ET Reddit Mentions | ChartExchange

GE Aerospace is a genuinely high-quality business with real earnings power, but the market has priced in a trajectory that the current fundamentals cannot yet justify, and the Samsung-driven chip selloff yesterday is a useful reminder of what happens when peak-cycle pricing meets a reality check.
**The mechanism and the numbers**
GE Aerospace trades at a trailing P/E of 47.1x and a forward P/E of 50.8x. That forward multiple expanding above the trailing multiple is an unusual signal, it typically means the market expects near-term earnings to compress before recovering, or that the Street is pricing in a growth acceleration that has not yet shown up in reported numbers. The reported numbers are worth sitting with: revenue grew 24.7% year-over-year, which is genuinely strong for an industrial business of this size. But year-over-year earnings were down 1.8%. Revenue accelerating while earnings decline is the kind of divergence that demands an explanation, not a shrug.
The quality metrics are real. ROE of 45.4%, net margin of 17.9%, and earnings quality flagged as strong. This is not a broken business. The ACCE score of 61/100 reflects that, Quality subscore of 76, Momentum of 90. The market is not wrong to like the franchise.
What the market may be getting wrong is the price it is paying for that franchise. The 6-model fair value composite comes in at $119.54, a 67.3% discount to the current price of $365.60. That is not a rounding error. That is the model saying the current price embeds assumptions about future earnings that require everything to go right for an extended period.
For context, the analyst consensus target is $362.57, essentially flat to where the stock trades today. So the Street is not seeing meaningful upside from here either, even while the Momentum score of 90 suggests price action has been strong.
**The bull case**
GE Aerospace is the dominant supplier of jet engines for commercial and defense aviation. The commercial aviation cycle is in a multi-year upcycle as airlines replace aging fleets, and the services revenue attached to installed engines (maintenance, parts, overhaul) is high-margin and recurring. If the earnings dip is transitory, a function of mix shift or timing rather than structural margin pressure, and the forward earnings path accelerates, the current multiple compresses quickly. A business with 45% ROE and strong earnings quality deserves a premium. The question is how large a premium.
**The bear case and what breaks the thesis**
The forward P/E of 50.8x is pricing in a significant earnings recovery that has not materialized yet. If the earnings decline of 1.8% YoY persists or deepens, whether from supply chain friction, engine delivery delays, or defense budget pressure, the multiple has no floor to catch it. The 6-model fair value gap of 67% is the quantitative expression of that risk. Yesterday's macro context adds texture: per CNBC, the Nasdaq dropped 1.16% on July 7 as Samsung's earnings miss reminded the market that peak-cycle pricing is fragile. GE Aerospace is not a semiconductor name, but the dynamic is structurally similar, a stock priced for a trajectory that requires sustained execution.
The FOMC minutes dropping today at 2:00 p.m. ET are also relevant. Per the Federal Reserve, the June meeting revised the median 2026 PCE inflation forecast to 3.6% from 2.7% in March, with nine of eighteen officials projecting at least one rate hike in 2026. A higher-for-longer rate environment raises the discount rate on any long-duration earnings stream, and a stock trading at 50x forward earnings is, by definition, a long-duration asset.
**Where valuation sits**
The honest read: the 6-model composite and the analyst consensus are telling the same story from different angles. The models say the stock is 67% overpriced on normalized fundamentals. The analysts say there is essentially no upside from here. Neither is a buy signal. The bull case requires believing that the earnings recovery is real, imminent, and large enough to grow into a multiple that currently has no margin of safety.
I find the quality of the underlying business genuinely compelling. I find the price genuinely difficult to justify at current levels. That tension is where the analytical work lives.
Not financial advice. I do not currently hold GE.

.dark-mode .qhcDcf{ color: white; background-color: #333333; border: 2px solid white; }.light-mode .qhcDcf{ color: #333333; background-color: white; border: 2px solid #333333; }ETEnergy Transfer LP Common Units representing limited partner interestsstock NYSE

ET
Energy Transfer LP Common Units representing limited partner interests
stock NYSE