UX
Roundhill Uranium ETF
stock BATS ETF

Try using the 3 buttons in the sidebar (I'm giving advice for browser, not the app) and choosing "Not Interested" or "Don't recommend channel" your thumbs down trigger it as engagement so it thinks you like it so it keeps feeding it to you.

But yes, god forbid YT UX/UI have a simple "Block" option, but of course they can manage to jam in a "Ask" button for Gemini AI. /s

Cake wallet is great with an excellent UX and integration with swap services within the wallet. But know that there is an ~2% markup on the price quotes you get for swaps within the wallet. For example, going to Trocador directly will give you a price that is 2% more favourable to you than what Cake wallet will show you within the wallet. Tradeoff on convenience - just be aware.

Most people will not live this rugged existence of owning keys, managing UTXOs, or balancing lightning channels, running nodes, securing seed phrases, etc. This is just completely ridiculous to expect of most people if we want bitcoin to be money.
If Bitcoin is successful, most people are going to use custodial solutions, there's just no way around that. Like Hal said, there will be Bitcoin banks.
What we can hope and fight for, however, is the development of custodial solutions that are as trust minimized as possible. Large lightning nodes, ecash mints, etc. can have substantially better privacy and trust assumptions vs. legacy fiat institutions, while giving people the same instant, idiot proof payments UX they expect.

Try using the 3 buttons in the sidebar (I'm giving advice for browser, not the app) and choosing "Not Interested" or "Don't recommend channel" your thumbs down trigger it as engagement so it thinks you like it so it keeps feeding it to you.

But yes, god forbid YT UX/UI have a simple "Block" option, but of course they can manage to jam in a "Ask" button for Gemini AI. /s

Cake wallet is great with an excellent UX and integration with swap services within the wallet. But know that there is an ~2% markup on the price quotes you get for swaps within the wallet. For example, going to Trocador directly will give you a price that is 2% more favourable to you than what Cake wallet will show you within the wallet. Tradeoff on convenience - just be aware.

Most people will not live this rugged existence of owning keys, managing UTXOs, or balancing lightning channels, running nodes, securing seed phrases, etc. This is just completely ridiculous to expect of most people if we want bitcoin to be money.
If Bitcoin is successful, most people are going to use custodial solutions, there's just no way around that. Like Hal said, there will be Bitcoin banks.
What we can hope and fight for, however, is the development of custodial solutions that are as trust minimized as possible. Large lightning nodes, ecash mints, etc. can have substantially better privacy and trust assumptions vs. legacy fiat institutions, while giving people the same instant, idiot proof payments UX they expect.

There are lots of platforms out there, 'good' is for the most part subjective, but yes absolutely the UX expertise here is astonishingly bad.

They are robust custodians in terms of the depth of their offerings. They are a UI/UX nightmare if you’re coming from Robinhood. If you like Robinhood, there’s nothing wrong with it. It’s certainly not going to be a common choice for Bogleheads, since it was born as a day-trading platform; but, hey, Schwab was born as a discount broker/day-trading platform too, and plenty on this sub use them.

Thanks for the response.
\- **Error Prone**: While not as bad as it used to be, executing rebalances and/or larger buy/sell orders can result in esoteric red text errors where it just fails. Typically waiting / submitting later has resolved.
\- **Mobile experience**: If I want to check the performance of positions in a basket, or of an overall basket I have to (1) tap the account its in, (2) tap the name of the basket, (3) scroll down two screen lengths to get to (4) the actual performance of the positions in the basket, which you then have to (5) scroll awkwardly left and right to get to the correct performance column. *Tons* of wasted white space throughout and *obviously* not built for a mobile screen. There should be a basket dashboard that shows performance of basket, with simple position performance accessible one tap away, [like M1 does](https://m1.com/invest/what-is-a-pie/). The team needs a UX designer on staff, badly. Basically - just straight-up copy everything M1 has done; the UI, and features.

My suggestion is just for the first time as clearly explained. It is indeed more tedious but necessary first step and after it is done they will be much more confident and knowledgeable.
I understand that some wallets try and improve UX by skipping basics like not backing up seed words or not forcing the user to verify those seed words. This is always a mistake when it comes to self custody. Not only should new users do the above before receiving Bitcoin but also practice recovery and spend at least an hour learning about best practices. Until than they should use a custodian with good 2fa or an ETF.
>but not sure it's for this person
Might not be , but the fact they are having anxiety means they likely have not practiced recovery .

Is there a way to go back to the old view of Fidelity?
The column selections don't persist, and the new UI just absolutely sucks. It's so dense and difficult to view with the stocks being constant and columns moving under it. Having been in product and UX for 20+ years, Fidelity really needs to rethink their design strategy. Absolutely horrible.

I operate a handful of Airbnbs in CA. They treat owners horribly. Call centers in India for support with pretty awful script answers and low English comprehension. Cities keep jacking up transient occupancy tax eating at owners revenue. Eventually there will be enough money put into a competitor that values both sides of the marketplace. I’d expect a much larger margins for a company that literally does nothing and has that much market share which should translate into pricing power. Also tech/UX is mediocre at best.

I’ve been building **Tark**, a trade-intelligence platform designed to help traders analyse a stock before making their own trade decision.
I wanted to share a real example from **Laurus Labs today** to explain what I’m trying to build.
The idea behind Tark is simple:
**A bullish stock and a good trade are not necessarily the same thing.**
For the **Multi-Day (1–5 day)** horizon, Laurus Labs was showing:
**Strong Buy | 92% confluence | 100/100 data quality**
But Tark doesn't stop at the directional verdict.
It breaks down **why** the view exists.
In this case, Technicals, Multi-Timeframe Alignment, Volume Profile, Relative Strength, Order Flow, Chart Structure, Smart Money and Sector/Macro were supporting the bullish thesis.
At the same time, **Options Structure was pulling against it.**
Then comes the part I personally find more useful — **execution context**.
Despite the strong bullish confluence, Tark was also highlighting:
**⚠️ Elevated trap risk**
**⚠️ Weak participation around the break**
**⚠️ The break had not extended**
**⏳ Structure still resolving / awaiting trigger**
So the output isn't simply:
**Strong Buy → Go buy the stock.**
It's closer to:
**“The broader evidence is bullish, but here are the risks and conditions you should understand before making your own decision.”**
That's the problem I'm trying to solve with Tark.
Instead of looking separately at technicals, MTF, volume, order flow, options, relative strength, market context and risk/reward, Tark tries to bring them into one decision workflow:
**Direction → Setup → Confirmation → Entry context → Risk → Invalidation → R:R**
And importantly, it shows **both supporting and contradicting evidence**, rather than hiding everything that disagrees with the final verdict.
The attached screenshot is the actual Tark analysis. I haven't removed the conflicting signals or risk warnings.
# About Tark
I'm building Tark as a **trade-intelligence and decision-support platform**, not a stock-tips service.
The goal is not to tell traders what they *must* buy or sell, but to help answer:
**“What does the evidence say, what could go wrong, and what should I understand before making my own decision?”**
I'm currently opening Tark to more traders and would genuinely value feedback on the analysis, UX, and information you'd want to see before making a trade decision.
[Explore Tark](https://tark.atlasfinlabs.com?utm_source=chatgpt.com)
**This is not a buy/sell recommendation for Laurus Labs. The stock is being used only as a real example of how the platform structures an analysis. Please do your own research and risk assessment.**

The Apple IIe and the iPhone are arguably the only two products that Apple has ever led the charge with.
The IIe was the first truly user-friendly PC. The iPhone was the very first of what we recognize now as a smartphone. Smartphones existed prior to the iPhone, obviously, but the combination of multi-touch screen and lack of both keyboard and stylus was unique.
Creative made the iPod before Apple did. Wireless headphones have existed since Bluetooth was introduced. Fitness trackers predate the Apple Watch by at least a decade. The iPad wasn’t the first tablet. The list goes on.
The difference is that Apple has a tendency to take existing technology and make it easier to use and more reliable. Their real innovation has always been in the UI/UX realm. PC’s existed before the IIe, but Apple made them easy enough to use that anyone who’d ever used a typewriter could use one. Smartphones existed before the iPhone, but the iPhone was the first smartphone that your grandma could intuitively use. But without the IIe and the iPhone and Apple’s massive UI/UX improvements on their predecessors I don’t think consumer technology would look anything like it does today.