IDUSDT
Everest / Tether USD
cryptoComposite

Hello, Binance P2P Verified merchant here. On 15th July, 2026, a customer asked me to send USDT on a wallet address; when I tried to send, it got rejected and my account got blocked. Initially, they told me it'll be resolved within 24 hours, next day they gave me a deadline of 25th August. Since then, it's been blocked. I've been trying to continuously ask for an update, but they keep telling me that it's still under review and I'll be informed via email when there's an update. It's been over 3 months now and I'm still not getting any meaningful response from the CS team. It had all my life savings and they aren't even releasing the funds so I can sustain my family. The only thing I know is that transaction may have violated the Binance ToS, but it's been over 100 days and I don't know what else to do. Case ID - #172432584 https://preview.redd.it/rn1hy0bfxjxh1.jpeg?width=738&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=f195a8c783f6fd08c74b87accbeb5eb6112edee3

My entire Binance account has been frozen under internal review since June 14th (over 4 months ago!) due to a TRX deposit from SatoshiHero. I have provided full video evidence of the source of funds, but live support keeps telling me to wait indefinitely for an email. My funds are held hostage without any updates. Case ID: 172410926. Please escalate this immediately to a senior compliance manager.

fake ID? When did i ever say fake? I can buy a 50 dollar ID at the DMV, silly.

A few things to compare beyond the feature list, since most extensions will claim they have previews, hardware support and risk warnings. How the preview is built is the biggest practical difference. Look at a real swap or token approval and check whether the preview shows the onchain program being called, the accounts being read or written, the token addresses, and the amounts. A preview that only says "Approve spending of TOKEN" without surfacing the spender program ID is weaker than one that breaks the instruction down. On Solana, a good preview also surfaces the affected addresses the way solstack\_solana mentioned, so you can see when a single transaction is touching programs you did not expect. The revocation story matters a lot for an actively trading wallet. Solana's token approval model means one bad approval can drain a balance. Check whether the wallet lists your active approvals and lets you revoke them in a couple of steps, and whether revoking an approval is one signed transaction that clearly names the token and the authority being revoked. Wallets that only show approvals as part of transaction history, or that need you to find a separate revocation tool, add real friction when you need to react. Incident history is useful, but the signal that matters more is the response. Read the post-incident write-ups: did they publish what was signed, which key or flow was involved, and what changed in the wallet so the same approval can't be abused again. A public write-up with a clear before/after beats a changelog that just says "security improvement." As verifiablestandpoint noted, an audit is a snapshot; the question is whether findings actually shipped into the version you'd run for larger trades. Fake extensions are the most likely threat for browser wallets, so compare the friction to install the real one. Does the project surface a single install path from its own domain, and does the store listing pin the developer identity rather than just showing a generic creator name? If you have to click through a search result that could plausibly be a clone, that's a real risk for a wallet that sits on a hot machine. Key storage and rotation are worth checking before you trust it with larger balances. See whether the wallet stores keys only in the extension and never in sync, whether it documents what happens to keys on uninstall, and whether a hardware wallet connection uses the chain's standard signing path instead of relaying the secret through the extension. You mentioned staying on desktop — the most common pattern people use for active trading is a browser wallet for the daily balance and a hardware wallet for anything larger, which keeps the extension's exposure bounded. For the day-to-day comparison, try this small set on each candidate: do one real approval and one real swap on a low-stakes account, screenshot the preview for both, revoke the approval, and time how many steps and signatures each took. That will separate the wallets faster than reading feature matrices, and it directly tests the flows you'll actually use.

Some things to clarify: It's very very easy to make an anonymous wallet. Any wallet you create yourself will inherently be anonymous.  The challenge is filling that wallet with anonymous bitcoin. When you buy bitcoin from a KYC service they will be able to follow that bitcoin with your ID attached to it. So the secret is to buy from a [non-KYC](https://kycnot.me/) service.  The unintuitive part that people get hung up on is that you need a KYC service like Zelle to send money for bitcoin using these services. The reason it works is because the Zelle transaction is not connected to the bitcoin transaction in any way, so the bitcoin remains anonymous (or at least not connected to your identity).

Buying and using a "50 dollar" fake ID is a good way to get a criminal record and end up with a lot of fines and court expenses that you clearly can't afford if you can't afford $100 at once.

I apologize I know this question has been asked and answered frequently, but i'm having issues and would greatly appreciate some help. Over the past week, I have been trying to buy a small amount of Bitcoin ($30–$50 USD) via non KYC and P2P methods. Unfortunately, I’ve run into so many issues. Vendors either ignore the orders I place/aren't even actually online, say they are unavailable, or only sell 100+ dollars worth. I’ve looked at safe P2P platforms with and have had no hope. Should I give up at this point? I don't wanna spend 100 dollars, and I dont wanna pay 50 dollars to buy an ID (I'm still working on my drivers license) Honestly, i'm just wasting my time at this point, so any insights or tips would be greatly appreciated.

[SSV Network] New Bare-Metal Operator Live - ID 2352 (Reth/Nimbus)

I’ve been trying to withdraw my money from Gemini for over two weeks with no resolution. I’ve successfully completed multiple identity verifications, including facial recognition and government-issued ID checks. Despite this, I still cannot withdraw my funds. I’ve opened multiple tickets: **#6514950** – October 19 **#6519204** – October 22 **#6520155** – October 23 Every response seems to be the same generic message asking me to verify my identity, which I’ve already done multiple times. **I’m simply trying to access my own money.** I’ve complied with every request, yet nobody can explain why I can’t withdraw or provide a timeline. If anyone from Gemini sees this, please escalate my case. I would prefer to resolve this directly rather than file formal regulatory complaints. Has anyone else experienced this? What finally worked?

Hello everyone, I am writing this to warn the crypto community about Bitget’s unlawful practices regarding user deposits. The exchange has permanently confiscated $750 USD of my personal funds and refuses to return them, completely ignoring international financial laws and standard corporate off-boarding procedures. Here is exactly what happened: 1. My Bitget account was previously banned due to a Terms of Service (ToS) violation. I fully accepted this decision and did not ask to restore my trading access or use their platform again. 2. Recently, an automated withdrawal of $750 USD was accidentally triggered from my Stake platform account to my old, saved Bitget BEP20 address. 3. The transaction was fully confirmed on the blockchain (BNB Chain / BEP20). Verified TxID: 0xad687fbf0451f3b1de6207f72cb183ac4fb5aaeb34df0621a98c533da196af95 I immediately contacted Bitget Support (Ticket ID: #3454156) asking for a one-time manual REFUND of my accidental deposit back to the sender or to my external personal non-custodial wallet (MetaMask/Trust Wallet). Instead of escalating the issue to the Compliance/AML department or asking for a standard Video Verification of the source of funds, Bitget support (operators Rainie, KW, and Jinn) repeatedly copy-pasted a template response stating that «any deposits made after account termination are made at your own risk» and declared that my funds are «unreturnable» and «this decision is final». I then sent them a final formal notice, giving them 24 hours to review the case professionally at a management level, explicitly stating that I am ready to provide full unedited video evidence proving the legitimate source of funds from Stake. Bitget’s response? They simply GHOSTED me and silently CLOSED my support ticket #3454156 without any reply or explanation. Let’s be clear: A private company’s Terms of Service DO NOT give them the legal right to misappropriate and steal a user’s private property. Unless there is an official warrant from law enforcement or a court seizure order, freezing a deposit and refusing to return it to the rightful owner is a straight-up exit scam. Bitget Team, I demand that a Senior Compliance Officer reviews this case manually and initiates a manual refund to my external wallet. I have all the proofs ready. Ticket ID: #3454156

Blockchain was one of the most prominent “exchanges” 10 years ago. I It was the first place I bought BTC. You get some weird ass string of letters and numbers you need to write down, in case your are logged out and can’t use your credentials. This is not your private address, it’s a Blockchain.com ID. So it’s basically a hot wallet, where they hold the keys for you, but refuses to hand them over if you can’t locate your credentials or your ID. There’s been so many cases of theft, lost access and maybe even insider fraud which has led to everyone keep saying “don’t use them”.

Case ID #172309770 Account blocked since Sept 12 for a transfer to HTX. Was given a review deadline of Oct 23 (today) — still "not concluded," no explanation, no new timeline. Multiple cases opened (#169444133, #172309770), every agent gives the same copy-pasted template, no one confirms the actual rule violated or whether this is related to the HTX/EU sanctions restrictions. Need this escalated to someone who can actually give a real answer and unblock my account. Thanks.

They asked me for bank statements, a selfie, pictures of the front and back of my ID, screenshots showing my BTC wallet balance, and details about which platform and app I used. There were several other things they requested, but I can’t remember everything. It was a lot of personal information.