DAOUSDT
DAO Maker / Tether USD
crypto Composite

I wouldn't apply an OUSG yield to an ONDO balance. It's easy to get from "Ondo does tokenized Treasuries" to the wrong conclusion about what you're actually holding.
Ondo Foundation describes ONDO as the governance token for the Ondo DAO and Flux Finance. Ondo Finance's OUSG documentation describes a separate product with investor eligibility and onboarding requirements. Its portfolio provides exposure mainly to short term US Treasuries, along with other specified holdings. OUSG subscriptions and redemptions use the net asset value per token.
Holding ONDO doesn't give you OUSG's investment or redemption rights, regardless of where you bought it. An ONDO/USDT spot purchase on BYDFi is a purchase of that governance token. I'd check which token I'm holding before doing any yield maths.

Exactly this. ZEC is the corporate privacy coin.
If you want the tech without the VC manipulation, look at PIVX.
Same zero-knowledge math, but 100% Proof of Stake, no ICO, and funded by a decentralized DAO.
Privacy should be grassroots, not an Israeli VC exit liquidity event.

The hot take right now: Solana is way cheaper, so Robinhood “should’ve” built there. Anatoly Yakovenko even ran the math: the 10% revenue share Robinhood pays Arbitrum could cover Solana fees several times over and still leave room to subsidize users.
But Steven Goldfeder’s reply hits a different angle: on Arbitrum Orbit, Robinhood keeps roughly 90% of sequencer revenue and only sends 10% back to the Arbitrum ecosystem (8% to the DAO treasury, 2% to the Developer Guild). On Solana, those same fees go to validators; Robinhood would retain none of the base-layer fees and would have to subsidize every user out of pocket if it wanted gasless UX.
In Goldfeder’s words: “Robinhood chose Arbitrum so they could be a landlord and not a tenant.” In practice, that means controlling the sequencer, setting the fee model, and capturing most of the economics from activity on their own chain—even when users aren’t trading directly inside Robinhood’s app.
So this isn’t really about “which chain has lower gas.” It’s about which design lets a platform extract and keep value from its own users at scale.