Create Account
Log In
Dark
chart
exchange
Premium
Terminal
Screener
Stocks
Crypto
Forex
Trends
Depth
Close
Check out our Dark Pool Levels

ATAK
Aurora Technology Acquisition Corp. Class A
stock NASDAQ

Inactive
Jan 18, 2024
5.02USD+18.396%(+0.78)1,391,965
Pre-market
0.00USD-100.000%(-4.24)0
After-hours
0.00USD0.000%(0.00)0
OverviewHistoricalExchange VolumeDark Pool LevelsDark Pool PrintsExchangesShort VolumeShort Interest - DailyShort InterestBorrow Fee (CTB)Failure to Deliver (FTD)ShortsTrends
ATAK Reddit Mentions
Subreddits
Limit Labels     

We have sentiment values and mention counts going back to 2017. The complete data set is available via the API.
Take me to the API
ATAK Specific Mentions
As of Oct 2, 2026 3:03:15 AM EDT (1 min. ago)
Includes all comments and posts. Mentions per user per ticker capped at one per hour.
22 days ago • u/QQpenn • r/MVIS • microvision_to_preview_nextgeneration_lidarbased • C
The market places more negative value on what they don't say than positive value on what they do say. If these announcements are not fixing this problem, it will continue.
This PR needed these questions answered to be effective: Is this an internal demonstration or a customer-specific solution? Is a customer requesting this platform? Which vehicles or machines are represented? Are the configurations based on Caterpillar, Gatik, or another customer? \[An NDA friendly version.\] Which sensors are in each reference configuration? Are third-party sensors already integrated? Is the software licensed separately? Is paid NRE propelling this? When does this become production hardware?
Even something as simple as this would be of value: “The platform was developed in response to customer requirements from commercial-vehicle and industrial customers. Demonstrations at IAA include configurations under active **revenue generating** customer evaluations—including short-range, long-range, and fused-sensor architectures.” Then you have a week to build on that as well as bring definition to the related fiscal status. Nothing matters more than that right now.
They're about 30 days away from immediate cash-runway pressure. They need to show how they expect to bridge gaps between $2M revenue to date vs current guidance vs run rate vs significant pipeline conversion \[that shows the $750M they're touting isn't meaningless marketing\]. The objectives are not mysterious. Answers are coming one way or another. It would \[obviously\] be much better for MVIS to demonstrate that it's out in front of the questions instead of letting the market continue to price in lack of material execution and the increased dilution that comes with it. Glen still isn't getting this.
I'd add that Movia Air/+ is what I'm watching specifically in terms of what might increase guidance. With 3rd party validation and a clear ATAK integration path in place, the number of aligned programs increased dramatically. An update from the company on that would be welcomed... and helpful if it addresses fiscal issues in conjunction.
sentiment 0.98
22 days ago • u/QQpenn • r/MVIS • microvision_to_preview_nextgeneration_lidarbased • C
The market places more negative value on what they don't say than positive value on what they do say. If these announcements are not fixing this problem, it will continue.
This PR needed these questions answered to be effective: Is this an internal demonstration or a customer-specific solution? Is a customer requesting this platform? Which vehicles or machines are represented? Are the configurations based on Caterpillar, Gatik, or another customer? \[An NDA friendly version.\] Which sensors are in each reference configuration? Are third-party sensors already integrated? Is the software licensed separately? Is paid NRE propelling this? When does this become production hardware?
Even something as simple as this would be of value: “The platform was developed in response to customer requirements from commercial-vehicle and industrial customers. Demonstrations at IAA include configurations under active **revenue generating** customer evaluations—including short-range, long-range, and fused-sensor architectures.” Then you have a week to build on that as well as bring definition to the related fiscal status. Nothing matters more than that right now.
They're about 30 days away from immediate cash-runway pressure. They need to show how they expect to bridge gaps between $2M revenue to date vs current guidance vs run rate vs significant pipeline conversion \[that shows the $750M they're touting isn't meaningless marketing\]. The objectives are not mysterious. Answers are coming one way or another. It would \[obviously\] be much better for MVIS to demonstrate that it's out in front of the questions instead of letting the market continue to price in lack of material execution and the increased dilution that comes with it. Glen still isn't getting this.
I'd add that Movia Air/+ is what I'm watching specifically in terms of what might increase guidance. With 3rd party validation and a clear ATAK integration path in place, the number of aligned programs increased dramatically. An update from the company on that would be welcomed... and helpful if it addresses fiscal issues in conjunction.
sentiment 0.98


Share
About
Pricing
Policies
Markets
API
Info
tz UTC-4
Connect with us
ChartExchange Email
ChartExchange on Discord
ChartExchange on X
ChartExchange on Reddit
ChartExchange on GitHub
ChartExchange on YouTube
© 2020 - 2026 ChartExchange LLC