BTCS
BTCS Inc. Common Stock
stock NASDAQ

Twins from birth... identical, one chooses a diet of all you can drink melted ice cream, the other eats healthy and clean.... They should be indistinguishable in your eyes because they came from the same place. Hmmm... No sir, what happens along the way matters. BTC is 64k atm for a reason, BCH is 240 bucks atm for a reason. I'll break down his wrong points down for you. BTW yall use "fairytale" a lot in describing "real Bitcoin", coming from a BCH'er that screams projection.
1. Miner's decide consensus... then why haven't miners changed transaction fees to $20 bucks per transaction. Isn't there a tweet of Adam "Epstein Island" Back saying he'd gladly pay $100 bucks per Bitcoin transaction? Jaime pull that up... Mmhmm, but he dulls that knife edge by saying "lower than $100 would be preferable" LOL, uhh yea, people are bitching about 30 cents per transaction more than 9 years later. Miner's can decide to mine on BCH and win 600 bucks per reward... but for what ever reason the majority of nodes (if Knots and Core split chains each would have more nodes than BCH currently) choose BTC. In your point to his point you say "nodes can be a sybil attack"... okay.. he's saying Miner's choose rules, you say "yea and nodes can fake numbers"... I get it man, I get drunk too, Idk how you got to that but lets roll with it, sybil attack... faking the amount of support for BIP110 should solidify BIP110 as a nothingburger in your point of view, so if miner's supported a sybil attack what would the result be? When the attack dies down, numbers fall, you got miners supporting fewer nodes than expected... You're a BCH'er you should know that it doesn't take that many nodes to run a coin. The more the merrier obviously, but you don't interact in the spaces I do, Knots is a threat to you, BIP110 is a threat, numbers are way way higher than you're leading on.
2. Miner's go where the money is... Okay here's a thought exercise, replace the word money with value, or ask yourself why is "real Bitcoin" worth more money than BCH? If you say BCH is better, why does it's monetary value not reflect that? Hey what's right isn't always popular, and what's popular isn't always right... maybe you're right and it's better and undervalued, maybe the flippening is coming. Save this post man so you can rub it in my face later, I'm a Bitcoin maxi, I stand to lose a lot.
3. I'm a little lost on this point, BCX uses PoS, BTCS uses PoS, Ethereum if you want to go as far as an old Bitcoin dev's project uses PoS... but "real Bitcoin" and even BCH use PoW... you say most nodes don't... uhh... inaccurate statement? Nonsensical? Plz explain?
4. Oh dude I HOPE we get to see some FAFO orphans, the very first block will go down in history as "this is what it looks like to lose $200,000 for 10 minutes of work". F2Pool especially with how toxic Wang Chun is.. everyone remember F2Pool will "NEVER signal for BIP110"... let us hope. By the way no one is going to force anyone to lose money, if you signal for BIP110 there is 0% chance you'll lose anything, if you decide to risk it you are only doing it to yourself. If you disagree with BIP110, firstly you haven't read it and don't understand it, and secondly if large mining pools didn't benefit from junk that clogs up the network and bogs down node storage they wouldn't give a F if it was removed. Mining needs some serious decentralization, I propose a BIP that would give ALL transaction fees to a higher percent to solo miners first, next smaller pools, and give an insignificant amount (if any) to large pools. They already win most every block, transaction fees too? Pfft... we can fix that greed with a BIP.
5. You say a hardfork that isn't agreed upon wouldn't lead to a split... What are you missing? Are you aware of the eCash hardfork that is also happening in August? Do you remember voting on that? They're just forking off, it's real as fuck, and if you don't believe me this is how real it is. The keys that hold your "real Bitcoin" will work to move eCash. BE CAREFUL... OBVIOUSLY... never expose your keys, but yea dude facts are out there. A fork doesn't require everyone to give the thumbs up, you didn't even KNOW about eCash fork next month. If you want to claim your free eCash (if it has any value) don't move your Bitcoin because you risk losing it's duplicate on the eCash chain. Once the split occurs if you add a utxo that only exists on "real Bitcoin" chain to your stack (send all your sats to yourself to combine them into 1 utxo, make sure the utxo contains a utxo that couldn't exist on the eCash chain... one made after the split happened, something newly mined) then when you are certain you have created an artificial relay protection situation on "real Bitcoin" send your stack to a BRAND NEW wallet, redo your security model, then go claim your eCash with your old keys, if it all worked out it should exist in your old wallet and you've officially doubled up what you held. More than likely it'll have less value than BCH even, and you don't know what exchange will let you cash out/swap but yea. I think you have to download their node to claim their shit, it might not be worth it at all, just saying, you're wrong about this and eCash is proof in yo pudding mang.

Twins from birth... identical, one chooses a diet of all you can drink melted ice cream, the other eats healthy and clean.... They should be indistinguishable in your eyes because they came from the same place. Hmmm... No sir, what happens along the way matters. BTC is 64k atm for a reason, BCH is 240 bucks atm for a reason. I'll break down his wrong points down for you. BTW yall use "fairytale" a lot in describing "real Bitcoin", coming from a BCH'er that screams projection.
1. Miner's decide consensus... then why haven't miners changed transaction fees to $20 bucks per transaction. Isn't there a tweet of Adam "Epstein Island" Back saying he'd gladly pay $100 bucks per Bitcoin transaction? Jaime pull that up... Mmhmm, but he dulls that knife edge by saying "lower than $100 would be preferable" LOL, uhh yea, people are bitching about 30 cents per transaction more than 9 years later. Miner's can decide to mine on BCH and win 600 bucks per reward... but for what ever reason the majority of nodes (if Knots and Core split chains each would have more nodes than BCH currently) choose BTC. In your point to his point you say "nodes can be a sybil attack"... okay.. he's saying Miner's choose rules, you say "yea and nodes can fake numbers"... I get it man, I get drunk too, Idk how you got to that but lets roll with it, sybil attack... faking the amount of support for BIP110 should solidify BIP110 as a nothingburger in your point of view, so if miner's supported a sybil attack what would the result be? When the attack dies down, numbers fall, you got miners supporting fewer nodes than expected... You're a BCH'er you should know that it doesn't take that many nodes to run a coin. The more the merrier obviously, but you don't interact in the spaces I do, Knots is a threat to you, BIP110 is a threat, numbers are way way higher than you're leading on.
2. Miner's go where the money is... Okay here's a thought exercise, replace the word money with value, or ask yourself why is "real Bitcoin" worth more money than BCH? If you say BCH is better, why does it's monetary value not reflect that? Hey what's right isn't always popular, and what's popular isn't always right... maybe you're right and it's better and undervalued, maybe the flippening is coming. Save this post man so you can rub it in my face later, I'm a Bitcoin maxi, I stand to lose a lot.
3. I'm a little lost on this point, BCX uses PoS, BTCS uses PoS, Ethereum if you want to go as far as an old Bitcoin dev's project uses PoS... but "real Bitcoin" and even BCH use PoW... you say most nodes don't... uhh... inaccurate statement? Nonsensical? Plz explain?
4. Oh dude I HOPE we get to see some FAFO orphans, the very first block will go down in history as "this is what it looks like to lose $200,000 for 10 minutes of work". F2Pool especially with how toxic Wang Chun is.. everyone remember F2Pool will "NEVER signal for BIP110"... let us hope. By the way no one is going to force anyone to lose money, if you signal for BIP110 there is 0% chance you'll lose anything, if you decide to risk it you are only doing it to yourself. If you disagree with BIP110, firstly you haven't read it and don't understand it, and secondly if large mining pools didn't benefit from junk that clogs up the network and bogs down node storage they wouldn't give a F if it was removed. Mining needs some serious decentralization, I propose a BIP that would give ALL transaction fees to a higher percent to solo miners first, next smaller pools, and give an insignificant amount (if any) to large pools. They already win most every block, transaction fees too? Pfft... we can fix that greed with a BIP.
5. You say a hardfork that isn't agreed upon wouldn't lead to a split... What are you missing? Are you aware of the eCash hardfork that is also happening in August? Do you remember voting on that? They're just forking off, it's real as fuck, and if you don't believe me this is how real it is. The keys that hold your "real Bitcoin" will work to move eCash. BE CAREFUL... OBVIOUSLY... never expose your keys, but yea dude facts are out there. A fork doesn't require everyone to give the thumbs up, you didn't even KNOW about eCash fork next month. If you want to claim your free eCash (if it has any value) don't move your Bitcoin because you risk losing it's duplicate on the eCash chain. Once the split occurs if you add a utxo that only exists on "real Bitcoin" chain to your stack (send all your sats to yourself to combine them into 1 utxo, make sure the utxo contains a utxo that couldn't exist on the eCash chain... one made after the split happened, something newly mined) then when you are certain you have created an artificial relay protection situation on "real Bitcoin" send your stack to a BRAND NEW wallet, redo your security model, then go claim your eCash with your old keys, if it all worked out it should exist in your old wallet and you've officially doubled up what you held. More than likely it'll have less value than BCH even, and you don't know what exchange will let you cash out/swap but yea. I think you have to download their node to claim their shit, it might not be worth it at all, just saying, you're wrong about this and eCash is proof in yo pudding mang.