BFRZ
Innovator Equity Managed 100 Buffer ETF
stock NYSE ETF

These can be used as a complement to a portfolio. Sometimes, these on their own thry are not the best, or they have to be structured properly. For example, the dual directional is great when you ladder it quarterly, starting at the beginning of the year. Thus, you expose yourself to prices of rolling volatility and limit cap drag. You can turn a year of large losses into small positive gains or smaller negative losses. Also, you can combine it with the managed floor to create a convex position. Or, I have seen XUSP+SFLR+BFRZ used to create convex upside with a hard floor and then added treasuries for an extra tail-end pop when needed. They are difficult to model over a long period because you have to know how to drive the dynamic caps during periods of high and low implied volatility. If you use these right, you can create a superior CAGR compared to a traditional portfolio. To get the best of this, you have to know how to use and look at it from a financial engineering and replication standpoint. So, you could possibly take a total equity ETF like SPGM and use Innovator ETFs like XUSP+SFLR+BFRZ + treasuries to probably create superior long-term CAGR and upside volatility and lower drawdown.
P.S. This is not 100% financial advice, and these are examples of how these could be used. Always do your own individual research and/or consult a financial professional.

These can be used as a complement to a portfolio. Sometimes, these on their own thry are not the best, or they have to be structured properly. For example, the dual directional is great when you ladder it quarterly, starting at the beginning of the year. Thus, you expose yourself to prices of rolling volatility and limit cap drag. You can turn a year of large losses into small positive gains or smaller negative losses. Also, you can combine it with the managed floor to create a convex position. Or, I have seen XUSP+SFLR+BFRZ used to create convex upside with a hard floor and then added treasuries for an extra tail-end pop when needed. They are difficult to model over a long period because you have to know how to drive the dynamic caps during periods of high and low implied volatility. If you use these right, you can create a superior CAGR compared to a traditional portfolio. To get the best of this, you have to know how to use and look at it from a financial engineering and replication standpoint. So, you could possibly take a total equity ETF like SPGM and use Innovator ETFs like XUSP+SFLR+BFRZ + treasuries to probably create superior long-term CAGR and upside volatility and lower drawdown.
P.S. This is not 100% financial advice, and these are examples of how these could be used. Always do your own individual research and/or consult a financial professional.