Create Account
Log In
Dark
chart
exchange
Premium
Terminal
Screener
Stocks
Crypto
Forex
Trends
Depth
Close
Check out our Dark Pool Levels

LILAK
Liberty Latin America Ltd. Class C Common Stock
stock NASDAQ

Market Open
Sep 1, 2026 3:08:48 PM EDT
8.41USD-1.637%(-0.14)536,726
8.41Bid   8.42Ask   0.01Spread
Pre-market
Aug 31, 2026 9:29:58 AM EDT
8.25USD-3.509%(-0.30)0
After-hours
Aug 31, 2026 4:00:30 PM EDT
8.55USD0.000%(0.00)0
OverviewOption ChainMax PainOptionsHistoricalExchange VolumeDark Pool LevelsDark Pool PrintsExchangesShort VolumeShort Interest - DailyShort InterestBorrow Fee (CTB)Failure to Deliver (FTD)ShortsTrendsNewsTrends
LILAK Reddit Mentions
Subreddits
Limit Labels     

We have sentiment values and mention counts going back to 2017. The complete data set is available via the API.
Take me to the API
LILAK Specific Mentions
As of Sep 1, 2026 3:08:38 PM EDT (<1 min. ago)
Includes all comments and posts. Mentions per user per ticker capped at one per hour.
20 days ago • u/Apibeary • r/ValueInvesting • liberty_latin_america_lila_why_the_eps_doesnt • AI-Written Content • B
LILA has missed EPS in **five of its last six** estimated quarters.
It's also +84% off its January low, and insiders, John Malone most visibly (\~$34M since late June) have been buying all summer.
Both things can be true, because for this company GAAP EPS mostly measures currency marks and one-offs, not operations.
The mechanics are worth walking through since they apply to any LatAm/Caribbean operator carrying USD debt.
How does the FX rate affect the P&L?

Revenue earned in Chilean pesos, Costa Rican colones, Jamaican dollars translates into fewer (or more) USD each quarter. Real, but gradual.
What is remeasurement?: USD-denominated debt sits inside subsidiaries whose functional currency isn't USD. Every quarter-end, that debt gets re-marked at the closing rate through "foreign currency transaction gains (losses)", non-cash until settled, the 10-Q says so explicitly. This line swung from ($33.0M) (Q2'25) to +$9.1M (Q2'26).
The hedges themselves.
LILA runs its book "fully-swapped" (6.9% all-in borrowing cost), e.g. Costa Rica forwards with $209M/CRC 105B notionals. The swaps neutralize the economic risk — but their mark-to-market runs through earnings too: −$24.7M → +$12.7M.
Add the non-FX one-off: Q2'25 carried a $494M impairment loss. The "impairment, restructuring and other" line went $517.2M → $15.9M this quarter.
Same company, two Q2s (in $M, parentheses are losses):
|Operating Income (loss)|\+181.2|(333.0) carries the $494M impairment|
|:-|:-|:-|
|Interest expense|(167.9)|(165.4)|
|Derivatives mark, net|\+12.7|(24.7)|
|FC remeasurement, net|\+9.1|(33.0)|
|Other, net|(11.1)|(14.7)|
|Pretax Earnings (loss)|\+24.0|(570.8)|
|Income Tax|(34.6)|\+155.7|
|Net loss|(10.6)|(415.1)|
Revenue was roughly flat between these two quarters. The entire swing is the impairment not repeating and the currency marks flipping sign. The business itself improved modestly, the reported number improved by $560M.
That's a \~$595M pretax swing for the better, reported as an EPS "miss" (−0.13 vs −0.09), because sell-side EPS estimates for this name require guessing quarter-end FX rates. A four-cent miss is inside the noise band of the remeasurement line alone.
The noise is the quarterly mark. The real FX risk is structural:
LatAm-currency cash flows servicing mostly-USD debt at 4.6x net leverage, the 6.9% fully-swapped rate is the permanent price of neutralizing it (some Puerto Rico credit facilities print at 12%). Whoever bought this summer was presumably reading the other lines: Adjusted OIBDA back to YoY growth, H1 operating cash flow $259M vs $166M, adjusted FCF up $160M+ YoY, buybacks running, and a new 9% cumulative preferred layered senior to the common.
When a business is permanently hedged like this, how do you treat the swap cost in an owner-earnings build?
Sources: [Q2 10-Q](https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1712184/000171218426000130/0001712184-26-000130-index.htm) · [Q2 earnings 8-K](https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1712184/000171218426000129/0001712184-26-000129-index.htm) · [Malone Form 4s](https://www.sec.gov/cgi-bin/browse-edgar?action=getcompany&CIK=0000937797&type=4&dateb=&owner=include&count=10)
Information, not advice. I run Apibeary (filings tooling). No position in LILA or LILAK.
sentiment 0.36
20 days ago • u/Apibeary • r/ValueInvesting • liberty_latin_america_lila_why_the_eps_doesnt • AI-Written Content • B
LILA has missed EPS in **five of its last six** estimated quarters.
It's also +84% off its January low, and insiders, John Malone most visibly (\~$34M since late June) have been buying all summer.
Both things can be true, because for this company GAAP EPS mostly measures currency marks and one-offs, not operations.
The mechanics are worth walking through since they apply to any LatAm/Caribbean operator carrying USD debt.
How does the FX rate affect the P&L?

Revenue earned in Chilean pesos, Costa Rican colones, Jamaican dollars translates into fewer (or more) USD each quarter. Real, but gradual.
What is remeasurement?: USD-denominated debt sits inside subsidiaries whose functional currency isn't USD. Every quarter-end, that debt gets re-marked at the closing rate through "foreign currency transaction gains (losses)", non-cash until settled, the 10-Q says so explicitly. This line swung from ($33.0M) (Q2'25) to +$9.1M (Q2'26).
The hedges themselves.
LILA runs its book "fully-swapped" (6.9% all-in borrowing cost), e.g. Costa Rica forwards with $209M/CRC 105B notionals. The swaps neutralize the economic risk — but their mark-to-market runs through earnings too: −$24.7M → +$12.7M.
Add the non-FX one-off: Q2'25 carried a $494M impairment loss. The "impairment, restructuring and other" line went $517.2M → $15.9M this quarter.
Same company, two Q2s (in $M, parentheses are losses):
|Operating Income (loss)|\+181.2|(333.0) carries the $494M impairment|
|:-|:-|:-|
|Interest expense|(167.9)|(165.4)|
|Derivatives mark, net|\+12.7|(24.7)|
|FC remeasurement, net|\+9.1|(33.0)|
|Other, net|(11.1)|(14.7)|
|Pretax Earnings (loss)|\+24.0|(570.8)|
|Income Tax|(34.6)|\+155.7|
|Net loss|(10.6)|(415.1)|
Revenue was roughly flat between these two quarters. The entire swing is the impairment not repeating and the currency marks flipping sign. The business itself improved modestly, the reported number improved by $560M.
That's a \~$595M pretax swing for the better, reported as an EPS "miss" (−0.13 vs −0.09), because sell-side EPS estimates for this name require guessing quarter-end FX rates. A four-cent miss is inside the noise band of the remeasurement line alone.
The noise is the quarterly mark. The real FX risk is structural:
LatAm-currency cash flows servicing mostly-USD debt at 4.6x net leverage, the 6.9% fully-swapped rate is the permanent price of neutralizing it (some Puerto Rico credit facilities print at 12%). Whoever bought this summer was presumably reading the other lines: Adjusted OIBDA back to YoY growth, H1 operating cash flow $259M vs $166M, adjusted FCF up $160M+ YoY, buybacks running, and a new 9% cumulative preferred layered senior to the common.
When a business is permanently hedged like this, how do you treat the swap cost in an owner-earnings build?
Sources: [Q2 10-Q](https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1712184/000171218426000130/0001712184-26-000130-index.htm) · [Q2 earnings 8-K](https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1712184/000171218426000129/0001712184-26-000129-index.htm) · [Malone Form 4s](https://www.sec.gov/cgi-bin/browse-edgar?action=getcompany&CIK=0000937797&type=4&dateb=&owner=include&count=10)
Information, not advice. I run Apibeary (filings tooling). No position in LILA or LILAK.
sentiment 0.36


Share
About
Pricing
Policies
Markets
API
Info
tz UTC-4
Connect with us
ChartExchange Email
ChartExchange on Discord
ChartExchange on X
ChartExchange on Reddit
ChartExchange on GitHub
ChartExchange on YouTube
© 2020 - 2026 ChartExchange LLC