DAO Reddit Mentions | ChartExchange

Reposting this with some revisions, given "the moderator" removed the original without word/response. \[thelaboredclerk, if you're the only one, please let us know what's up. Haven't heard from you in DM.\]
I think this is a good time for AVAX Labs to jump in on what differentiates AVAX from ETH that helps resolve some of the issues with ETH.
Here are my AI-synthesized thoughts on AVAX addresses these issues already.
To position **AVAX (Avalanche)** as a compelling alternative to **Ethereum**, we can walk through the six key problem areas outlined in Ethereum’s *Trillion Dollar Security* report and compare how Avalanche’s design and architecture *already address* or *proactively mitigate* these concerns.
# 1 - User Experience (UX)
**Ethereum’s Issue:** Fragmented UX due to complex gas models, unpredictable fees, and network congestion.
**How AVAX Solves This:**
* **Subnets**: Avalanche’s architecture supports *custom blockchains (subnets)* that can be tailored for specific use cases—allowing dApps to create user-centric environments with fixed fees or no gas at all.
* **Fast Finality**: Avalanche achieves sub-second finality, which dramatically improves UX in DeFi and gaming apps compared to Ethereum’s often congested network.
* **Easier Wallet Interaction**: Wallets like Core and MetaMask on Avalanche provide seamless multichain UX with native subnet support and cleaner fee presentation.
**TL;DR:** AVAX is built from the ground up for smoother, faster, and more predictable UX.
# 2 - Smart Contract Vulnerabilities
**Ethereum’s Issue:** Smart contracts remain exposed to coding errors, hacks, and exploits due to limited tooling and the high risk of writing insecure Solidity code.
**How AVAX Solves This:**
* **EVM-Compatible But Not Limited to EVM**: Avalanche supports the Ethereum Virtual Machine (EVM) but allows developers to deploy on other VMs (e.g., WASM) for safer execution environments.
* **Subnet Customization**: Projects can enforce additional security layers (custom gas rules, permissions, validator sets) unavailable in Ethereum’s global execution environment.
* **Isolated Execution**: Subnets reduce cross-contract risk by isolating dApp execution environments.
**TL;DR:** Avalanche lets devs deploy more secure, sandboxed smart contract environments with better tools and optionality.
**3 - Infrastructure and Cloud Dependencies**
**Ethereum’s Issue:** Heavy reliance on centralized infrastructure like Infura and cloud hosting leads to single points of failure.
**How AVAX Solves This:**
* **Validator Decentralization**: Avalanche’s consensus allows thousands of independent validators to participate at lower hardware costs, spreading the network's hosting burden.
* **Subnet Independence**: Developers can host their own subnets with custom rules, avoiding dependency on third-party cloud APIs.
* **No Infura Dependency**: Avalanche's architecture naturally supports independent node runners and doesn’t rely on a small set of providers.
**TL;DR:** Avalanche decentralizes its infrastructure at both the base and subnet levels, avoiding the centralization pitfalls Ethereum is trying to overcome.
# 4 - Consensus Protocol Strength
**Ethereum’s Issue:** While Ethereum transitioned to Proof of Stake (PoS), its finality and decentralization are still maturing under the Beacon Chain.
**How AVAX Solves This:**
* **Snowman Consensus**: Avalanche’s novel PoS-based consensus scales to thousands of validators without sacrificing finality or decentralization.
* **Sub-Second Finality**: Unlike Ethereum, which can take \~13 minutes to finalize a transaction fully, Avalanche achieves finality in under 2 seconds—by design.
* **Validator Inclusivity**: Avalanche allows any participant to become a validator with 2,000 AVAX (significantly lower than Ethereum’s 32 ETH requirement), making it more accessible and decentralized.
**TL;DR:** AVAX’s consensus is faster, more inclusive, and achieves stronger finality than Ethereum’s.
# 5 - Monitoring and Incident Response
**Ethereum’s Issue:** Lack of centralized coordination or tools to rapidly detect and respond to protocol-level exploits or network issues.
**How AVAX Solves This:**
* **Smaller Attack Surfaces via Subnets**: Incidents can be contained at the subnet level, reducing impact to the broader Avalanche ecosystem.
* **Governance Flexibility**: Subnets can design their own incident response and governance protocols—offering flexibility for fast-moving teams and DAO governance.
* **Ecosystem Observability**: Avalanche’s consensus and validator models make network behavior easier to audit in real time, with telemetry tools like Avalanche Explorer.
**TL;DR:** Avalanche enables faster, more localized incident response mechanisms due to its modular architecture.
#
**6 -** **Ecosystem Coordination and Information Flow**
**Ethereum’s Issue:** Slow and fragmented communication between the Foundation, core devs, dApps, and the broader community has led to delays and frustration.
**How AVAX Solves This:**
* **Single Coordinated Team (Ava Labs)**: While Ethereum is open-source and loosely federated, Avalanche’s Ava Labs maintains closer integration with ecosystem projects, leading to faster feature rollouts.
* **Subnet Governance**: Subnets are self-governing and allow for faster iteration and upgrades without needing global consensus across the entire network.
* **Developer Experience**: Avalanche provides a faster feedback loop between devs and infrastructure because it controls and supports its own SDKs, wallets, explorer, and dApp tools.
**TL;DR:** Avalanche’s tighter coordination model and subnet governance avoids Ethereum’s communication bottlenecks.
**Final Thoughts: Why Choose Avalanche Over Ethereum?**
Ethereum is foundational but *legacy-bound*—it’s evolving but carries massive baggage from its own success. Its move to address security and functional concerns through the “Trillion Dollar Security” initiative is laudable, but late.
Avalanche, on the other hand, has **already designed for these concerns**:
* Modular security and governance (via subnets),
* Faster finality and cheaper validation,
* Greater flexibility for developers,
* And a more cohesive, responsive ecosystem.

\-----------------
# Good time for AVAX Labs to explain the Value - Article from The Block on ETH Challenges
[Discussion](https://www.reddit.com/r/Avax/?f=flair_name%3A%22Discussion%22)
I think this is a good time for AVAX Labs to jump in on what differentiates AVAX from ETH that helps resolve some of the issues with ETH.
\--------------------------
# Ethereum Foundation outlines key security challenges facing the network in new report
By [Naga Avan-Nomayo](https://www.theblock.co/author/naga-avan-nomayo)[Crypto Ecosystems](https://www.theblock.co/category/crypto-ecosystems) • June 11, 2025, 6:53AM EDT UPDATED: June 11, 2025, 7:06AM EDTShare[The Block](https://www.theblock.co/)
# Quick Take
* UX, smart contract integrity, and Ethereum’s consensus mechanism were identified in a report as key areas for improvement.
* The analysis is part of a so-called Trillion Dollar Security plan and follows changes within the protocol’s R&D department.
The Ethereum Foundation has identified six key areas for improvement in its initial Trillion Dollar Security report as the organization adopts a more deliberate approach to strengthening the largest blockchain in decentralized finance.
The overview listed user experience, smart contract vulnerabilities, infrastructure and cloud dependencies, consensus protocol strength, monitoring and incident response governance as critical spheres requiring attention.
Next, the EF will prioritize certain areas to tackle the highlighted issues. “This first report is focused on identifying and mapping the problems and challenges that remain,” a [blog post](https://ethereum.org/en/trillion-dollar-security/) from the foundation said. “The next step will be to choose the highest priority issues, identify solutions, and work with the ecosystem to address them.”
The findings, discovered through the [1TS initiative launched in mid-May](https://www.theblock.co/post/354312/ethereum-foundation-trillion-dollar-security-initiative-blockchain-resilience), are part of a three-part strategy to enhance Ethereum’s security architecture and meet global financial demands. Besides identifying vulnerabilities and addressing high-risk loopholes, the initiative emphasizes improving information flow within Ethereum’s ecosystem.
# Start your day with the most influential events and analysis happening across the digital asset ecosystem.
Also receive The Scoop, The Funding, and our weekly Data & Insights newslettersBy signing-up you agree to our [Terms of Service](https://www.theblock.co/terms-service) and [Privacy Policy](https://www.theblock.co/privacy-policy)
1TS preceded a shake-up at EF’s Protocol research and development division. Earlier this month, the foundation [announced layoffs and management changes in its protocol research and development division](https://www.theblock.co/post/356703/ethereum-foundation-restructures) to streamline operations.
Additionally, the EF recently appointed long-serving EF member and former executive director, Aya Miyaguchi, as the new foundation president. It also unveiled a [reformed treasury management model](https://www.theblock.co/post/357066/ethereum-foundation-expects-2025-26-to-be-pivotal-for-the-ecosystem-as-it-reforms-its-treasury-management) to optimize spending. These moves appeared to address recent community criticism regarding the foundation’s direction and perceived delays in research progress.

.dark-mode .rgnq5D{ color: white; background-color: #333333; border: 2px solid white; }.light-mode .rgnq5D{ color: #333333; background-color: white; border: 2px solid #333333; }DAOUSDTDAO Maker / Tether USDcrypto Composite

DAOUSDT
DAO Maker / Tether USD
crypto Composite