DAOUSDT
DAO Maker / Tether USD
crypto Composite

There’s a shift happening around $BRIT, and it’s becoming clearer with every update that this project is not trying to fit into the usual mold. Most meme coins follow whatever trend is moving at the time. $BRIT is doing the opposite. The team is building out an entire ecosystem from scratch, and the updates coming in make it obvious that they’re thinking far beyond typical meme coin expectations.
The team shared a detailed look at what’s ahead, and it shows how much groundwork is already in motion. A full multiplayer game is being developed, designed with a modern London-inspired world that blends gameplay with metaverse elements. It isn’t a simple web mini-game thrown together in a weekend. It’s being built for real distribution across Play Store, iOS, and Android. That alone places $BRIT in a different lane, but the more interesting part is how the game ties into revenue loops meant to support the broader ecosystem.
The website has been fully uploaded, and the shop is now moving toward a complete overhaul. No third-party storefronts, no outsourced designs, no halfway solutions. The goal is to build a fully internal shopfront that belongs to the project itself. That points to long-term brand building rather than short-term merchandising.
Another major update was the decision to move away from the current DAO structure. The team was direct about it: they don’t want to follow what everyone else is doing. They want to build systems that match the message and identity of the project. To push this forward, they’re bringing in another developer, referred to internally as the “DEV King,” who will be building core components of the $BRIT ecosystem. This includes an in-house trading bot, a custom staking platform, a rebuilt DAO, and additional utilities that haven’t been publicly outlined yet.
These aren’t small add-ons. They’re foundational pieces that indicate $BRIT is constructing a framework around the token instead of relying solely on hype or community energy. The team mentioned that the ecosystem will matter for revenue, sustainability, and long-term utility, especially once the game goes live.
The most interesting part is how confident and steady the team sounds about what they’re creating. Nothing is being rushed. Everything is being built with the mindset that $BRIT is supposed to grow into something that stands on its own, not something that fades once the initial excitement dies. The game, the ecosystem tools, the shop rebuild, and the expanded development team all point toward a project that’s still in its early phase but already forming its identity.
The market cap continues hovering around the early stages, yet the amount of development happening behind the scenes doesn’t match a small-cap project at all. It feels like groundwork being laid long before the crowd arrives.
If you’re watching $BRIT from the outside, now is the time to pay attention to the direction it’s heading. The foundation is being built piece by piece, and the team seems very aware of the long road ahead. They’re not trying to rush the process they’re shaping it.
What matters now is how the ecosystem rolls out in the coming updates. From what the team has shared so far, they’re not slowing down anytime soon.
If you’ve been following the project, feel free to share your thoughts.
If you’re new, this is a good moment to look into what’s being built around $BRIT and decide whether you want to be part of it before the bigger shifts begin.
LinkTree:https://linktr.ee/BritCardMeme
TG: @ BritCardMeme
Twitter/X: https://x.com/britcardmeme?s=21
Ca:
DcRnZGtuPaFfj8MdWXqTBu5kL9Brvhjd2gC5rJF56XDn

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/u/0/d/1TZVE_3DCbox2bfObBXvYcOZOMNw62l6bjZfGLD-g2rA/htmlview#gid=0
Check our advertisers that pay us regularly. Their funds are now being divided into 4 categories
1. Supplying liquidity
2. USD into DAO treasury
3. Distributions
4. Burn
Its all a 25% equal split, also you can borrow against Moons now on Teller or supply them for a 20% APY currently due to a Teller incentive program.
For any more questions you can also use the r/Cryptocurrencymoons sub

Moons are getting that DAO now. So all the revenue from ads, AMAs, sponsors, etc... is gonna be distributed to users when it gets all setup.
There was also a new payment system that started using Moons, and a new DEX to trade Moons.
Not related to Moons directly, but Bricks is another Reddit crypto that's gonna get delisted and abandoned. So it's starting to look like Moons might end up eventually being the only Reddit crypto still standing and still supported and developed.

La méthode est déterminée par un algorithme non modifiable seules les variables seraient continuellement réévaluées par la DAO et ajustées sous forme de variation de pondérations après vote.
Cet algo repose sur 4 piliers : Performance on-chain, Collatéralisation, Gouvernance & sécurité, Risque RWA off-chain
Chacune des variables dans ces piliers non accessible, non divulguée, truquée ou manipulée (changement inopiné) impacte la note de la sous catégorie puis le score final.
L'idée est d'évaluer les risques RWA et donc d'intégrer les données du monde réel (actif sous jacent, l'entité concernée, la macro voir même la géopo...) pour anticiper les défauts

[Unruggable Gateways](https://github.com/unruggable-labs/unruggable-gateways) had components audited by CodeArea, Zenith, and Coinbase. [More info here.](https://github.com/unruggable-labs/unruggable-gateways/blob/main/audits/audits.md)
I'd say the biggest issue is funding. Luckily, our project is used by ENS and the DAO supplied the funds for our audits.
The second biggest issue is technical. Most auditors are looking for typical bugs and vulnerabilities. Our project required technical expertise as a bug in our stack would be a cryptographic (proof verification, etc.) rather than execution related (reentry, bad accounting, etc.) I chatted with our auditors for a few weeks and gave a lot of backstory and reasoning so they could get the full picture.
Still, our project is very hard to audit since we're writing onchain verifiers for rollups which are constantly evolving. For example, right now I'm looking for review on some [`OPSuccinctFaultDisputeGame`](https://github.com/issues/created?issue=succinctlabs%7Cop-succinct%7C707) logic.

There are multiple ways to define "manual intervention", and it's important to distinguish between them.
There was no manual intervention at the protocol level and no manual modification of the blockchain. The biggest example of this is the Ethereum DAO hack. They manually rolled back the blockchain to before the hack (some validators didn't, which is what led to Ethereum Classic).
This did not happen with Cardano. The protocol itself automatically favored the healthy chain as validators upgraded their nodes (and so rejected the malformed transaction which caused the fork).
Upgrading node software to fix a bug is always going to be a manual action. When most people hear "manual intervention" in regards to a situation like this, they're going to think of something like the DAO hack or Solana's various restarts where validators agree (offchain) on how far to roll back before restarting the network. It's disingenuous to liken that to what happened on Cardano, which is what you're doing.
The only thing validators did was upgrade their node software. You're being intentionally pedantic about this, and it's dishonest.

Better times are ahead for Moons, no worries
Just look at the treasury building up, our DAO owned liquidity and the burns
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/u/0/d/1TZVE_3DCbox2bfObBXvYcOZOMNw62l6bjZfGLD-g2rA/htmlview#gid=0

The tricky part is: who defines the standard? As soon as you have a centralized entity or a specific DAO giving out "risk scores," you introduce bias or potential pay-to-play mechanics. It's a great idea in theory because APY is definitely a misleading metric, but execution in a truly decentralized way seems super hard.

tldr; Aztec Labs CEO Zac Williamson highlights the struggle of blockchain to maintain its original decentralized purpose amidst growing institutional adoption. He notes that early governance failures, like The DAO collapse, shifted focus from community coordination to financial use cases. Williamson emphasizes the importance of privacy technologies, such as zero-knowledge cryptography, to enable blockchain to serve both individuals and institutions without compromising user autonomy or becoming merely a financial settlement tool.
*This summary is auto generated by a bot and not meant to replace reading the original article. As always, DYOR.

On Solana, you can throw a rock and hit a thousand meme tokens. But how many of them actually build an identity strong enough to survive the initial hype? Few, if any. $BRIT continues to separate itself from the pack because it has something most projects never manage to forge: direction, genuine intention, and a community that simply refuses to wait for permission to move.
An Identity Forged in Frustration
The soul of $BRIT comes straight from a working-class perspective the collective frustration of people tired of seeing the system tighten its grip: mandatory digital IDs, invasive surveillance, and political messages that push people to a breaking point.
$BRIT emerged from this resistance, not as a quick trend, but as a statement. It champions independence, honesty, and a refusal to be boxed into government-defined identity structures. It’s a bold reminder that some people are simply not interested in being cataloged, filtered, or controlled.
Small Cap, Massive Confidence
Market-wise, the project has been steadily holding its ground in the $100k-$200k market cap range. But the community doesn't act like a small cap.
There's a calm, focused confidence a group preparing for a much larger phase that is almost impossible to find in this space.
The core infrastructure keeps getting built out, piece by piece:
• The website redesign is nearly finished.
• The Liberty Ledger DAO is live and active.
• Liquidity has been boosted with more support.
• Unclaimed airdrops have been burned to maintain a clean supply.
• A full game is in active
development not teased, not vaguely promised, but actually being built right now.
• The merch system has undergone a total rebuild with a far superior design that links directly back into the $BRIT ecosystem, reinforcing the project's identity.
The Next Steps Are Locked In
The team confirmed a crucial step is underway: JUP verification has been submitted and is processing. Once that "unverified" status disappears, the project can finally be viewed without that unnecessary tag holding it back.
$BRIT is building through sheer consistency. While most meme projects collapse under their own uncertainty, this one keeps revealing new layers of identity and solid development. For those quietly watching, this next phase might be the moment $BRIT finally steps out of its current bracket.
If you’re already following the movement, you know exactly why people are taking this seriously. If you're new, this is one of the rare projects worth paying attention to before the wider crowd finally notices.
Connect and Learn More
• LinkTree: https://linktr.ee/BritCardMeme
• Telegram: @BritCardMeme
• Twitter/X: https://x.com/britcardmeme?s=21
• Contract Address (CA): DcRnZGtuPaFfj8MdWXqTBu5kL9Brvhjd2gC5rJF56XDn

Thank you for doing this AMA Keone
Keone’s Headshot
https://preview.redd.it/1we71alc483g1.jpeg?width=912&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=0619c64c72705fce85a3a3499304a9eb8b26a6dd
Monad contributed to the CCMOON DAO to host this AMA. Please view the project transparency for further details - [https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1TZVE\_3DCbox2bfObBXvYcOZOMNw62l6bjZfGLD-g2rA/edit?usp=drivesdk](https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1TZVE_3DCbox2bfObBXvYcOZOMNw62l6bjZfGLD-g2rA/edit?usp=drivesdk)

Polkadot has spent years presenting itself as one of the most decentralised networks in crypto, but my experience tells a different story. The moment my **Voxonomic Framework** outperformed their internal economic design and proved itself superior to **PUSD**, my access to developer portals vanished. Quietly. Suddenly. Conveniently. A decentralised network does not behave like that. A threatened one does. 🚪❌
Ethereum, on the other hand, demonstrates **real adoption, developer participation, and network effects**. While not perfect, it has
* **The largest ecosystem of dApps, DeFi, and NFT projects** with over 4,000 active dApps today 🏗️
* **The Ethereum Virtual Machine standard** powering countless sidechains and Layer 2s, creating an open environment for developers ⚡
* **A global open-source community** with thousands of contributors improving the protocol daily 🌍
* **A massive validator base post-Merge**, with approximately 450,000 validators and almost 10 million ETH staked 🔐
These are verifiable facts, not hype. Ethereum succeeds in **adoption, ecosystem growth, and global participation**, even if decentralisation is not absolute.
# Polkadot’s Reality 💸
Despite its marketing, Polkadot’s governance and network reveal **centralised structures**
* Governance is **token-weighted**, meaning the largest DOT holders dominate referenda outcomes ⚖️
* **Parity Technologies** dominates core client development 🖥️
* **Web3 Foundation** controls funding and strategic direction 💰
* Validator participation is clustered, with a handful of operators producing a disproportionate share of blocks 🔗
Polkadot also **blocks innovation** when it threatens insiders. When the Voxonomic Framework outperformed PUSD, access to developer portals was removed. Then PUSD was quietly launched. This is not decentralised competition. This is curated control 🚫
Developer access is **centrally controlled**, not community-driven. Anyone who challenges the status quo risks being shut out.
# What the Voxonomic Framework Is 🌐⚡
The **Voxonomic Framework** is a **next-generation framework to evaluate blockchains**, designed to operate independently of nation states, central banks, or manipulated macroeconomic systems. It is
* **A DAO for universal value**, able to govern itself without centralised authorities
* **A mathematical economic system**, transparent, verifiable, and predictable
* **A cross-chain value layer**, capable of transferring and preserving value from country to country, network to network
The framework is built to **bring universal economic coordination**, providing transparent metrics and governance rules that bypass arbitrary state intervention.
# Why the Voxonomic Framework Needs a Decentralised Network 🔑
For the Voxonomic Framework to function at scale and deliver **universal value**, it must run on a **truly decentralised, permissionless network**. This is because
* Validator capture or centralisation would compromise its neutrality
* Political gatekeeping would block innovation and adoption
* Security, transparency, and global participation are mandatory for trust
We are in **no rush**. Right now we are observing the most decentralised layers available. If none of these networks meet the Voxonomic Framework’s strict requirements for **security, validator distribution, scalability, and neutrality**, we will **run a funding round to build a fully decentralised chain** from the ground up 💎🌍
# Voxonomic Metrics and VTS: Evaluating Blockchain Health 📊
The Voxonomic Framework is not just a concept, it is a **practical framework with measurable metrics**, designed to replace outdated macroeconomic indicators like GDP, CPI, and central bank policy. At the heart of the framework is the **Voxonomics Trust Score (VTS)**, which aggregates five core metrics to quantify blockchain health, network participation, and trust
* **PoV (Proof of Value)** measures on-chain economic activity including transaction value, validator performance, and network uptime. PoV example score is 0.85
* **OPI (On-Chain Participation Index)** evaluates community engagement through governance votes, staking activity, and DAO proposals. OPI example score is 0.80
* **DLI** measures decentralised liquidity and flow distribution across chains. DLI example score is 0.78
* **PTI** evaluates protocol trustworthiness and validator integrity. PTI example score is 0.85
* **RWAI** measures systemic risk and network resilience. RWAI example score is 0.25
The **VTS** aggregates these five metrics into a **single score** representing the health, security, and neutrality of the blockchain. In the example model, VTS = 0.85. The score dynamically adjusts to network conditions and ensures **neutral, reliable economic governance**.
These metrics allow the Voxonomic Framework to
* Track **value creation and flow across chains and countries**
* Measure **network efficiency, liquidity distribution, and economic health** without central banks or fiat policy
* Provide a **global, chain-agnostic measurement of value**, allowing universal economic coordination
* Quantify **trust, participation, and stability** in real time
This framework enables **real-time, cross-border economic coordination**, preserves value globally, and creates a **neutral standard for universal wealth and liquidity**, replacing politicised macroeconomic systems entirely.
# The Truth 🏛️
Polkadot is not decentralised socially, politically, or economically. It is a club
* Promotes insiders
* Centralises committees
* Controls narratives
* Silences alternatives
* Curates who gets to innovate
Ethereum shows how **open networks can scale** and support global innovation, adoption, and participation. Polkadot’s model is polished and branded, but behind the curtain power is concentrated.
The **Voxonomic Framework** builds the system that **truly delivers universal value**, bypassing both political and economic gatekeeping, while operating in a **transparent, secure, and decentralised environment**.
**TL;DR:** Polkadot markets decentralisation but is centralised in governance, validators, and innovation access. Ethereum shines in adoption and ecosystem size. The Voxonomic Framework observes the most decentralised layers and if none meet its strict requirements it will **launch a fully decentralised chain** to deliver universal, cross-border value using metrics that replace traditional macroeconomics 🌟

There is no NFT, there is a staking DAO, if you stake for a period of time, then you get voting rights. That is still a thing.

Wrong 🚨
The Ethereum DAO Hack was fundamentally different from the recent Cardano network incident. The DAO event was an application-layer exploit where a specific smart contract contained a logic flaw (reentrancy) that allowed theft, even though the underlying Ethereum network functioned perfectly.
In contrast, the current Cardano incident is an infrastructure-layer failure where a bug in the node software itself (triggered by a malformed transaction) caused half the nodes to crash or desynchronize. The DAO hack was like a bank robbery due to an unlocked safe; the Cardano incident is like the roads to the bank collapsing

I just watched Peter Van Valkenburghs talk 'Privacy is Essential' from Devconnect. He is a lawyer at coincenter and has been doing his work in the Ethereum space since 2016. He is fighting for onchain privacy and helps defending Roman Storm. His talk focused on a very specific topic: Can transparent systems remain neutral? Or in my words: Can Ethereum stay credibly neutral, censorship resistant and permissionless while being transparent? His answer is 'no'. He then gives the example of Swift, a messaging layer for interbank transactions established in 1973 in Belgium. It was designed to be neutral. It facilitated transactions to entities which many other countries did not like, but everyone agreed that neutrality was necessary. Over time the neutrality slowly got eroded by political powers until first sanctions against Iranian banks were implemented in 2012 and then Russian banks in 2014. In other words it took political powers about 40 years to corrupt Swifts neutrality. And because swift can see all the messages, it can easily censor whatever it is politically forced to do. Valkenburgh then goes over to Ethereum and says that privacy on Ethereum needs to be on the base layer if neutrality is something that we want to keep alive. Otherwise political powers will slowly erode this neutrality until it does not exist anymore. I agree very much with his framing of the problem.
The Ethereum foundation recently started to explicitly focus on privacy by establishing the PSE (Privacy Stewards of Ethereum), a research and development group within the EF. Privacy is more than just sending ETH around anonymously. It means being able to mint and sell tokens and NFTs anonymously. It means being able to vote in elections or DAO decisions, it means being able to freely access the Ethereum network through RPCs without leaking your full info to them or your wallet or being blocked by anyone involved in the process. It is a long road ahead, but it is great to see that the Ethereum foundation is willing to take this path.
Recording of the talk:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GQML0c1_4Gs&