DOGEUSDT
Dogecoin / Tether USD
crypto Composite

It was the first meme coin, which was created to take the mickey out of the self appointed Bitcoin experts. It had a nice dog as an icon and people liked it.
I actually bought some at 8p, watched it climb quite steadily to 33p in December 2024. I'm not sure Musk did anything other than tweaking it in the short term during a period of growth. In January 2025 he started axing jobs and cutting benefits, and DOGE started to fall. I got out at 25p with a near 200% profit but the special nature of DOGE ended.
It's such a shame. I think Musk has been given way too much credit for things he hasn't achieved. I think he's a dangerous ultra right wing menace to society.

I remember when I made 3,500% in DOGE, and it went on to briefly go another 1,000% from there.
No one did any "submitting".

Didn’t DOGE aggregate citizen data *and* exfiltrate it or do I use the TDS?

> The reason I think you are a partisan hack instead of seriously concerned about the Federal budget deficit is because every single Democrat like yourself blames the ENTIRETY of the $7 Trillion the Federal government spends every year on the $800 billion defense budget. Which is the ONE Constitutional duty the Federal government actually has.
I've never heard any Democrat do that. Can you point to a Democrat blaming the entirety of the deficit on defense? Seriously. I'd like you to do that. And, I'd like you to actually find me some serious Democrats, people with power. People in Congress or serious voices that govern policy. You just said every single Democrat like myself. So, prove that. I'm a partisan hack, but you are serious about deficits.
https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/FYFSGDA188S
Every year, the St. Luis FED produces a simple graph that shows that years deficit as a % of GDP. Now, before you look, you tell me how you want to decide who is 'responsible' for the deficit each year. Is it the part in charge of the House? In charge of the Senate? The Presidency? Some combination? Feel free, you get to decide who we blame. But, you gotta say it before we start to look. Then, we can go through each year and decide who was responsible. What do you say? I'm the hack. You are a serious person. Let's look, together, and we can decide who makes the deficit worse and who makes it better. What do you think? Are you really willing to trust a turd like Ted Cruz?
> Every Federal office DOGE poked a head in caused a riot among Democrat Congressmen...and women.
DOGE never produced a single audit of anything. Not a government agency, not a contract, not a person, nothing. They were going to uncover all the fraud and waste and they didn't do anything but prove what happens when you put Homer Simpson in charge of something. Everyone with any sense was outraged that the incompetent boobs at DOGE were being allowed access to anything. They didn't follow through on any promise that was made, other than the promise that they would be allowed to fire every one of the Inspectors General that was investigating a company owned by Elon Musk. The fact that you referred to them without calling out for being the clowns that they are is an insult to me, because you are just wasting the time of intelligent people by even bringing them up.
> But sure. Let's cut defense...after every other single program is cut first.
That's what 'serious' people say? Really? You don't even want us to look at what is happening with Defense, do you? We could cut everything else by 25% and you'd say that we now don't have any reason to look at DoD. God forbid, the only way you would concede that someone could look at it is if we cut 'every other single program'. You want to cite the Constitution, but you'll ignore that the actual intent of the founding fathers was that there would be no standing army. They only reason they would fund a Navy is because they thought that the Federal Government couldn't use a Navy to attach the Rights of citizens. We spend more than enough to defend ourselves, by any measure. But you say that we cannot even look at what happens in that department until we cut every other program.
Are people really supposed to take you seriously?
Oh, but you quote the CBO, right? Maybe you are serious? Well, let's see. Let's compare the document from just a couple weeks ago, which will reflect the impact of the clowns that Republicans have elected to office, with the document from one year ago, when those clowns hadn't had much chance to do any damage:
Here is the document from 2025: https://www.cbo.gov/publication/60870
And you've shared the document from 2026 already.
Let's see, let's look at the last year that both documents have in common, which would be 2035. As of Jan 2025, the CBO thought the deficit would be 6.1% of GDP in the year 2035.
After a single year of the Republicans being in charge of both houses of Congress and the Presidency, what does YOUR SOURCE say... Oh, yeah, it says that in 2035, the deficit will be 6.6% of GDP. Imagine that. Just in case you aren't sure, 6.6% is more than 6.1%
Again, why do you guys pretend that you care about deficits or the debt? It is painfully obvious that you do not. If you cared at all, you certainly wouldn't be here attacking Democrats. So, my main question to you is, why do you keep pretending that you really care about this stuff?
No one who cares about deficits or the debt has EVER voted for a Republican for national office.

depends.
People complained about Apple having a high PE for too long as well. Sometimes the market goes through rounds of re-ratings. What investors are willing to pay and not pay for something.
I think some names will be fine, but I think there is some legit issues with some margins in some software names and I don't think anyone knows how this will shake out.
I was here pounding the table for defense names during DOGE since that was really just fear and there was actual evidence they weren't really impacting much.
This case, I have no idea where everything winds up.

https://www.cbo.gov/publication/61882#:~:text=In%20CBO's%20projections%2C%20the%20federal,and%20moderates%20in%20later%20years.
The reason I think you are a partisan hack instead of seriously concerned about the Federal budget deficit is because every single Democrat like yourself blames the ENTIRETY of the $7 Trillion the Federal government spends every year on the $800 billion defense budget. Which is the ONE Constitutional duty the Federal government actually has.
Furthermore, every time Democrat like yourself get into office, they CUT defense and put 150% of the former defense spending into Socialist vote buying schemes or outright fraud.
That's why I'm calling bullshit on you.
Want to cut defense spending?
Sure. I'll bite.
Cut EVERY single Federal program by 25%...Including the Defense budget.
Hey, look, we just balanced the Federal budget.
"Audit the DOD."
Right.
Every Federal office DOGE poked a head in caused a riot among Democrat Congressmen...and women.
In the end, the Supreme Court ruled that without the consent of Congress, not a SINGLE DOLLAR can be cut.
So here we are. Another year of a $2 Trillion deficit that has been going on for over 6 years now.
I see Congress passing Continuing Resolutions, which just promise to keep on spending every dollar already approved.
But sure. Let's cut defense...after every other single program is cut first.

Imagine if Claude got this COBOL tool out earlier, DOGE wouldn't have embarrassed itself with the social security recipients born in 1875 nonsense

For your first point I would have been inclined to believe that some amount of market correction would occur but after seeing Elon musks most recent compensation package after absolutely destroying Teslas global public image with all the DOGE shenanigans I’m not so sure anymore lol

> pubs get the entitlement spending cuts they want
If they get big cuts sure....
But they won't. Look how much damage they took just fighting to remove ACA enhanced subsidies which have cost a mere $60B for a two year extension. And that's with a $2T deficit. Look at the spectacular backlash and failure of DOGE. The whole ordeal will end up actually have probably cost taxpayers money not saved it.
While healthcare costs will keep rising, that doesn't magically make money disappear from the economy and circulation.
It only vanishes when government:
* Taxes.
* Cuts spending.
Otherwise that money goes to someone else who consumes and generates profits and invests.
>pressure against the inflow-outflow balance
Only thing that would contract liquidity in the system is through taxation and reduced spending plus less printing to support that.
>is there anything we could call it besides communism for companies?
I try to avoid the political labeling part here. It is not very productive for what we do as individuals. Do I think it is probably bad for the sustainability of the country for my kids? Yea which is why I vote, volunteer, donate etc. But investing I just can't make a good case for cash.
Like literally credit expansion is accelerating faster and faster.
https://fred.stlouisfed.org/graph/fredgraph.png?g=1St8G&height=490
Rate of growth has risen to 6.8% YoY and continues climbing.
Credit conditions are loosening, not tightening.

This is a bitcoin sub. This post is going to upset/confuse a lot of people here lol.
The best idea is to use..... Thorchain! Its super quick and easy, effectively trustless and supports BTC, ETH, LTC, BCH, DOGE, AVAX, BSC, BASE, TRON, XRP, ATOM. Just send a bitcoin transaction with an OP\_Return memo and get paid on whatever chain you request.
Once you have your shitcoin of choice, there are plenty of Dex's for swapping them, such as Pancake Swaps.
The biggest limitation is that thorchain does not support xmr. You will need to use trocador (technically custodial) or a specialised trustless swap.

Eso de meter todo en una cripto como bitcoin no es rentable, ya que otras crecen a mejores tasas de rendimiento. Incluso hace unos días mientras todas caían arrastradas por bitcoin unas pocas subían y dieron buen rendimiento. Una buena cartera debe tener BTC, ETH, SOL, BNB, TAO (ligada a IA), LINK, XRP, DOGE, PEPE y la que medio alto rendimiento mientras todas caían XMR.

https://preview.redd.it/2rpr8z9ez8lg1.png?width=1556&format=png&auto=webp&s=53c1a5a2e69df7466712172ceeb31cbe4be8e997
Soooo you guys know I'm a free-trade loving capitalist. I LOVVVVED the SC ruling that confirmed what the constitution clearly states which is that CONGRESS has the power to regulate trade, impose duties, and raise taxes. I think that has been lost in our modern day political climate. As America has moved towards more of the cult of personality, we have forgotten that the Presidential role is really to be the administrator of the day to day of the country and the military leader of the nation. Everything else is supposed to come from Congress. We have lost that vision in the past 50 years and it has been the President that has been setting the agenda and their political parties in congress have supported that agenda.
It's supposed to be the other way around. But no one will ever win the election nominating the most efficient bureaucrat and administrator to be president. So now the president is the "leader of the party" for others to rally around. There was nothing "ground breaking" in the courts ruling and frankly I'm shocked is wasn't 9-0. It's spelled out in the constitution. Not a lot of ambiguity there. Sure the President does have authority to make SPECIFIC tariffs on SPECIFIC products for SPECIFIC countries when responding to a national crisis. Whatever this tariff policy has been, it aint that.
So now its 10% wait no 15% tariffs on EVERYWHERE because we are throwing an apparent temper tantrum. Does this include the deals already struck with other nations? Are they excluded??? This requires congressional approval after 150 days so what happens then? What if Congress says no?? Does that mean its over for good? Or can we re-start it with a new change??? Like is this going to be the next 3 years? 150 day tantrums waiting for Congress to rein the president in???? Is the TACO trade still in effect???
All of this and more is just noise that the market doesn't need and it is spiking the VIX back above 20. Which is not what AMD needs at this moment. We are seeing pressure on tech as a whole and the AI trade is just concerned because we haven't seen that breakthrough use case that has been destabilizing to industries as a whole. Unfortunately, (without AGI) we aren't going to see those widespread benefits that the market likes to hear about until we build the infrastructure which is great for AMD and NVDA. You have to build the DC first, so you can support the deployment. I have to be honest with you, I kinda feel like ChatGPT is more valuable to me personally than AMZN prime right now at this moment. So I think a lot more people are open to subscription models to have a personal assistant living in their background. I think there is monetization out there that hasn't happened yet and its like google or FB before ads. So I think there already is a financial case out there but the really really big stuff still needs the DC to be built.
I saw a job posting recently on LinkedIn. Hiring for construction project administrator here in Central Florida to build data centers. pay was $250k-$350k plus bonuses. Said this was not just a one time project hire, that the contractor has a backlog of DC projects for the next 5 years. Does anyone really think this is stopping????
Buy the dip. AMD down to $192 is a buy. Not sure if its going to dip lower than that but with State of the Union coming, market usually takes an upbeat turn towards the idea of new spending. DOGE is dead and cuts seem to have gone away. Expect Trump to unleash aggressive spending that was the hallmark of his first administration, especially now that his tax cut has gone through. DOW JONES 55000 by EOY. I'm calling it!
Someone do that Remindme thingy

Are you fucking retarded? BBB added > $2T to the debt. DOGE cost far more than it "cut".

XRP, ADA, DOGE, TRX, BNB, ZEC, MANA, XLM, NEO, IOTA, VET, ZRX, VTHO, ZIL - a lot of these I picked up back in 2017 or 2018.
DOGE was basically a “house money” trade in 2021. I sold a few ETH, bought DOGE, then sold it a day or so later and bought back my original ETH - plus kept the leftover DOGE as profit.

Time to re-up on DOGE no doubt.

Yeah, but how short is short enough, and how much % orphan rates are tolerable? Why are orphan rates even a problem? Let's answer those questions first:
1) They are a problem because they get skewed by hashpower - if everyone had the same hashpower then everyone would have the same orphan rate and it wouldn't be a problem: it would be as if everyone's asic efficiency is reduced by that factor. But if you have Bitcoin's pool distribution then the top pool will have about half the orphan rate than the bottom pool - which creates some centralization pressure. https://gitlab.com/0353F40E/fablous/-/raw/master/img/fig-orphan-skew.png (Toomim explains this same thing in the post you linked)
2) What is tolerable? Toomim established 3%, and my CHIP claims 2% is tolerable, based on impact on margins. https://gitlab.com/0353F40E/fablous#tolerable-orphan-rate
If network had 2%, the difference between top pool and bottom pool's rate would be about 1% revenue advantage for the top pool. (Toomim explains this same thing in the post you linked)
3) Under what conditions should we not exceed 2%? Of course if you try run a pool on a bad connection your orphan rate will skyrocket. We need to establish a reasonable lower bar for a competitive pool to stay under 2%. Nowadays global pings are under 300ms even between opposite points on Earth, and 1GB/s links are widely accessible. Starlink will only keep getting better. With this in mind, I demonstrate that even with full blocks spaced 1 minute, even relaying a whole full block (0% mempool sync) would have <2% orphan risk. https://gitlab.com/0353F40E/fablous#impact-assessment
To put things in perspective - the impact of latency on DOGE is 0.15%. It's like a fixed constant based on ping/interval ratio. From there, orphan rate goes up as blocks get filled - but the impact of that will be the same no matter the target blocktime, it just adds on top of the base rate given by latency.
Another useful referecne is Nervos who have 10s target block time and are only seeing 3.3% orphan rate. Too much for us, but hey, it's 10s target time, and we're proposing 60s.

Pretty sure Elon sicc'd DOGE on them they're gone now

Half of the crayon lodged in brain people and bots on Twitter think checks cut from the tariff revenue go back to foreign nations. Because they still think it was the foreign nations that paid the tariff in the first place.
I’ll expect a tariff check right around when the DOGE check shows up.

The republicans lie about everything. Remember the DOGE checks? Yeah that wasn’t happening either. They need Congress to allocate money and the republicans that keep 🥭 in power don’t want to do that. This is what they want. They want money for the 1% who never paid tariffs in the first place and wipe out all the competition to them so they secure their empires better. There was never a check bro. That’s not a thing.

It was the first meme coin, which was created to take the mickey out of the self appointed Bitcoin experts. It had a nice dog as an icon and people liked it.
I actually bought some at 8p, watched it climb quite steadily to 33p in December 2024. I'm not sure Musk did anything other than tweaking it in the short term during a period of growth. In January 2025 he started axing jobs and cutting benefits, and DOGE started to fall. I got out at 25p with a near 200% profit but the special nature of DOGE ended.
It's such a shame. I think Musk has been given way too much credit for things he hasn't achieved. I think he's a dangerous ultra right wing menace to society.