ET Reddit Mentions | ChartExchange

I’ve been trading SPY 0DTE options on a Vanquish eval account, and one of the easiest ways I’ve found to give back progress is forcing trades during lunchtime chop.
See the chart? It looks tradeable. For my strategy, it usually isn’t.
This is the part of the day that silently kills 0DTE accounts. It’s normally a series of weak entries while SPY moves sideways and the 0DTE option continues losing time value.
**What the dead zone actually is**
For me, the dead zone most often appears between roughly 11:30 a.m. and 1:30 p.m. ET.
That isn’t a fixed rule for every session. News, unusually high volume or a strong trend can keep the market active through lunch. But on an ordinary day, volume and volatility often decline around midday, leaving smaller moves and less follow-through.
The candles still move. Price touches important levels and the shorter EMAs cross, making it look like several setups are forming.
The problem is that many of those signals fail almost immediately.
*\[as the image shows: SPY moving sideways during lunch. The 9 EMA and 21 EMA repeatedly converge and cross while price struggles to sustain a move.\]*
# How I identify SPY lunchtime chop
I look for several conditions together – the 9 EMA and 21 EMA are flat, tangled or repeatedly crossing, price keeps moving above and below the same levels, breakouts fail to produce follow-through, candles become smaller or alternate direction frequently, and volume is noticeably lower than it was during the morning session.
One EMA crossover by itself isn’t enough. When several of these conditions appear together, I treat the market as directionless until price proves otherwise.
This matters even more when buying SPY 0DTE options. If SPY stays inside a narrow range, the contract can continue losing value from theta while the directional move you expected never arrives.
**The trap I kept falling into**
I would have a good morning or at least a manageable one but remain at my desk simply because the market was still open.
SPY would move toward a level, I’d enter what looked like a breakout and price would reverse. Then it would move the other way and tempt me into another entry.
Four or five mediocre trades later, the morning’s progress would be gone.
It was rarely one terrible trade. It was repeated exposure during market conditions that didn’t suit my strategy.
**What I do now**
If the short EMAs are tangled, volume has faded and breakouts keep failing, I close the platform.
If I’m green, that protects my morning gains. If I’m red, it prevents me from trying to recover the loss. Either way there's no good reason to be actively trading between 11:30 and 1:30.
That rule has become particularly important in my Vanquish options evaluation. Every unnecessary midday loss reduces the room I have before reaching the eval account’s maximum drawdown. If I eventually move to a funded account, I’d apply the same risk-management rule there.
I may check the chart again around 2 p.m. ET, but I only trade if clear direction and volume have returned. Some days they do. Many days they don’t, and that’s fine.
**The simple rule I use**
Tangled short EMAs + declining volume + failed breakouts = no trade.
You don't need a clock to tell you when lunch is, your chart will tell you. When the EMAs stop making sense and price is bouncing randomly between levels, that's your cue to step away.
Do you guys use a fixed lunchtime cutoff or wait for volume and market structure to tell you when to stop?

.dark-mode .KC81h9{ color: white; background-color: #333333; border: 2px solid white; }.light-mode .KC81h9{ color: #333333; background-color: white; border: 2px solid #333333; }ETEnergy Transfer LP Common Units representing limited partner interestsstock NYSE

ET
Energy Transfer LP Common Units representing limited partner interests
stock NYSE