FITZ
Fitz-Gerald Must Have Portfolio ETF
stock NYSE ETF

IMO FITZ sucks
It has huge fees taking your money away every single year.
It tends to have higher volatility drag due to the lack of diversification. This is another mathematical drag on your portfolio, every single year
It bets on growth stocks ("must haves"), historical losers. Not because the companies suck, but because they're too expensive, so expected returns are compressed.
Fitz is some guy who couldn't become a fund manager or maybe he didn't want to - I don't know. What I know is that people who managed to get that job are usually squashed by the markets (98% lose to SPIVA after fees after taxes in 20 years)
FITZ, the ETF, is basically closet indexing but worse. You'll have the companies that you couod get for cheap just buying the index. But it will be more volatile, more expensive, with high concentration risk (fraud or catastrophe in a single name hurts you more).
Some other guy in the thread is preaching DRAM or RAM. IMO they suck even more. It is a wild bet that a single ultra-volatile sector isn't properly precified. Might work. Betting on the roulette also might work.

IMO FITZ sucks
It has huge fees taking your money away every single year.
It tends to have higher volatility drag due to the lack of diversification. This is another mathematical drag on your portfolio, every single year
It bets on growth stocks ("must haves"), historical losers. Not because the companies suck, but because they're too expensive, so expected returns are compressed.
Fitz is some guy who couldn't become a fund manager or maybe he didn't want to - I don't know. What I know is that people who managed to get that job are usually squashed by the markets (98% lose to SPIVA after fees after taxes in 20 years)
FITZ, the ETF, is basically closet indexing but worse. You'll have the companies that you couod get for cheap just buying the index. But it will be more volatile, more expensive, with high concentration risk (fraud or catastrophe in a single name hurts you more).
Some other guy in the thread is preaching DRAM or RAM. IMO they suck even more. It is a wild bet that a single ultra-volatile sector isn't properly precified. Might work. Betting on the roulette also might work.