ET
Energy Transfer LP Common Units
stockNYSE

$ECHO: 8.15% $RIG: 8.07% $AG: 8.06% $MELI: 8.04% $UBER: 8.03% $ABNB: 8.02% $QXO: 7.97% $MOS: 7.78% $DBX: 7.59% $ETN: 7.46% $NVO: 7.33% $BILL: 7.2% $CVS: 7.17% $TEVA: 7.08% $DASH: 7.05% $CF: 6.89% $APA: 6.87% $FIS: 6.8% $APO: 6.65% $CI: 6.59% $EMR: 6.52% $BKNG: 6.43% $MT: 6.35% $CAH: 6.21% $RACE: 6.14% $WMB: 5.92% $VRTX: 5.86% $LYV: 5.82% $IRM: 5.58% $DVN: 5.56% $NTR: 5.43% $SERV: 5.38% $KHC: 4.81% $COP: 4.8% $AMGN: 4.74% $MAR: 4.63% $SU: 4.6% $AIG: 4.42% $PFE: 4.39% $KMB: 4.24% $ET: 4.02% $MCD: 3.85% $AFL: 3.75% $APT: 3.7% $ROKU: 3.14% $CART: 1.51%

Welcome to the [Binance.US](http://Binance.US) Monthly Support Thread. Need help with an issue or have a question? You're in the right place. If you posted in a previous month's support thread, don't worry, your case has been logged and our team is working through it. We cannot provide official account support through Reddit. Our moderators can guide you on common issues and help escalate anything urgent, but for anything account-specific, the fastest path is always direct support: * **Contact us directly:** [support.binance.us/en/](http://support.binance.us/en/), live agents are available seven days a week, 3:00 AM PT / 6:00 AM ET to 9:00 PM PT / Midnight ET * **Track an existing case:** log in at [support.binance.us/en/](http://support.binance.us/en/) to view your case history anytime **Important:** * [Binance.US](http://Binance.US) staff and moderators will never ask for sensitive information on Reddit. The only details we'll ever ask for are your Ticket ID and User ID (found on your Profile page in the app). * **Beware of scams:** Binance.US will never ask for your password, 2FA codes, or request that you send crypto to an external wallet. If someone claiming to be Binance.US asks for this, it's not us. If you need help, reply to this thread with: * Your Ticket ID (if you have one) * Your User ID * A brief description of your issue Once your case is resolved, please delete your comment or edit it to say RESOLVED, this helps other users get seen faster. Thank you for your patience as we continue improving how we support this community.

**BanBet Created** ▲ | **Record:** 0W - 2L | Ticker | Target | Entry | Move | Expires | |:---:|:---:|:---:|:---:|:---:| | **AAOI** | $200.00 (above) | $69.12 | +189.4% | Sat, Nov 7, 9:41 PM ET |

Assignment is random after the 5:30pm ET cutoff. A long call ITM at the 4pm close gets auto-exercised by exception, so a vertical settles at max loss, not a naked short. The only hole is if the long is OTM at the close.

>it will be assigned to SOMEONE That someone must have an open short position after 5:30 pm ET.

| Ticker | Target | Entry | Current | Move | Expires | |:---:|:---:|:---:|:---:|:---:|:---:| | **SPY** ▲ | $800.00 (above) | $767.13 | $755.72 | +4.3% | Thu 8:40 AM ET | | **Record** | 0W - 5L | 0% | - | - | - |

Only positions still open after 5:30 pm ET can be assigned. The scenario you described in the last paragraph cannot happen.

you don't totally have to take their word on the reserves part. their update this morning says a new snapshot was taken friday 8pm ET and is already on the proof of reserves page, and the full zk proof you can check your own balance against is due tuesday. same update says 90% of the stolen assets are replaced and btc, eth, usdt, bnb, sol etc are back to fully 1:1, paid partly out of SAFU and the futures insurance fund. tuesday's proof is the bit worth actually checking.

SCHD is a value focused large cap etf......and a good one but its not going to diversify this portfolio. It can give it a value tilt if that is what he is looking for....but diversification means uncorrelated assets and SCHD just adds more to what he already owns. Diversification would mean things like international (IDVO, VYMI, IDMO), BDC (MAIN, CSWC, TRIN, ARCC), MLP (EPD, ET, WES, MPLX) and even some bond funds like JAAA.

Technically, from 4.06(a)(iii) they could have filed an extension with Computershare before 5PM ET Oct 30th, 2026 and release an 8K Monday morning (5th of November being the latest I believe). It's highly unlikely..... I just view them as inept if they literally let them expire worthless, the only people getting burnt were the most loyal shareholders. Good times! 

Hi All, So I am new to options trading and my stratergy is to make few very small risk defined trades and try to learn atleast for few months. I had a bit of scare yesterday with an potential assignment after market close. So my question is can someone share their experience with an actual assignemnt. For example if I have a long call vertical spread and the the market closes at 4 PM ET and later at 4:30 the stock rises above the strike price and someone decides to exercise it (My understanding is they can exercise it till 5:30 PM). Lets say the expiration date is later so this is an unpredictable exercise. What will happen exactly? Assume that my buying power is less than the amount to exercise because I have entered a risk defined trade. 1) I am guessing the broker will exercise both my Long and Short Call option and I will be at my max defined risk loss => This is best case scenario 2) How does exercise work, if someone requests exercise at 4:30 PM ET, does the broker have to immediately exercise it? If yes do they inform you immediately call or something? **3) The worst case scenario is what I am really worried, what if the broker for some reason doesnt really take care of the situation and lets the short call get exercised and the long call is not exercised. I will be screwed in that case right**, **any chances of this happening?** Thanks!

**BanBet Created** ▲ | **Record:** 2W - 6L | Ticker | Target | Entry | Move | Expires | |:---:|:---:|:---:|:---:|:---:| | **SPY** | $763.28 (above) | $755.72 | +1.0% | Tue 10:01 AM ET |

Iran peace coming Monday 8:45 AM ET

Good to see you around the sub today. As you're aware, most 401(k) plans offer mutual funds as investment choices, and these funds are priced at the end of regular market hours, which is 4 p.m. ET. While it typically takes several hours after the market closes for the pricing data to be reported, sometimes it may not be updated online until the next day. With that said, we appreciate your patience as we work to update the pricing as soon as possible. If you have any other questions, please don't hesitate to let us know. Otherwise, we hope you have a great day.

Good morning! It looks like our community has chimed in, so I'm here to confirm some info for you. Mutual funds are typically priced at 6:00 p.m. ET, Monday through Friday. The gain and loss for the day will display from that time until 9:28 a.m. ET the following morning prior to market opening. Once the clock strikes 9:28 a.m. ET, your G/L will reflect as $0.00 and 0%, but your fund will reflect the previous day's closing price. If you have additional questions, just LMK. I hope you have a spiffy Saturday!

TL;DR: NSCC filed an immediately effective rule change ([SR-NSCC-2026-012](https://www.sec.gov/files/rules/sro/nscc/2026/34-106784.pdf)) taking effect November 23, 2026. It targets the ETF creation/redemption reasonability checks. Going forward, if an order triggers an automated pend, both the Index Receipt Agent (custodian) and the Authorized Participant (AP) must independently submit written sign-offs with documented business rationale before tight cutoffs, or the order gets automatically rejected. It doesn't ban operational shorting, but it puts AP risk officers on the legal hook for abnormal basket orders. Hey everyone, stonkdongo here. A new DTCC/NSCC filing dropped on October 30 that touches the exact plumbing we've spent years tracking around ETF creation/redemption, continuous net settlement (CNS), and threshold securities. * Filing: SR-NSCC-2026-012 * SEC Release:[34-106784](https://www.sec.gov/files/rules/sro/nscc/2026/34-106784.pdf) * Status: Effective immediately; implementation date set for November 23, 2026. Here is a breakdown of what changes in the pipes, how it intersects with AP mechanics, and where its limits lie. # What Is Actually Changing? When an Authorized Participant creates or redeems ETF units (exchanging component baskets or cash), the data routes through NSCC’s Trade Comparison and Recording Service (Procedure II). Currently, NSCC runs automated "reasonability checks" that place a pend (temporary freeze) on an order if: 1. Total settlement value hits $15 billion or greater, or 2. The order’s NAV variance against the prior day's close is 98% or higher. Previously, only the Index Receipt Agent (the custodian bank representing the ETF sponsor) had to review and verify the pended order. Under the new rule: * Dual-Sided Written Sign-Off: Both the Index Receipt Agent and the AP must separately submit written confirmation explaining the validity and business rationale behind the trade. * Registered "Authorized Approvers": APs can't pass the buck to an automated desk error. They must register dedicated risk/compliance contacts directly in NSCC’s portal who carry explicit authority to approve these trades. * Hard Cutoffs & Auto-Rejection: Confirmations must be in by 1:00 PM ET for Same-Day Settling (SDS) cycles and 10:00 PM ET for T+1 / extended settlement. If either party misses the window or fails to provide valid justification, NSCC automatically rejects the transaction. # Why Does This Matter for ETF & CNS Mechanics? While this filing is framed around operational risk and preventing fat-finger margin spikes (specifically citing Clearing Fund and Supplemental Liquidity Deposits / SLD under Rule 4A), it has practical ripple effects on settlement cycling: 1. Eliminates "Ghost" / Placeholder Blotter Entries: An AP managing delivery obligations cannot let massive or irregular create/redeem orders sit in pending limbo to simulate pending locates or settlement offsets. If compliance doesn't sign off on paper with a verifiable business reason, the trade drops out of the clearing stream, providing zero CNS credit. 2. Hard Escalation on Extended Settlement: APs using T+1 or extended settlement windows to manage Reg SHO close-out clocks (T+3 / T+5) now face strict cutoff deadlines. Unverified orders get purged instead of carrying overnight, which forces default delivery handling and standard buy-in procedures. 3. DTCC Retains Floating Discretion: While the default triggers are high ($15B / 98% NAV), the filing explicitly reminds members that NSCC reserves sole discretion to adjust these thresholds based on market volatility or clearing feedback. If they ever dial that dollar threshold down, it immediately catches smaller, high-churn baskets. # What This Rule Does NOT Do Keeping expectations grounded is key: * It does not rewrite Rule 204: Bona fide market-maker exemptions and standard ETF arbitrage mechanics remain fully intact. * It won't catch everyday basket churn: Normal-sized creation/redemption orders that fall below the $15B / 98% NAV threshold process automatically without triggering the dual-approval hurdle. * It is not an immediate silver bullet for FTDs: It does not force an instant recall or ban operational shorting of ETFs like XRT. # What I’m Watching Next Starting November 23, I'll be tracking whether we see noticeable shifts in XRT creation/redemption patterns, sudden changes in shares outstanding, or any operational friction during volatile settlement windows. Curious to hear your thoughts, especially from anyone digging into the specific margin/SLD interplay under Rule 4A. Does anyone see additional angles on how AP risk desks will handle these written confirmation requirements when settlement cycles get tight?

**BanBet Created** ▲ | Ticker | Target | Entry | Move | Expires | |:---:|:---:|:---:|:---:|:---:| | **MSFT** | $550.00 (above) | $522.43 | +5.3% | Sat, Nov 14, 6:40 AM ET |

Value research online, ET Money also provide this feature.. Even for importing your external mutual funds (invested in other apps)

**BanBet Created** ▼ | Ticker | Target | Entry | Move | Expires | |:---:|:---:|:---:|:---:|:---:| | **TSLA** | $360.00 (below) | $399.67 | -9.9% | Sat, Nov 7, 1:51 AM ET |

**BanBet Created** ▲ | **Record:** 0W - 1L | Ticker | Target | Entry | Move | Expires | |:---:|:---:|:---:|:---:|:---:| | **GOOGL** | $325.00 (above) | $281.27 | +15.5% | Fri, Nov 6, 11:03 PM ET |

It's past 11 PM ET, why is Fidelity.com still reporting my 401(k) plan status as $0.00 (0.00%)

I’m not meaning to rub salt in anyone’s wounds here… but I’ve said this many times, and right now my largest position is in ET, which I was selling CSP on near the Covid lows, until eventually I got assigned. From then until now, including the premium I got selling CSP at the beginning, and reinvesting dividends, I’m up around 10X from then until now. I did actually do the research on it and was confident that it was at a very deep discount at the time. Nowadays, obviously many stocks are very high multiples, and while there is a lot of premium to wheel them… it’s picking up $100 bills in front of a steamroller if you can’t actually make a valid claim that the stock will be worth more than the current price in a year or two. For the record, I still think ET is underpriced, even after being up 10X. Unfortunately it’s not a good stock for selling CSP on because the volatility is low, and it wouldn’t be prudent for me to own any more since it’s such a large percentage of my portfolio as is.

Numbers are live as of Fri 30 Oct, 8 PM ET: 1,049 ALGO pool (≈ $100), 24 tickets sold, Ticket price 2.41 ALGO (≈ $0.23) The pool grows with every ticket, so check [algoroll.com/lottery](http://algoroll.com/lottery)

Till 2PM ET then its all downhill

**BanBet Created** ▼ | **Record:** 3W - 6L | Ticker | Target | Entry | Move | Expires | |:---:|:---:|:---:|:---:|:---:| | **GLD** | $351.85 (below) | $355.41 | -1.0% | Fri, Nov 6, 4:27 PM ET |