GPS
The Gap, Inc.
stock NYSE

Why are you spreading so much FUD about SLS as a shareholder? Moderna just had such a pop today on their melanoma vaccine!
Cancer vaccines can work look at that!!!! I only hope to see the same for SLS and GPS.
Just because previous attempts at something fail does not doom all future attempts to fail that is the nature of science. It would be quite a year to get two onc vaccines approved in one year.
Bears down, Bulls up baby!!!!! 💉

I needed to hear this.
The idiot whores on X convinced me that the only people left alive were the BAT immortals and maybe one person still receiving GPS “for show.”

I fell asleep in the poker room once, EST USA, around 22:00, and found a seat upon waking up, never checking the time.
Whole skin started crying when I check my phone, to discover it was almost 07:00, and I wasn't even a round through.
Damn poker room changed my GPS to central Europe.
No crying, no FOMO, and STAY AWAKE.

That right there is the dumbest shit I’ve read all month, phase 3 data readout is going to show GPS with an HR less than 0.5 reducing risk of death by more than 50% and a mOS that won’t be met at 80 events meaning median overall survival will go from a toxic 8-11 months with the current standard of care to a non-toxic 3+ years with GPS and you’re worried about “approval” which Sellas won’t even handle after being bought out by big pharma.
“Yes, Sellas, you basically cured AML in half the population and made the prognosis way better for the other half, but we still don’t know about approval” — FDA.
Do you see how dumb that sounds?
For the love of god, please bet against it based on FDA approval you absolutely uninformed buffoon.

I would never trust another persons strategy. I just don't need to anymore. I would however strongly recommend you learn the underlying principles as to why one profitable traders strategy works for them, and then modify it to your style, personality, risk tolerance and time you have available to commit to trading. I have done this several times.
Depending on what style you trade, there are several I can give to you here for Swing Trading, Options, and Intraday scalping on futures or equities.
The first is the TTM squeeze made popular by John Carter in his book, 'Mastering the Trade.' I have read it four times and own a hardback copy for the most recent version, but I actually like the older version one better. You can track It down for free online in digital format in a lot of places. It's fine he doesn't mind, he has made 20+ million.
If you can imagine looking at a GPS while driving, you might see a red spot where a lot of traffic is clustering ahead. For a time you get slowed down, but ultimately after getting passed the bottle neck, traffic immediately starts to speed up. This is essentially the TTM squeeze playing out in the market.
https://preview.redd.it/5k1ni3rw97kh1.png?width=2426&format=png&auto=webp&s=aade4ff4fa8d3b8fb4c15cc55b9e66f483788084

Market Makers do not care about these fluctuations, and do not account for it when pricing options. So if you buy while the market is consolidating you can nicely with momentum for a nice gain. John Carter seems to have a certain level of discretion where he adds to and takes from positions and to determine the direction of the breakout, he uses the TTM wave indicator. I actually hate that, I feel like it never reliably told me when to get in and out, so I adapted it to me. For the exit I use a different indicator called the parabolic SAR, this to me made more sense as an exit that I could more concretely understand.

For determining the direction of the breakout, I use a sort of Frankinstiened indicator that I have put together over the years from other people on the website, 'UseThinkScript.' I guess the open source platform for the kids these days is more Tradingview, but TOS is still what I use. It's not that hard nowadays to have AI translate this code from Thinkscipt into C# or whatever is needed for your trading platform.
You can get these indicators/strategy for free at my website.
[https://rankuptrading.com](https://rankuptrading.com)
I have also modified a lot of what Ross Cameron does with scanners. For his trading style he says he uses a bullish flag candle pattern after finding a stock that has 50x relative volume. He uses leverage on his trades. I do not use leverage. I also broaden the intraday scans so that I am not obligated to trade only on tickers the have 50x relative volume to tickers that simple have >5% return on the day AND 1M shares of volume from the open. [https://finviz.com](https://finviz.com) actually has a free scanner as well, but it is based on yesterdays close rather than todays open, so it isn't as reliable for me to scalp with.
I have given these scanners to people I have taught and I found out quickly that a large portion of my edge comes from speed of execution, likely having had played too many videos games in my life that require faster reaction times. This one is called, Equities scalping super pack, also on my website.

There are others as well if you prefer a longer term holding period with the CAN SLIM scanner which is great for swing trading.

Yeah… okay. But BAT clearly is coming in way higher than 5-6 months. The weak BAT data in phase 2 wasn’t even randomized, it was post hoc matched.
Then we have the valuation concern even if GPS is successful that doesn’t translate to 40B. REGAL success, shows we can work in AML, it would still take a year or more before any sales in that limited indication. To expand it requires more trials, oncology trials take time… trials that might even fail.
I think success is largely priced in at this point. I have a massive position here, but I’m as hedged as I can be going into the 80th.

[US] Revolut sided with the merchant despite FedEx GPS evidence showing the package was delivered to the wrong building

GPS is still being ordered and administered to patients that are still alive.
I don’t buy the argument that BAT + clinical observation leads to immortality.

options chain are short term bearish and long term bullish. those loud FUDsters need the short term dump for short positions. Truly if they don't think GPS works, I agree that wouldn't someone who has no skin in the game just move on with their lives? they clearly have motive

Who cares?! It’s a blinded trial. Nobody knows anything. All we know is the pooled survival time is longer than expected. I’m in on it because the tail is behaving like a vaccine and I believe GPS is creating a survivor separation tail.
But who tf has time to police these forums and argue with imbeciles. Everyone on those forums needs to get a job fr. Go touch grass. Stick your head in the sand. Idk. Whatever it takes to not freak out every day on zero new information. If you’re committed to the readout, then just hold and let it go

If you’re not on X, consider yourself lucky or intelligent. To be fair, I can say the same thing about StockTwits.
I’m here and on both and I’m seeing things that are starting to freak me out.
Every biotech stock with a great deal of potential begins to generate some fanboys. The binary plays, the catalysts, the FDA approvals, the M&A, etc. is all adrenaline pumping stuff and, if you’re truly lucky, your wallet pumps as well.
What you’re missing by not being on X is what appears to be a “negative astroturfing” campaign against SLS.
Without so much as a logical argument, multiple accounts, some who have otherwise been very rational in their daily approach to biotech, are trashing SLS and the REGAL trial.
Their arguments are inane. The fact that the 80th event hasn’t occurred is viewed as a scam. If the CEO mentions the 80th event hasn’t occurred in the last quarterly update but only says “…we await the 80th event…” in the most recent quarterly call, they seize on it as some shred of evidence that there is a scam going on. (Which I know makes zero sense but that was the entire argument.)
The “best” argument they have is the one that I’ll turn against them: the pro-SLS noise is the proof that it’s a rug pull.
Sad when hype is their best argument…
So, allow me to turn it around.
The fact that they are downright ugly and negative about the potential of GPS is, in itself, a Buy signal.
Huh?
Think of it from a higher level:
1. They don’t care that GPS may work and save lives.
2. They aren’t white knights trying to save naive biotech investors from taking on too much risk.
They are putting their names - which in many instances have built a reputation in biotech - online where things are permanent as trashing the company, the drug and the investors.
Even if they wind up deleting everything, they will be remembered as having been obnoxious and crass about a drug trial.
And what’s their upside if it’s not altruistic?
Maybe chest thumping bragging rights if the trial fails. But they have no idea whether it will fail or not and it’s a biotech binary so who cares that they were right about a phase III trial failure? I could predict that every time and claim an 88% success rate.
Nope. I don’t think that’s it.
Which leaves two scenarios.
1. They’re paid
2. They’re angry that they’re not paid
Why would anyone pay five or six of the biggest biotech influencers on X to trash SLS and GPS and those hopeful hypers on a daily basis?
I’m interested in your answer and if you want to say some shorting entity is working overtime to drive SLS down, fine but it’s very tin foil hat without more details.
If they’re angry that they’re not getting paid, it tells you something very sinister about the industry as a whole. If I’m the CEO of a clinical pharma co and I’m desperate to avoid trashing the stock with another dilution round, is it possible I might slide some cash to an influencer to pump my ticker?
Well, that would be illegal. But imagine if that were the norm and the X biotech bros are bitter that they can’t wet their beak in the SLS pond.
They just might get ugly.
I’m going to take a position on SLS here before the 80th event because something stinks. If you think I’m exaggerating, do the following:
Hold your nose, go on X and type $SLS into the search bar and choose Latest.
You won’t believe the amount of endless negative hype pouring out when all these influencers had to do was ignore the hype or block the term REGAL from their X feed.
I’m not suggesting you invest in SLS.
I am asking you to tell me why the bio-bros are working so hard to counter the SLS hype and the pending end of the REGAL trial.
It doesn’t make sense unless there’s something nasty going on that isn’t obvious.

"In exchange for creating maritime chaos to keep Western navies distracted, the Houthis have supplied Somali pirate cells with advanced weaponry, military training and precision GPS tracking devices to pinpoint commercial hulls"
Hilarious stuff lfmao

Hey everyone, I'm back with GCTS update part 5!!! I do not P&D stocks. I do not buy P&D hype stock i will just get in for the hype for like a week and get out. If you are not an investor DO NOT buy this. My biggest winner was Quantum in the pennies (RGTI) already sold but bought IONQ recently. Quantum had no to so tiny limited cash, concerns of the computer actually works and so much other bear case many people pointed out but I knew **quantum was the next gen computing with highly advanced physics, and a big change from traditional 0 or 1 to 0 and 1 computing.** I waited at least a year and a half to even see some movement. ***AS I do my research*** on GCTS, I got so much reason that I just can't let this opportunity go of such a amazing company still in the dollars. `I did hours of research so hope you saved some time and got some ideas of GCTS and how GCTS's future might look like.` **Actually read through it because I don't want you to lose money on this name. And PLEASE do your OWN research.**
**So many people have been waiting for this post so hope you enjoy, and I appreciate it** **for such a great community** $GCTS**.**
**Quick Overview**, GCTS is a **fabless semiconductor designer focused on 5G, LTE and IoT chipsets,** positioning itself in the high-growth **next-generation connectivity** market where demand for advanced communication solutions continues to expand globally. GCTS has also attracted institutional interest, with dozens of funds reporting positions and occasional insider buying activity signaling confidence from management. *GCTS is still pre-profit and in heavy investment mode.*
https://preview.redd.it/ydro7lfwrzjh1.png?width=1368&format=png&auto=webp&s=06044092fc5153dd4b916e87a5dd75a2436d4fc5
Recently, there has been massive volatility, **severe revenue misses, and heavy dilution chatter** around GCT Semiconductor. A lot of people are panicking about the recent **Q2 earnings report**, **but if you look past the raw numbers and examine the executive roster, supply chain, and secret contracts, the macro thesis has actually gotten significantly stronger.** I really don't care about the numbers right now. I just want see if they can prove their tech to big tech partnership and execute them. I'm not only investing on current 4G-5G but also investing in their 6G future, will be out starting 2028-2030. Big future but long wait.
`Lets dive deeper on their Q2 earnings and cash flows.`
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
GCTS diluted to survive the transition gap and **fully fund and lock down their physical wafer slots at Samsung Foundry.**
>
Management is **intentionally killing its legacy**, **low-margin 4G business** to **go all-in on advanced 5G/Satellite Non-Terrestrial Network (NTN) SoCs and industrial infrastructure**. they are combining both 4G and 5G technologies onto one single piece of silicon. In the semiconductor industry, this is called a multi-mode chipset. How the Single "Combo" Chip Works Instead of forcing a drone or a satellite company to buy and solder two different chips onto their circuit boards, GCTS designs a **single microchip that contains multiple radio engines built right into the same piece of silicon**.
[#Only for NTN market, GCTS combines both in one](https://preview.redd.it/ou51vflyrzjh1.png?width=600&format=png&auto=webp&s=dc61efd8d60138d69f35d5eeb78051f7f98439e9)
The revenue numbers missed because major global rollouts got pushed back by 1 to 2 quarters due to client scheduling adjustments. But look at the physical volume metric hidden in the Q2 report: **GCTS shipped over 5,100 of these advanced 5G/4G multi-mode chipsets last quarter alone.**
That represents an explosive **71% sequential volume growth over Q1 2026**. Those 5,100+ chips didn't go to retail shelves; they went directly into the hands of engineering labs at **MaxLinear router partners, secure defense drone (UAV) teams, aviation connectivity builders, and tactical field radio manufacturers.** The industry is aggressively testing this exact multi-mode combo chip right now, meaning the physical foundation is being laid for massive commercial orders the moment these product evaluations conclude.
>
Because these 4 customers are massive infrastructure players (handling FWA routers, aviation Wi-Fi, tactical field radios, and mobile hotspots), they are running **Beta Pilot Production Ramps**. They are building real, functional devices to clear carrier certification (like Verizon/T-Mobile approvals) and military test runs.
When a major telecom or defense hardware line moves from carrier certification to a standard commercial rollout, the production volume per customer scales up by a **100x to 300x multiplier**.
**1. The Normal Case: Standard Commercial Scale-Up (150x Multiplier)**
>
>
>
>
`[ THE 300x AGGRESSIVE CASE ] - 1,275 pilot chips scaled up to 382,500 mass distribution units per Whale. - Total Volume: 1,530,000 commercial chipsets shipped. - Total Projected Revenue: 1,530,000 x $40 ASP = $61.2 MILLION =================================================================================`
While Q2 2026 earnings looked rough on the surface due to customer timeline deployment delays, a deep dive into their technology stack, executive pedigree, secured Samsung wafer capacity, and secret contracts reveals a hyper-speculative bull case engineered to capture the **AI Wireless Last Mile** and the 6G revolution.
* **The 5G Engine:** This handles the high-speed, low-latency data and links up with next-generation 5G towers or modern direct-to-cell satellites.
* **The 4G Engine:** This sits quietly inside the same exact chip and acts as a built-in safety net. If the 5G signal cuts out, the chip automatically switches its internal routing to use the 4G engine.
https://preview.redd.it/l8p6obh3szjh1.png?width=1280&format=png&auto=webp&s=4a1ac9d8cd9542ec9adc6149e0115562b8883b1f
Many people mistake GCTS for a generic cellular chip company competing with Qualcomm. They aren't. GCTS specializes in **RF-CMOS Integration**. Right now, a top-tier rugged device like a **Garmin Fenix 8 Pro** or an industrial asset tracker requires a fragmented motherboard setup to handle tracking
1. **The Main Brain:** An NXP processor running the software.
2. **The GPS Ear:** A Synaptics or Airoha GNSS chip (A **one-way** receiver that only listens to space to map coordinates; it cannot talk back).
3. **The Local Radio:** A Silicon Labs chip handling local Wi-Fi/Bluetooth.
4. **The Space Radio:** A separate, bulky legacy Iridium Transceiver module for satellite text messaging.
**The GCTS Edge: The System-on-Chip (SoC)**
GCTS’s flagship **GDM7243SL** combines the Baseband Modem, Radio Frequency (RF) Transceiver, and Digital Signal Processor (DSP) onto **one single piece of silicon**.
* **True Two-Way Transceiver:** It doesn't just listen like a GPS chip. It contains an integrated Power Amplifier that takes battery power and fires an encrypted signal hundreds of miles straight up to connect to space satellites.
* **Motherboard Consolidation:** It replaces three separate chips from three different vendors. For hardware makers, this saves critical space, allowing them to cram in larger batteries to maintain multi-week runtimes while adding true 5G space-to-ground connectivity
**For people who don't know what RF-CMOS Integration is**
**RF-CMOS Integration is a highly advanced microchip manufacturing technique that prints two completely different types of technology onto a single, microscopic piece of silicon.**
https://preview.redd.it/n2vynk0pszjh1.png?width=620&format=png&auto=webp&s=eee07f79ac4090434be14ad77f5583453469cddd
To understand why this is a massive technological moat for GCTS, you have to look at the physical physics of wireless radios:
1. **The "RF" Layer (Radio Frequency)**: This is the **analog antenna** side. It handles high-power, high-frequency, noisy radio waves traveling through the air from cell towers or satellites. It requires specialized, expensive materials that can handle heat and power.
2. **The "CMOS" Layer (Complementary Metal-Oxide-Semiconductor)**: This is the **digital brain side**. It is the cheap, standard silicon computer processor that calculates millions of 1s and 0s to run software code and data applications.
The Old Way vs. The GCTS "RF-CMOS" Way
* **The Old Multi-Chip Setup**: Historically, companies could not mix RF and CMOS together. The high-power analog antenna would generate so much heat and radio noise that it would literally melt or scramble the digital computer brain. Because of this, device makers (like Garmin) had to buy an **analog RF antenna chip** from one vendor, and a **digital modem chip** from a second vendor, and solder them side-by-side on the motherboard. This takes up massive space, costs double the money, and heavily drains the battery.
* **The GCTS RF-CMOS Breakthrough**: GCTS owns deep proprietary patents that solve this interference problem. Through highly complex math and circuit architecture, they figured out how to cleanly isolate the noise. This allows them to print the analog radio antenna, the digital baseband processor, and the power amplifiers onto **one single piece of silicon die (a System-on-Chip, or SoC).**
**Why This is a Game-Changer for Drones, Satellites, and 6G**
By mastering RF-CMOS integration, GCTS can manufacture an all-in-one chip that hits the holy grail of engineering:
* **Drastically Lowers SWaP-C:** It reduces the **Size, Weight, Power, and Cost of devices.** A drone or robot maker only has to buy and solder one tiny chip instead of three.
* **Extreme Battery Savings**: Electrons don't have to travel across copper motherboard wires to move from the antenna chip to the brain chip. Everything happens instantly inside a single piece of silicon, saving vital battery life.
* **The 6G Foundation**: 6G operates on extreme ultra-high frequencies (Sub-Terahertz) where signal noise is devastating. You cannot use multiple chips at those speeds because the wiring noise will kill the signal. Single-die RF-CMOS integration is the only physical way a 6G chip can function.
\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_
[https://www.reddit.com/r/pennystocks/comments/1u23pmp/gcts\_am\_i\_crazy\_or\_is\_the\_hype\_on\_this\_ticker/](https://www.reddit.com/r/pennystocks/comments/1u23pmp/gcts_am_i_crazy_or_is_the_hype_on_this_ticker/)
>
`Starlink or Amazon. who do you think????`
***My bet is on Amazon, 90%***. GCT saying "*we are working with Globalstar and an unnamed partner*" which means globalstar's partner, all 3 working on the same project refer to Amazon Leo, Project Kuiper.
**SpaceX & EchoStar are Closed Loops:** SpaceX operates with complete vertical integration. They design custom in-house chips for Starlink and use advanced satellite antennas to talk directly to unmodified regular phone chips. EchoStar recently executed a massive $19.6B spectrum reshuffle, putting its Hughes consumer division into bankruptcy and routing its Boost Mobile network directly through Starlink's system. **Neither company needs GCTS.**
>
>
>
>
>
>
\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_
https://preview.redd.it/he5gq4latzjh1.png?width=596&format=png&auto=webp&s=e50da9a79e673b008270cb9beed81f74933cd4a1
Many people gets this wrong. GCTS's chips **doesn't go inside any satellite.** GCTS builds **User Equipment (UE) ground chips**. For every satellite in space, there are millions of ground devices trying to talk to it (drones, routers, smartwatches, IoT trackers). GCTS targets this **high-volume ground market.**
>
**1. Iridium Communications (NASDAQ: IRDM)**
* **Technical Function:** GCTS and Iridium operate under a formal MOU to co-develop a next-generation, ultra-low-power Narrowband Internet of Things (NB-IoT) chipset. GCTS has meticulously integrated the proprietary **Iridium NTN Direct℠ service** directly onto its physical silicon architecture.
* **Strategic Impact:** This pre-certified technical bridge creates a "Trojan Horse" into **Garmin’s** future supply chain. Because Garmin’s multi-million-dollar *inReach* emergency messaging framework is locked into Iridium’s space network, any future upgrade Garmin plans to support modern 5G satellite standards will require a chip pre-tuned to Iridium's frequencies. GCTS provides the exact pre-validated plug-and-play solution.
**The Globalstar (GSAT) Program**
* **The Tech:** Industrial IoT and two-way tracking.
* **The Detail:** Amazon signed an intensive infrastructure deal with Globalstar to anchor its upcoming **Project Kuiper LEO constellation** into Globalstar's ground frequencies. Because GCTS is already the premier silicon blueprint for Band 53, Amazon’s multi-billion-dollar ground terminal rollout creates a massive, indirect volume multiplier for GCTS chips. GCTS chips (like the GDM7243i) are physically built into Globalstar’s current RM200M modules to handle their specific Band 53 spectrum. Even though Amazon bought Globalstar, this remains a separate legacy hardware stream.
**3. Skylo Technologies & Sateliot**
* **Technical Function:** Skylo operates as a massive virtual satellite network operator across 36 countries. GCTS has achieved full network certification on Skylo's platform.
* **The Hardware Integration:** Skylo’s network demands advanced **Mode-Switching Logic**. GCTS hardcodes an automated algorithmic layer into its modem baseband. When a device (like an industrial asset tracker or drone) walks out of traditional 5G cell tower range, the GCTS chip detects the signal drop and instantly re-routes its internal antennas to point straight up to an overhead Skylo-partnered satellite in milliseconds, preventing the machine from freezing or experiencing data lag.
**4. MaxLinear Inc. (NASDAQ: MXL)**
* **Technical Function:** GCTS and MaxLinear co-developed a joint reference platform for high-speed converged gateways and FWA routers. They combine MaxLinear’s network processors with GCTS’s 5G modems on a single circuit board.
* **The Hardware Integration:** MaxLinear’s chip acts as the **Internal Router Brain** (Wi-Fi 7 / routing processing), while GCTS’s chip acts as the **External 5G Modem**. They supply this combined blueprint to **OEMs/ODMs (Gemtek, Sercomm, WNC, Franklin Wireless)** who manufacture the physical router boxes for Tier-1 global telecom carriers like **Verizon and T-Mobile** to replace traditional home cable/fiber internet.
>
In their latest business update, management dropped a massive bomb: they signed a secure contract to supply **IoT hardware and modules to a strategic collaborator in the Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) and defense sector.**
The contract explicitly covers flight control, secure data transmission, and **Alternative PNT (Positioning, Navigation, and Timing)** capabilities. In military electronic warfare, alternative PNT means the GCTS chip can calculate a drone's position and maintain control links even when an enemy is actively jamming traditional GPS signals.
Because of strict Non-Disclosure Agreements (NDAs), the partner's identity is hidden. Filtering the drone market by GCTS’s parameters (**must serve dual commercial/military markets, must build physical flying UAVs, and must source outside silicon**), here are the highest-probability targets:
**Skydio (Estimated Probability: 40%):** The undisputed leader in U.S. autonomous flight (*Skydio X10*). They focus their capital on AI vision software, not radio silicon. They are `legally banned from using Chinese 5G modules, making GCTS's secure, U.S.-managed chip a perfect supply-chain match.`
**Red Cat Holdings / Teal Drones (Estimated Probability: 35%):** Publicly traded (NASDAQ: RCAT). They operate on a strict assembly/integration model. Their tactical drones (*Teal 2*) require secure 5G mesh connectivity to orchestrate multi-drone swarms.
**AeroVironment (NASDAQ: AVAV) (Estimated Probability: 12%):** Massive defense giant behind the *Switchblade* kamikaze drone. They are heavily focused on anti-jamming PNT tech, making them a very strong technical candidate.
**Performance Drone Works (PDW) — 7% Probability The Technical Case:** PDW is a highly specialized, boutique U.S. drone manufacturer that the Pentagon officially selected for its elite "Drone Dominance" program to build secure, non-Chinese military hardware.
**Shield AI / V-BAT Platforms — 3% Probability The Technical Case:** Shield AI builds the *V-BAT*, a massive vertical-takeoff tactical drone used for long-range military reconnaissance and commercial maritime tracking. \[[1](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UCq-hVW70_Y), [2](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vuJ3lKSHb1I)\]
One of my favorite **Anduril Industries**. The lowest **probability of 1%** but it's fun to include them so.
[This was the most exciting moments this year for me so let me include it](https://preview.redd.it/p4y95ypdtzjh1.png?width=1080&format=png&auto=webp&s=b75840133523d676500b1274e747bc6706e0ab82)
https://preview.redd.it/o0n4t0pgtzjh1.png?width=1080&format=png&auto=webp&s=f9f54f4f57f9d467ffbaca0da9a6b2536dc681b7
https://preview.redd.it/onwwmnchtzjh1.png?width=1080&format=png&auto=webp&s=57bf4d49a11c34489f32db78c6c3118acc3d6548
GCTS currently trades like a volatile penny stock, but its **internal leadership and boardroom consist of a highly elite, well-funded alliance of tech veterans, semiconductor pioneers, and heavy cross-border capital managers\*\*. I'm talking like top 0.5% people's working together**. I'm half Japanese and I know how competitive they are coming from one of the top university from Korea with a Electrical Engineering degree which is a crazy degree to have. **They could legitly be working at SKHY and like Samsung.** Some of them actually used to work at Samsung.\*\* `I like to research this to also know about the people so I could have more passion in them and not only for the stock price.`
https://preview.redd.it/usmnyyxitzjh1.png?width=1080&format=png&auto=webp&s=d27cd2e824a211c1e24c70af735edf6679e1133d
* **Dr. Kyeongho "K.H." Lee (Co-Founder, Former CEO & Chairman):** The engineering genius behind GCTS’s core architecture. Dr. Lee holds a Ph.D. in Electrical Engineering from **Seoul National University** and personal design patents for GCTS's key transceiver technologies. He pioneered the **world’s first 4x4 MIMO LTE-Advanced single chip**, `winning global industry awards` alongside **Samsung** and Ericsson.
* **Kukjin Chun (Independent Director):** A premier figure in elite Asian semiconductor engineering networks. Chun is a Professor Emeritus of Electrical and Computer Engineering at **Seoul National University** and served as the President of the Institute of Electronics and Information Engineers (IEIE).
* **Dr. Jeongmin "Jeemee" Kim (CTO & VP of Engineering):** Achieved his B.S., M.S., and Ph.D. in High-Performance CPU Architecture from **Seoul National University** (**South Korea's top 0.5% elite tier**). He spent nearly a decade designing advanced multimedia ASICs for **Samsung Electronics** and handling high-performance telecom projects for Korea Telecom. `To even enter Seoul National University as an undergraduate, a student must score in the top 0.5% of the entire nation on the brutal Suneung`
* **Edmond Cheng (CFO):** Ivy League MBA (Columbia) with joint credentials from London Business School and Hong Kong University. Former CFO of Cenntro EV (where he led their IPO process), TCL Electronics, and UTStarcom. He commands a massive cross-border private equity background managing portfolio operations for global powerhouses like **The Blackstone Group, Goldman Sachs, and Temasek Holdings**.
When retail investors look at a micro-cap stock, they are usually terrified of weak leadership running out of money. GCTS has a boardroom packed with **the absolute top tier of South Korean semiconductor engineering (Chun & Lee)**, a **CFO who has managed money for Goldman Sachs and Blackstone (Cheng)**, and a **multimillionaire insider actively buying up the float with his own cash (Shin)**.
When a micro-cap company needs to sit down with **Samsung Foundry to negotiate and prepay for tight 4nm/5nm wafer production lines through 2027, they aren't viewed as an unproven U.S. startup.** They are welcomed as SNU academic and industrial peers, unlocking supply chain access that other small companies cannot buy at any price`.`
`I also got some Robotics play possible in the future but won't talk about it on this post.`
https://preview.redd.it/lvdgqiuktzjh1.png?width=1080&format=png&auto=webp&s=26cd82b60677a5bc30bcc470875aa87de55fe6b7
If you look back at my previous posts, **I explicitly predicted that GCTS would break away from the handset market to become a primary enabler of Edge AI infrastructure.**
>
>
>
>
>
>
[**https://www.reddit.com/r/pennystocks/comments/1u2fz6p/gcts\_update\_part\_4/**](https://www.reddit.com/r/pennystocks/comments/1u2fz6p/gcts_update_part_4/) **my last post and prediction on GCTS. I actually did predicted right.**
**My core thesis has been completely validated:** GCTS functions as the **Wireless Access Layer for Edge AI**. As AI workloads expand, data cannot just sit inside a massive data center in Virginia. It has to move between remote edge terminals, robotic warehouses, automated heavy tractors, and centralized clouds. **GCTS provides the secure, un-jammable pipeline that physically links the real world back to the AI core.**
https://preview.redd.it/7u0dae4qtzjh1.png?width=1080&format=png&auto=webp&s=766901aea8070127202acdb08c76df5922ee9cc1
**How GCTS Actually Builds the 6G Chip Future: The Sub-THz Physics**
To understand *how* GCTS expands into 6G, you have to look at the severe radio limitations of next-generation networks. 6G will completely shift away from traditional cellular frequencies and move into **Sub-Terahertz (sub-THz) bands (100 GHz to 300 GHz).** \[[1](https://medium.com/network-digest/the-future-of-connectivity-advantages-of-6g-over-5g-07bca9bde0cc), [2](https://www.orangemantra.com/blog/how-6g-technology-will-revolutionize-the-future-benefits-you-must-know/)\]
While sub-THz bands unlock blistering, fiber-optic-like wireless speeds capable of uploading a humanoid robot's entire 3D environmental map in milliseconds, **sub-THz signals are highly fragile.** They have almost zero range and can be completely blocked by rain, a concrete wall, or even a human hand. \[[1](https://www.manchesterdigital.com/post/ve3/role-of-6g-in-technological-breakthroughs-and-growth)\]
GCTS will conquer this bottleneck using three core proprietary technologies they are already refining today:
**RF-CMOS Integration Matrix:** Squeezing separate antenna transceivers and digital processors onto a circuit board creates too much signal noise at 100 GHz+. GCTS’s core moat is **RF-CMOS integration**—the ability to etch the high-power analog radio antennas and the digital computing brain onto the **exact same physical piece of silicon die**. This eliminates external wiring noise and maximizes signal purity.
**Extreme Beamforming & Giga-MIMO:** To stop a 6G signal from dropping when a drone twists or a humanoid robot walks behind a metal beam, the GCTS 6G chip will utilize an array of hundreds of microscopic antennas built into the silicon. Using their legacy **8-antenna (8Rx) diversity IP**, the chip runs real-time mathematical calculations to electronically bend, steer, and focus a razor-thin radio beam directly at a passing satellite or local cell hub, completely bypassing obstacles.
**Joint Sensing and Communication (JCAS):** In the 6G era, the GCTS chip changes from a simple radio into a sensor. The sub-THz radio signals don't just carry data packets—they bounce off surroundings like radar. A GCTS 6G chip will allow a drone or a Garmin watch to map a room, calculate distances, and detect moving objects **using radio waves alone**, serving as a backup navigation sensor if optical cameras fail. \[[1](https://nextage.com.br/blog/en/the-6g-revolution/)\]
https://preview.redd.it/5mokv76vtzjh1.png?width=733&format=png&auto=webp&s=dd93bc6eb7ab29d800670c2ee54db83a037acccd
stream real-time 3D sensory maps to cloud AI brains. \* Autonomous UAVs (Skydio/Teal): Utilizes JCAS radar circuits to act as an un-jammable backup navigation system if optical cameras are blinded by fog or combat disruption. \* Industrial Fleets (John Deere/Caterpillar): Features Adaptive Spectrum Management, keeping heavy mining and farm equipment connected by automatically hopping between ground 6G towers and LEO satellites. \* Edge AI Infrastructure (MaxLinear Gateways): Forms an indestructible wireless last-mile safety ring around hospitals and smart factories, instantly rerouting data if primary fiber cables fail. \* Rugged Wearables (Garmin): Consolidates three separate components into a single-die architecture, giving next-generation smartwatches true two-way satellite texting capabilities without destroying battery life.
Although, 6G is still far away I see the roadmap of how they will make it all connect and build up based on their 4G-5G chips foundation to be in the new gen connectivity.
[](https://preview.redd.it/reversing-q2-losses-via-multi-mode-combo-architecture-the-v0-tecurclxezjh1.png?width=1280&format=png&auto=webp&s=2246da0df23a79b113839cda5af8ac59e31f4381)

Lack of credible biological rationale suitable for an impending phase 3 readout (WT1 as a general target, cancer "vaccines" in general, this specific cancer "vaccine" and it's proposed mechanism, lack of previous controlled data for GPS)
Small sample size giving little statistical room for manoeuvre
Trial design: no attempt to enrich recruitment for likely responders or even understand who the responders might be
Lack of stop at interim for efficacy constrains the lower bound of a hazard ratio
Trial heavily influenced by unknown data points which SLS has access to but hasn't released (baseline cytogenetics and other characteristics of cohort, post randomisation transplants)
Lack of confidence in management due to repeated instances of lack of integrity or misrepresentation when presenting data about REGAL or about their own credentials

Please direct me to them, they never get shared, legitimately. Every time a beat comes around it’s either “most biotechs fail” or just pure nonsense. We are all well aware most biotechs fail, and I am more than willing to entertain bear arguments, it helps me either build or refute my own investment thesis.
The closest to legitimate bear thesis out there maybe attack Sterg’s credibility, or point out that the elongated trial does not indicate GPS is driving the trial length (there certainly is major selection criteria that will boost BAT), but in my research any bear argument has been well refuted. This is not to say success is guaranteed, but only that any attempt to refute my reason for investing has only strengthened my case for stay the course.
Perhaps another bear argument could be against WT1 or cancer vaccines in general and their track record, but none has been tested with this particular mechanism of action and in this line of treatment, so does that really apply?
Anything I’m missing?

There is no placebo arm. There is the GPS arm and the BAT arm.