Create Account
Log In
Dark
chart
exchange
Premium
Terminal
Screener
Stocks
Crypto
Forex
Trends
Depth
Close
Check out our Dark Pool Levels

FTC
First Trust Large Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund (based on the Defined Large Cap Growth Index--symbol DEFILGOI)
stock NASDAQ ETF

Market Open
Oct 2, 2026 12:44:17 PM EDT
180.47USD+0.911%(+1.63)23,741
180.30Bid   180.79Ask   0.49Spread
Pre-market
0.00USD-100.000%(-178.84)0
After-hours
0.00USD0.000%(0.00)0
OverviewOption ChainMax PainOptionsPrice & VolumeDividendsHistoricalExchange VolumeDark Pool LevelsDark Pool PrintsExchangesShort VolumeShort Interest - DailyShort InterestBorrow Fee (CTB)Failure to Deliver (FTD)ShortsTrendsNewsTrends
FTC Reddit Mentions
Subreddits
Limit Labels     

We have sentiment values and mention counts going back to 2017. The complete data set is available via the API.
Take me to the API
FTC Specific Mentions
As of Oct 2, 2026 1:19:31 PM EDT (1 min. ago)
Includes all comments and posts. Mentions per user per ticker capped at one per hour.
4 hr ago • u/Wonderful-Nature2919 • r/Daytrading • trading_academy • C
I am in Day 2 of the 3 Day Intro Course. So far their presentations are interesting. However, the cost is very high and having looked up the settlement with FTC is concerning.
What did you end up doing?
sentiment 0.49
18 hr ago • u/bobuxstonks • r/wallstreetbets • ftc_is_investigating_openai_anthropic_and_other • C
FTC is a slap on the wrist
sentiment 0.15
18 hr ago • u/avagrantthought • r/Gold • we_need_to_talk_about_mintbuilder • C
The proof that MLM is intrinsically predatory and doesn't just rely but DEPENDS on people who don't know any better ?
I don't know man, besides the obvious fact that exploitation is a core tenant of the system, maybe the study done by the FTC that shows 99/100 of people who take part in MLM organizations as members lose money, would mean something to you
https://www.google.com/goto?url=CAESgwIB6zswFeQHh1HxYZyRqUdEuVsLHy79R_-x2Cudq-cM5qCQIjSEh-_tfDzD0QaC-jaz25Ou8ImmUozauucjzSYs5amFSSwUpuoZw5m92O1DEA56BZUpY1Zf2LeuKIhW6jwAYcApI0PkRH-gNsxE9Fz0XBH5KP88k_i8rEbqs6pAntXRh_8A8Y3Go8RyFFIs4KOgJP8yh8lsiKTL78-TL4wZBUSqgsPfVw55pbvDnxssBRjzqSCvLH_mpKuqYh-BQAyYjUXN_oKqWxu2id_2oPriPu7O2ex2OGVU2V4Me8yW5mpjwKcKHZT5Oi3SLb54-QSV0feUpFNx4xbJ6afwQYt_DGNW
But let me guess, your favourite company is an exemption to this tend, and shouldn't be grouped in with the rest because it's not actually a 1:1 example to the ones the FTC focused on?
sentiment -0.59
22 hr ago • u/KindBench2700 • r/wallstreetbets • ftc_is_investigating_openai_anthropic_and_other • C
lol. You mean people at FTC looking for private sector jobs right?
sentiment 0.42
23 hr ago • u/ecleipsis • r/wallstreetbets • ftc_is_investigating_openai_anthropic_and_other • C
lol what does the FTC know about AI?
sentiment 0.42
1 day ago • u/njcuban123 • r/wallstreetbets • daily_discussion_thread_for_october_1_2026 • C
"The FTC has opened an investigation into OpenAI, Anthropic and other AI companies over the potential dangers posed by their products, CNBC has confirmed." YAWN - Like the FTC and SEC have any power...
sentiment -0.18
1 day ago • u/Raddish3030 • r/wallstreetbets • ftc_is_investigating_openai_anthropic_and_other • C
The named of the game is either
1/ FTC wants some money so they need some "green light" money for a label of "acceptable risk"
2/ FTC is being used as a weapon cause the more deeper & shadowy parts of the government has the edge tech already and they don't wish to private/public facing companies to "officially" be in a positioning to "legally" and "own/use" said tech.
sentiment -0.43
1 day ago • u/BrockDouken13 • r/wallstreetbets • ftc_is_investigating_openai_anthropic_and_other • C
The FTC bureaucrats will be thinking what am I even understanding when this mathematical engineer explains an LLM from a tech giant.
These dipshits cannot even figure a solution to block spam calls other then forwarding 7726 which does absolutely nothing. 
Google's LLM instead fixed spam on pixel phones making the FTC another failed taxpayer agency. 
They will just most the hyperscalers in the name of national security in the protection of the consumer when lobbyists rain down on D.C. against start up frontier models from a Nigerian Prince
sentiment -0.61
1 day ago • u/RuleSafe6767 • r/wallstreetbets • ftc_is_investigating_openai_anthropic_and_other • C
Here come the regulations.
"Use of AI by Americans and American business may only be conducted through FTC authorised and compliant services"
And there you go.. It's now illegal to use open weight models.
sentiment -0.56
1 day ago • u/CalebVanPoneisen • r/wallstreetbets • ftc_is_investigating_openai_anthropic_and_other • C
No, no, no. FTC finds out that only Anthropic is dangerous because AI is nearly sentient. Of course, they find out right after the dip two weeks after they IPO to give it the boost they need.
sentiment -0.10
1 day ago • u/codespyder • r/wallstreetbets • ftc_is_investigating_openai_anthropic_and_other • C
FTC get slipped a cool billion to find nothing wrong with
sentiment 0.59
1 day ago • u/StraightSky7809 • r/wallstreetbets • ftc_is_investigating_openai_anthropic_and_other • News • T
FTC is investigating OpenAI, Anthropic and other AI companies over product risks
sentiment -0.27
2 days ago • u/azure_king5 • r/Revolut • revolut_violates_us_regulation_e_rules_denies • 🔐 Security • B
Having a very unfortunate and frustrating experience with Revolut right now.
I divorced my ex partner after I found out that he had transferred about $3000 out of 2 of my bank accounts using a complex scheme (it’s very clever but cruel at the same time).
Step 1: Takes my phone off the bedside charger while I’m sleeping, proceeds to use my sleeping face to break thru Face ID. Copies a bunch of personal information off of the phone thru AirDrop, then enters my BOA mobile app.
Step 2: Transfers roughly $3000 in multiple transactions over 2 months from BOA to Revolut via Apple Pay, then from Revolut via Apple Pay to his account.
I’m convinced he knows that Apple Pay/Apple Cash is extremely difficult to report fraud about and thus there is a very low chance of him having the money he took taken away from him.
Step 3: After 2 months, he disappears. His family and friends don’t know where he is and may have filed a police missing persons report. He is obviously using the stolen funds to live off.
I never authorized any of these transfers, nor did he take my card etc. From reading other posts on this site, it appears this dispute has fallen into this grey area because it involves Apple transfer methods. I have seen some people saying that “this isn’t Revolut’s business/liability” but I would like to absolutely dispute that when it comes to US accounts and US law.
I have filed a police report and an FTC fraud affidavit, and divorce papers.
I reported the fraud to Revolut first, because the money moved from one of my accounts to another is basically still in my accounts but the money exited my possession when he Apple Cashed it to himself.
The claim was denied in less than a day, with no review or investigation. I have spoken to over 5 agents, who say that this is “final” and are quoting European regulations and do not understand that, as a registered financial institution in the US, Regulation E rules supercede whatever jumble of internal “policies” they are quoting.
For context, Regulation E rules basically are what secures US bank consumers and defines what is an “authorized” or “unauthorized” transfer - the rules clearly state that this was “unauthorized” since this is basically both “burglary/robbery” and fraud, similar to what happens in Latin America when people are drugged and their phones are taken and drained.
(§1005.2(m)) is the particular piece of this which governs “authorized” and “unauthorized” transactions.
Revolut are acting like they have no responsibility for this because of their network rules/internal policies, but the CFPB (banking federal regulator) have said that Revolut’s duty to us does not depend on their network rules or whether a chargeback is possible - our money is still supposed to be insured and thus they would owe us the money back.
None of these 5 agents would provide any documentation whatsoever regarding their denial, which is illegal under 12 CFR 1005.11(d)(1). Banks must provide this documentation.
The screenshot above is the actual denial from a “senior representative” who kept repeating himself and refused to provide the documents I’m legally entitled to.
He also admits that Revolut did not follow their own supposed internal policies on dispute.
I am not a lawyer, nor a banker. I am a regular person that just got out of a 4 year DV relationship that ended with a huge negative “bang”.
By contrast, BOA has refunded the money that was taken directly from that account within 2 days. They, as a “real bank”, do not subject customers to this kind of rediculous treatment.
It appears Revolut staff have absolutely no training on US banking regulations despite operating in the country. They say no US support is available and it’s very obvious that they are getting confused between European and US rules.
I no longer feel like my money is safe with Revolut, nor that they act like a real, authorized bank. I do not recommend them to anyone else since they continue to pick and choose which rules they follow while flagrantly violating US laws.
I have already filed a CFPB complaint and am taking this to the regulators. I don’t know what else to do.
sentiment -1.00
2 days ago • u/GanacheNegative1988 • r/AMD_Stock • daily_discussion_wednesday_20260930 • C

So FTC announced, day after the SI meeting with all the Tech bros and Lisa too... a prob into the Consumer Safety of these Agent and SI/AI products. Should be interesting to see what kind of media side show this creates but hopefully the outcome will be non technical folks getting a more realistic understand of the networking and security landscape these applications operate within and how the industry is now working double time to bring the security control and auditability up to snuf. Nothing these jail breaking AIs have done in especially novel, nor can they do anything any person couldn't have done given the state of security as it was configured. This can absolutely improve. Harnesses that execute agent task must be able to use security roles and accounts that correct constrain what they can do and access and not just run under the full users own security enablement. So this point of pressure to ensure the tools users are handed over are property empowered but not over empowered is key. Now if you decide to break the seal on the containment bottle and ask that djin to 'make me rich'... well, don't be too surprised when the FBI knocks on your door.
https://www.cnbc.com/amp/2026/09/30/ftc-ai-probe-openai-anthropic.html
sentiment 0.99
2 days ago • u/EnginrA • r/wallstreetbets • daily_discussion_thread_for_september_30_2026 • C
FTC investigation into AI models lol
sentiment 0.42
2 days ago • u/Beginning-Fig-9089 • r/wallstreetbets • daily_discussion_thread_for_september_30_2026 • C
FTC opens probe of Anthropic, OpenAI and others
sentiment 0.00
2 days ago • u/Stonk_Trader69420 • r/wallstreetbets • daily_discussion_thread_for_september_30_2026 • C
Only thing FTC is opening is a bag of chips
sentiment 0.00
2 days ago • u/likamuka • r/wallstreetbets • daily_discussion_thread_for_september_30_2026 • C
FTC LAUNCHES INDUSTRY-WIDE AI PROBE AFTER HUGGING FACE INCIDENT THAT HAPPENED IN 1945
sentiment 0.00


Share
About
Pricing
Policies
Markets
API
Info
tz UTC-4
Connect with us
ChartExchange Email
ChartExchange on Discord
ChartExchange on X
ChartExchange on Reddit
ChartExchange on GitHub
ChartExchange on YouTube
© 2020 - 2026 ChartExchange LLC