USDCGBP
USD Coin / Pound sterling
crypto Composite

NO. It will accept them but turn them into USDC/USDT, crypto is coming, but not available yet.

Wei Zhou, CEO of regulated crypto exchange Coins.ph, states banks rely on them for stablecoin liquidity, with their $100M daily USDT/USDC to peso trading largely bypassing traditional banking. He identifies capital access and cost as key emerging market hurdles.

Using Aave through a wallet can be simpler, but the underlying risks don’t disappear. You still have smart-contract risk, USDC depeg risk, and changing yields. For a beginner, simplicity and understanding exactly where the yield comes from matter more than chasing the highest APY.

If you're staying partly onchain, a couple things take the edge off. For USDC, use a route that goes through Circle's CCTP so you get native USDC on the other side and skip the wrapped-version headaches. And approve exact amounts, then run revoke.cash every now and then to clean up the infinite ones you've already signed.
For the 20 wallets, trackers like Chain Glance and DeBank at least put it all in one view so you're not opening five extensions to remember where your stuff is. Won't make bridging any less painful though.
Splitting it the way you are is pretty reasonable tbh. Keep the boring stuff on a CEX and only go onchain when a play clearly beats what you'd get staking there. Most farms don't clear that bar once you count your own time.

Avoid Transfi, they are scammers. They took my $100 USDC and never release it. Even their facebook page has a lot of complaints of transfers not going through.

On the "which are the most liquid" question, here are the main Solana pools over the last 24h. Numbers are from DexPaprika, where I work, pulled this morning:
\- NVDAx/USDC on Raydium: about $3.1M liquidity, $7.4M volume
\- SPYx/USDC on Raydium: about $3.3M liquidity, $2.8M volume
\- CRCLx/USDC on Raydium: about $2.3M liquidity, $3.2M volume
\- TSLAx/USDC on Raydium: about $2.2M liquidity, $1.1M volume
If you're deciding where to LP, two things matter more than depth.
Volume relative to liquidity is what actually pays you, and it varies a lot even within the same pair. There's a second SPYx/USDC pool on Raydium with only about $0.5M of liquidity that did about $4M in the same 24h, roughly 8x its size, while the big one turned over less than 1x. Routers send flow to whichever pool quotes best, so check the fee tier and range setup before assuming the deepest pool is the best one to sit in.
And the point above about the underlying being closed is the real cost. These pools trade 24/7, so when the stock gaps at the open, arbitrage rebalances the pool against you. Your fee income has to outrun that, which is exactly why a pool with high turnover is worth more than a pool with a high displayed APR.

Something I’ve been thinking about with payment tokens.
Making a token “usable” is relatively easy. Creating a reason for people to actually hold and use it instead of USDT/USDC is much harder.
OOB is an interesting example because it sits inside Oobit’s payment ecosystem and can be spent rather than just traded. On paper, that gives it real utility.
But I don’t think “you can spend it” is enough.
If I have $1,000 in USDT and $1,000 worth of OOB and both can ultimately pay for the same coffee, hotel or whatever, the important question isn’t which one is spendable.
It’s why I would choose to keep OOB in the first place.
That’s where payment tokens either become interesting or pointless IMO. The token needs to make the product better — cheaper transactions, better rewards, access, incentives, something — without turning the whole thing into artificial tokenomics.
If that loop works, actual payment volume could matter more than exchange volume.
If it doesn’t, “utility token” is just a nicer description for another tradable asset.
Disclosure: I’m involved with Oobit, so I obviously have skin in the game. Posting this because this is the part of the OOB model I think actually deserves discussion, including the holes in it.

Proof: [https://coindex.app/a/LcTBpN](https://coindex.app/a/LcTBpN)
I have an impersonator on here - I will NEVER initiate a chat (that means YOU must initiate the chat)
*\*\*\* All Items Sigma or LCS Verified \*\*\**
[2015 Philharmonic NGC MS70](https://coindex.app/a/ihe1jz) \- **$76**
[2026 Philharmonic NGC MS69](https://coindex.app/a/WZvTM2) \- **$76**
[2018 Krugerrand PCGS MS70 First Week](https://coindex.app/a/8gGHod) \- **$76**
[2022P Australia Kangaroo NGC MS69](https://coindex.app/a/v1J5BG) \- **$76**
[2023 Britannia NGC MS69 1st Day King Charles ](https://coindex.app/a/UJVe5O)\- **$76**
[2023 St. Helena Pegasus NGC MS70 1st Day](https://coindex.app/a/8pxyZL) \- **$76**
[2024 Australia One Love Colorized PCGS PR70DCAM](https://coindex.app/a/wiBPUf) \- **$76**
[Cook Islands U.S. State Animal Series NGC MS70](https://coindex.app/a/JYTytu) **- $85**
\- AL Yellowhammer
\- AZ Ridge-Nosed Rattlesnake
\- CO Rocky Mtn. Bighorn Sheep
\- FL Panther
\- HI Monk Seal
\- NV Mountain Bluebird
\- VT Monarch Butterfly
\- WA Orca
[2026 Engelhard Prospectors](https://coindex.app/a/JidA9z) \- **$75**
[2 oz. Bullet](https://coindex.app/a/1tjUei) \- **$150** (2 available)
[1 oz. Bullet](https://coindex.app/a/1tjUei) \- **$75** (2 available)
[Pamp 1 oz. Silver Fortuna, Swiss Minted Assay](https://coindex.app/a/ugs4zD) \- **$75** (7 available)
[Pamp 1 oz. MMTC India Lotus Blossom in Assay](https://coindex.app/a/45hnis) \- **$75** (7 available)
**\*\*\***
**PRICES: I do my best to list what I believe is FAIR and COMPETITIVE, and therefore FIRM.**
**Payment** (no notes please, emoji if required):  Zelle (preferred), Paypal F&F, Venmo F&F, USDC crypto, additional options available for larger amounts.  PP or Venmo paid G&S will be refunded & order canceled.
**Shipping**:  **$7 to $9 ground advantage / $11 priority / $25 insured signature priority**
See this link for shipping details & descriptions: [https://coindex.app/a/xCdDhI](https://coindex.app/a/xCdDhI)
My liability for lost packages is 50%, capped at $500, and ends when marked "delivered." 
I have no expertise in grading, be your own judge based on the photos, please ask for more detailed photos of anything you want a clearer picture of. Coins are not new and often have scratches, scuffs, spots, etc. so make sure you look first to your satisfaction!
My account has 2fa enabled, strong passwords, and you must comment before I accept a chat invite.
Please check my [feedback](http://old.reddit.com/r/pmsfeedback/search?q=stillwaters23&sort=new&restrict_sr=on&t=all) \- I offer verified metals, quick shipping, good communication, very secure packing, and I'm always happy to answer questions, whether about my listings or anything else, so please don't hesitate to ask.

I use cbBTC on Base, lend to AAVE and borrow USDC around 30% LTV. Use the stables to farm yield that’s greater than my borrowed position rate. Check out Pendle. Just make sure you understand where the underlying yield is coming from or you’ll become the yield.

The real issue here isn't even the crypto itself, it's that banks see a transfer coming out of a massive pooled Coinbase account and their automated filters immediately treat it like sketchy retail trading volume because the actual client data gets stripped along the way. Even modern setups like Mercury still answer to underlying partner banks that panic the second they see raw exchange inflows without clear commercial context attached. Honestly, if your new setup gives you any trouble, ditch the regular exchange off-ramps completely and run your invoices through a licensed B2B gateway like Inxy instead. Because they're built specifically for companies to accept, exchange, and pay out in USDC and USDT, the money actually moves with clean corporate provenance when it hits fiat rails, so you aren't constantly gambling your working capital against a random compliance freeze.

How to really make money in crypto
1. Work and save as much as you can
2. Change everything to USDC
3. Place it in high-performance DeFi protocols
4. Win every month
5. Change the profits to USDC and repeat
The school will never teach you this...

Below, are the best rates you can get for 1K, 10K, and 100K USD investments on fixed term/fixed yield principal tokens (PTs).
Similar leaders this week, with 3Jane's sUSD3 token, a junior, first-loss tranche on their lending pool, continuing its unbroken lead.
Total dominance by Pendle as the marketplace with all the highest PT APY opportunities across all measured investment sizes.

1,000 USD Investment Level Opportunities:
1. 21.63% - sUSD3 (USDC), Ethereum, Pendle, December 16
2. 18.73% - sUSDx (USDx), Ethereum, Pendle, December 2
3. 18.32% - reUSDe (USDe), Ethereum, Pendle, December 9
4. 16.90% - USP (USDC), Ethereum, Pendle, November 25
5. 14.69% - USDx, Ethereum, Pendle, December 2

10,000 USD Investment Level Opportunities:
1. 21.43% - sUSD3 (USDC), Ethereum, Pendle, December 16
2. 18.70% - sUSDx (USDx), Ethereum, Pendle, December 2
3. 18.29% - reUSDe (USDe), Ethereum, Pendle, December 9
4. 16.84% - USP (USDC), Ethereum, Pendle, November 25
5. 14.62% - USDx, Ethereum, Pendle, December 2

100,000 USD Investment Level Opportunities:
1. 19.94% - sUSD3 (USDC), Ethereum, Pendle, December 16
2. 18.49% - sUSDx (USDx), Ethereum, Pendle, December 2
3. 14.73% - USP (USDC), Ethereum, Pendle, November 25
4. 14.17% - USD3, Ethereum, Pendle, December 16
5. 13.90% - USDx, Ethereum, Pendle, December 2
\*Note: rates are calculated at time of publication and subject to change; limited to markets with > 2 weeks in duration and tokens at or above their peg. PT markets still have risk of loss from underlying stablecoin depegs.

Join me and get yours! Sign up and complete tasks, let's earn USDC rewards together!

It works pretty much like normal AMM LPing since tokenized stocks are nothing but crypto tokens in the front end.
The big APR numbers can be misleading though. A lot of the time it’s just low liquidity + a short burst of volume or incentives.
You need to also understand about impermanent loss here. If the stock pumps hard, the pool sells some of your stock token into USDC as the price moves, so you can end up worse off than if you had just held it.

[WTB] Five 1 oz .999 silver bars or rounds — paying with USDC (crypto)

Sending USDC still shows the chain. The balance can be enough and the transfer still fails when that wallet has no SOL left for the network fee.

Well those are aggregators so they... aggregate from many different sources. So it depends on each source.
The listed APR should not be trusted, it's highly variable and it all depends on your specific settings and how concentrated is your liquidity.
So if we take for example this opportunity: [https://app.merkl.xyz/opportunities/17006444626997054711](https://app.merkl.xyz/opportunities/17006444626997054711)
To be eligible, you must provide liquidity on Coinbase tokenized stocks on Aerodrome, via Revert. So, you open revert, put in the filter exchange: aerodrome, RWA: [https://revert.finance/#/discover?exchanges=aerodrome&page=1&rewards=true&rwa=true](https://revert.finance/#/discover?exchanges=aerodrome&page=1&rewards=true&rwa=true)
And look for the pools of tokenized stocks with the "c" suffix like for instance USDC/NVDAc.
If you want to learn more about Coinbase tokenized stocks: [https://www.coinbase.com/en-gb/tokenize](https://www.coinbase.com/en-gb/tokenize)
>Coinbase Tokenized Stocks give you exposure to a real underlying share. Holders have a direct, senior claim on the underlying equity. Some other products offer a synthetic, a debt claim, or a derivative wrapper rather than a claim on a real share.
And then you can open a position on this pair. You can define a price range where you want to provide liquidity. The more concentrated your price range, the more yield you get if the price remains in your range.
However, if the price shoots up, you're missing out on the upside, and if it craters down, you're missing out on the downside. So you have to set your range accordingly.
If you set a very big range to ensure that the price is always within your range, your liquidity will be more diluted and you will earn less fees.

I'm launching a small ERC-20 memecoin on Base called **NOW MATTERS ($NOW)**.
Blockaid currently marks the token as **“Malicious”**, and I'm trying to figure out how to resolve it.
I contacted Blockaid and they manually re-reviewed the token. Their latest response confirmed:
* The verified contract is a minimal OpenZeppelin ERC-20.
* No post-deployment mint.
* No owner privileges.
* No fees.
* No blacklist.
* No pause functionality.
* No proxy.
* The deployer wallet is not the reason for the classification.
* The official website currently scans as non-malicious.
* The contracts holding the supply are official Uniswap Liquidity Launchpad contracts.
* The remaining code signal is similarity to an ERC-20 template that has also been used by rug launches, **not a hidden backdoor in my contract**.
However, they won't remove the Malicious classification yet because the Uniswap auction has very little participation and hasn't migrated into a live liquidity pool.
And this is where the situation becomes a circular problem with no obvious way out:
**Blockaid marks the token as Malicious → potential buyers see the warning → they don't want to participate in the auction → the auction doesn't reach the graduation threshold → no live liquidity pool is created → Blockaid won't remove the Malicious classification until there is a live market.**
In other words, **the condition Blockaid requires in order to remove the warning is the very thing that the warning itself makes difficult to achieve.**
I'm not asking whether the token is a good investment or whether anyone should buy it. I'm trying to understand the technical/practical solution to this situation.
Blockaid told me to come back after the auction has successfully migrated into a live, locked Uniswap v4 pool.
But how is a new project supposed to reach that point if the security warning itself prevents potential participants from taking part in the initial auction?
Possible options I'm considering:
1. Continue the current auction and hope it reaches the graduation threshold despite the warning.
2. Let the auction finish unsuccessfully, recover the unsold tokens, and create a normal liquidity pool.
3. Create a real pool elsewhere with USDC/WETH and demonstrate actual liquidity and trading activity to Blockaid.
4. Deploy a new version of the token with a different contract implementation to avoid the code-similarity signal.
5. Something else I'm missing?
Has anyone dealt with a similar Blockaid false positive or code-similarity classification?
**If you were in this situation, what practical route would you take to break this circular dependency?**
I'm particularly interested in experiences with Blockaid, Uniswap CCA/Liquidity Launchpad, or getting a token reassessed after a false-positive malicious classification.
Token: `0x059112ec4c72c4e131b84F4B3Ecb6bF5CF12D597`
Network: Base
Website: [https://nowmatters.xyz/](https://nowmatters.xyz/)

I know crypto but tokenized stocks are new to me, help me pick
Metamask has 250+ stocks through ondo and ondo is a big name in rwa but the tokens don't actually give me ownership of the underlying shares, its a structured product through a bvi entity and you're also routing through swaps so you're paying gas plus slippage on every trade and its only 24/5.
Bloom (previously gm markets) has fewer stocks than metamask but every token is backed by a real share at interactive brokers or alpaca, pricing is rfq so no pool slippage, 20 bps trading fee and gas is abstracted in USDC and its 24/7 but its early so the catalog isn't huge yet. BIG FUCKING PROMISES btw
what should I pick in comparison, both have their own advantages..

yes, that's aave underneath, the wallet is just a front end for the same deposit. one more layer of contracts and sometimes a cut of the yield, but broadly the same thing.
if you're actually interested in more yield, a bigger step up is options-based vaults. instead of earning from borrowers you get paid yield for agreeing to buy or sell at a set price, and it's usually a fair bit more than lending pays. you know your yield upfront and there's no liquidation, and you're not trading or timing anything, you just pick a level which i would buy or sell at anyway so
caveat: just take note it's not a stablecoin deposit anymore, if it fills you're holding the other asset, so it fits money you're happy putting into eth or btc at the right price rather than money you want to stay in USDC.