DAOUSDT
DAO Maker / Tether USD
crypto Composite

> The current curve eventually results in negative real yield for solo stakers, that's unacceptable.
I keep seeing this claim but nobody will tell me why they think the issue here is the *real* yield. When I'm deciding whether to keep staking, my ETH is getting diluted or accreted whether I stake or not.
Also, if what you're saying is true and solo-staking is always less profitable pooled staking [*], I think it's also true of the other proposed curve? If my competitor is getting higher yield than me, and they keep adding funds until their yield is zero, and at that point my yield is necessarily negative. You can't fix this by futzing with the curve: If we're playing a zero-sum game and I'm worse at it than average, I'm going to make a loss.
The way to fix it is to get more usage, so we have lots of revenue from fees and/or MEV and we're playing a positive-sum game, but if you do that your "negative real yield" claim is false: You could have 100% staked and I could be worse than average than the competition and I'd still be making money in real terms.
[*] I think it's in fact false because you have to account for the amount that will be embezzled by custodians or DAO governance exploiters

Hay mejores soluciones de autocustodia en AlienFlowSpace DAO siempre barajamos todas las mejores opciones

Peak fud, bonk is on firesale
I'd be much more concerned if the 'hack' was encryption or smart contact related but some DAO proposal that went unnoticed is fair game

> The current curve eventually results in negative real yield for solo stakers, that's unacceptable.
I keep seeing this claim but nobody will tell me why they think the issue here is the *real* yield. When I'm deciding whether to keep staking, my ETH is getting diluted or accreted whether I stake or not.
Also, if what you're saying is true and solo-staking is always less profitable pooled staking [*], I think it's also true of the other proposed curve? If my competitor is getting higher yield than me, and they keep adding funds until their yield is zero, and at that point my yield is necessarily negative. You can't fix this by futzing with the curve: If we're playing a zero-sum game and I'm worse at it than average, I'm going to make a loss.
The way to fix it is to get more usage, so we have lots of revenue from fees and/or MEV and we're playing a positive-sum game, but if you do that your "negative real yield" claim is false: You could have 100% staked and I could be worse than average than the competition and I'd still be making money in real terms.
[*] I think it's in fact false because you have to account for the amount that will be embezzled by custodians or DAO governance exploiters

Hay mejores soluciones de autocustodia en AlienFlowSpace DAO siempre barajamos todas las mejores opciones

Peak fud, bonk is on firesale
I'd be much more concerned if the 'hack' was encryption or smart contact related but some DAO proposal that went unnoticed is fair game