Create Account
Log In
Dark
chart
exchange
Premium
Terminal
Screener
Stocks
Crypto
Forex
Trends
Depth
Close
Check out our Dark Pool Levels

DAOUSDT
DAO Maker / Tether USD
crypto Composite

Real-time
Aug 2, 2026 1:26:34 AM EDT
0.02232USDT-0.800%(-0.00018)18,234,270DAO406,064USDT
0.02139Bid   0.02224Ask   0.00085Spread
OverviewHistoricalDepthTrendsNewsTrends
Composite
0.02232
Huobi
0.02232
HitBTC
0.00000
DAO Reddit Mentions
Subreddits
Limit Labels     

We have sentiment values and mention counts going back to 2017. The complete data set is available via the API.
Take me to the API
DAO Specific Mentions
As of Aug 2, 2026 1:25:35 AM EDT (1 min. ago)
Includes all comments and posts. Mentions per user per ticker capped at one per hour.
39 min ago • u/Waste-Safety-3754 • r/CryptoCurrency • im_done_with_crypto_after_seeing_what_keeps • C
Like so many i have also experienced this roller coaster. Ive worked in the financial sector for 20 years, have my CFA, understand valuations, pricing models etc. I could never get an answer from anyone as to why a price for any give coin. In the summer of 2021, I had enough of being at lunches and people talking about how much they made in coin x or y... I jumped into to trading crypto not because of the long term value, but simply because it was volatile, and traders make money on price movements. During this time, DAO's were popping up every hour, total pump and dump schemes, but if you could get in early and out, you made some pretty good money. I noticed some of the whitepapers for some of these "projects" referenced "the prisoner's dilemma" and how that would play a part in the price of the coin. Huge red flag... i was part of a trading club, and GRT was brought up - how it analized data on the block chain etc etc... i asked a simple question - "so what portion of the revenue are you entitled to with ownership of the coin?" Of course the answer was 0 and is the core reason why crypto is worthless. Stocks give you legal equity/ownership in a given company. Bonds make you a creditor, and give you priority of assets in the event a company becomes insolvent. Crypto is nothing more than napkin with scribble on it, given to you by an analyst at microsoft. It's worthless fellas. There's no intrinsic value. There's no hedging benefit (trades lock step with equities), and no safety in the event of a disaster (grid goes down, no crypto). It's a scam. The biggest financial scam in history. Ponzi scheme
sentiment -0.98
4 hr ago • u/Historical-Boot-114 • r/Bitcoin • this_is_getting_exhausting • C
todo es trabajo interno, hackeos de verdad hay muy pocos.
Lo de Kelp DAO también fué algo muy obvio, practicamente el sistema no tenía ninguna medida de seguridad, no pueden ser tan inútiles.
sentiment -0.53
15 hr ago • u/knowledgelover94 • r/CryptoCurrency • why_is_btc_maximalism_still_the_default_take_here • C
Cause it’s the only sure future of crypto. Most decentralized, the only one that founders didn’t take a cut, largest market cap by a long shot, and the only one that really ensure a fixed supply (the other coins can’t really be said to have a fixed supply since things like the DAO hack on Ethereum allowed them to change the blockchain).
sentiment 0.68
1 day ago • u/herzmeister • r/BitcoinBeginners • what_do_you_think_about_block_chain_technology • C
There has been a lot of hype and misconceptions about the term "blockchain" years ago. Like so: https://old.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/1v9xns4/satoshi_nakamotos_cryptography_encyclopedia/p0o00y9/
About your "use case" specifically, in such cases, the map is not the territory. "Bananas on the blockchain", meaning, the reality may not reflect the data. In Bitcoin on the other hand, the map *is* the territory.
If we're talking about governments using "blockchain" for land records, this doesn't solve any problem for them or anyone else. They're the ones who control the territory anyway, if necessary by force, so what that government says is law, with or without "blockchain". A decentralized infrastructure doesn't help here. A nice gov could maintain a public verifiable record that anyone can sync, that would be git-like, but they still have the say in the end.
If on the other hand we're talking about hypothetical sci-fi scenarios like a programmed autonomous government that also enforces property rights, with "DAO" funded robots and drones if necessary (this might be where that whole idea comes from, such things were discussed in the bitcointalk forums back then), well we can talk about it again once we're there. But even then, "blockchain" in the more narrow sense would be the wrong technical term, or only part of the required larger technological framework.
sentiment 0.81


Share
About
Pricing
Policies
Markets
API
Info
tz UTC-4
Connect with us
ChartExchange Email
ChartExchange on Discord
ChartExchange on X
ChartExchange on Reddit
ChartExchange on GitHub
ChartExchange on YouTube
© 2020 - 2026 ChartExchange LLC