expenses oo.75% for PBDC and 0.4% for BIZD. BIZD might look like the best choice but when you look at total return PBDC has better performance. I have PBDC for its better total returns and diversification with about 25 BDC in its portfolio.

Assuming you live in the US With 300K to invest it will have togo into taxable account. So you need to take into account taxes on the dividend income. Dividends are taxed at 3 rates:
* regular dividends are taxed at the same rate as your work income. This is the highest tax rate.
* Qualified Dividned are taxed at the long term capital gains tax rate. Worst case only 20% of your dividends are considered taxable income. best cash you will owe zero tax
* there is a ROC dividneds. ROC dividend are subtracted from fate cost basis of the shares you own. If the cost basis is above or you owe no tax on the dividneds. Now most funds that generate ROC dividned will produce some ROC, some qualified, or some regular dividends. So it is rarely 100 % ROC dividend a fully tax free. Once the cost basis reaches zero Which Takes years you dividned income is taxed at the long term capital gains tax rate.
So if you pay attention to the type of tax generated by the dividned income you could end up owing close to zero tax on the income.
* JEPQ, JEPI, TRIN, ARCC and possibly MITT(I am not failure with it) are exaples of funds the produce regular dividends. The income is great but the tax is high. Also TRIN and ARCC arebisness development companes not funds so they have no fund expenses.
* SCHD and PFF, EMO, UTF, UTG are all examples of funds that produce qualified dividends
* SPYI, QQQI are NEOS funds. which are popular do to the90% of the dividend being classified as ROC. Sp ,minimal taxes. These are covered call funds. The covered call process converts price volatility of the asset it holds into income. So capital gains is converted cash. If you are looking for income you don't really need growth. Although NEOS funds do retain a little bit of grwoth to avoid NAV erosion which is bad for investors. And GPIX and GPIQ are similar to NEOSretain more growth. But when a covered call fund retrains more growth you get a lower yield and ROC portion of the dividend is reduced. So there is a trade off for CC funds involving yield, Growth and tax efficiency. So if you want maximum growth invest in the index these funds fallow and live with the 1% dividned. Or if you want inocme use a cover call find that will have low ergrowth and high dividned.
You can always get maximum growth from growth index funds. And Mximum dividends from dividned fund. Funds that try to do both like SCHD often have a very low dividend and less gowth then growth index funds.
Now you could invest your 150K in VOO (S\*P500 index fund and 150Kin SPYI (CC fund using S&P500 index) and get a combined portfolio with an average growth of 5% and and combined dividend of about 6% of the S&P index. and pay very low taxes.
OR you could with 300K in covered call funds like QQQI and get 14% yield with minimal growth and tax efficiency.
I woudlpersonally recomend QQQI, 13% yield, EMO 9% yield, UTF 7%, UTG 6.4% and PFF All produce qualified or ROC dividneds so the entire portfolio is tax efficient and would is each funds had an equal ammount of money the combined yield would be 8.28% which would generate about 24,840 per year of income.

Those are mortgage reits. ARCC, MITT, TRIN
With raising interest rates they will not perform.

BDCs like TRIN and ARCC or mortgage REITs like MITT don't show an expense ratio, but they aren't fee-free. They charge high internal management fees, usually 1.5% to 2% of assets, plus leverage interest costs. Their total operating expenses often run between 4% and 8% of assets, which is much higher than JEPQ or SPYI. Also, their payouts are ordinary income. If you're investing the property sale cash in a taxable account and fall in the 24% bracket, a 10% yield on $300k drops to 7.6% after taxes. You lose $7.2k of your $30k annual payout. Are you putting this in a taxable account, or do you have space in a retirement wrapper?

for MITT symbol I found
TPG Mortgage Investment Trust Inc, would not touch this one
TRIN ,is decent but cyclical might consider at $15.65 but payout is 104% so would wait for a pull back

MITT's a real estate trust and trades of the nyse. Trinity Capital (trin) is on nasdaq. Not sure what OP is referring to as 'arc'.

I am looking to invest after selling an investment property. I generally always see people talk about JEPQ/JEPI, SPYI, QQQI, SCHDetc which can cap upside and have higher volatility. However, I hardly see people mentioning MITT, TRIN, ARC which also gives around 10% returns with no expense ratio. Why not buy those as opposed CC funds? Any thoughts?