GPT
EA Series Trust Intelligent Alpha Atlas ETF
stock NASDAQ ETF

Thanks chat GPT.

I don't even know one single person that uses ai or chat GPT or anything like that and I'm 44. It's just not that prevalent for our age group. I was at a community function on Monday discussing this very thing about ai giving terrible medical advice and car repair advice with just completely made up stuff it just randomly spit out to one of our members sons. Causing him to destroy his car by putting the wrong fluid in his car to "improve horse power".  It's the younger generations that are driving this crap and corporations needs to make wall street happy by surrounding anything they can. But normal day to day people I haven't seen using this younger people have turned to mush brain power on a 5% because of it. You thought it was bad when they could not count back change to you at the grocery store, these kids are having complete conversations with AI for life advice LOL 🤣

Hey, we found the guy who wrote that "all you anti-AI people, what if it all disappeared tomorrow, how would you get through the day without Claude or GPT?" post!
You're in so deep you don't realize that you're the freak.

These forward growth assumptions are drastically different from the current trajectory of the business, its projected to grow 80%+ top line this year and they have beaten and raised guidance for every quarter since chat GPT was released. If anyone believes your growth rates, they would never invest in the business
Not saying one thing or another but you can get a DCF to say anything if you say this business is going to stop growing or have it accelerate growth into perpetuity

Here. I work for a non-FAANG big tech, AI use went from any model/software unlimited to 100$ of GPT a month.

Mine as well, proper grammar is now a negative on the internet thanks to GPT.

Real story, my company has been using GPT 5.4 API when it comes out, management fainted when they receive the monthly bill. They drag everyone using the room and ask why do we need the frontier stuff? (interestingly the team who set this up knows that it is a POC, POC meant to do what we can do or waht we cannot do right?) Then we switch to Deepseek overnight with 1/10 of the AI token cost. We don't really need local AI, hyscaler has been hosting Chinese model long time ago and they make huge profit with it. Deepseek runs much more efficiently and require less GPU compared to frontier.

Management Win, Hyperscaler Win, OpenAI Lose in this case.

Here is the alternative view point from the same or similar GPT model.
The State as Venture Capitalist: In 1947, India had virtually no private wealth, no domestic capital markets, and no industrial infrastructure. Defenders argue that only the central government had the scale to fund and build essential national foundations like dams, power grids, steel plants, and railways.
Preventing National Collapse: Fresh off the trauma of Partition and deeply fragmented, India was at risk of political balkanisation. A centralized economic plan bound the diverse princely states and provinces together into a single, cohesive national identity, preventing severe regional inequality from sparking civil wars.
Laying the Foundation for the IT Boom: The elite technical institutions built under Nehru - such as the Indian Institutes of Technology (IITs) and space/nuclear research programs - created a highly skilled, English-speaking technocratic class. This exact talent pool became the engine behind India's massive post-1991 software and services explosion.
Protection from Foreign Exploitation: Having just escaped two centuries of corporate-colonial rule via the East India Company, India was deeply vulnerable. Early protectionist policies shielded fragile domestic businesses from being immediately wiped out by powerful multinational corporations.

Yeah, I always see comments like the one you're responding to & I assume they're using a shitty model.
Been using the higher models of GPT & Claude daily in a personal & professional setting for months now & I rarely have to rework whatever it's produced.

If Anthropic, Gemini, GPT etc. started to monetize Llama ona large scale, I'd just switch to DeepSeek for an instance.

Claude Pro is like $200 a year, so is Gemini Pro, not sure about GPT, but I would bet it's similar. So yes, spending $1K on a rig that'll be obsolete in less than a year so you can run your own model that will also be obsolete in a year is pretty dumb.

Bro just ask GPT how to get it all back

CHAT GPT COMMENT 🤖🤖🤖🤖🤖

I atleast made sure to do Chat GPT of what CAGR is/was.
And good luck to you and your methods of amity university!

Per my AI/NVDA thesis, the $300 barrier gets crossed when the street knows $500 billion annual revenue for NVDA is real and that NVDA’s growth in calendar years 2028 and 2029 don’t decelerate to the mid teens - per GPT. I believe $500 billion annual rev is attainable because Jensen Huang said he sees NVDA at a $3 trillion annual revenue run rate in the future. Since 2023, he’s been right all along. And the growth numbers? We haven’t even seen self driving, robotics, more cures, space . . . I think the future growth for NVDA in 2028 and 2029 will be much higher than mid teens. And much higher going forward.
Here is a simple test. Go to your local metropolitan city - Philly for me. Ask 50 randoms who look over 22 years old if they “heard of” Nvidia or Jensen Huang. Then ask the same 50 people if they “heard of” Amazon or Jeff Bezos. I would bet that close to 100% heard of Amazon. I’d say less than 20% have heard of Nvidia. In 5 years, that will no longer be the case. Staggering growth ahead. And I think I will do that test soon in Philly and let you know what I record. Maybe I’m wrong :)

We are now 4 years into the GPT age and profitability is no better (it's still perpetually just around the corner).
The internet did not need companies forcing it down your throat: people wanted to use it. We've watched the last several years as OpenAI, Microsoft, and Google try desperately to get consumers hooked, partly because the quality has not been there.
So the market is defined by an unclear ROI for consumers, negative profitability, negative marginal scaling, a ton of hype, and a marketwide inclination to rely on domestic protectionism.
If that does not make you nervous-- well, enjoy the ride, I guess.

“Dear Chet GPT. This guy said I was wrong on Reddit. Can you please write a reply to him explaining how he’s wrong and I’m right?”

Sure but this opinion has a problem:
It's technologically illiterate.
You are only talking about models like Claude, GPT, or Gemini or whatever.
There are many new open weight models that can literally fit inside your phone. These models are getting ridiculously more and more powerful with less and less parameters.
This is a huge threat to frontier models in the US.
The future isn't that it'll be $20/mo to even access it, but larger tech corps will be wondering how to even charge that when users can easily find open weight models for free to do the stuff they need to do to justify for the absolute batshit infra spin up that's happening right now.
That's a reality that's almost already here for them.
Ever since I got Qwen3.5 9B for my home use I haven't bothered subscribing to shit. It does everything I need it to do and it runs off of my graphics card. I wish I could use a 27B one, but that's where I'm waiting for all this nonsense to end so I can go scavenge graphics cards off of decommissioned data centers.

I agree, if they pulled the plug on chat GPT etc, and said you could only use it for a fee, we would all pay up!

Chat GPT generate an image of the fries in the bag