Create Account
Log In
Dark
chart
exchange
Premium
Terminal
Screener
Stocks
Crypto
Forex
Trends
Depth
Close
Check out our Dark Pool Levels

TLDR
The Laddered T-Bill ETF
stock BATS ETF

At Close
Oct 1, 2026 12:43:01 PM EDT
25.00USD0.000%(+25.00)54,917
0.00Bid   0.00Ask   0.00Spread
Pre-market
0.00USD0.000%(0.00)0
After-hours
Oct 1, 2026 4:10:30 PM EDT
25.01USD+0.040%(+0.01)1
OverviewHistoricalExchange VolumeDark Pool LevelsDark Pool PrintsExchangesShort VolumeShort Interest - DailyShort InterestBorrow Fee (CTB)Failure to Deliver (FTD)ShortsTrends
TLDR Reddit Mentions
Subreddits
Limit Labels     

We have sentiment values and mention counts going back to 2017. The complete data set is available via the API.
Take me to the API
TLDR Specific Mentions
As of Oct 2, 2026 2:16:14 AM EDT (1 min. ago)
Includes all comments and posts. Mentions per user per ticker capped at one per hour.
5 hr ago • u/U-Copy • r/Superstonk • october_pullback_t35_from_rc_buy_inwarrant • 📈 Technical Analysis • B
Hello y'all. It's been a while.
There has been lots of hypes into October so I wanted to share my thought why there will be possible pullback to $20.5 gap filll. There are lots of Dark pool actvity and there has been always pullback before big rally.
This week, I've looked into the warrants, and it appears that GME can extend them **without shareholder approval**. In other words, I believe GME could extend the warrants, and it appears they only need to announce the extension within 5 days of the expiration date.
https://preview.redd.it/5hgt54gyaysh1.png?width=726&format=png&auto=webp&s=d3bb68009d136aa77a91292a9225194b14fbe701
Also, RC and insiders have recently started buying GME. I've seen many posts there will be squeeze like VW Squeeze in Ocotober. However, I disagree. I will share my TA and I believe Market makers will try to push down to create fear before October 30 Warrant expiration and rally into $40.
If we add T+35 settlement to those recent Sep 21, 29 purchases, that takes us into November. Looking at the current data, we can also see shares being routed through dark pools.
My theory is that the market makers won't simply let the price run immediately. Instead, they may wait until the T+35 settlement date and then buy back shares, pushing the price higher. At the same time, October 30 warrant could add additional pressure from warrant exercises.
https://preview.redd.it/nwaka8pwaysh1.png?width=1776&format=png&auto=webp&s=470738b662fddf6af92bdc97631e8a3c68d94763
https://preview.redd.it/qifwh3uwiysh1.png?width=2048&format=png&auto=webp&s=ced46ee87bae0e228ac018447846d138e2ed4946
Putting all of this together, I'm looking for a rally toward the **$40 range in November** after Pullback to $20.5 Gap fill in October.
\*TLDR: **RC's recent September 21 & 29 purchases + market makers' T+35 settlement date + pressure from GME warrant exercises = November rally toward the $40s.** 💥🔥🚀
\*Not Financial Advice!
\-U
sentiment 0.39
5 hr ago • u/lumen_loop • r/Stellar • stellar_developers_meeting_10012026 • C
TLDR:
Stella Developers Meeting covers USDT0, Tether's USDT delivered to Stellar via LayerZero's OFT standard. Live on mainnet since September with $2.58M in bridged assets, 23,717 accounts, and 7 DVN operators. Technical walkthrough of cross-chain architecture and developer capabilities for sending, receiving, and tracking stablecoins across 23 networks.
sentiment 0.18
6 hr ago • u/Suitable_Advisor_878 • r/Daytrading • trump_losing_the_midterms_could_be_the_trigger • C
TLDR: Trump admin looses midterms = bad for Nasdaq
sentiment -0.62
10 hr ago • u/Little_Treat_1982 • r/AMD_Stock • jim_cramer_delivers_unmistakable_verdict_on_amds • C
TLDR?
sentiment 0.00
14 hr ago • u/Klutzy_Pianist1782 • r/Superstonk • multi_time_frame_confluence_structure • C
TLDR Tin foiL engaged! 🚀✅🚀✅🚀✅🍌✅🚀✅🍌✅🚀✅🍌✅🚀✅🍌✅🚀✅🍌🍌✅🚀✅🍌✅🚀✅🍌✅🚀✅🍌🚀✅🍌🍌✅🚀✅🍌✅🚀✅🍌✅🚀✅🍌✅🚀✅🍌✅🚀✅🍌✅
sentiment 0.98
16 hr ago • u/AidenTai • r/BitcoinMarkets • daily_discussion_thursday_october_01_2026 • C
I was hesitant to write exactly this but didn't want to attract even more down votes 😅
That said to the parent comment: maybe the TLDR is more of what you want? A lot of comments have told me to reduce size and not include so many details, while comments from a couple days ago asked for more sources, math and additional information. Can't win...
sentiment -0.65
16 hr ago • u/Rav_3d • r/Daytrading • trump_losing_the_midterms_could_be_the_trigger • C
TLDR. You burned a lot of AI tokens on that.
sentiment 0.00
17 hr ago • u/BaelZharon7 • r/Daytrading • trump_losing_the_midterms_could_be_the_trigger • C
A TLDR for others.
Republicans lose Midterms = Polictical tension = Rate hikes worries increase = Companies might slow Capex spending in 2027-2028 = AI driven companies take a hit = Nasdaq falls pretty hard.
sentiment -0.40
18 hr ago • u/AidenTai • r/BitcoinMarkets • daily_discussion_thursday_october_01_2026 • C
It's sort of the point though. I check Glassnode, analyst opinions and what's going on with macro, and then figure out which topics or points seem most important to Bitcoin trading short term. Then summarize what's happening for those points. You can choose not to read or care, or you can even read the TLDR if you prefer that. But only writing the TLDR in the first place leaves out more details that I would like to include for context or that link a topic to trade expectations, etc.
For example, I could just write 'macro news coming on Friday', but I would prefer to also say: well, while we have some macro news coming, and last time the previous jobs report led Bitcoin to sink, this time around the CPI print and comments from Fed members make even a solid jobs reading less likely to drop us sharply because rate expectations aren't as uncertain as they were last time. If I include that level of detail for six topics or so, post length will get long regardless.
sentiment 0.79
20 hr ago • u/TalkInternal6681 • r/quantfinance • difference_between_jump_qt_and_qr_intern • B
**TLDR: what is Jump QT interview process focussed on? any info on super day in particular would be great.**
I am wondering what the difference in what gets asked in interviews for both is because the stuff ive seen online seems to blend the two tracks together for Jump.
normally in firms QR is stats/ML, prob, coding, data science and QT is prob, simpler stats and some market making stuff.
was wondering if that was true for jump as well coz i have only really heard jump QT be prob. any info on the super day would be great as well.
sentiment 0.99
23 hr ago • u/lumen_loop • r/Stellar • trustless_work_v2_is_live_in_beta_on_stellar • C
TLDR:
Trustless Work V2 arrives in beta on Stellar Testnet. The major upgrade makes escrow configurable: quorum approvals, multi-address roles, batch operations, observers, and flexible milestones let builders adapt the trust model to grants, marketplaces, agencies, and autonomous systems. V1 remains production on Mainnet with no changes. V2 SDKs include React and new JavaScript/TypeScript framework-agnostic options.
sentiment 0.15
5 hr ago • u/U-Copy • r/Superstonk • october_pullback_t35_from_rc_buy_inwarrant • 📈 Technical Analysis • B
Hello y'all. It's been a while.
There has been lots of hypes into October so I wanted to share my thought why there will be possible pullback to $20.5 gap filll. There are lots of Dark pool actvity and there has been always pullback before big rally.
This week, I've looked into the warrants, and it appears that GME can extend them **without shareholder approval**. In other words, I believe GME could extend the warrants, and it appears they only need to announce the extension within 5 days of the expiration date.
https://preview.redd.it/5hgt54gyaysh1.png?width=726&format=png&auto=webp&s=d3bb68009d136aa77a91292a9225194b14fbe701
Also, RC and insiders have recently started buying GME. I've seen many posts there will be squeeze like VW Squeeze in Ocotober. However, I disagree. I will share my TA and I believe Market makers will try to push down to create fear before October 30 Warrant expiration and rally into $40.
If we add T+35 settlement to those recent Sep 21, 29 purchases, that takes us into November. Looking at the current data, we can also see shares being routed through dark pools.
My theory is that the market makers won't simply let the price run immediately. Instead, they may wait until the T+35 settlement date and then buy back shares, pushing the price higher. At the same time, October 30 warrant could add additional pressure from warrant exercises.
https://preview.redd.it/nwaka8pwaysh1.png?width=1776&format=png&auto=webp&s=470738b662fddf6af92bdc97631e8a3c68d94763
https://preview.redd.it/qifwh3uwiysh1.png?width=2048&format=png&auto=webp&s=ced46ee87bae0e228ac018447846d138e2ed4946
Putting all of this together, I'm looking for a rally toward the **$40 range in November** after Pullback to $20.5 Gap fill in October.
\*TLDR: **RC's recent September 21 & 29 purchases + market makers' T+35 settlement date + pressure from GME warrant exercises = November rally toward the $40s.** 💥🔥🚀
\*Not Financial Advice!
\-U
sentiment 0.39
5 hr ago • u/lumen_loop • r/Stellar • stellar_developers_meeting_10012026 • C
TLDR:
Stella Developers Meeting covers USDT0, Tether's USDT delivered to Stellar via LayerZero's OFT standard. Live on mainnet since September with $2.58M in bridged assets, 23,717 accounts, and 7 DVN operators. Technical walkthrough of cross-chain architecture and developer capabilities for sending, receiving, and tracking stablecoins across 23 networks.
sentiment 0.18
6 hr ago • u/Suitable_Advisor_878 • r/Daytrading • trump_losing_the_midterms_could_be_the_trigger • C
TLDR: Trump admin looses midterms = bad for Nasdaq
sentiment -0.62
10 hr ago • u/Little_Treat_1982 • r/AMD_Stock • jim_cramer_delivers_unmistakable_verdict_on_amds • C
TLDR?
sentiment 0.00
14 hr ago • u/Klutzy_Pianist1782 • r/Superstonk • multi_time_frame_confluence_structure • C
TLDR Tin foiL engaged! 🚀✅🚀✅🚀✅🍌✅🚀✅🍌✅🚀✅🍌✅🚀✅🍌✅🚀✅🍌🍌✅🚀✅🍌✅🚀✅🍌✅🚀✅🍌🚀✅🍌🍌✅🚀✅🍌✅🚀✅🍌✅🚀✅🍌✅🚀✅🍌✅🚀✅🍌✅
sentiment 0.98
16 hr ago • u/AidenTai • r/BitcoinMarkets • daily_discussion_thursday_october_01_2026 • C
I was hesitant to write exactly this but didn't want to attract even more down votes 😅
That said to the parent comment: maybe the TLDR is more of what you want? A lot of comments have told me to reduce size and not include so many details, while comments from a couple days ago asked for more sources, math and additional information. Can't win...
sentiment -0.65
16 hr ago • u/Rav_3d • r/Daytrading • trump_losing_the_midterms_could_be_the_trigger • C
TLDR. You burned a lot of AI tokens on that.
sentiment 0.00
17 hr ago • u/BaelZharon7 • r/Daytrading • trump_losing_the_midterms_could_be_the_trigger • C
A TLDR for others.
Republicans lose Midterms = Polictical tension = Rate hikes worries increase = Companies might slow Capex spending in 2027-2028 = AI driven companies take a hit = Nasdaq falls pretty hard.
sentiment -0.40
18 hr ago • u/AidenTai • r/BitcoinMarkets • daily_discussion_thursday_october_01_2026 • C
It's sort of the point though. I check Glassnode, analyst opinions and what's going on with macro, and then figure out which topics or points seem most important to Bitcoin trading short term. Then summarize what's happening for those points. You can choose not to read or care, or you can even read the TLDR if you prefer that. But only writing the TLDR in the first place leaves out more details that I would like to include for context or that link a topic to trade expectations, etc.
For example, I could just write 'macro news coming on Friday', but I would prefer to also say: well, while we have some macro news coming, and last time the previous jobs report led Bitcoin to sink, this time around the CPI print and comments from Fed members make even a solid jobs reading less likely to drop us sharply because rate expectations aren't as uncertain as they were last time. If I include that level of detail for six topics or so, post length will get long regardless.
sentiment 0.79


Share
About
Pricing
Policies
Markets
API
Info
tz UTC-4
Connect with us
ChartExchange Email
ChartExchange on Discord
ChartExchange on X
ChartExchange on Reddit
ChartExchange on GitHub
ChartExchange on YouTube
© 2020 - 2026 ChartExchange LLC