Create Account
Log In
Dark
chart
exchange
Premium
Terminal
Screener
Stocks
Crypto
Forex
Trends
Depth
Close
Check out our API

EVER
EverQuote, Inc. Class A Common Stock
stock NASDAQ

At Close
Sep 25, 2026 3:59:56 PM EDT
18.62USD+3.101%(+0.56)969,034
0.00Bid   0.00Ask   0.00Spread
Pre-market
Sep 25, 2026 9:29:59 AM EDT
17.92USD-0.775%(-0.14)2,657
After-hours
Sep 25, 2026 4:35:30 PM EDT
18.64USD+0.107%(+0.02)700
OverviewOption ChainMax PainOptionsHistoricalExchange VolumeDark Pool LevelsDark Pool PrintsExchangesShort VolumeShort Interest - DailyShort InterestBorrow Fee (CTB)Failure to Deliver (FTD)ShortsTrendsNewsTrends
EVER Reddit Mentions
Subreddits
Limit Labels     

We have sentiment values and mention counts going back to 2017. The complete data set is available via the API.
Take me to the API
EVER Specific Mentions
As of Sep 27, 2026 6:47:45 AM EDT (<1 min. ago)
Includes all comments and posts. Mentions per user per ticker capped at one per hour.
8 hr ago • u/diverdadeo • r/unusual_whales • are_we_getting_fucked_by_the_boomers • C
I did not vote for the last 40 years of corruption. I voted for women's, LGBTQIA+, Voting rights, minority rights ad naseum and for what? Kept waiting for the next GENERATIONS! to pick up the ball and run with it. We did get Obama and then everyone went home. trump after Obama is what we got. I thank all you cry baby generations who thought it was over and stayed home. You didn't do the work or pay attention to what was happening, You didn't organize, picket or march. We gave you the most rights EVER and you gave us trump.
sentiment -0.26
9 hr ago • u/What-tha-fck_Elon • r/smallstreetbets • we_are_winning_so_much • C
I love my EVs and will never go back to gas. EVER.
sentiment 0.64
12 hr ago • u/Spl00ky • r/ValueInvesting • share_buybacks_without_future_dividends_are • C
"Under this scenario, we would leave all earnings in the company and each sell 3.2% of our shares annually. Since the shares would be sold at 125% of book value, this approach would produce the same $40,000 of cash initially, a sum that would grow annually. Call this option the "sell-off" approach.
Under this "sell-off" scenario, the net worth of our company increases to $6,211,696 after ten years ($2 million compounded at 12%). Because we would be selling shares each year, our percentage ownership would have declined, and, after ten years, we would each own 36.12% of the business. Even so, your share of the net worth of the company at that time would be $2,243,540. And, remember, every dollar of net worth attributable to each of us can be sold for $1.25. Therefore, the market value of your remaining shares would be $2,804,425, about 4% greater than the value of your shares if we had followed the dividend approach.
Moreover, your annual cash receipts from the sell-off policy would now be running 4% more than you would have received under the dividend scenario. Voila! -- you would have both more cash to spend annually and more capital value." Warren Buffett
[Buffett: You Want a Dividend? Go Make Your Own | The Motley Fool](https://www.fool.com/investing/general/2013/03/04/buffett-you-want-a-dividend-go-make-your-own.aspx)
>He is on record stating clearly that if the Berkshire EVER thought that they could no longer provide sufficient compounding to shareholders through managing their investments…they would absolutely initiate a dividend.
"In 1998, a student at the University of Florida asked Buffett about dividends. Buffett repeated the question for the crowd. "The question is about evaluating Berkshire when it doesn't pay any dividends," he said. "**And it won't pay dividends, either. That's a promise I can keep.** All you get with Berkshire stock is that you can stick it in your safe deposit box, and every year you take it out and fondle it. "
>Pretty much sums up your personality id say.
You literally can't understand that dividends are paid from free cash flow. If there is no free cash flow, then there are no dividends or share buybacks. I can't explain this anymore clearly to you since you can't understand basic order of operations.
sentiment 0.99
13 hr ago • u/BanditoBoom • r/ValueInvesting • share_buybacks_without_future_dividends_are • C
You are entirely misrepresenting Warren Buffett’s position on dividends. Which, that comment alone, tells me you aren’t worth engaging with on this topic on an intellectual level.
He is on record stating clearly that if the Berkshire EVER thought that they could no longer provide sufficient compounding to shareholders through managing their investments…they would absolutely initiate a dividend.
He is on record as stating: “The value of a company is equal to the value of all cash you can extract from a company throughout its life.”
Translation: if it were legally impossible for investors to extract those cash flows (ahem…dividends) then the stock would have no value to shareholders.
“One of the great challenges in life is knowing enough to think you're right, but not enough to know you're wrong.”
\- NDT
Pretty much sums up your personality id say.
sentiment 0.91
13 hr ago • u/Not_So_Rich__677 • r/AMCSTOCKS • amc_closing_in_on_3_4_may_be_closer_than_it_looks • C
It will be the biggest quarter EVER!!!
sentiment 0.00
15 hr ago • u/OfficiallyAlec • r/Pmsforsale • wts_first_sale_ever_deals_my_silver_libertad • T
[WTS] FIRST SALE EVER DEALS! My Silver Libertad Collection! Lots of Slabbed, Key/Semi Years + 2025 RP, and Some Raw Libs!
sentiment 0.00
20 hr ago • u/Bidenh8er • r/Gold • advice_for_repurposing_my_dads_wedding_band • C
SIDE NOTE:
Definitely DO NOT get married.... EVER 😆
sentiment 0.64
22 hr ago • u/danjoreddit • r/WallStreetbetsELITE • mcd_is_blowing_85_billion_to_figure_out_why_we • C
Since McDonald’s let Trump use them as a prop for his “Every Man” fry cook skit, I will NEVER EVER eat there again.
sentiment 0.00
8 hr ago • u/diverdadeo • r/unusual_whales • are_we_getting_fucked_by_the_boomers • C
I did not vote for the last 40 years of corruption. I voted for women's, LGBTQIA+, Voting rights, minority rights ad naseum and for what? Kept waiting for the next GENERATIONS! to pick up the ball and run with it. We did get Obama and then everyone went home. trump after Obama is what we got. I thank all you cry baby generations who thought it was over and stayed home. You didn't do the work or pay attention to what was happening, You didn't organize, picket or march. We gave you the most rights EVER and you gave us trump.
sentiment -0.26
9 hr ago • u/What-tha-fck_Elon • r/smallstreetbets • we_are_winning_so_much • C
I love my EVs and will never go back to gas. EVER.
sentiment 0.64
12 hr ago • u/Spl00ky • r/ValueInvesting • share_buybacks_without_future_dividends_are • C
"Under this scenario, we would leave all earnings in the company and each sell 3.2% of our shares annually. Since the shares would be sold at 125% of book value, this approach would produce the same $40,000 of cash initially, a sum that would grow annually. Call this option the "sell-off" approach.
Under this "sell-off" scenario, the net worth of our company increases to $6,211,696 after ten years ($2 million compounded at 12%). Because we would be selling shares each year, our percentage ownership would have declined, and, after ten years, we would each own 36.12% of the business. Even so, your share of the net worth of the company at that time would be $2,243,540. And, remember, every dollar of net worth attributable to each of us can be sold for $1.25. Therefore, the market value of your remaining shares would be $2,804,425, about 4% greater than the value of your shares if we had followed the dividend approach.
Moreover, your annual cash receipts from the sell-off policy would now be running 4% more than you would have received under the dividend scenario. Voila! -- you would have both more cash to spend annually and more capital value." Warren Buffett
[Buffett: You Want a Dividend? Go Make Your Own | The Motley Fool](https://www.fool.com/investing/general/2013/03/04/buffett-you-want-a-dividend-go-make-your-own.aspx)
>He is on record stating clearly that if the Berkshire EVER thought that they could no longer provide sufficient compounding to shareholders through managing their investments…they would absolutely initiate a dividend.
"In 1998, a student at the University of Florida asked Buffett about dividends. Buffett repeated the question for the crowd. "The question is about evaluating Berkshire when it doesn't pay any dividends," he said. "**And it won't pay dividends, either. That's a promise I can keep.** All you get with Berkshire stock is that you can stick it in your safe deposit box, and every year you take it out and fondle it. "
>Pretty much sums up your personality id say.
You literally can't understand that dividends are paid from free cash flow. If there is no free cash flow, then there are no dividends or share buybacks. I can't explain this anymore clearly to you since you can't understand basic order of operations.
sentiment 0.99
13 hr ago • u/BanditoBoom • r/ValueInvesting • share_buybacks_without_future_dividends_are • C
You are entirely misrepresenting Warren Buffett’s position on dividends. Which, that comment alone, tells me you aren’t worth engaging with on this topic on an intellectual level.
He is on record stating clearly that if the Berkshire EVER thought that they could no longer provide sufficient compounding to shareholders through managing their investments…they would absolutely initiate a dividend.
He is on record as stating: “The value of a company is equal to the value of all cash you can extract from a company throughout its life.”
Translation: if it were legally impossible for investors to extract those cash flows (ahem…dividends) then the stock would have no value to shareholders.
“One of the great challenges in life is knowing enough to think you're right, but not enough to know you're wrong.”
\- NDT
Pretty much sums up your personality id say.
sentiment 0.91
13 hr ago • u/Not_So_Rich__677 • r/AMCSTOCKS • amc_closing_in_on_3_4_may_be_closer_than_it_looks • C
It will be the biggest quarter EVER!!!
sentiment 0.00
15 hr ago • u/OfficiallyAlec • r/Pmsforsale • wts_first_sale_ever_deals_my_silver_libertad • T
[WTS] FIRST SALE EVER DEALS! My Silver Libertad Collection! Lots of Slabbed, Key/Semi Years + 2025 RP, and Some Raw Libs!
sentiment 0.00
20 hr ago • u/Bidenh8er • r/Gold • advice_for_repurposing_my_dads_wedding_band • C
SIDE NOTE:
Definitely DO NOT get married.... EVER 😆
sentiment 0.64
22 hr ago • u/danjoreddit • r/WallStreetbetsELITE • mcd_is_blowing_85_billion_to_figure_out_why_we • C
Since McDonald’s let Trump use them as a prop for his “Every Man” fry cook skit, I will NEVER EVER eat there again.
sentiment 0.00
1 day ago • u/LocalNo7757 • r/wallstreetbets • wait_till_after_midterms • C
This right here is exactly why he won. Think about it... what are Americans desperate for right now? Economic relief! We have been desperate for relief from the high cost of literally everything (groceries, gas, all forms of insurance, interest rates, vehicles, homes, land etc etc) for 4 years! When was the last time life was affordable?? Ding ding ding, you guessed it! 2016-2020. Interest rates were the lowest EVER in the history of our country, gas was under $2 per gallon, groceries were affordable, homes were affordable, there were no wars, and the border was closed. That’s why he won, period. It’s not because people are retarded or whatever other nasty name they are being called this week. It’s because Americans are desperate for financial relief and they had 2 options to pick from. The one who just had 4 years to make life better for Americans and chose to do nothing or the one who had a proven track record of a strong economy? The definition of insanity is doing the same thing multiple times and expecting a different result. So, Americans did the only sane thing, they elected the person who had a decent track record on the things that actually mattered to people. People looked back at 2016-2020 and compared it with 2020-2024. They didn’t look at anything else. People didn’t care that he was a jerk, a pervert, or that he tweets all night. They don’t care about any of the “social” issues. All people want from their government is a strong economy, social security and Medicaid/are, and a strong border/national security. We just want to be able to provide for our families, be safe, and be left alone. Obviously, his first term was all an act. He never intended to do anything for Americans, only to enrich himself and his friends. He is clearly trying to crash the dollar and usher in the New World Order and he’s so narcissistic I think he actually believes he will be the leader of that world. He wants Americans to be so desperate for relief that we will accept anything he says, like central bank digital currency. Think about it…gas doubles what it is now, groceries double, diesel runs dry. Grocery shelves are sparse. Parents are desperate to put food on the table, panic sets in and here comes the big T with the solution. All we have to do to fix everything is replace the dollar with a CBDC, the national debt disappears. Everyone will be begging him to please just do it so we can feed our children. There is no other explanation for what he is doing right now other than doing it all on purpose to usher in the new world order and make himself seem like the hero in the end. And I fully expect a false flag of some kind to interfere with elections. Attack on our grid maybe, some sort of cyber attack from Iran, or worse. Buckle up folks, this is going to get worse. And the craziest part, Americans will let him. They will let him do it all. The only people with the power to stop all of this is WE THE PEOPLE. But we won’t, because we aren’t willing to suffer for 5 minutes. We’re not willing to give up our comforts. We’re fat, lazy, and scared. We sit behind keyboards and whine about it. If you don’t like it, do something about it. Read the constitution, the constitution tells you what to do in these circumstances. But no one will do that either, it’s pathetic.
sentiment -0.82
1 day ago • u/TempeGrumble • r/Bogleheads • why_is_tiaa_so_terrible • C
As someone with five different TIAA accounts from three employers, I more than sympathize: I empathize! Yeah, after finishing the code for their platform some years ago, TIAA clearly rested on the 7th day, and 8th, .... and 10,834th... and ...
As others have noted, you need to watch carefully for the contract-specific expense ratios of funds available to you, and do not EVER agree to automatic reallocation based on a Morningstar calculation. Some employers -- like my current one -- pay for fee-free advice from the "wealth management" staff at TIAA. The retirement-plan and investment analysis side is fiduciary, but the allocation-recommendation advice, which often has Morningstar as a sub-advisor, is not, and whoooeeey! Last time I did this, Morningstar's report suggested adding about 30 new funds for me, including several with expense ratios over 0.45%.
sentiment 0.66
1 day ago • u/LADCTRADER • r/Daytrading • bad_day • C
It is a really simple rule, Do not, ever, and I do Ever, never, which for the uneducated, this means DO not EVER close a loosing trade. I dont understand why so many of these posts of people said they are blowing up thier accounts so quickly..... If its Red, do not touch it, ever, until its Green... Problem solved... If it takes a year, Still do not touch it.... Super simple...
sentiment -0.54
2 days ago • u/EmptyBee23 • r/fidelityinvestments • are_there_any_plans_to_integrate_ai_into_the • C
Hopfully no AI gets added EVER to the Fidelity Website
sentiment -0.30


Share
About
Pricing
Policies
Markets
API
Info
tz UTC-4
Connect with us
ChartExchange Email
ChartExchange on Discord
ChartExchange on X
ChartExchange on Reddit
ChartExchange on GitHub
ChartExchange on YouTube
© 2020 - 2026 ChartExchange LLC