Create Account
Log In
Dark
chart
exchange
Premium
Terminal
Screener
Stocks
Crypto
Forex
Trends
Depth
Close
Check out our API

DAOUSDT
DAO Maker / Tether USD
crypto Composite

Real-time
May 16, 2026 8:41:08 PM EDT
0.0450USDT+0.446%(+0.0002)7,605,621DAO342,112USDT
0.0417Bid   0.0542Ask   0.0125Spread
OverviewHistoricalDepthTrendsNewsTrends
Composite
0.0450
Huobi
0.0450
HitBTC
0.0000
DAO Reddit Mentions
Subreddits
Limit Labels     

We have sentiment values and mention counts going back to 2017. The complete data set is available via the API.
Take me to the API
DAO Specific Mentions
As of May 16, 2026 8:37:37 PM EDT (5 minutes ago)
Includes all comments and posts. Mentions per user per ticker capped at one per hour.
9 hr ago • u/Deep_Ad1959 • r/UniSwap • gasless_voting_on_uniswap_governance_only_works • Dev/Tech • B
I went down a rabbit hole on how voting actually works on vote.uniswapfoundation.org and the part nobody really talks about is the relayer.
In a plain OpenZeppelin Governor setup, casting an onchain vote is a transaction, so you pay gas. fine for a whale delegate. but if you're sitting on a few hundred UNI of delegated weight, paying real money to vote on a proposal you might be on the losing side of anyway is a genuine disincentive. participation quietly skews toward people who don't notice the gas.
The gasless flow sidesteps that with a relayer. you sign your ballot as an EIP-712 typed message offchain, a relayer submits it onchain and eats the gas. the vote still settles onchain, you just don't pay for the settlement. catch is somebody has to, and right now that somebody is the Uniswap Foundation covering the relayer cost out of its budget. ENS DAO does the exact same thing for its own governance.
which makes gasless voting a subsidy, not a protocol feature. it holds as long as the foundation keeps funding it. if that line item ever gets trimmed, gasless voting doesn't throw an error, it just silently reverts to gas-gated participation and small-delegate turnout craters. feels like relayer funding should be endowed or treated as a protocol-level cost rather than a discretionary foundation expense, and I haven't seen a proposal that actually does that. given how much of current turnout leans on it, that's a strange gap to leave open.
sentiment 0.16
1 day ago • u/ethdaily • r/ethereum • daily_general_discussion_may_15_2026 • C
**Gm frENS, Happy Friday.**
**ETH Daily - May 14, 2026**
* CLARITY Act [advances](https://x.com/BankingGOP/status/2054975087795716133).
* KelpDAO [resumes](https://x.com/KelpDAO/status/2054977337264144768) rsETH withdrawals.
* Coinbase treasury [deployer](https://www.coinbase.com/blog/coinbase-and-hyperliquid-aligning-markets-on-hyperliquid-to-usdc) on Hyperliquid.
* Lido [plans](https://x.com/d_gusakov/status/2054956970575118462) validator consolidation.
* ACDC #178 [minutes](https://christinedkim.substack.com/p/acdc-178).
* Fidelity FILQ [market fund](https://x.com/VivekVentures/status/2054946669083390374).
* Lido DAO [approves](https://x.com/LidoFinance/status/2054978950372208924) Earn protection.
* EIP-8025: [optional execution proofs](https://x.com/ladislaus0x/status/2054880667293339966).
* PSE: [problems](https://pse.dev/blog/private-transfers-engineering-user-research) in private transfers.
* Vitalik [on MTSlive](https://x.com/MTSlive/status/2054991439654965284).
* Ethereum Security QF [final day](https://x.com/ethereumfndn/status/2054969464387436576).
* Ethereum Hub [in Libson](https://x.com/EFetheverywhere/status/2054934350702026995).
* Etherscan [adds](https://x.com/etherscan/status/2054890415317512399) snakey charts.
* Aave [bug bounty](https://x.com/StaniKulechov/status/2054940212455789009).
* Kraken [migrates](https://x.com/krakenfx/status/2054941472512717301) to CCIP.
* Zerion [CLI](https://x.com/zerion/status/2054947495512510546) for agents.
Read more: [https://ethdaily.io/947](https://ethdaily.io/947)
sentiment 0.88
2 days ago • u/Deep_Ad1959 • r/ethereum • tally_is_dead_and_we_killed_the_future_it_was • C
the part that gets lost here is that Tally was an interface, not the governance itself. the governance for Uniswap, ENS, Arbitrum lives in OpenZeppelin Governor contracts that are still onchain and still getting votes regardless of which frontend renders them. a frontend company winding down is a counterparty moment, not an endgame - the contracts keep running and someone else serves the UI. so 'Tally is dead' and 'DAO governance is dead' are two very different claims, and only the first one is actually true. on the participation point the top comment makes, it's real, but a chunk of it is mechanical: voting onchain costs gas, so turnout gets gated by whether anyone will sponsor a gasless relay. the DAOs that fixed that (ENS and Uniswap both sponsor relayers indefinitely) see meaningfully higher participation. that doesn't make governance a mass-participation activity, but 'nobody votes' is partly a UX bill nobody wanted to pay.
sentiment -0.67
2 days ago • u/cryptotaff • r/CryptoCurrency • kelp_dao_exploited_for_292_million_with_wrapped • C
Kelp DAO contracts never failed; the vulnerability stemmed entirely from LayerZero underlying infrastructure.
The mass exodus we are seeing today, with institutions like Kraken and giants like Solv abandoning LayerZero technology, confirms that the problem was systemic.
sentiment 0.47


Share
About
Pricing
Policies
Markets
API
Info
tz UTC-4
Connect with us
ChartExchange Email
ChartExchange on Discord
ChartExchange on X
ChartExchange on Reddit
ChartExchange on GitHub
ChartExchange on YouTube
© 2020 - 2026 ChartExchange LLC