ET
Energy Transfer LP Common Units
stockNYSE

| Ticker | Target | Entry | Current | Move | Expires | |:---:|:---:|:---:|:---:|:---:|:---:| | **QQQ** ▼ | $700.00 (below) | $746.01 | $718.62 | -6.2% | Thu, Oct 29, 1:38 PM ET | | **Record** | 1W - 2L | 33% | - | - | - |

**BanBet Created** ▼ | Ticker | Target | Entry | Move | Expires | |:---:|:---:|:---:|:---:|:---:| | **QQQ** | $705.00 (below) | $718.62 | -1.9% | Fri 7:39 AM ET |

Mate you don’t need to be awake for the US session, you need to be awake for about 4 minutes of it. CPI/jobs 8:30 ET = 11:30 at night Sydney, catch it then sleep. FOMC 14:00 ET = 5 in the morning, one alarm. Your earnings names report pre-market or after close, so that’s your evening or your morning coffee. Everything else: push alerts on your watchlist + those prints, mute the rest. If a 1am headline is real, the move’s still on the chart at breakfast. If it’s not, you slept. Full disclosure, this exact problem is why I’m building a mobile app that only buzzes you for the catalysts that actually move your names. Not linking it here, but the routine above works with any alert tool.

| Ticker | Target | Entry | Current | Move | Expires | |:---:|:---:|:---:|:---:|:---:|:---:| | **SNDK** ▼ | $1200.00 (below) | $1299.55 | $1375.41 | -7.7% | Wed 6:36 PM ET | | **Record** | 10W - 8L | 56% | - | - | - |

**BanBet Created** ▼ | **Record:** 2W - 5L | Ticker | Target | Entry | Move | Expires | |:---:|:---:|:---:|:---:|:---:| | **SPY** | $760.00 (below) | $766.48 | -0.8% | Fri 1:21 AM ET |

**BanBet Created** ▼ | Ticker | Target | Entry | Move | Expires | |:---:|:---:|:---:|:---:|:---:| | **QQQ** | $710.00 (below) | $718.62 | -1.2% | Wed 12:02 AM ET |

**BanBet Created** ▲ | **Record:** 1W - 0L | Ticker | Target | Entry | Move | Expires | |:---:|:---:|:---:|:---:|:---:| | **RDDT** | $158.00 (above) | $155.45 | +1.6% | Tue 10:36 PM ET |

No, EPD, MPLX, ET are all seeing volume and earnings growth so they won't tank just because rates rise VZ and T on the other hand are semi-bond proxies yes.

I establish rules for max loss per day and per week and only take trades with risk reward if at least 1:2 preferably 1:3 and I also trade after 10:15 AM ET or after 1:3o or preferably into the close. I trade Futures and options but I do not let greed or fear get in the way. Some days no trade is the best trade. Good luck.

It has a nice yield and it's pretty well diversified across growth and recession-proof budinesses, collecting rent from them, but I agree. I think treasuries and bonds are going to pass 6% in the coming months and O will tank, along with my other dividend favorites like EPD, MPLX, ET, VZ, T, and PFE. I'm not selling what I have, but I wouldn't be buying right now.

72 contracts of the IWM $265 put (0DTE) printed at $0.03 at 9:32:31 AM ET at MIAX I also solved the puzzle for OP, the quotes were stale from Friday close, no it was likely Schwab data not updating from previous close. Nothing special about these options either, no sure why OP was trying to hide it.

options. Trading of select single-stock and ETF options is now available during a pre-market session from 7:30 a.m. to 9:25 a.m. ET and a post-market session from 4:00 p.m. to 4:15 p.m. ET, Monday to Friday, covering some of the most actively traded and liquid symbols, including the Magnificent 10 stocks and other widely followed U.S.-listed names plus major ETFs. The full list of underlying symbols is: AAPL, AMD, AMZN, AVGO, BABA, BAC, F, GLD, GOOG, GOOGL, HOOD, INTC, IWM, META, MRVL, MSFT, MU, NFLX, NOK, NVDA, ORCL, PFE, PLTR, QQQ, SNDK, SPY, TSLA, TSM, XLF.

**BanBet Created** ▲ | Ticker | Target | Entry | Move | Expires | |:---:|:---:|:---:|:---:|:---:| | **SPY** | $773.42 (above) | $766.48 | +0.9% | Tue 8:19 PM ET |

Why do you double down on an incorrect claim? I definitely sold in after hours, 100 GMEWS at 4:14PM ET for $1.30, today 10/13/2016 a few minutes after the GameStop press release. https://preview.redd.it/fqn93btdmiwh1.jpeg?width=1199&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=4c9b3405ffdf94f1ca1484b087e44a527d87ff85 I also sold warrants shortly thereafter out of a Schwab account. Yes. After hours,

**📊 Lower-impact U.S. Economic Data (ET)** **8:15 AM** | ADP Weekly Employment Change | Previous: 24.8K **8:30 AM** | Building Permits / Housing Starts | Forecast: 1.39M / 1.30M | Previous: 1.40M / 1.28M **10:00 AM** | Pending Home Sales m/m | Forecast: -0.7% | Previous: 0.3% ⚠️ For informational purposes only. Not financial advice. 📌 #SPY #SPX #Employment #Housing https://preview.redd.it/6kmv7szmgiwh1.png?width=1789&format=png&auto=webp&s=da58361ea528ebb23ddc30e0c5e05124407be5b0

I keep hearing "Fed week = bigger moves", so I finally sat down and checked it on ES. What I did: took every FOMC meeting from 2010 to now and compared it against weeks/days with no meeting but similar volatility going in. Ranges measured as multiples of ATR so different years are comparable. What came out: \- Full FOMC week: 1.14x the range of the comparison weeks (127 weeks) \- Announcement day: 1.38x (129 sessions) \- 2pm to 4pm ET window: 2.49x (109 sessions, data from 2013) So yeah, the week is a bit bigger, but most of it is packed into the two hours around the statement. The rest of the week looks pretty normal. I also ran it on NQ. Announcement day is bigger there too (1.23x), but the full week (1.09x) didn't hold up once I corrected for running six comparisons at once. Basically noise. To be clear, this is only about size, not direction. It says nothing about which way it goes. Has anyone tested this with a different control? Curious if matching on VIX instead of prior ATR changes the picture.

* **Guaranteed Delivery Option:** If warrants cannot be delivered by the cutoff, holders can submit a Notice of Guaranteed Delivery with full payment by 5:00 p.m. ET on October 30, with final warrant delivery due by 5:00 p.m. ET on November 2, 2026. Does this mean I can effectively exercise as late as 10/30 on the computersharecas site?

**BanBet Created** ▼ | **Record:** 5W - 6L | Ticker | Target | Entry | Move | Expires | |:---:|:---:|:---:|:---:|:---:| | **MU** | $869.00 (below) | $905.16 | -4.0% | Wed 7:03 PM ET |

| Ticker | Target | Entry | Current | Move | Expires | |:---:|:---:|:---:|:---:|:---:|:---:| | **ASTS** ▲ | $100.00 (above) | $40.67 | $41.88 | +145.9% | Tue, Nov 17, 4:10 PM ET | | **Record** | 0W - 1L | 0% | - | - | - |

**BanBet Created** ▲ | **Record:** 0W - 1L | Ticker | Target | Entry | Move | Expires | |:---:|:---:|:---:|:---:|:---:| | **GOOG** | $355.00 (above) | $340.06 | +4.4% | Mon, Oct 26, 5:27 PM ET |

The distinction between acceptance, document availability and feed discovery is particularly relevant for Form 4 research. I recently examined recorded acceptance timestamps in a Form 4 corpus against SEC submission headers. One methodological issue is that an HTTP Last-Modified timestamp matching acceptance does not establish when a client could first retrieve the document. That requires timestamped retrieval observations, ideally including the last unsuccessful and first successful attempt. Do you have a Form 4-specific breakdown comparing first successful XML/SGML retrieval with RSS discovery? It would be interesting to see the distribution around 16:00 ET and whether the newer CIK requirement changed coverage or latency.

ET Jordan from Solana

Computershare might not support sales outside of normal market hours. Try again tomorrow after 9:30AM ET.

**BanBet Created** ▲ | **Record:** 15W - 6L | Ticker | Target | Entry | Move | Expires | |:---:|:---:|:---:|:---:|:---:| | **SPCX** | $155.51 (above) | $148.10 | +5.0% | Wed 4:10 PM ET |

**BanBet Created** ▼ | **Record:** 0W - 1L | Ticker | Target | Entry | Move | Expires | |:---:|:---:|:---:|:---:|:---:| | **NFLX** | $60.00 (below) | $69.76 | -14.0% | Tue 3:40 PM ET |