SAB
Sonic Healthcare
stock NYSE

Upps, auch verpennt. Irgrndwann ist halt das erste Mal..
wunderschönen guten Morgen liebe SAB! 🔆
(Uff, musste meinem Handy gerade diese Abkürzung antrainieren)

Verpennt. Guten Morgen Verlierer SAB!

Moin WE-FAB. Hallo? Kaum ist mal langes Wochenende und schon sind alle sind zur SAB verkommen?
Oder wo sind alle 🤨?

GuMo SAB. Zweites Frühstück rockt!

GuMo FAB und SAB. Gönnt euch ein Wochenende das so sexy ist wie euer Portfolio

GuMo SAB, warum ist dieser Herbst mit 2 Grad mit mir im Raum und wer hat das Fenster über Nacht auf „egal wie kalt es draußen ist, komm rein“ stehen lassen.

GuMo SAB!

GuMo SAB!

Endlich die Lösung für die SAB damit die nicht nur von der Börse gefikt werden sondern auch mal selbst aktiv werden können!
https://preview.redd.it/ojujgrfrjxsf1.jpeg?width=4284&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=9b6e2f76ebbda4459a652a5125885218b8893368
Lang auf $NVDA wahrscheinlich weil AI

Moin SAB, hilfe was pasiert 😘😩

I think that the game is over for native crypto assets to achieve true institutional scale. The regulatory playbook is now explicit: traditional finance is being mandated to funnel capital into Real World Assets and this is the biggest structural shift the market has seen this year.
Here are the facts that anchor this forced shift:
The Regulatory Unlock: The effective rescission of the SEC's SAB 121 in early 2025 removed the massive capital burden that previously made digital asset custody fundamentally uneconomical for major global banks. This created the possibility of entry.

The Punitive Charge : Under the Basel III prudential standards, highly volatile, native crypto are subject to a punitive 1,250% risk weight. This results in a dollar-for-dollar capital requirement against the entire exposure, ensuring that speculative native crypto holdings at scale are financially non-viable for regulated banks.

The Capital-Efficient Path : Assets like tokenized U.S. Treasuries are subject to standard, minimal risk weights. This makes RWA products exceptionally capital-efficient for banks to custody and issue.
The Result: The institutional custody race is now inextricably tied to the RWA issuance race, leveraging products like tokenized Money Market Funds for yield-bearing collateral and 24/7 settlement capabilities.

This is what my research is showing: the Basel framework strategically aligns the G-SIB focus exclusively on Group 1a RWA. I'm genuinely curious about the counter-arguments: Do you think the structural utility of native tokens will eventually force regulators to ease the 1,250% capital trap, or is institutional capital forever capped at the RWA layer?
I'm open to learning what I'm missing here, let's discuss.

Beschreibung SAB:
Ein Blick hier ins unter jedoch hat mir gezeigt dass ich ein absolut nutzloses Mitglied der Gesellschaft geworden bin

I think that the game is over for native crypto assets to achieve true institutional scale. The regulatory playbook is now explicit: traditional finance is being mandated to funnel capital into RWA, and this is the biggest structural shift the market has seen this year, because
1) SAB 121’s Removal: The SEC’s effective rescission of SAB 121 in January 2025 removed the massive accounting hurdle that previously made digital asset custody uneconomical for major banks. This created the possibility of entry.
2) The Basel III Mandate: The BCBS framework requires banks to apply a punitive 1,250% risk weight to highly volatile, native crypto. This renders large-scale holdings of native crypto financially non-viable.
3) The RWA Viability: Assets like tokenized U.S. Treasuries are subject to standard risk weights, making them exceptionally capital-efficient for banks to custody and issue. The institutional race is therefore inextricably tied to the RWA issuance race.

4) RWA Utility: Tokenized MMFs are becoming standard because they offer massive capital efficiency gains, they function as yield-bearing collateral for derivatives, available 24/7 via smart contract.
5) The Regulatory Greenlight: Agencies like the OCC and FDIC have streamlined compliance, confirming that traditional custody is a permissible activity, setting off a "Race to Non-Objection" among major banks.

This is what my research is showing. I'm genuinely curious about the counter-arguments: Do you think the structural utility of native tokens (like decentralized settlement) will eventually force regulators to ease the 1,250% capital trap, or is institutional capital forever capped at the RWA layer?
I'm open to learning what I'm missing here, let's discuss.

GuMo SAB, geil, ausschlafen beim Städtetrip und dann feststellen, dass Börsi geöffnet ist. Beste!

GuMo Feiertags SAB. Heute beste Feiertag mit Börsi offen🤗

The Institutional Custody Race: SAB 122 Unlocked the Floodgates, and RWA is the First to Benefit