ET
Energy Transfer LP Common Units
stockNYSE

Possibly. Funding is still only slightly negative (OKX BTC perp about -0.002% per 8h as of 9 PM ET) and price wicked to 61.9k today without much of a bounce, so shorts don't look crowded yet. I'd watch whether 62k holds into the weekly close Sunday night.

Pulled Binance's public market data around 8:27 PM ET and the answer is a bit more boring than "liquidity is dead": BTC/EURI is showing status BREAK, meaning trading on that pair is halted, and its order book is completely empty. EURI is a euro stablecoin, not the euro itself, and EURI/USDT was about 1.0997, basically the same as EUR/USDT (1.1002). So fair value is roughly 62,690 / 1.0997, about 57,000, which lines up with the regular BTC/EUR pair (around 56,970 at that time). The ~51,580 on BTC/EURI is just the last trade on a pair nobody can trade right now. Its last six daily candles all sit between ~50,700 and ~54,800, so it's not a crash from tonight either. To your question: arb bots do close gaps on thin pairs, but only when there's an open book to hit. With the pair halted there's nothing for them to buy, so the stale print just sits there and ends up in cropped screenshots. Easy check next time: look at the pair's volume and whether the book has any orders before trusting a scary wick.

**BanBet Created** ▼ | **Record:** 0W - 1L | Ticker | Target | Entry | Move | Expires | |:---:|:---:|:---:|:---:|:---:| | **IBIT** | $29.00 (below) | $38.77 | -25.2% | Sat, Nov 28, 8:25 PM ET |

The day before the FAA issued its nationwide ground stop, DAL and UAL options traded at roughly **4× their usual intraday pace** by midday. Both stocks were already falling. The reported volume leaves open whether traders were buying new puts, closing positions, or hedging. [Options report](https://www.schaeffersresearch.com/content/options/2026/11/12/2-airline-stocks-drawing-unusual-options-volume-today) SEC filings show that United CEO Scott Kirby sold **90,367 UAL shares** on Nov. 10 and Delta EVP Steven Sear sold **17,768 DAL shares** on Nov. 12. Both filings record sales of existing shares. The records I reviewed yielded no verified trade by Trump, his family or administration officials in the Nov. 9–13 window, and no evidence that the executives traded on advance knowledge. [Kirby Form 4](https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/100517/000010051726000203/xslF345X06/wk-form4_1794365145.xml) · [Sear Form 4](https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/27904/000168316826008711/xslF345X06/ownership.xml) · [Trump’s September disclosure](https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/11/President-Donald-J.-Trump-Periodic-Transaction-Report-09.17.26.pdf) Has anyone checked **opening put buys by strike and expiration** for DAL or UAL on Nov. 12–13? I’d like to see whether they were unusual compared with the same time of day over the prior few weeks. For Friday’s trades, the FAA issued an O’Hare ground-stop advisory at **3:28 p.m. ET** and the nationwide advisory at **3:54 p.m. ET**. [O’Hare advisory](https://www.fly.faa.gov/adv/adv_otherdis?adv_date=11132026&advn=107) · [National advisory](https://www.fly.faa.gov/adv/adv_otherdis?adv_date=11132026&advn=111) My detailed post got filtered: [https://www.reddit.com/r/stocks/comments/1xwhzgd/trading\_before\_the\_november\_13\_2026\_faa\_outage/](https://www.reddit.com/r/stocks/comments/1xwhzgd/trading_before_the_november_13_2026_faa_outage/)

| Ticker | Target | Entry | Current | Move | Expires | |:---:|:---:|:---:|:---:|:---:|:---:| | **SPY** ▼ | $730.00 (below) | $750.39 | $754.37 | -2.7% | Fri, Nov 27, 12:05 PM ET | | **Record** | 5W - 0L | 100% | - | - | - |

Not exactly, Shuttle orbiter was half a stage because it didn’t include the ET. The problem is, if you try to build the ET into the Shuttle and make it a full stage, then it becomes too big and it is impossible to actually land it like a glider. However, it becomes possible to land it propulsively… which we just witnessed… Plus Starship has technically demonstrated the dry recovery of both of its stages, although independently. So that’s big

| Ticker | Target | Entry | Current | Move | Expires | |:---:|:---:|:---:|:---:|:---:|:---:| | **SPY** ▼ | $610.78 (below) | $735.88 | $754.37 | -17.0% | Fri, Nov 27, 4:28 PM ET |

**BanBet Created** ▲ | **Record:** 5W - 7L | Ticker | Target | Entry | Move | Expires | |:---:|:---:|:---:|:---:|:---:| | **GLD** | $359.00 (above) | $355.45 | +1.0% | Sat, Nov 21, 1:39 PM ET |

One thing I'd add to the leverage-flush read: on BloFin's BTC perp, open interest went from about 4,639 BTC at 8:30am ET to about 4,711 BTC at 1:19pm ET, while price slid from roughly 66.6k to 65.8k. Funding is still slightly positive (around +0.006% per 8h on BloFin, +0.004% on Bitunix), so shorts aren't crowded yet either. Rising OI into a falling price can mean fresh positions are opening rather than just longs getting closed out, so the flush might not be fully done. That's one venue's data, not the whole market, and not a call. Agree on staying off leverage until the weekly close. (we partner with both of those exchanges)

I’d separate extra access hours from changes to the regular session. The article you linked says the opening/closing crosses remain, and Nasdaq expects most liquidity to stay in traditional hours. It also lists existing extended hours of 4am–8pm ET, so 6.5 hours isn't the full pre-change access window. Separately, 23/6.5 is about 3.54 times as long, or a 254% increase, rather than a 350% increase. For your signals question, my inference is that the first thing to audit is the data definition: does a ‘daily’ bar include overnight trades, what counts as the official close, and is relative volume compared with the same session? A 20-day average or volume spike calculated from different session boundaries wouldn't be a like-for-like test. I'd evaluate regular-session and overnight results separately, including actual spreads/costs, before assuming that more hours either destroys or improves an existing signal. Source for the stated schedule and auctions: [https://www.nasdaq.com/newsroom/nasdaq-explains-what-is-23-5-trading](https://www.nasdaq.com/newsroom/nasdaq-explains-what-is-23-5-trading) . The signal-testing implications are my interpretation, not a claim that a particular strategy will work.

Welcome to our sub, and thank you for reaching out. If you're still experiencing issues, our Workplace representatives are available to help. They can review your situation in more detail and assist with the next steps. Representatives are available Monday through Friday, from 8:30 a.m. to midnight ET. [Contact Us](https://www.fidelity.com/customer-service/contact-us) Feel free to keep us updated here on the sub.

I appreciate you checking in on this. Currently, we do not have anything additional to share regarding the ability to specify lots when placing a conditional order. However, you can specify tax lots after a trade has been completed. For reassigning lots, you have until 9:00 p.m. ET on the trade's settlement date to make changes. This can be done by following these steps: 1. Select "Accounts & Trade," then choose "Account Positions" 2. Switch the "Overview" box to "Closed Positions" 3. Click "Reassign recent lots" and follow the prompts to make your selections Alternatively, if you want to update the method that your account uses to dispose of lots for your account, you can do so by following these steps: 1. Select "Accounts & Trade," then click "Account Features" 2. Under "Brokerage and trading," tap "Manage" next to "Cost Basis Information Tracking" 3. Make any adjustments you like on the following screen Lastly, I have shared your interest in this feature with the appropriate team for further review. If there is anything else we can help you with, please let us know.

Quick update since you posted: as of about 10:30 AM ET, ETH perp on BloFin is around 1,834, so the 1,860-1,890 hourly support you flagged has given way, and the 24h low there is about 1,828. The 9 AM ET hourly candle did most of the damage, roughly 1,893 down to 1,853 on about 13,000 ETH traded versus about 1,700 ETH the hour before, so that was a real volume push, not a slow drift. Funding is the part I'd watch next. It's still slightly positive, about +0.0007% per 8h on BloFin and +0.0012% on Bitunix (public market data; we partner with both). So even after the support break, longs are still paying a little to stay in. If the retest from below fails the way you described and funding flips clearly negative, that would point to shorts piling in rather than longs getting flushed, which can set up a squeeze later, though not always. Until then, waiting for a reclaim instead of catching the knife makes sense to me. Just one data lens, not a call.

**BanBet Created** ▲ | **Record:** 1W - 1L | Ticker | Target | Entry | Move | Expires | |:---:|:---:|:---:|:---:|:---:| | **MU** | $800.00 (above) | $769.08 | +4.0% | Tue 9:32 AM ET |

Thanks for the update, and for trying those initial troubleshooting steps. I recommend connecting with our technical support team for further assistance. They'll be able to work one-on-one with you to get you back online. We have representatives available Monday through Friday from 8:30 a.m. to 9:00 p.m. ET. For your convenience, I'm including our contact information below. [Contact us](https://www.fidelity.com/customer-service/contact-us) I hope you have a nice weekend.

One way to separate deleveraging from a real demand shift is to watch perp positioning next to price. As of about 8:30 AM ET this morning, from BloFin's and Bitunix's public market data (we partner with both): BTC perp funding is roughly flat, about +0.0045% per 8h on BloFin and +0.0033% on Bitunix, and BloFin's BTC open interest is about 4,640 BTC, basically unchanged from last night even though price slid from roughly 69.2k to 66.6k over the last 24 hours. If this were still mostly forced long liquidation, you'd usually expect open interest to keep dropping and funding to go clearly negative as shorts pile in. Flat open interest with near-zero funding while price keeps falling looks more like spot selling and missing buyers than a leverage flush, which fits your macro read and the ETF outflows. The point where ETF outflows slow and funding turns negative with open interest falling has historically been closer to where the leverage side is cleared. Just one data lens, not a call.

| Ticker | Target | Entry | Current | Move | Expires | |:---:|:---:|:---:|:---:|:---:|:---:| | **QQQ** ▲ | $730.00 (above) | $676.44 | $676.95 | +7.9% | Thu, Dec 10, 6:28 PM ET | | **Record** | 1W - 3L | 25% | - | - | - |

they made headlines lately because of some wild swings but those are not "reliable" I'm not even sure what "reliable" means. I'd dump all your equity stocks except walmart and bofa, keep your basket of etfs for long term and research your long term holds more, There's lots of stocks with high dividends above 15% if thats what youre after like RWAY MNR and HRZN. There's lots of 5% dividend payers with high price targets and strong buy ratings like ET EPD and MO. Dividend stocks are mostly long term plays. If youre young you can afford to take some risk and you seem like an active trader, maybe reserve 10% for daytrading and short term plays

**BanBet Created** ▲ | Ticker | Target | Entry | Move | Expires | |:---:|:---:|:---:|:---:|:---:| | **MU** | $800.00 (above) | $769.08 | +4.0% | Mon 11:32 PM ET |

Checked just now (around 9:20 PM ET on Nov 13): BTC is sitting near $68.2K, and the 24h range on CoinGecko is roughly $67.8K to $70.8K, so we're hugging the bottom of it. Fear & Greed reads 33, which is fear but not the extreme-fear reading you usually see at real capitulation lows. A drop like this tends to be more about leverage getting flushed than long-term holders leaving, so I'd watch whether the $67.8K area holds on a retest before reading too much into the headlines.

Hey there, thanks for reaching out. The available withdrawal methods can vary depending on the specific stock plan. Since Neo Financial doesn’t accept incoming U.S. wires, another Canadian bank that does may be an alternative, though I see from the comments that you want to avoid this. To best point you in the right direction, I'd recommend connecting with our Stock Plan Services team directly. They'll be able to review your specific plan and determine the best next steps. You can find numbers to call, based on your location, below. [Stock Plan Services](https://www.fidelity.com/globalcall) Our team is available continuously from Sunday at 5 p.m. to Friday at midnight, ET. You may connect sooner if you're able to call earlier or later in the day, relative to Eastern time. If you have any additional questions or would like any clarification, please just let us know.

posting my final DD for the year tmrw at 6 PM ET

| Ticker | Target | Entry | Current | Move | Expires | |:---:|:---:|:---:|:---:|:---:|:---:| | **SOXL** ▼ | $47.00 (below) | $58.05 | $56.30 | -19.0% | Fri, Nov 20, 2:23 PM ET | | **Record** | 1W - 2L | 33% | - | - | - |

They can see when you've used all your dry powder.. and will promptly DAMP ET.

Agree with the point above about watching funding and OI more than price. Snapshot as of about 5:25 PM ET: BTC perp funding is around +0.011% per 8h on BloFin and +0.008% on Bitunix (we partner with both, I'm just using their public data). So funding is back near the normal positive baseline, not negative. BloFin BTC open interest is about 4,640 BTC, down roughly 3% from about 4,800 this morning, while price only slipped from about 68.7k to 68.2k. So some leverage is still coming off, but shorts aren't crowded yet. Relief squeezes tend to come after funding flips negative. If price tests the August area with funding going negative and OI still falling, that looks more like a flush finishing than fresh selling. Not financial advice.