ET
Energy Transfer LP Common Units
stockNYSE

**BanBet Created** ▼ | **Record:** 2W - 5L | Ticker | Target | Entry | Move | Expires | |:---:|:---:|:---:|:---:|:---:| | **SPY** | $760.00 (below) | $766.48 | -0.8% | Fri 1:21 AM ET |

**BanBet Created** ▼ | Ticker | Target | Entry | Move | Expires | |:---:|:---:|:---:|:---:|:---:| | **QQQ** | $710.00 (below) | $718.62 | -1.2% | Wed 12:02 AM ET |

**BanBet Created** ▲ | **Record:** 1W - 0L | Ticker | Target | Entry | Move | Expires | |:---:|:---:|:---:|:---:|:---:| | **RDDT** | $158.00 (above) | $155.45 | +1.6% | Tue 10:36 PM ET |

No, EPD, MPLX, ET are all seeing volume and earnings growth so they won't tank just because rates rise VZ and T on the other hand are semi-bond proxies yes.

I establish rules for max loss per day and per week and only take trades with risk reward if at least 1:2 preferably 1:3 and I also trade after 10:15 AM ET or after 1:3o or preferably into the close. I trade Futures and options but I do not let greed or fear get in the way. Some days no trade is the best trade. Good luck.

It has a nice yield and it's pretty well diversified across growth and recession-proof budinesses, collecting rent from them, but I agree. I think treasuries and bonds are going to pass 6% in the coming months and O will tank, along with my other dividend favorites like EPD, MPLX, ET, VZ, T, and PFE. I'm not selling what I have, but I wouldn't be buying right now.

72 contracts of the IWM $265 put (0DTE) printed at $0.03 at 9:32:31 AM ET at MIAX I also solved the puzzle for OP, the quotes were stale from Friday close, no it was likely Schwab data not updating from previous close. Nothing special about these options either, no sure why OP was trying to hide it.

options. Trading of select single-stock and ETF options is now available during a pre-market session from 7:30 a.m. to 9:25 a.m. ET and a post-market session from 4:00 p.m. to 4:15 p.m. ET, Monday to Friday, covering some of the most actively traded and liquid symbols, including the Magnificent 10 stocks and other widely followed U.S.-listed names plus major ETFs. The full list of underlying symbols is: AAPL, AMD, AMZN, AVGO, BABA, BAC, F, GLD, GOOG, GOOGL, HOOD, INTC, IWM, META, MRVL, MSFT, MU, NFLX, NOK, NVDA, ORCL, PFE, PLTR, QQQ, SNDK, SPY, TSLA, TSM, XLF.

**BanBet Created** ▲ | Ticker | Target | Entry | Move | Expires | |:---:|:---:|:---:|:---:|:---:| | **SPY** | $773.42 (above) | $766.48 | +0.9% | Tue 8:19 PM ET |

Why do you double down on an incorrect claim? I definitely sold in after hours, 100 GMEWS at 4:14PM ET for $1.30, today 10/13/2016 a few minutes after the GameStop press release. https://preview.redd.it/fqn93btdmiwh1.jpeg?width=1199&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=4c9b3405ffdf94f1ca1484b087e44a527d87ff85 I also sold warrants shortly thereafter out of a Schwab account. Yes. After hours,

**📊 Lower-impact U.S. Economic Data (ET)** **8:15 AM** | ADP Weekly Employment Change | Previous: 24.8K **8:30 AM** | Building Permits / Housing Starts | Forecast: 1.39M / 1.30M | Previous: 1.40M / 1.28M **10:00 AM** | Pending Home Sales m/m | Forecast: -0.7% | Previous: 0.3% ⚠️ For informational purposes only. Not financial advice. 📌 #SPY #SPX #Employment #Housing https://preview.redd.it/6kmv7szmgiwh1.png?width=1789&format=png&auto=webp&s=da58361ea528ebb23ddc30e0c5e05124407be5b0

I keep hearing "Fed week = bigger moves", so I finally sat down and checked it on ES. What I did: took every FOMC meeting from 2010 to now and compared it against weeks/days with no meeting but similar volatility going in. Ranges measured as multiples of ATR so different years are comparable. What came out: \- Full FOMC week: 1.14x the range of the comparison weeks (127 weeks) \- Announcement day: 1.38x (129 sessions) \- 2pm to 4pm ET window: 2.49x (109 sessions, data from 2013) So yeah, the week is a bit bigger, but most of it is packed into the two hours around the statement. The rest of the week looks pretty normal. I also ran it on NQ. Announcement day is bigger there too (1.23x), but the full week (1.09x) didn't hold up once I corrected for running six comparisons at once. Basically noise. To be clear, this is only about size, not direction. It says nothing about which way it goes. Has anyone tested this with a different control? Curious if matching on VIX instead of prior ATR changes the picture.

* **Guaranteed Delivery Option:** If warrants cannot be delivered by the cutoff, holders can submit a Notice of Guaranteed Delivery with full payment by 5:00 p.m. ET on October 30, with final warrant delivery due by 5:00 p.m. ET on November 2, 2026. Does this mean I can effectively exercise as late as 10/30 on the computersharecas site?

**BanBet Created** ▼ | **Record:** 5W - 6L | Ticker | Target | Entry | Move | Expires | |:---:|:---:|:---:|:---:|:---:| | **MU** | $869.00 (below) | $905.16 | -4.0% | Wed 7:03 PM ET |

| Ticker | Target | Entry | Current | Move | Expires | |:---:|:---:|:---:|:---:|:---:|:---:| | **ASTS** ▲ | $100.00 (above) | $40.67 | $41.88 | +145.9% | Tue, Nov 17, 4:10 PM ET | | **Record** | 0W - 1L | 0% | - | - | - |

**BanBet Created** ▲ | **Record:** 0W - 1L | Ticker | Target | Entry | Move | Expires | |:---:|:---:|:---:|:---:|:---:| | **GOOG** | $355.00 (above) | $340.06 | +4.4% | Mon, Oct 26, 5:27 PM ET |

The distinction between acceptance, document availability and feed discovery is particularly relevant for Form 4 research. I recently examined recorded acceptance timestamps in a Form 4 corpus against SEC submission headers. One methodological issue is that an HTTP Last-Modified timestamp matching acceptance does not establish when a client could first retrieve the document. That requires timestamped retrieval observations, ideally including the last unsuccessful and first successful attempt. Do you have a Form 4-specific breakdown comparing first successful XML/SGML retrieval with RSS discovery? It would be interesting to see the distribution around 16:00 ET and whether the newer CIK requirement changed coverage or latency.

ET Jordan from Solana

Computershare might not support sales outside of normal market hours. Try again tomorrow after 9:30AM ET.

**BanBet Created** ▲ | **Record:** 15W - 6L | Ticker | Target | Entry | Move | Expires | |:---:|:---:|:---:|:---:|:---:| | **SPCX** | $155.51 (above) | $148.10 | +5.0% | Wed 4:10 PM ET |

**BanBet Created** ▼ | **Record:** 0W - 1L | Ticker | Target | Entry | Move | Expires | |:---:|:---:|:---:|:---:|:---:| | **NFLX** | $60.00 (below) | $69.76 | -14.0% | Tue 3:40 PM ET |

One thing worth doing once the rules are written down is testing each filter on its own instead of just trusting it. Pull your last 100 or so setups that touched a key level and split them into the ones that closed with your min volume vs the ones that didnt, then compare win rate and avg R for each bucket. If the volume bucket isnt clearly better after fees, the filter is mostly making you feel safer lol. Also worth defining min volume as relative, like 1.5x the 20 bar average for that same time of day, since BTC volume at 3 ET looks nothing like volume around the US open. And write the exit rules down the same way, a lot of the edge (or lack of it) shows up there and not in the entry.

| Ticker | Target | Entry | Current | Move | Expires | |:---:|:---:|:---:|:---:|:---:|:---:| | **SOXX** ▼ | $450.00 (below) | $576.24 | $501.99 | -21.9% | Thu 3:26 PM ET | | **Record** | 0W - 3L | 0% | - | - | - |

What a night for Rovia users. Around 22:25 IST tonight (Oct 19), everyone in Rovia Insiders WhatsApp group (104 members) started getting emails: "Your SELL order is complete" Problem: No one placed any sell order. Within 5 mins: \- Portfolio shows 0 stocks / blank \- All cash moved to wallet \- Many accounts show a forced BUY of PLAG (Planet Green Holdings Corp) that they never placed \- App says "Transfer your RSUs" screen, unable to access holdings Rovia Team response in group: \> "There seems to be an issue with the custodian and this will be restored" \> "Yes, Alpaca incorrectly marked some trades on the account due to an issue at their end" \> "All the funds assets and money are completely safe" \> "These will be restored by end of day and there will be no tax implications" BUT - PLAG WAS actually traded on NYSE AMERICAN. This was not just a display bug. I have Yahoo Finance chart: \- Open: $0.689 \- High: $2.68 \- Low: $0.70 \- Vol: 3.491Cr (normal vol is ∼200k) \- Clear vertical spike at exactly 22:00-23:00 IST (12:30pm ET) So erroneous orders DID hit the exchange tape and caused a 308% pump. PLAG is a $9M market cap micro-cap with 45 employees, float 11.68M. Any small erroneous volume pumps it. Questions that Rovia/Alpaca haven't answered: 1. How can a custodian initiate trades on client accounts without authorization? Isn't this a breach of fiduciary duty / trust? 2. If trades are "trade busted" tomorrow, who bears the loss for PLAG bought at $2.68 now trading at $0.95? 3. Why no official incident report on Alpaca status page? 4. What about STCG/LTCG and 180-day repatriation compliance if trades are recorded at exchange level? Anyone else affected? Did your portfolio come back? Mine is still showing empty / PLAG buy.

🛢️ The Houthis claim they hit a Saudi Aramco site, an oilfield, and the Riyadh and Abha airports (Reuters, about 12:41 PM ET). Damage isn't confirmed. This goes further than this morning's Riyadh scare because oil sites are now being named. So far oil is mixed, with WTI up 1.5% and Brent flat as of 1:06 PM ET. SPY: a mild headwind that turns into a real risk to the bounce if the damage is confirmed or crude spikes. Reuters via Devdiscourse · Oil move on X Heads up: viral X posts saying Trump announced a US-Iran settlement are a recycled June 11 video from spam accounts. No wire service has it, so don't trade it.