Create Account
Log In
Dark
chart
exchange
Premium
Terminal
Screener
Stocks
Crypto
Forex
Trends
Depth
Close
Check out our Level2View

STRL
Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. Common Stock
stock NASDAQ

At Close
Sep 30, 2026 3:59:56 PM EDT
491.63USD-2.636%(-13.31)544,435
0.00Bid   0.00Ask   0.00Spread
Pre-market
Sep 30, 2026 9:24:30 AM EDT
507.00USD+0.408%(+2.06)1,291
After-hours
Sep 30, 2026 4:59:30 PM EDT
493.75USD+0.431%(+2.12)771
OverviewOption ChainMax PainOptionsHistoricalExchange VolumeDark Pool LevelsDark Pool PrintsExchangesShort VolumeShort Interest - DailyShort InterestBorrow Fee (CTB)Failure to Deliver (FTD)ShortsTrendsNewsTrends
STRL Reddit Mentions
Subreddits
Limit Labels     

We have sentiment values and mention counts going back to 2017. The complete data set is available via the API.
Take me to the API
STRL Specific Mentions
As of Oct 1, 2026 2:15:23 AM EDT (1 min. ago)
Includes all comments and posts. Mentions per user per ticker capped at one per hour.
20 hr ago • u/Twisteesmt • r/ValueInvesting • which_stocks_are_you_holding_for_the_next_20 • C
I been doing more research let me know what you think
# Growth Stocks Research — Concise Report
**As of 30 September 2026**
# 1. Objective
The purpose of this research was to identify **genuine growth stocks with potential for further fundamental rerating**, rather than simply companies with high historical growth.
Your investment framework prioritises:
* Revenue acceleration
* Operating leverage and margin expansion
* Improving unit economics
* Rising EPS
* Strong/free-cash-flow potential
* Large credible markets
* Underappreciated business change
* Valuation versus implied future growth
* Catalysts over the next 12–24 months
* Risk-adjusted returns and opportunity cost
The framework explicitly allows **“wait”, “watchlist” or “no trade”** when valuation or evidence is insufficient.
# 2. Initial growth-stock universe
The research identified the following broad groups:
# AI / semiconductor infrastructure
**NVDA, CRDO, ANET, MU, SNDK, FN, AEIS, SIMO**
# AI power / data-centre infrastructure
**VRT, PWR, FIX, STRL, MOD, FPS**
# Software / AI monetisation
**APP, PLTR, RDDT, GLBE, CRWD, AVPT**
The key conclusion was that **AI infrastructure should not be viewed purely as GPU exposure**.
The broader investment chain is:
**AI models → GPUs → networking → memory → power → cooling → data-centre construction → grid infrastructure**
This creates opportunities well beyond NVIDIA.
# 3. Most interesting companies from the Excel screener
The uploaded screener contained approximately **340 stocks**.
The strongest fundamental candidates identified were:
|Stock|Revenue growth|5Y Revenue CAGR|5Y EBIT CAGR|5Y FCF CAGR|
|:-|:-|:-|:-|:-|
|**FPS**|**78.0%**|**34.9%**|**61.5%**|**164.6%**|
|**CRDO**|**86.1%**|**35.5%**|**49.1%**|**83.3%**|
|**SIMO**|**111.0%**|12.4%|34.1%|**150.2%**|
|**STRL**|**64.2%**|**25.3%**|31.9%|30.3%|
|**RDDT**|**53.4%**|**29.3%**|43.1%|66.2%|
|**GLBE**|**38.9%**|**22.6%**|**54.6%**|31.3%|
|**FN**|**31.1%**|**22.3%**|39.0%|**119.3%**|
|**AEIS**|**34.9%**|18.3%|**45.0%**|78.0%|
|**MOD**|**27.6%**|**22.8%**|42.0%|78.4%|
|**AVPT**|21.7%|**23.4%**|**55.1%**|43.0%|
These numbers are **screening projections**, not guarantees.
# 4. Key company conclusions
# FPS — Forgent Power Solutions
Potentially the most interesting discovery.
Excel projections:
* Revenue: **+78%**
* 5Y revenue CAGR: **34.9%**
* EBIT CAGR: **61.5%**
* FCF CAGR: **164.6%**
Actual FY2026:
* Revenue **+89%**
* Net income **+508%**
* Adjusted EBITDA **+163%**
* Bookings **+375%**
* Backlog **+256%**
* FY2027 revenue guidance: **$2.4–2.6bn**
* EBITDA guidance: **$575–625m**
**Thesis:** AI/data-centre power infrastructure with significant operating leverage.
# CRDO — Credo Technology
Excel:
* Revenue growth: **86.1%**
* 5Y revenue CAGR: **35.5%**
* EBIT CAGR: **49.1%**
* FCF CAGR: **83.3%**
Latest quarter:
* Revenue: **$479m**
* YoY growth: **114.7%**
* Net income growth: **140%**
* Non-GAAP gross margin: approximately **68%**
* Next-quarter revenue guidance: **$525–535m**
**Thesis:** One of the cleanest high-growth AI networking/connectivity businesses.
**Main risk:** valuation and the assumption that extremely high growth persists.
# STRL — Sterling Infrastructure
Excel:
* Revenue growth: **64.2%**
* 5Y revenue CAGR: **25.3%**
* EBIT CAGR: **31.9%**
* FCF CAGR: **30.3%**
Actual Q2:
* Revenue **+90%**
* Organic growth \~**50%**
* Net income **+120%**
* EBITDA **+104%**
* Backlog **+116%**
* 2026 revenue guidance: approximately **$4.0–4.15bn**
**Thesis:** Data-centre infrastructure beneficiary without being a semiconductor company.
# GLBE — Global-e
Excel:
* Revenue growth: **38.9%**
* 5Y revenue CAGR: **22.6%**
* EBIT CAGR: **54.6%**
* Net-income CAGR: **54.2%**
Actual Q2:
* GMV **+44%**
* Revenue **+39%**
* Adjusted EBITDA margin **20.9%**
* Margin expansion: **+300 bps**
**Thesis:** Strong revenue growth combined with operating leverage.
# RDDT — Reddit
Excel:
* Revenue growth: **53.4%**
* 5Y revenue CAGR: **29.3%**
* EBIT CAGR: **43.1%**
* FCF CAGR: **66.2%**
Actual Q2:
* Revenue **+61%**
* DAUq **+18%**
* WAUq **+24%**
* Net income **+183%**
* EBITDA **+106%**
* FCF **+135%**
**Thesis:** User growth is translating into substantially faster monetisation and cash-flow growth.
# FN — Fabrinet
Excel:
* Revenue growth: **31.1%**
* 5Y revenue CAGR: **22.3%**
* EBIT CAGR: **39.0%**
* FCF CAGR: **119.3%**
Actual FY2026:
* Revenue **+36%**
* Revenue: **$4.64bn**
* Q4 revenue **+45%**
* EPS: **$13.05 vs $9.17**
**Thesis:** Less obvious optical/AI infrastructure exposure with strong cash-flow economics.
# AEIS — Advanced Energy Industries
Excel:
* Revenue growth: **34.9%**
* 5Y revenue CAGR: **18.3%**
* EBIT CAGR: **45.0%**
* FCF CAGR: **78.0%**
Q2 2026:
* Revenue **+30%**
* Semiconductor revenue **+33%**
* Data-centre revenue **+35%**
* Gross margin: **41.9%**
* Operating cash flow: **$86m**
Management expected data-centre revenue to grow **>50% in 2026**.
**Thesis:** Power conversion + semiconductor/data-centre exposure.
# MOD — Modine
Excel:
* Revenue growth: **27.6%**
* 5Y revenue CAGR: **22.8%**
* EBIT CAGR: **42.0%**
* FCF CAGR: **78.4%**
Q1 FY2027:
* Revenue **+28%**
* EPS **+44%**
* Data-centre revenue **+90%**
* FY2027 sales outlook **+20–35%**
**Thesis:** Thermal-management/cooling exposure to data centres.
# 5. Important cyclical candidates
# MU — Micron
Not a conventional long-duration compounder, but a major **earnings inflection**.
Q3 FY2026:
* Revenue: **$41.46bn**
* Prior-year quarter: **$9.30bn**
* Operating cash flow: **$25.39bn**
* Net income: **$28.24bn**
The thesis is:
**HBM + AI memory demand → dramatically higher earnings → potential valuation rerating.**
The risk is that memory remains cyclical.
# SIMO — Silicon Motion
Excel:
* Revenue growth: **111%**
* EPS growth: **206%**
* EBIT growth: **411%**
* FCF CAGR: **150%**
Very attractive numbers, but much of this represents **earnings/base-effect acceleration**.
Therefore:
**High-growth/inflection trade rather than automatically a 10-year compounder.**
# SNDK
Extremely strong AI-storage/memory earnings story, but the share price had already increased roughly **1,400%+ over the preceding year**.
Therefore the central question becomes:
>How much of the future earnings improvement is already priced in?
# 6. Mega-cap growth
# NVDA
Still unquestionably a growth company:
* Q2 FY2027 revenue: **$96.2bn**
* Revenue growth: **+106%**
* Data-centre revenue: **$89bn**
* Data-centre growth: **+117%**
* Gross margin: **75%**
However, NVIDIA is now a **mega-cap growth company**, not an early-stage growth discovery.
The investment challenge is the amount of future growth already embedded in its valuation.
# PLTR
Fundamentally exceptional:
* Q2 revenue: **$1.935bn**
* Revenue growth: **+93%**
* U.S. commercial revenue: **+149%**
* Adjusted operating margin: **62%**
* 2026 revenue-growth guidance: approximately **82%**
But valuation was extremely demanding, around **99× forward earnings** in the data reviewed.
Therefore:
**Excellent growth business ≠ automatically attractive investment at any price.**
# APP
One of the more interesting growth/valuation combinations:
* Q2 revenue: **$1.924bn**
* Revenue growth: **+53%**
* EBITDA growth: **+58%**
* FCF: **$863m**
APP's AI-driven advertising platform is generating substantial operating leverage.
# 7. Names requiring caution
The screener produces some spectacular-looking numbers that need interpretation.
# KLIC
* EPS growth: **98,148%**
* EBIT growth: **2,781%**
* 5Y EBIT CAGR: **113%**
These numbers are dominated by a low/base-effect situation and should **not** be interpreted as sustainable 98,000% growth.
# HUBS
* EPS growth: **1,452%**
* EBIT growth: **6,054%**
But actual revenue growth is closer to the high-teens.
# APPN
* EPS growth: **6,482%**
* EBIT growth: **720%**
Again, largely an earnings-recovery/operating-leverage effect rather than equivalent revenue growth.
# 8. Final research shortlist
After combining the **Excel projections + actual operating evidence + business quality**, the most interesting group became:
# Highest-priority research
**FPS** — power distribution / data centres
**CRDO** — AI connectivity
**STRL** — data-centre infrastructure
**GLBE** — e-commerce infrastructure
**RDDT** — advertising/platform monetisation
**FN** — optical/AI manufacturing
**AEIS** — power conversion
**MOD** — thermal/data-centre infrastructure
# Secondary
**SIMO** — storage/controller inflection
**MU** — HBM/memory cycle
**AVPT** — software compounder
**NVT** — electrical/data-centre infrastructure
**SANM** — electronics manufacturing
**GRAB** — platform growth
**FLYW** — fintech/software
**GWRE** — insurance software
**TOST** — restaurant software/payments
# High-quality but valuation-sensitive
**NVDA**
**ANET**
**PLTR**
**APP**
**CRWD**
# 9. Overall conclusion
The research changed the focus from simply asking:
>**“Which stocks are growing fastest?”**
to:
>**“Which companies have accelerating fundamentals that the market may not yet have fully priced?”**
The most interesting **fundamental inflection candidates from the spreadsheet** are:
**FPS → CRDO → STRL → GLBE → RDDT → FN → AEIS → MOD**
The most interesting **cyclical earnings-inflation candidates** are:
**MU → SIMO → SNDK**
The **mega-cap/established growth leaders** are:
**NVDA → ANET → PLTR → APP → CRWD**
The biggest unresolved question is **valuation**. Your spreadsheet establishes the growth side very well, but the next stage needs to determine whether these companies are **cheap, fairly valued or already priced for near-perfect execution**. Your framework explicitly identifies this as a required question before making an investment decision.
**Bottom line:** the research has reduced the original \~340-stock universe to roughly **8–15 names worth serious second-stage due diligence**, with **FPS and CRDO standing out most strongly from the combination of projected growth and current fundamental evidence.**
sentiment 1.00
20 hr ago • u/Twisteesmt • r/ValueInvesting • which_stocks_are_you_holding_for_the_next_20 • C
I been doing more research let me know what you think
# Growth Stocks Research — Concise Report
**As of 30 September 2026**
# 1. Objective
The purpose of this research was to identify **genuine growth stocks with potential for further fundamental rerating**, rather than simply companies with high historical growth.
Your investment framework prioritises:
* Revenue acceleration
* Operating leverage and margin expansion
* Improving unit economics
* Rising EPS
* Strong/free-cash-flow potential
* Large credible markets
* Underappreciated business change
* Valuation versus implied future growth
* Catalysts over the next 12–24 months
* Risk-adjusted returns and opportunity cost
The framework explicitly allows **“wait”, “watchlist” or “no trade”** when valuation or evidence is insufficient.
# 2. Initial growth-stock universe
The research identified the following broad groups:
# AI / semiconductor infrastructure
**NVDA, CRDO, ANET, MU, SNDK, FN, AEIS, SIMO**
# AI power / data-centre infrastructure
**VRT, PWR, FIX, STRL, MOD, FPS**
# Software / AI monetisation
**APP, PLTR, RDDT, GLBE, CRWD, AVPT**
The key conclusion was that **AI infrastructure should not be viewed purely as GPU exposure**.
The broader investment chain is:
**AI models → GPUs → networking → memory → power → cooling → data-centre construction → grid infrastructure**
This creates opportunities well beyond NVIDIA.
# 3. Most interesting companies from the Excel screener
The uploaded screener contained approximately **340 stocks**.
The strongest fundamental candidates identified were:
|Stock|Revenue growth|5Y Revenue CAGR|5Y EBIT CAGR|5Y FCF CAGR|
|:-|:-|:-|:-|:-|
|**FPS**|**78.0%**|**34.9%**|**61.5%**|**164.6%**|
|**CRDO**|**86.1%**|**35.5%**|**49.1%**|**83.3%**|
|**SIMO**|**111.0%**|12.4%|34.1%|**150.2%**|
|**STRL**|**64.2%**|**25.3%**|31.9%|30.3%|
|**RDDT**|**53.4%**|**29.3%**|43.1%|66.2%|
|**GLBE**|**38.9%**|**22.6%**|**54.6%**|31.3%|
|**FN**|**31.1%**|**22.3%**|39.0%|**119.3%**|
|**AEIS**|**34.9%**|18.3%|**45.0%**|78.0%|
|**MOD**|**27.6%**|**22.8%**|42.0%|78.4%|
|**AVPT**|21.7%|**23.4%**|**55.1%**|43.0%|
These numbers are **screening projections**, not guarantees.
# 4. Key company conclusions
# FPS — Forgent Power Solutions
Potentially the most interesting discovery.
Excel projections:
* Revenue: **+78%**
* 5Y revenue CAGR: **34.9%**
* EBIT CAGR: **61.5%**
* FCF CAGR: **164.6%**
Actual FY2026:
* Revenue **+89%**
* Net income **+508%**
* Adjusted EBITDA **+163%**
* Bookings **+375%**
* Backlog **+256%**
* FY2027 revenue guidance: **$2.4–2.6bn**
* EBITDA guidance: **$575–625m**
**Thesis:** AI/data-centre power infrastructure with significant operating leverage.
# CRDO — Credo Technology
Excel:
* Revenue growth: **86.1%**
* 5Y revenue CAGR: **35.5%**
* EBIT CAGR: **49.1%**
* FCF CAGR: **83.3%**
Latest quarter:
* Revenue: **$479m**
* YoY growth: **114.7%**
* Net income growth: **140%**
* Non-GAAP gross margin: approximately **68%**
* Next-quarter revenue guidance: **$525–535m**
**Thesis:** One of the cleanest high-growth AI networking/connectivity businesses.
**Main risk:** valuation and the assumption that extremely high growth persists.
# STRL — Sterling Infrastructure
Excel:
* Revenue growth: **64.2%**
* 5Y revenue CAGR: **25.3%**
* EBIT CAGR: **31.9%**
* FCF CAGR: **30.3%**
Actual Q2:
* Revenue **+90%**
* Organic growth \~**50%**
* Net income **+120%**
* EBITDA **+104%**
* Backlog **+116%**
* 2026 revenue guidance: approximately **$4.0–4.15bn**
**Thesis:** Data-centre infrastructure beneficiary without being a semiconductor company.
# GLBE — Global-e
Excel:
* Revenue growth: **38.9%**
* 5Y revenue CAGR: **22.6%**
* EBIT CAGR: **54.6%**
* Net-income CAGR: **54.2%**
Actual Q2:
* GMV **+44%**
* Revenue **+39%**
* Adjusted EBITDA margin **20.9%**
* Margin expansion: **+300 bps**
**Thesis:** Strong revenue growth combined with operating leverage.
# RDDT — Reddit
Excel:
* Revenue growth: **53.4%**
* 5Y revenue CAGR: **29.3%**
* EBIT CAGR: **43.1%**
* FCF CAGR: **66.2%**
Actual Q2:
* Revenue **+61%**
* DAUq **+18%**
* WAUq **+24%**
* Net income **+183%**
* EBITDA **+106%**
* FCF **+135%**
**Thesis:** User growth is translating into substantially faster monetisation and cash-flow growth.
# FN — Fabrinet
Excel:
* Revenue growth: **31.1%**
* 5Y revenue CAGR: **22.3%**
* EBIT CAGR: **39.0%**
* FCF CAGR: **119.3%**
Actual FY2026:
* Revenue **+36%**
* Revenue: **$4.64bn**
* Q4 revenue **+45%**
* EPS: **$13.05 vs $9.17**
**Thesis:** Less obvious optical/AI infrastructure exposure with strong cash-flow economics.
# AEIS — Advanced Energy Industries
Excel:
* Revenue growth: **34.9%**
* 5Y revenue CAGR: **18.3%**
* EBIT CAGR: **45.0%**
* FCF CAGR: **78.0%**
Q2 2026:
* Revenue **+30%**
* Semiconductor revenue **+33%**
* Data-centre revenue **+35%**
* Gross margin: **41.9%**
* Operating cash flow: **$86m**
Management expected data-centre revenue to grow **>50% in 2026**.
**Thesis:** Power conversion + semiconductor/data-centre exposure.
# MOD — Modine
Excel:
* Revenue growth: **27.6%**
* 5Y revenue CAGR: **22.8%**
* EBIT CAGR: **42.0%**
* FCF CAGR: **78.4%**
Q1 FY2027:
* Revenue **+28%**
* EPS **+44%**
* Data-centre revenue **+90%**
* FY2027 sales outlook **+20–35%**
**Thesis:** Thermal-management/cooling exposure to data centres.
# 5. Important cyclical candidates
# MU — Micron
Not a conventional long-duration compounder, but a major **earnings inflection**.
Q3 FY2026:
* Revenue: **$41.46bn**
* Prior-year quarter: **$9.30bn**
* Operating cash flow: **$25.39bn**
* Net income: **$28.24bn**
The thesis is:
**HBM + AI memory demand → dramatically higher earnings → potential valuation rerating.**
The risk is that memory remains cyclical.
# SIMO — Silicon Motion
Excel:
* Revenue growth: **111%**
* EPS growth: **206%**
* EBIT growth: **411%**
* FCF CAGR: **150%**
Very attractive numbers, but much of this represents **earnings/base-effect acceleration**.
Therefore:
**High-growth/inflection trade rather than automatically a 10-year compounder.**
# SNDK
Extremely strong AI-storage/memory earnings story, but the share price had already increased roughly **1,400%+ over the preceding year**.
Therefore the central question becomes:
>How much of the future earnings improvement is already priced in?
# 6. Mega-cap growth
# NVDA
Still unquestionably a growth company:
* Q2 FY2027 revenue: **$96.2bn**
* Revenue growth: **+106%**
* Data-centre revenue: **$89bn**
* Data-centre growth: **+117%**
* Gross margin: **75%**
However, NVIDIA is now a **mega-cap growth company**, not an early-stage growth discovery.
The investment challenge is the amount of future growth already embedded in its valuation.
# PLTR
Fundamentally exceptional:
* Q2 revenue: **$1.935bn**
* Revenue growth: **+93%**
* U.S. commercial revenue: **+149%**
* Adjusted operating margin: **62%**
* 2026 revenue-growth guidance: approximately **82%**
But valuation was extremely demanding, around **99× forward earnings** in the data reviewed.
Therefore:
**Excellent growth business ≠ automatically attractive investment at any price.**
# APP
One of the more interesting growth/valuation combinations:
* Q2 revenue: **$1.924bn**
* Revenue growth: **+53%**
* EBITDA growth: **+58%**
* FCF: **$863m**
APP's AI-driven advertising platform is generating substantial operating leverage.
# 7. Names requiring caution
The screener produces some spectacular-looking numbers that need interpretation.
# KLIC
* EPS growth: **98,148%**
* EBIT growth: **2,781%**
* 5Y EBIT CAGR: **113%**
These numbers are dominated by a low/base-effect situation and should **not** be interpreted as sustainable 98,000% growth.
# HUBS
* EPS growth: **1,452%**
* EBIT growth: **6,054%**
But actual revenue growth is closer to the high-teens.
# APPN
* EPS growth: **6,482%**
* EBIT growth: **720%**
Again, largely an earnings-recovery/operating-leverage effect rather than equivalent revenue growth.
# 8. Final research shortlist
After combining the **Excel projections + actual operating evidence + business quality**, the most interesting group became:
# Highest-priority research
**FPS** — power distribution / data centres
**CRDO** — AI connectivity
**STRL** — data-centre infrastructure
**GLBE** — e-commerce infrastructure
**RDDT** — advertising/platform monetisation
**FN** — optical/AI manufacturing
**AEIS** — power conversion
**MOD** — thermal/data-centre infrastructure
# Secondary
**SIMO** — storage/controller inflection
**MU** — HBM/memory cycle
**AVPT** — software compounder
**NVT** — electrical/data-centre infrastructure
**SANM** — electronics manufacturing
**GRAB** — platform growth
**FLYW** — fintech/software
**GWRE** — insurance software
**TOST** — restaurant software/payments
# High-quality but valuation-sensitive
**NVDA**
**ANET**
**PLTR**
**APP**
**CRWD**
# 9. Overall conclusion
The research changed the focus from simply asking:
>**“Which stocks are growing fastest?”**
to:
>**“Which companies have accelerating fundamentals that the market may not yet have fully priced?”**
The most interesting **fundamental inflection candidates from the spreadsheet** are:
**FPS → CRDO → STRL → GLBE → RDDT → FN → AEIS → MOD**
The most interesting **cyclical earnings-inflation candidates** are:
**MU → SIMO → SNDK**
The **mega-cap/established growth leaders** are:
**NVDA → ANET → PLTR → APP → CRWD**
The biggest unresolved question is **valuation**. Your spreadsheet establishes the growth side very well, but the next stage needs to determine whether these companies are **cheap, fairly valued or already priced for near-perfect execution**. Your framework explicitly identifies this as a required question before making an investment decision.
**Bottom line:** the research has reduced the original \~340-stock universe to roughly **8–15 names worth serious second-stage due diligence**, with **FPS and CRDO standing out most strongly from the combination of projected growth and current fundamental evidence.**
sentiment 1.00


Share
About
Pricing
Policies
Markets
API
Info
tz UTC-4
Connect with us
ChartExchange Email
ChartExchange on Discord
ChartExchange on X
ChartExchange on Reddit
ChartExchange on GitHub
ChartExchange on YouTube
© 2020 - 2026 ChartExchange LLC