BBBY
Bed Bath & Beyond, Inc.
stock NYSE

Hi, i wrote similair text my self as this below, but i'm not a native English speaker so i had AI fix my typos and structure of my post.
(Dont hate please)
\------------------------------------
I've spent some time looking into [bbbyq.com](http://bbbyq.com) to see what can actually be verified and what is still speculation.
The frontend HTML and JavaScript I analyzed do not show anything malicious. There is no wallet functionality, token functionality, external JavaScript, hidden network request, redirect, or other action programmed to happen when the timer reaches zero.
In the version I analyzed, the timer simply reaches `00:00:00` and stops.
However, this does NOT tell us what is happening on the server side, and it does not tell us what the operator may serve in the future.
The operator can replace the HTML/JavaScript being served by the website at any time, including when the countdown ends. We also cannot determine from the frontend source what server-side logging exists or what request metadata may be retained.
So I would still be careful.
# The Greg connection
From what can currently be observed on X:
* Greg follows the `beebeebeewhyQ` account.
* `beebeebeewhyQ` follows Greg.
* `beebeebeewhyQ` also appears to subscribe to Greg.
* Greg appears to be the account's only follow/subscription.
That is interesting, but it does NOT prove that Greg owns the account or has anything to do with bbbyq.com.
If someone has access to a service that historically tracks X follow relationships, it would be interesting to determine **when Greg first followed** `beebeebeewhyQ`.
The timing could matter.
If Greg followed the account before the website started spreading publicly, that would be more interesting than if he followed it after the website had already become popular in the BBBY/GME community.
Even then, it would still not prove ownership.
Greg himself also remains an anonymous internet personality. I have not found a statement from him saying that he owns, operates, commissioned, or is otherwise involved with bbbyq.com.
# beebeebeewhyQ
The website explicitly links to the X account u/beebeebeewhyQ, and directly below that link the page says:
"Love,
greg"
We do not know who controls u/beebeebeewhyQ.
The website deliberately associates itself with that account, but a website linking to an X account does not prove that the same person controls both.
Likewise, writing "Love, greg" does not authenticate Greg as the person behind it.
# Wayback / historical information
I've checked the Wayback Machine and other publicly available historical information, but I haven't found anything that reliably establishes a relationship between [bbbyq.com](http://bbbyq.com) and GameStop, Greg, `beebeebeewhyQ`, buybuy BABY, or an official BBBY-related entity.
I only briefly investigated some of the archive history, so absence of evidence here should not be interpreted as proof that no historical evidence exists.
There was discussion about this exact domain in 2024.
An archived forum discussion from October 1, 2024 repeated a claim that [bbbyq.com](http://bbbyq.com) was connected to buybuy BABY through Shopify.
That is an anonymous forum claim.
A redirect or link from one website to another does not prove common ownership. Anyone controlling a website can redirect visitors to another domain.
Likewise, sharing Shopify infrastructure does not by itself establish common ownership.
So there is currently no evidence I would consider sufficient to establish that the 2024 website was officially connected to buybuy BABY.
More importantly, we cannot currently establish that whoever controlled [bbbyq.com](http://bbbyq.com) in 2024 is the same person controlling it today.
# Domain history
There is one particularly interesting finding.
**August 2, 2024:**
[`bbbyq.com`](http://bbbyq.com) appears in ABTdomain's list of newly registered `.com` domains.
**September 25, 2026:**
[`bbbyq.com`](http://bbbyq.com) appears again in a separate service's list of newly registered `.com` domains.
That second observation occurred only a few days before the current countdown appeared.
This could potentially mean that:
* the 2024 registration expired or was deleted and the domain was registered again;
* the domain temporarily disappeared from the `.com` zone and later reappeared;
* the same owner re-registered it;
* a completely different person registered it;
* or one of these third-party "new domain" datasets classified the event differently from the authoritative registry.
Without authoritative historical WHOIS/RDAP data, we cannot determine which explanation is correct.
Therefore, I would NOT assume that the person behind the 2024 version of [bbbyq.com](http://bbbyq.com) is the same person behind the 2026 version.
I was also unable to obtain useful authoritative historical RDAP/WHOIS or certificate-registration information that identifies the operator.
# One interesting clue in the source code
The countdown is deliberately configured for:
**September 29, 2026 at 9:00 PM Central Time (America/Chicago)**
That timezone is explicitly written into the source code.
Interestingly, September 29, 2026 is exactly three years after the old Bed Bath & Beyond Chapter 11 plan became effective on **September 29, 2023**.
That makes a deliberate BBBY reference plausible.
However, an anniversary reference is very different from evidence that an actual corporate or financial event will happen on that date.
I haven't found an explanation for why **9:00 PM Central Time** specifically was chosen.
# Followers
A number of recognizable BBBY/BBBYQ-related accounts appear to follow `beebeebeewhyQ`.
That is interesting, but it is weak evidence by itself.
The account and website are now spreading through BBBY/GME forums and X, so many of those people could simply have followed the account after seeing everyone discussing it.
The more interesting relationship is Greg himself apparently following the account, especially since `beebeebeewhyQ` appears to follow only Greg.
But until we know **when that relationship began**, or Greg publicly acknowledges the project, we should not assume he is behind it.
I've followed Greg's account since around 2021, and my personal impression is that he does not follow everyone despite having roughly 2.1 million followers. That makes the follow interesting to me personally, but this is an observation/opinion — not evidence of ownership.
# Bottom line
* **Be careful.** We do not know who controls this website.
* The HTML and JavaScript I analyzed contain **no malicious functionality that I could identify** and no hidden action waiting for the countdown to reach zero.
* That does NOT guarantee that future versions of the website will contain the same code. Whoever controls the server can replace the page at any time.
* If the website suddenly promotes a cryptocurrency, token, presale, wallet connection, investment, or asks you to sign a wallet transaction, do not assume it is legitimate because of the Greg references or the accounts following it.
* Look for independent confirmation from a verified source before trusting anything involving money, credentials, or a wallet.
* We cannot determine from the frontend source what server-side request logging exists. As with ordinary websites, visiting it necessarily exposes connection/request metadata such as your IP address to infrastructure serving the request.
* At the moment, this looks consistent with someone creating a **BBBYQ-community teaser/mystery project**.
Whether that ultimately turns out to be something positive, a joke, marketing, or something less legitimate is currently unknown.
I'm skeptical, but I'm trying to separate that skepticism from what can actually be demonstrated.
For my investigation, I retrieved and analyzed the publicly served source through an isolated environment rather than interacting with the website through my normal browser environment.
This post isn't intended to spread negativity or accuse anyone of running a scam.
The purpose is to separate **what we can verify from what we're speculating about**, and to remind people in the community to be careful until we know who is actually behind it.
/Cybersecurity Specialist

They just insist that it's all happening behind the scenes. BBBY apes still worship Pulte even though he cut ties with all of them and hasn't said a word about BBBY, MMTLP, naked short selling, etc. since he got nominated for his government job.

i just accept their semantic inversion as something that cults do, and further evidence that they're in a cult.
But also:

1. yes, you are wrong about the NOL value. When they existed, they could have offset \~2B in income (eg: 2B \* 0.21). For any company that substantially continued the operations of BBBY, including their existing stores, etc. But those stores were closed.
2. Why would a $50 billion acquisition result in the merged corporation being taxed its market cap? That doesn't make any sense.
Do these people just see numbers and misunderstand them immediately, then post about them?

I'm just grabbing this from my faulty brain-memory but its like 2023 09 30 or something, so September 30th, 2023. Like the date they sold off the BBBY name and created the entity that holds its corpse. Wow! We're 4 days away from butterfly's birthday!

Some of these "Investors" are so wrong I don't even know where to begin with them.
1. GME did not buy a massive stake in the at-the-time BBBY (lately known as BBBYQ), as the title says, it would have been disclosed to the SEC.
2. Even if GME owned such stake, all the shares have been deleted and don't exist anymore, so it's irrelevant; owning a stake of BBBYQ is as meaningful as owning a stake of the Hanging Gardens of Babylon.
3. BBBYQ is never coming back: the company failed to pay the creditors and declared bankruptcy, nearly all the assets have been sold, there is nothing left of the original company outside of a bunch of assets that wait to be squeezed up to the last cent.
4. The Ebay acquisition is never happening, it's a chapter that was never really opened to begin with and never had the chance to happen, members of the Ebay board of administration don't even remember it happening and rightfully so, they have more important things to deal with rather than entertain ridiculous buy out offers.

It’s blatantly obvious that the SEC is just under an NDA and it can’t tell anyone about GME buying BBBY

Already hyping themselves up for another Thanksgiving of *Yea, I still live in the basement, but I've been checking out mansions that I'll be buying with by BBBY payout. There's a lot of signals that we'll get paid out by Summer 2027 at the latest.*

Imagine going back FIVE years in Super Stonk, and telling BBBY Apes having 50 millions in the bank because of BBBY MOASS was foolish, and the true flex was being wiped out worthless.