Create Account
Log In
Dark
chart
exchange
Premium
Terminal
Screener
Stocks
Crypto
Forex
Trends
Depth
Close
Check out our API

DUET
DUET Acquisition Corp. Class A Common Stock
stock NASDAQ

Inactive
Nov 25, 2024
11.31USD-0.187%(-0.02)10
Pre-market
0.00USD-100.000%(-11.33)0
After-hours
0.00USD0.000%(0.00)0
OverviewHistoricalExchange VolumeDark Pool LevelsDark Pool PrintsExchangesShort VolumeShort Interest - DailyShort InterestBorrow Fee (CTB)Failure to Deliver (FTD)ShortsTrends
DUET Reddit Mentions
Subreddits
Limit Labels     

We have sentiment values and mention counts going back to 2017. The complete data set is available via the API.
Take me to the API
DUET Specific Mentions
As of Aug 7, 2026 4:28:03 PM EDT (<1 min. ago)
Includes all comments and posts. Mentions per user per ticker capped at one per hour.
117 days ago • u/Zipski577 • r/biotech_stocks • for_the_people_worried_about_sell_the_news_on_the • C
You obviously didn’t read any of the materials produced from the workshop… they stated that in using eGFR as the primary endpoint is impractical because it would require >500 patients PER ARM to detect even a modest 1 mL/min/1.73m^2/yr difference. In duplex study n was 371 TOTAL.
So no, this trial was not “large and long enough to see a difference” lol.
Laura Damashek, the founding Executive Director of the Int’l. Society of Glomerular Disease, specifically stated “the data from PARASOL suggest that those trials (DUET and DUPLEX) would have been underpowered to detect a GFR slope difference in FSGS within the study timeline.”
*“But of course non expert retail investors will try to point to signs such as "why wouldn't they issue the CRL earlier, why extend it".”* You say this to sound intelligent but are unfamiliar with the fact that nearly 90% of applications that have approval decisions pushed out by 3 months ultimately get approved. So no, it doesn’t alone mean they are going to approve it - but it does show a willingness of CDER to work with TVTX towards an approval and directly contradicts your CRL thesis which is simply that it failed on the primary endpoint.
Aliza Thompson has been at the FDA for nearly 20 years and is a very respected director at CDER and was a prominent member of the PARASOL group, so while you may “not care about parasol,” their findings and conclusions will be a huge factor in this decision.
I am not sure why you are calling people “non expert retail investors” when that is clearly exactly what you are as well. And I can easily tell that because it’s clear you haven’t been able to access, read, or hear any of the buy-side or credible sell-side views on this application/ decision. On the sell-side, Guggenheim, Leerink, TDC, JPM, Wells Fargo, Jefferies, Citigroup, and many others have given PoS%s between 75-85%. On the buy-side, the specialist biopharma HF PMs that follow/ own TVTX are bullish on the decision. I know many of them. Several of which have been amongst the best performers of all biotech specialists over the last 2-5 years.
sentiment 0.99
117 days ago • u/Zipski577 • r/biotech_stocks • for_the_people_worried_about_sell_the_news_on_the • C
You obviously didn’t read any of the materials produced from the workshop… they stated that in using eGFR as the primary endpoint is impractical because it would require >500 patients PER ARM to detect even a modest 1 mL/min/1.73m^2/yr difference. In duplex study n was 371 TOTAL.
So no, this trial was not “large and long enough to see a difference” lol.
Laura Damashek, the founding Executive Director of the Int’l. Society of Glomerular Disease, specifically stated “the data from PARASOL suggest that those trials (DUET and DUPLEX) would have been underpowered to detect a GFR slope difference in FSGS within the study timeline.”
*“But of course non expert retail investors will try to point to signs such as "why wouldn't they issue the CRL earlier, why extend it".”* You say this to sound intelligent but are unfamiliar with the fact that nearly 90% of applications that have approval decisions pushed out by 3 months ultimately get approved. So no, it doesn’t alone mean they are going to approve it - but it does show a willingness of CDER to work with TVTX towards an approval and directly contradicts your CRL thesis which is simply that it failed on the primary endpoint.
Aliza Thompson has been at the FDA for nearly 20 years and is a very respected director at CDER and was a prominent member of the PARASOL group, so while you may “not care about parasol,” their findings and conclusions will be a huge factor in this decision.
I am not sure why you are calling people “non expert retail investors” when that is clearly exactly what you are as well. And I can easily tell that because it’s clear you haven’t been able to access, read, or hear any of the buy-side or credible sell-side views on this application/ decision. On the sell-side, Guggenheim, Leerink, TDC, JPM, Wells Fargo, Jefferies, Citigroup, and many others have given PoS%s between 75-85%. On the buy-side, the specialist biopharma HF PMs that follow/ own TVTX are bullish on the decision. I know many of them. Several of which have been amongst the best performers of all biotech specialists over the last 2-5 years.
sentiment 0.99


Share
About
Pricing
Policies
Markets
API
Info
tz UTC-4
Connect with us
ChartExchange Email
ChartExchange on Discord
ChartExchange on X
ChartExchange on Reddit
ChartExchange on GitHub
ChartExchange on YouTube
© 2020 - 2026 ChartExchange LLC