FIAT
YieldMax Short COIN Option Income Strategy ETF
stock NYSE ETF

Let me add a new case from today. I tried to send some FIAT money from one of my accounts to another account that is also in my name. In Europe, banks are now required to check that the recipient's name matches the account holder's name to help prevent scams.
Guess what? It was flagged as possible fraud three times. Even after answering all the security questions and confirming that I was making the transfer myself, they still didn't believe me. And the best part? The transfer was only €1,000. The sender is me, the recipient is me, and both banks are in my own country.
I completely understand the need for fraud protection, but this is excessive to the point where the service becomes unusable. There should either be some kind of opt-out for users who are willing to accept the risk, or at the very least the checks should be much more logical and context-aware. Not every transaction is a high-risk event, especially when the sender and recipient have the exact same name and both accounts are in the same country.

I read a little about mechanisms you mentioned bc I didn't know them. PIVX’s LLMQ/ChainLocks provide strong finality, but they do not completely eliminate the chain selection problem. A node that has been offline for a long time still needs a trusted checkpoint or assumption about the correct historical state. The signatures prove who approved a chain, not independently that it is the canonical history from genesis.
Also, in PoS system, money goes to people that already have money, rich get richer, just like in FIAT.
Also when you are so worried about energy waste, you should remember that bitcoin promotes cheap energy. Finally only green energy will be used for mining.
This PIVX thing has no chance to survive. Ultimate shitcoin.

Let me add a new case from today. I tried to send some FIAT money from one of my accounts to another account that is also in my name. In Europe, banks are now required to check that the recipient's name matches the account holder's name to help prevent scams.
Guess what? It was flagged as possible fraud three times. Even after answering all the security questions and confirming that I was making the transfer myself, they still didn't believe me. And the best part? The transfer was only €1,000. The sender is me, the recipient is me, and both banks are in my own country.
I completely understand the need for fraud protection, but this is excessive to the point where the service becomes unusable. There should either be some kind of opt-out for users who are willing to accept the risk, or at the very least the checks should be much more logical and context-aware. Not every transaction is a high-risk event, especially when the sender and recipient have the exact same name and both accounts are in the same country.

I read a little about mechanisms you mentioned bc I didn't know them. PIVX’s LLMQ/ChainLocks provide strong finality, but they do not completely eliminate the chain selection problem. A node that has been offline for a long time still needs a trusted checkpoint or assumption about the correct historical state. The signatures prove who approved a chain, not independently that it is the canonical history from genesis.
Also, in PoS system, money goes to people that already have money, rich get richer, just like in FIAT.
Also when you are so worried about energy waste, you should remember that bitcoin promotes cheap energy. Finally only green energy will be used for mining.
This PIVX thing has no chance to survive. Ultimate shitcoin.