DAOUSDT
DAO Maker / Tether USD
crypto Composite

**Olympia Upgrade — May 2026 Development Checkpoint**
Multi-client stability achieved to May 2026 LTS codebases. All three Olympia execution clients are stable, peered, and advertising Olympia as the next hardfork on the wire.
**🟢 Fukuii v0.5.0+** — Multi-EVM architecture implemented. Dual Ethereum Classic (PoW) and Ethereum (PoS) execution from a single client. ETH/68 + ETH/69+ PoW compatibility validated on ETC mainnet. Purpose-built for ETC — the primary client for the Olympia era. [fukuii.com](https://fukuii.com)
**🟠 Core-Geth v1.13.0+** — Stable, peered, carrying Olympia support through transition. Go 1.26+ and 2026 LTS dependencies from previous deprecated codebase. [https://github.com/ethereumclassic/core-geth](https://github.com/ethereumclassic/core-geth)
**🔵 Besu v26.5.0+** — Migrated to Besu's May 2026 release. ETH/68 + ETH/69 PoW compatibility resolved.
**What changed since April**
* Fukuii now runs as a dual-network execution client — native PoW for ETC and Mordor, Engine API V1-V4 for post-Merge Ethereum via any consensus client (Lighthouse, Prysm, Teku, Lodestar, Nimbus)
* Original ETH/69 (EIP-7642) chain weight resolution implemented for PoW peer ranking — no upstream equivalent exists. Validated to 0.01% accuracy against ETH/68 wire TD on live ETC mainnet
* Besu's ETH/69+ TD logic for PoW networks identified and resolved — enabling stable multi-client peering across all three clients
* Critical security patches, performance hardening, and dependency modernization across the full client stack
* All three clients now advertising Olympia as next hardfork on the network (ECIP-1111, ECIP-1112, ECIP-1121)
* Olympia Contract layer live Demo v0.2 -> v0.3 deployed on Mordor testnet.
**Working Demo v0.3 infrastructure — live on Mordor testnet**
🏛 [olympiatreasury.org](https://olympiatreasury.org) — Immutable treasury contract. Deployed and accumulating. (ECIP-1112)
🗳 [olympiadao.org](https://olympiadao.org) — On-chain governance. Proposals, voting, execution — all on-chain. (ECIP-1113, ECIP-1114)
**Institutional Coordinating Organizations**
⚖ [ethereumclassicdao.org](https://ethereumclassicdao.org) — Wyoming DAO LLC. Institutional portal for Ethereum Classic — regulatory framework, leadership, coordinating organizations, and the open, permissionless, regulatory-compliant governance architecture for the only Proof-of-Work smart contract platform.
**Post-Olympia roadmap**
ETC's core software returns to head-of-branch development following the 2024 maintenance period. In addition to full stack client work, the post-Olympia EL plugin roadmap is in active development via the ETC Cooperative — upstream ETC compatibility layers for Go-Ethereum, Nethermind, Erigon, Besu, and Reth.
**What's next**
Continued client hardening and critical infrastructure cleanup and modernization. Mordor testnet migration to a post-Olympia environment is in preparation. On track for ETC mainnet activation before 2027.
Full client details: [ethereumclassic.com/build/clients](https://ethereumclassic.com/build/clients)
The Olympia upgrade gives Ethereum Classic the tools to sustain what it's always been — the original, immutable, Proof-of-Work Ethereum. Delivering production-grade infrastructure for miners, mining pools, exchanges, infrastructure providers, institutions, and custody platforms.
[Ethereum Classic - Immutable infrastructure for global finance.](https://preview.redd.it/drnnaktfsy1h1.png?width=3840&format=png&auto=webp&s=0055c000f20c250aaa8a3848cd8662751c41e88f)

Yes, but I'm not sure which ones are still around.
Membership is still there I think . Tipping. You're still part of the DAO with your Moons. And you can still buy AMAs and sponsors I think? Just not a banner. They were working on the new Moonplace and other stuff. So I think you can buy a "tile" lol.

I don't know what Tally is.
DAOs where a great idea but widely adopted because of hype. It was a bubble inside the bubble. Most daos didn't make sense. Many didn't even work. They just had a governance token just to say they did.
So at some point no one cared when anything had a DAO. I still don't. I shouldn't. If anything has a dao and it deserves having a dao, good for them.
But putting governance tokens on the market is silly even for actual running daos.

pDAI Pulsechain DAI is the first ever speculative stable with no admin keys or blacklist function. Rumor has it there is a private layer 2 that is repairing the pMAKER DAO. pDAI to $1 Dorra is inevitable.

Well said.
What happened with the DAO fork was the moment Ethereum abandoned the principle that made blockchains revolutionary in the first place: immutability. “Code is law” suddenly became “code is law unless powerful people lose money.” That single decision exposed the reality what influence could override the supposedly trustless system.
People can argue forever about whether the fork was practical or necessary, but the deeper issue is integrity. A blockchain either stands above centralized intervention, or it doesn’t. Once you prove the ledger can be rewritten under enough pressure, the foundation changes completely. The precedent matters more than the event itself.
Ethereum Classic exists because some people refused to accept that rewriting history was justified, in the name of protecting investors. They believed the chain should remain neutral, regardless of who won or lost.
And now with Proof of Stake, the system drifts even further toward concentration of power. The wealthy validators compound their influence and rewards endlessly, while newcomers enter a system where the game is already largely controlled by entrenched capital. It starts resembling the traditional financial structure crypto originally claimed to replace.
The irony is that Ethereum still markets itself as decentralized while relying heavily on social coordination, foundations, influential insiders, infrastructure providers, and staking concentration. That’s not the cypherpunk vision many people signed up for.

Both **Visa and Mastercard officially support the TRON blockchain**, but they do so through different methods and infrastructure partnerships. 
While **Visa** currently leads the market for consumer-facing crypto spend cards, **Mastercard** focuses on deep backend infrastructure and enterprise settlements on the TRON network. 
Comparison Matrix
**Feature** 
**Visa Integration**
**Mastercard Integration**
**Primary Focus**
Consumer point-of-sale spending.
Cross-border B2B, remittances, and infrastructure.
**TRON Network Support**
Strong support for TRON-linked stablecoins (USDT/USDC) via provider cards.
TRON is an official member of the **Mastercard Crypto Partner Program**.
**Buying TRX**
Widely supported at major exchanges and wallets.
Widely supported at major exchanges and wallets.
**Direct Crypto Spending**
Available via Visa-linked stablecoin cards.
Historically processed via partner cards; shifting heavily toward enterprise infrastructure.
1. How Visa Supports TRON
Visa captures roughly 90% of the stablecoin-linked payment card transaction volume. 

X
·trondao
**Stablecoin Spending:** Because TRON hosts over $85 billion in USDT, Visa utilizes fintech infrastructure partners to allow users to spend TRON-based assets instantly at standard merchant terminals. The crypto is seamlessly converted to fiat in the background during checkout.
**Direct Purchasing:** You can use any standard Visa credit or debit card to buy TRX instantly on platforms like [Zengo](https://zengo.com/buy/tron-trx/buy-tron-trx-with-credit-card/), [Bitget](https://www.bitget.com/academy/best-platforms-to-buy-trx-with-credit-or-debit-card-in-america-2026), and [Kraken](https://www.kraken.com/en-gb/learn/buy-tron-trx). 
2. How Mastercard Supports TRON
Mastercard has deeply integrated the TRON DAO directly into its core digital payment strategy. 

**Crypto Partner Program:** TRON is an official partner in [Mastercard's Crypto Partner Program](https://mlq.ai/news/mastercard-expands-crypto-partner-program-with-tron-bringing-total-participants-past-85/). This program links the TRON blockchain directly to traditional banking payment rails to optimize global remittances and corporate settlements.
**Infrastructure Acquisitions:** Mastercard relies heavily on stablecoin middleware assets, such as its acquisition of BVNK, to route high-volume, low-cost financial transactions across the TRON network.
**Direct Purchasing:** Like Visa, standard Mastercard debit and credit cards are globally accepted for buying TRX across all compliant Web3 exchanges. 
CryptoSlate
 
Key Blind Spots to Consider
**Regional Availability:** The ability to get a Visa or Mastercard that lets you spend TRON-based assets depends entirely on your local cryptocurrency regulations.
**Conversion Fees:** While TRON blockchain transaction fees are low, the card provider may charge a 1% to 3% fiat conversion fee when you swipe your card at a store. 

The Mavericks have a DAO. The charter for that DAO says our mission is to educate the world about Ethereum. So if we had funds we would just invest them into educational initiatives. I've applied for a few projects myself. One of the ideas was to create a pro-Ethereum AI agent that we could ping on social media to counter all the misinformation people spout about Ethereum every day.

🇦🇪 [Crypto.com](https://t.co/lhCPQEMn23) became the first VASP in the UAE to receive a SVF license
🔼 Tokenized stocks AUM on xStocks surpassed $438M
📝 Kelp DAO burned 117,132 rsETH and outlined a two-week recovery plan

Full details 👇
[https://crypto.com/market-updates/defi-l1l2-weekly-2026-05-14?utm\_source=x&utm\_medium=x&utm\_campaign=rni\_defi-l1l2](https://t.co/zhweNoEuRI)

Heyy Guys, im back from learning foundry and next looking to build some projects and host them in the testnet.
I was thinking of building a standard and solid project (like DAO/DEX) instead of small projects..
So when i looked up, i came to know that uniswap is very useful in developing commercial level projects and has many built-in features ideal for production grade apps..
Now should i learn Uniswap and then build a solid project or just build a project and then learn Uniswap..
Thanks in advance...

Uniswap DAO votes to take back $42m of governance tokens loaned to delegates

close DAO votes get less turnout than landslide ones. I pulled 18 months of data across 10 DAOs and the pattern is consistent. contested votes draw fewer voters

i keep seeing this framed as a pure bridge failure, but half of it is a governance failure. rsETH being on aave's accepted asset list was a governance decision, and so was every panic-pause that followed. the bridge exploit is the headline, the response speed is the governance question. most protocols still push emergency actions through the same proposal pipeline as a routine parameter tweak, so by the time a pause vote clears the funds are already spread across 20 chains. the ones that handle this well keep a separate fast lane, a security council that can pause or delist in minutes with the full DAO able to override after, instead of one slow path for everything. that's the boring infrastructure gap these hacks keep exposing.

I'm always on the look out for cheap Cryptos with high probability of going up in the future and also was up in the past. Right now **SWELL** is at it's lowest buying price yet (extremely cheap), so my advice is to invest before the price jumps up, I did myself but at a little higher price then it's current. Also on a side note, Swell was at 0.014 before people got scared from all the tariff nonsense that had nothing to do with crypto. So my advice would be to stay invested and look at the past charts even beyond that, it has high potential.
If you're new to the how to buy/sell crypto coin game, I would suggest using the coinbase app. They do have fees for buying and selling but worth it in my opinion in the grand scheme of things. They do have graphs and other useful information as well. Here is some info about SWELL if your interested:
[https://www.swellnetwork.io/](https://www.swellnetwork.io/)
Swell's mission is to deliver the world's best liquid staking and restaking experience, simplify access to DeFi, and secure the future of the Ethereum network
. Swell Network is a non-custodial protocol that allows users to stake ETH and receive liquid tokens (swETH) that can be used across the DeFi ecosystem. 
Core components of Swell's mission
* **Democratize access to staking:** Swell aims to make staking ETH accessible to everyone, regardless of the amount of ETH they hold or their technical expertise. Traditional staking on Ethereum typically requires users to lock up 32 ETH and have specific technical knowledge to run a validator.
* **Provide a high-quality user experience:** The protocol strives to overcome the complexity and poor user experience often found in DeFi. It focuses on creating a simple and easy liquid staking process for all users.
* **Embrace decentralization and innovation:** Swell is built on core values of decentralization and innovation. It uses new technologies, such as Distributed Validator Technology (DVT) and restaking protocols like EigenLayer, to enhance the security and integrity of the Ethereum network.
* **Strengthen community governance:** The Swell Network is governed by the Swell Decentralized Autonomous Organization (DAO), which is run by holders of the SWELL token. This allows the community to participate in major decisions, ensuring the protocol aligns with the collective interests of its members.
* **Uphold a security-first approach:** Recognizing the inherent risks in DeFi, Swell prioritizes security. The protocol undergoes regular smart contract audits, offers bug bounty programs, and uses reputable node operators to protect user assets and the network.

i think you're stacking two separate problems and calling them one. token-weighted governance, which is what optimism, uniswap and ens actually run, doesn't care how many wallets you spin up, because 10,000 dust wallets carry dust weight. funding a python botnet hollows out an airdrop, it does not move a vote. the sybil problem is real but it lives in distribution, not in voting.
the failure mode that actually eats DAO governance is the opposite of sybil: turnout. most token holders never vote at all, so a handful of large delegates end up deciding everything, and an orb credential does nothing about that. one-human-one-vote only matters if you've already decided votes shouldn't be weighted by stake, and almost no protocol with real money on the line has decided that. worth being precise about which problem you're solving before reaching for biometrics.

I went down a rabbit hole on how voting actually works on vote.uniswapfoundation.org and the part nobody really talks about is the relayer.
In a plain OpenZeppelin Governor setup, casting an onchain vote is a transaction, so you pay gas. fine for a whale delegate. but if you're sitting on a few hundred UNI of delegated weight, paying real money to vote on a proposal you might be on the losing side of anyway is a genuine disincentive. participation quietly skews toward people who don't notice the gas.
The gasless flow sidesteps that with a relayer. you sign your ballot as an EIP-712 typed message offchain, a relayer submits it onchain and eats the gas. the vote still settles onchain, you just don't pay for the settlement. catch is somebody has to, and right now that somebody is the Uniswap Foundation covering the relayer cost out of its budget. ENS DAO does the exact same thing for its own governance.
which makes gasless voting a subsidy, not a protocol feature. it holds as long as the foundation keeps funding it. if that line item ever gets trimmed, gasless voting doesn't throw an error, it just silently reverts to gas-gated participation and small-delegate turnout craters. feels like relayer funding should be endowed or treated as a protocol-level cost rather than a discretionary foundation expense, and I haven't seen a proposal that actually does that. given how much of current turnout leans on it, that's a strange gap to leave open.