DAOUSDT
DAO Maker / Tether USD
crypto Composite

US CDC APP has Defi Yield , Defi Staking and Earn.
The Kelp DAO hack wasn't a hack on the CDC yield/Staking vault. That isn't what they said, you said that, in a negative conatation.
Change perspective please, stop being a hater.

**ETH Daily - May the 4th be with you 2026**
* Law firm [files](https://x.com/ImperiumPaper/status/2050395870831456601) notice to Arbitrum DAO, aiming to seize 30k ETH from April 18th exploit.
* Aave [files](https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/71941310/42/kim-v-the-democratic-peoples-republic-of-korea/) emergency motion to vacate restraint.
* Core devs [target](https://blog.ethereum.org/2026/05/02/soldogn-interop-recap) 200M gas limit floor by Glamsterdam.
* EIP-8141 [could remove](https://ethresear.ch/t/frame-transactions-and-the-three-gates-to-privacy/24666) relayer dependency for privacy protocols.
* Upbit [announces](https://www.optimism.io/blog/dunamu-just-signed-an-mou-on-giwa-chain.-korea-s-largest-exchange-is-picking-a-side-on-infrastructure) GIWA chain built on OP Stack.
* Bitmine [stakes](https://x.com/BitMNR/status/2051327388148002927) $4.3m ETH.
* [ETHis Munich](https://x.com/ethisnetwork/status/2051335922935861264) on July 2nd.
* Fe [bug bounty](https://bountiful.fe-lang.org/#src/registry::registry::BountyRegistry) program.
* OpenZeppelin [Risk Assessment](https://x.com/OpenZeppelin/status/2051249669439692907).
* Base [to use](https://x.com/SuccinctLabs/status/2051346637767774715) Succinct SP1.
* ENS [celebrates](https://x.com/ensdomains/status/2051294203712504302) 9 years.
* LEND token [migration](https://x.com/Marczeller/status/2051365915544125719).
* Bryan Pellegrino [comments](https://x.com/PrimordialAA/status/2051345750559478178) on exploit.
* Relay [brings](https://x.com/RelayProtocol/status/2051303540442730635) cross-chain to Peer.
* L2Beat April [Ecosystem Update](https://x.com/l2beat/status/2051345338976419905).
* SAFE [staking rewards](https://x.com/safe/status/2051346270086897773).
Read more: [https://ethdaily.io/939](https://ethdaily.io/939)

Other people received a judgement against north Korea in 2016 for unrelated crimes (terrorism, kidnapping).
In 2026, arbitrum DAO seized money stolen via Aave in the Kelp DAO after math.
On Friday, a law firm said "Oh look! North Korean money, that's compensation for my victims, not your crypto victims".
A court ordered Arbitrum not to move the money until this is settled.
Now the argument is court will be over... if north Korea stole crypto is it "theirs" for courts to seize for other cases?

Yes, that's been clear for a long time (ever since the DAO hack). If it's truly about substance and the overwhelming majority of users are in favor, then the powerful actors (who don't govern the system but still have influence) can take appropriate measures for the common good. I see that as a strength, not as "giving up" decentralization.

So, un update on the restraining notice which was served against Arbitrum DAO on May 1st, that attempts to seize approximately $71 million in ETH belonging to victims of the April 18 exploit: **Aave LLC has filed an emergency motion to vacate it!**
[According to Aave](https://x.com/aave/status/2051329772190347560?s=20): "*A thief does not gain lawful ownership of stolen property simply by taking it, and the law is clear on this. Those assets were recovered to be returned to users victimized in the April 18, 2026 exploit. Freezing them harms the very people this recovery effort is designed to protect.*
*We’ve asked the court for an expedited hearing and a temporary vacatur, and we are continuing to work alongside the Arbitrum community and DeFi United to make affected users whole."*
But this plot thickened more, as Heyden Adam [just posted some very inntresting info](https://x.com/haydenzadams/status/2051341585976090746?s=20) on WHO the entity behind the restraining notice actually is.. Remember Pooltogether and their legal troubles some years ago??
*"The person behind this lawsuit is the same former Warren staffer that put like $10 into PoolTogether and then sued them. Tells you all you need to know.."*
You can find even [more interesting info](https://x.com/flyest/status/2050668854137819435?s=20) in the comments of that X post*: "turns out Gerstein Harrow has been running silly crypto lawsuits for years. in 2021, they sued compound labs and StaniKulechov for over $200M.* ***The lead plaintiff was a staffer for Elizabeth Warren*** *who lost $276.5 in a yield redistribution lottery. They lost the case"*
🤮

Previous victims are trying to claim the $71M in ETH recovered from the April 18th Kelp DAO exploit
Aave is pushing back on this and stating the obvious: new money stolen should be paid to the victims of that new attack and does not = money to payback previous exploit victims
This should be a clear win but worth showing your support for DeFi here
What do you think? Clear cut or nuanced case?

US CDC APP has Defi Yield , Defi Staking and Earn.
The Kelp DAO hack wasn't a hack on the CDC yield/Staking vault. That isn't what they said, you said that, in a negative conatation.
Change perspective please, stop being a hater.

**ETH Daily - May the 4th be with you 2026**
* Law firm [files](https://x.com/ImperiumPaper/status/2050395870831456601) notice to Arbitrum DAO, aiming to seize 30k ETH from April 18th exploit.
* Aave [files](https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/71941310/42/kim-v-the-democratic-peoples-republic-of-korea/) emergency motion to vacate restraint.
* Core devs [target](https://blog.ethereum.org/2026/05/02/soldogn-interop-recap) 200M gas limit floor by Glamsterdam.
* EIP-8141 [could remove](https://ethresear.ch/t/frame-transactions-and-the-three-gates-to-privacy/24666) relayer dependency for privacy protocols.
* Upbit [announces](https://www.optimism.io/blog/dunamu-just-signed-an-mou-on-giwa-chain.-korea-s-largest-exchange-is-picking-a-side-on-infrastructure) GIWA chain built on OP Stack.
* Bitmine [stakes](https://x.com/BitMNR/status/2051327388148002927) $4.3m ETH.
* [ETHis Munich](https://x.com/ethisnetwork/status/2051335922935861264) on July 2nd.
* Fe [bug bounty](https://bountiful.fe-lang.org/#src/registry::registry::BountyRegistry) program.
* OpenZeppelin [Risk Assessment](https://x.com/OpenZeppelin/status/2051249669439692907).
* Base [to use](https://x.com/SuccinctLabs/status/2051346637767774715) Succinct SP1.
* ENS [celebrates](https://x.com/ensdomains/status/2051294203712504302) 9 years.
* LEND token [migration](https://x.com/Marczeller/status/2051365915544125719).
* Bryan Pellegrino [comments](https://x.com/PrimordialAA/status/2051345750559478178) on exploit.
* Relay [brings](https://x.com/RelayProtocol/status/2051303540442730635) cross-chain to Peer.
* L2Beat April [Ecosystem Update](https://x.com/l2beat/status/2051345338976419905).
* SAFE [staking rewards](https://x.com/safe/status/2051346270086897773).
Read more: [https://ethdaily.io/939](https://ethdaily.io/939)

Other people received a judgement against north Korea in 2016 for unrelated crimes (terrorism, kidnapping).
In 2026, arbitrum DAO seized money stolen via Aave in the Kelp DAO after math.
On Friday, a law firm said "Oh look! North Korean money, that's compensation for my victims, not your crypto victims".
A court ordered Arbitrum not to move the money until this is settled.
Now the argument is court will be over... if north Korea stole crypto is it "theirs" for courts to seize for other cases?

Yes, that's been clear for a long time (ever since the DAO hack). If it's truly about substance and the overwhelming majority of users are in favor, then the powerful actors (who don't govern the system but still have influence) can take appropriate measures for the common good. I see that as a strength, not as "giving up" decentralization.

So, un update on the restraining notice which was served against Arbitrum DAO on May 1st, that attempts to seize approximately $71 million in ETH belonging to victims of the April 18 exploit: **Aave LLC has filed an emergency motion to vacate it!**
[According to Aave](https://x.com/aave/status/2051329772190347560?s=20): "*A thief does not gain lawful ownership of stolen property simply by taking it, and the law is clear on this. Those assets were recovered to be returned to users victimized in the April 18, 2026 exploit. Freezing them harms the very people this recovery effort is designed to protect.*
*We’ve asked the court for an expedited hearing and a temporary vacatur, and we are continuing to work alongside the Arbitrum community and DeFi United to make affected users whole."*
But this plot thickened more, as Heyden Adam [just posted some very inntresting info](https://x.com/haydenzadams/status/2051341585976090746?s=20) on WHO the entity behind the restraining notice actually is.. Remember Pooltogether and their legal troubles some years ago??
*"The person behind this lawsuit is the same former Warren staffer that put like $10 into PoolTogether and then sued them. Tells you all you need to know.."*
You can find even [more interesting info](https://x.com/flyest/status/2050668854137819435?s=20) in the comments of that X post*: "turns out Gerstein Harrow has been running silly crypto lawsuits for years. in 2021, they sued compound labs and StaniKulechov for over $200M.* ***The lead plaintiff was a staffer for Elizabeth Warren*** *who lost $276.5 in a yield redistribution lottery. They lost the case"*
🤮

Previous victims are trying to claim the $71M in ETH recovered from the April 18th Kelp DAO exploit
Aave is pushing back on this and stating the obvious: new money stolen should be paid to the victims of that new attack and does not = money to payback previous exploit victims
This should be a clear win but worth showing your support for DeFi here
What do you think? Clear cut or nuanced case?