Create Account
Log In
Dark
chart
exchange
Premium
Terminal
Screener
Stocks
Crypto
Forex
Trends
Depth
Close
Check out our Level2View

TNET
TRINET GROUP, INC.
stock NYSE

At Close
Jul 16, 2026 3:59:50 PM EDT
60.52USD+5.436%(+3.12)459,544
51.83Bid   71.04Ask   19.21Spread
Pre-market
0.00USD-100.000%(-57.40)0
After-hours
Jul 16, 2026 4:10:30 PM EDT
60.47USD-0.083%(-0.05)1
OverviewOption ChainMax PainOptionsPrice & VolumeDividendsHistoricalExchange VolumeDark Pool LevelsDark Pool PrintsExchangesShort VolumeShort Interest - DailyShort InterestBorrow Fee (CTB)Failure to Deliver (FTD)ShortsTrendsNewsTrends
TNET Reddit Mentions
Subreddits
Limit Labels     

We have sentiment values and mention counts going back to 2017. The complete data set is available via the API.
Take me to the API
TNET Specific Mentions
As of Jul 17, 2026 12:53:16 AM EDT (1 min. ago)
Includes all comments and posts. Mentions per user per ticker capped at one per hour.
73 days ago • u/lukastymo • r/ValueInvesting • backtested_the_magic_formula_over_16_years • C
Vanilla Magic Formula alone underperformed the index in my runs: lower CAGR, lower Sharpe, \~30% win rate.
I added a Sortino ratio filter with a cutoff of >= 0.2 (not a high bar) over a trailing 252-day window. Sortino measures annual return per unit of downside volatility. Stocks below 0.2 tend to have persistent price deterioration despite good fundamentals, the classic value trap signature.
Concrete example: in 2023 the formula picked MED (Sortino: -1.48) and IRWD (Sortino: -0.16). Filtering them out promoted TNET and VGR, which returned 19% and 8% that year. These happens consistently: When a stock fails the Sortino cutoff, I replace it with the next highest-ranked Magic Formula name that passes. Same position count, better average quality.
Similar thinking applies to the Piotroski F-score. I require at least 3 out of 5 criteria to pass (I used a subset of 5 from the original 9, chosen based on data I already had available): EBIT > 0, EBIT higher than prior year, total debt lower than prior year, current ratio improved vs prior year, shares outstanding did not increase vs prior year.
sentiment 0.52
73 days ago • u/lukastymo • r/ValueInvesting • backtested_the_magic_formula_over_16_years • C
Vanilla Magic Formula alone underperformed the index in my runs: lower CAGR, lower Sharpe, \~30% win rate.
I added a Sortino ratio filter with a cutoff of >= 0.2 (not a high bar) over a trailing 252-day window. Sortino measures annual return per unit of downside volatility. Stocks below 0.2 tend to have persistent price deterioration despite good fundamentals, the classic value trap signature.
Concrete example: in 2023 the formula picked MED (Sortino: -1.48) and IRWD (Sortino: -0.16). Filtering them out promoted TNET and VGR, which returned 19% and 8% that year. These happens consistently: When a stock fails the Sortino cutoff, I replace it with the next highest-ranked Magic Formula name that passes. Same position count, better average quality.
Similar thinking applies to the Piotroski F-score. I require at least 3 out of 5 criteria to pass (I used a subset of 5 from the original 9, chosen based on data I already had available): EBIT > 0, EBIT higher than prior year, total debt lower than prior year, current ratio improved vs prior year, shares outstanding did not increase vs prior year.
sentiment 0.52


Share
About
Pricing
Policies
Markets
API
Info
tz UTC-4
Connect with us
ChartExchange Email
ChartExchange on Discord
ChartExchange on X
ChartExchange on Reddit
ChartExchange on GitHub
ChartExchange on YouTube
© 2020 - 2026 ChartExchange LLC