Create Account
Log In
Dark
chart
exchange
Premium
Terminal
Screener
Stocks
Crypto
Forex
Trends
Depth
Close
Check out our Level2View

CPSU
Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF - June
stock NYSE ETF

At Close
Jul 31, 2026 12:02:45 PM EDT
27.70USD+0.181%(+0.05)1,320
27.83Bid   27.90Ask   0.07Spread
Pre-market
0.00USD0.000%(0.00)0
After-hours
Aug 4, 2026 4:10:30 PM EDT
27.88USD+0.647%(+0.18)3
OverviewHistoricalExchange VolumeDark Pool LevelsDark Pool PrintsExchangesShort VolumeShort Interest - DailyShort InterestBorrow Fee (CTB)Failure to Deliver (FTD)ShortsTrends
CPSU Reddit Mentions
Subreddits
Limit Labels     

We have sentiment values and mention counts going back to 2017. The complete data set is available via the API.
Take me to the API
CPSU Specific Mentions
As of Aug 5, 2026 12:11:50 PM EDT (1 min. ago)
Includes all comments and posts. Mentions per user per ticker capped at one per hour.
72 days ago • u/laurenthu • r/ETFs • bnd_vs_buffer_spy_performance_throughout_2008_and • C
Interesting compare but I think the 5% cap blanket is doing a lot of the heavy lifting. Buffer ETFs reprice the cap on each reset based on prevailing option pricing, so 2010-2019 vintages would've had caps closer to 7-10% in low-vol windows, not a flat 5%. That probably moves the buffer line meaningfully closer to SPY and farther from BND.
The other thing is they do different jobs - BND pays a coupon and is rate-sensitive, the buffer flattens both tails and pays nothing if you stay below the cap. So even with the same CAGR they're not interchangeable in a portfolio. I'd rather hold BND because at least the carry is real money, the buffer is essentially paying an insurance premium every year.
Could be off on the exact cap mechanics for MAXJ/CPSU specifically but the general point holds - care to redo the test with vintage-realistic caps?
sentiment 0.82
72 days ago • u/laurenthu • r/ETFs • bnd_vs_buffer_spy_performance_throughout_2008_and • C
Interesting compare but I think the 5% cap blanket is doing a lot of the heavy lifting. Buffer ETFs reprice the cap on each reset based on prevailing option pricing, so 2010-2019 vintages would've had caps closer to 7-10% in low-vol windows, not a flat 5%. That probably moves the buffer line meaningfully closer to SPY and farther from BND.
The other thing is they do different jobs - BND pays a coupon and is rate-sensitive, the buffer flattens both tails and pays nothing if you stay below the cap. So even with the same CAGR they're not interchangeable in a portfolio. I'd rather hold BND because at least the carry is real money, the buffer is essentially paying an insurance premium every year.
Could be off on the exact cap mechanics for MAXJ/CPSU specifically but the general point holds - care to redo the test with vintage-realistic caps?
sentiment 0.82


Share
About
Pricing
Policies
Markets
API
Info
tz UTC-4
Connect with us
ChartExchange Email
ChartExchange on Discord
ChartExchange on X
ChartExchange on Reddit
ChartExchange on GitHub
ChartExchange on YouTube
© 2020 - 2026 ChartExchange LLC