ET
Energy Transfer LP Common Units
stockNYSE

Most people I've seen split it. RTH (9:30-16:00 ET) as the main profile, since that's where most of the volume trades, and the overnight session as its own profile. Then the overnight high/low and the prior RTH value area are your levels for the open. A full 24h profile on NQ tends to blur the value area.

| Ticker | Target | Entry | Current | Move | Expires | |:---:|:---:|:---:|:---:|:---:|:---:| | **SPY** ▼ | $730.00 (below) | $750.39 | $754.37 | -2.7% | Fri, Nov 27, 12:05 PM ET | | **Record** | 5W - 0L | 100% | - | - | - |

Hey all. Ever wonder why the same setup works great some days and gets chopped up on others? A lot of the time the difference is what the options board is doing underneath it. That’s what I built this to read. Full disclosure, I built it and it's paid. It's called TRT Compass, a desktop app for Windows and Mac that reads the options board on your own ThetaData feed and says what it sees in plain words. Here's QQQ on Thursday, about an hour apart, with the dollar sizes hidden. This is the Chart Room, Compass’s own charting, with the GEX ladder drawn right beside the candles so the size and the price sit on one screen. Watch only the ladder on the right. At 10:07 ET price is sitting on the biggest strike, 685, with only a little size above it. As the move starts, size keeps building above price and draining below it. The board was in AMPLIFY, where the hedging moves with price instead of leaning against it, and price only got sticky once it got up into that stack of positive strikes. By 11:23 the biggest strike had moved up to 700. [QQQ, Thu 12 Nov, 10:07 ET. Price sitting on the King at 685, not much size above it yet. Dollar sizes hidden.](https://preview.redd.it/ejv27bocrs1i1.png?width=1486&format=png&auto=webp&s=1e9cfabda120454d51f9dd2fd91d0ea383c5e9bf) Here's that read, and you can do it yourself with any options chain and a free GEX site. Three questions. Where does the biggest size sit? Is the board amplifying or compressing, meaning is the hedging chasing price or leaning against it? And as price moves, is size building in front of it or draining behind it? When it's amplifying and the size ahead keeps building, I stay with the move until price gets up into that size. That's mainly how I trade. I read QQQ and take the move on NQ, same with SPY and ES. Occasionally I'll still trade SPX options. [Same board, 11:23 ET. Size built from 693 up to 705 as price moved into it, and the King moved to 700.](https://preview.redd.it/9ro0rlrdrs1i1.png?width=1486&format=png&auto=webp&s=738f6807e6059d18d177211c35009b0e5fa38549) The hard part is answering those three live, on three boards at once, with your hand on the mouse. A GEX chart hands you 40 strikes of numbers and leaves the rest to you, and the rest is exactly the part you're worst at in the middle of a red candle. I know I was. Compass does the interpretation and says it in words instead of just giving you rows of numbers. Here's the phone view on SPY the morning of 9 Nov, and these are lines straight off it: "752 not tested since Compass started." "The King changed hands 1 time." Next to every level it says how often price has actually gotten that far, "likely", "a stretch", "rarely reached", measured on our own recordings instead of calculated. And when the board is quiet it says that too, which ends up being one of the most useful lines on the screen. [The mobile view on SPY, Mon 9 Nov, mid-morning.](https://preview.redd.it/m5yqiu2mrs1i1.png?width=2514&format=png&auto=webp&s=2f9947eef8afb6b9ad0a6174b75853b126d29927) This one's from the Weekly King Book, every session drawn with where the biggest strike sat. Friday, QQQ opened over a 685 King, fell through it to 671.90, and once 680 took over, price walked up to it by about 2pm ET. The quiet days are in the book too. [Weekly King Book, QQQ, Fri 13 Nov.](https://preview.redd.it/jcr1y9zurs1i1.png?width=1956&format=png&auto=webp&s=c17ef7586ccaffb61d43cd927e549708523c7ee5) Then there's the swing side, the Telescope. Every night it reads open interest across every live expiry, weights the 8 to 30 day contracts the heaviest because that's where a swing actually lives, and makes the call in one line: the side if the board has one, the level carrying real size, how often price has gotten that far inside a week on our own recordings, and the level that ends the read. On a quiet board it says "A watch this week, not a position yet." Here are the 21 beta boards that pass that rule. 13 reached their level, 6 hit their out, 2 ran out of time. We found that looking back, so the forward record is what counts. Held boards still get logged and graded the same way, and from 1.0 on every board that finishes gets published, the outs included, every Sunday on the TRT Compass X. That's the real test. [The 21 beta swing boards that pass today's rule \(posted with the name's own 20-day average\), outs included.](https://preview.redd.it/rx9mw7uzrs1i1.png?width=2000&format=png&auto=webp&s=d985ffa889995b599c5c75ec01dd49ace96f19ff) What every board has is the level that ends it, written the night before. That's the part I care about most. You decide where you're wrong while you're calm, with the board in front of you. Why I built it. I was a neurologic OT for 8 years before I became a trader, and a big part of that job was watching what the brain does under load. I'd have someone do a task perfectly in a quiet room with me. Same person, same hands, then at home with the TV on and family in the room or all eyes on them and it fell apart. Their ability never changed... the load did. In OT the fix is changing the environment so the task asks less of them. Trading is the same problem. The right side of a chart is empty and your brain fills that blank in. It draws the next few candles for you. "It's going to bounce." "It's going to break." Then real money goes on, your attention narrows onto the last candle, and the part of you that holds the plan gets quieter right when you need it. Compass is me changing the environment. The board is where the size actually sits, said in plain words, so there's less empty space for my head to fill. The skeptic stuff... because I'd be asking too. Open interest shows where the size sits, and that’s exactly what Compass reads: where it is, how big, and how it’s changing. What held up on all our recordings was the environment and the distance. Across 1.5 years and three products, amplified boards covered about 1.8 times the ground compressed ones did, which is why the second question matters so much. And if you’re wondering about backfitting, Compass has officially recorded every session since August, every board is dated the night it posts, and the outs stay up. I’d rather you judge it on what it posts next than on anything I say about the past. Cost, all in: $175 a month after a free first month, plus your own ThetaData Options Standard at $80 a month, paid to them, so about $255 a month. The $175 is the software plus help from me getting set up and whenever you get stuck. ThetaData is separate because of the data. It comes straight from ThetaData to your own computer, so the board updates every few seconds. A lot of GEX tools give you a snapshot every few minutes, and the few minutes right after price starts running are exactly when you need the read. A few things are free on [trtcompass.com](http://trtcompass.com), no signup. The Legend has every word on the screen. The Today page posts how the boards opened just after 9:30 ET and how each session closed after 4:20. The Weekly King Book goes up on the TRT Compass X every week. Now, I'm here and happy to answer any questions you have, the hard ones included. Do you trade more intraday or swings?

I built Global Threat Map: https://globalthreatmap.com It's a free in-browser map with no signup. Markets move on fear and greed. Prices often swing because the world got tense or calmed down, not because of anything on a chart. People get cautious or start taking risk again, and liquidity dries up or comes back. I built this so one screen shows the live events behind those swings, and you can judge the backdrop yourself. What it shows: - Armed conflicts and military activity - Disasters - Internet and power outages - Cyber events - U.S. flight disruptions and airport closures - Insider and big-money trades - A markets bar with oil, gold and the U.S. 10-year - Early-warning scores for regions and sectors. The 3-month percentages on the board are analyst estimates, not forecasts. Here's what it showed this morning, Sunday, Nov 15, at about 10 AM ET: - **Early-warning board:** Defense is at 83/100 (Severe). AI & credit is at 72. Gulf / Strait of Hormuz is at 71. Black Sea, Energy & shipping, and Taiwan Strait are all at 67. - **Markets bar:** Brent is $95.84 and WTI is $88.56 (both Nov 13 settles). Gold is $3,887.60 spot. The U.S. 10-year is at 5.15%. - **Flights:** Santa Ana is closed during the day, and LAS, LAX and SAN are under restrictions. There's no national ground stop. - **Headlines:** Jensen Huang's abrupt resignation from Nvidia is leading the headlines. **Insider and big-money trades on the map right now (13):** 1. Nvidia options: about $163M in put premium against $92M in calls on Nov 10, including about 116K Nov 11 $170 puts against roughly 9.5K open interest. 2. A prediction-market contract on when Huang would leave Nvidia was listed days before the reports, and $105K traded on Sunday, Nov 8. 3. Nvidia insiders made no open-market buys or sales from Oct 14 to Nov 13. The only filing was a director's 500,000-share gift on Nov 4. 4. General Dynamics' CEO sold 45,353 shares ($16.39M) on Nov 5, and the general counsel sold $4.84M on Nov 3, neither under a pre-set trading plan. 5. A Chevron vice chairman sold 112,000 shares ($23.57M) on Nov 10. Three Chevron insiders have sold $38.98M since Oct 19. 6. Five CoreWeave insiders sold $6.71M between Oct 12 and Nov 9. 7. Meta director Marc Andreessen sold $12.77M on Nov 2, and the COO sold $5.23M under a plan, about $18M together. 8. There were zero open-market insider purchases across 19 AI, defense, energy and cyber names, including NVDA, AMD, META, MSFT, PLTR, LMT, RTX, XOM, CVX and CRWD. 9. House members filed 35 trade reports between Oct 20 and Nov 9. Among them, Rep. Pete Sessions' spouse sold MSFT, NVDA and CVX. 10. Hedge funds net sold about $6.6B of Brent between Oct 27 and Nov 3, during Brent's biggest one-week drop on record. 11. Gold speculators cut net longs five weeks straight (down 17.9%). 10-year note speculators are net short about 962K contracts, and dollar speculators are net long. 12. The U.S. awarded 40M+ barrels on Oct 29, completing a 172M-barrel emergency oil release, with about 71M more barrels planned through Feb 2027. 13. The Army awarded a $4.17B five-year contract to 11 firms to modernize seven ammunition plants. It won't tell you what to buy or sell, and it doesn't predict the next move. It just puts the events that can shake risk appetite and liquidity in one place.

You guys ready for the pumpiest pump ever to have pumped the market? When Jensen is surprise reinstated to NVDA right at 4:01 ET?

Quick perp read on the bounce for anyone watching today: - BTC is around 64.6k, back under the ~66.1k rebound high from the 4 AM ET hour, with the overnight low still ~62k - Funding on the BTC perps I track has drifted to flat or slightly negative this morning, so longs aren't paying up to chase - Open interest on one major book is roughly flat vs early this morning (about 4.5k BTC) So nobody looks crowded right now. If price gets back over 66k with funding staying flat, that's spot doing the work. If it loses the 62k low while open interest climbs, that's fresh shorts pressing. Not a call, just what I'm watching.

You're right, thanks. Summit's PR went out Sunday 7:00 AM ET, the FDA issued a CRL for the BLA based on HARMONi. I missed it when I posted. Edited the post. So that's one of three on a Sunday morning; still waiting on CYTK and BioXcel.

So yesterday (Sat Nov 14) was the FDA goal date for three companies I've been following: \- Cytokinetics: MYQORZO (aficamten) sNDA, based on MAPLE-HCM \- Summit: ivonescimab + chemo BLA, EGFR-mutated NSCLC after TKI \- BioXcel: IGALMI sNDA for at-home use As of Sunday morning ET, no press release and no 8-K from any of them. I checked a few times. Here's my rough read on timing, and I want to hear if I'm wrong: \- Cytokinetics and Summit: Monday before the open. Bigger companies, and a weekend date usually means the FDA acted on Friday or acts on Monday. \- BioXcel: harder to call. Smaller company, so it could come any time Monday or even later in the week. I'm only talking about WHEN we hear, not what the answer is. I don't want to guess outcomes. Also, this happens again next weekend: Capricor (deramiocel) and Savara (molgramostim) both have Nov 22, which is a Sunday. Has anyone kept track of how weekend PDUFA dates usually play out? Friday action, Monday PR, or something else? Happy to be corrected. Have a good Sunday!

Some context from the derivatives side, since price targets alone don't tell you much. On BloFin's BTC perp the low so far was 61,989 in the 8 PM ET hour last night, on roughly 1,033 BTC traded, about 3x the hour before. That looks more like a forced-selling flush than steady spot selling. As of 8:40 AM ET it's back around 65.4k, open interest is ~4,550 BTC (up from ~4,457 late last night), and funding is barely positive at about +0.002% per 8h. So positions are being rebuilt, but nobody is paying up to be long yet. (BloFin is one of the exchanges we partner with; I'm just reading their public market data.) Not a call either way.

Interesting it has a qualified Div. I hold 1150 shares of ET.PRI in our IRA and keep the total div below $1000.so I have no UBIT issues. Currently at an 8% yield

Owned for years. Buy in high 40s to 50s and drop it. When it peaks when rates.drop.take dividends to reinvest later or use. It's a solid investment and I have ridden it for years. Same for EPD, ET.

| Ticker | Target | Entry | Current | Move | Expires | |:---:|:---:|:---:|:---:|:---:|:---:| | **QQQ** ▲ | $700.00 (above) | $676.44 | $676.95 | +3.5% | Tue, Nov 24, 6:24 PM ET | | **Record** | 9W - 2L | 82% | - | - | - |

The weekly candle isn't closed yet (it closes Sunday 7 PM ET). Right now this week is 76.1k open to about 63.2k, roughly -17%, with a 62.0k low on OKX spot. 37k would be another ~41% down from here. March 2020 was a two-day liquidity panic that roughly halved BTC from ~7.9k to under 4k. Today BTC perp funding is about flat to slightly negative (-0.002% per 8h on OKX), so the market is already leaning defensive rather than max long. Waiting for a base makes sense, but I'd judge it on whether the weekly closes back above 65-66k or loses the 62k wick, not on a 2020 replay.

Pulled Binance's public market data around 8:27 PM ET and the answer is a bit more boring than "liquidity is dead": BTC/EURI is showing status BREAK, meaning trading on that pair is halted, and its order book is completely empty. EURI is a euro stablecoin, not the euro itself, and EURI/USDT was about 1.0997, basically the same as EUR/USDT (1.1002). So fair value is roughly 62,690 / 1.0997, about 57,000, which lines up with the regular BTC/EUR pair (around 56,970 at that time). The ~51,580 on BTC/EURI is just the last trade on a pair nobody can trade right now. Its last six daily candles all sit between ~50,700 and ~54,800, so it's not a crash from tonight either. To your question: arb bots do close gaps on thin pairs, but only when there's an open book to hit. With the pair halted there's nothing for them to buy, so the stale print just sits there and ends up in cropped screenshots. Easy check next time: look at the pair's volume and whether the book has any orders before trusting a scary wick.

**BanBet Created** ▼ | **Record:** 0W - 1L | Ticker | Target | Entry | Move | Expires | |:---:|:---:|:---:|:---:|:---:| | **IBIT** | $29.00 (below) | $38.77 | -25.2% | Sat, Nov 28, 8:25 PM ET |

The day before the FAA issued its nationwide ground stop, DAL and UAL options traded at roughly **4× their usual intraday pace** by midday. Both stocks were already falling. The reported volume leaves open whether traders were buying new puts, closing positions, or hedging. [Options report](https://www.schaeffersresearch.com/content/options/2026/11/12/2-airline-stocks-drawing-unusual-options-volume-today) SEC filings show that United CEO Scott Kirby sold **90,367 UAL shares** on Nov. 10 and Delta EVP Steven Sear sold **17,768 DAL shares** on Nov. 12. Both filings record sales of existing shares. The records I reviewed yielded no verified trade by Trump, his family or administration officials in the Nov. 9–13 window, and no evidence that the executives traded on advance knowledge. [Kirby Form 4](https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/100517/000010051726000203/xslF345X06/wk-form4_1794365145.xml) · [Sear Form 4](https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/27904/000168316826008711/xslF345X06/ownership.xml) · [Trump’s September disclosure](https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/11/President-Donald-J.-Trump-Periodic-Transaction-Report-09.17.26.pdf) Has anyone checked **opening put buys by strike and expiration** for DAL or UAL on Nov. 12–13? I’d like to see whether they were unusual compared with the same time of day over the prior few weeks. For Friday’s trades, the FAA issued an O’Hare ground-stop advisory at **3:28 p.m. ET** and the nationwide advisory at **3:54 p.m. ET**. [O’Hare advisory](https://www.fly.faa.gov/adv/adv_otherdis?adv_date=11132026&advn=107) · [National advisory](https://www.fly.faa.gov/adv/adv_otherdis?adv_date=11132026&advn=111) My detailed post got filtered: [https://www.reddit.com/r/stocks/comments/1xwhzgd/trading\_before\_the\_november\_13\_2026\_faa\_outage/](https://www.reddit.com/r/stocks/comments/1xwhzgd/trading_before_the_november_13_2026_faa_outage/)

| Ticker | Target | Entry | Current | Move | Expires | |:---:|:---:|:---:|:---:|:---:|:---:| | **SPY** ▼ | $730.00 (below) | $750.39 | $754.37 | -2.7% | Fri, Nov 27, 12:05 PM ET | | **Record** | 5W - 0L | 100% | - | - | - |

Not exactly, Shuttle orbiter was half a stage because it didn’t include the ET. The problem is, if you try to build the ET into the Shuttle and make it a full stage, then it becomes too big and it is impossible to actually land it like a glider. However, it becomes possible to land it propulsively… which we just witnessed… Plus Starship has technically demonstrated the dry recovery of both of its stages, although independently. So that’s big

| Ticker | Target | Entry | Current | Move | Expires | |:---:|:---:|:---:|:---:|:---:|:---:| | **SPY** ▼ | $610.78 (below) | $735.88 | $754.37 | -17.0% | Fri, Nov 27, 4:28 PM ET |

**BanBet Created** ▲ | **Record:** 5W - 7L | Ticker | Target | Entry | Move | Expires | |:---:|:---:|:---:|:---:|:---:| | **GLD** | $359.00 (above) | $355.45 | +1.0% | Sat, Nov 21, 1:39 PM ET |

One thing I'd add to the leverage-flush read: on BloFin's BTC perp, open interest went from about 4,639 BTC at 8:30am ET to about 4,711 BTC at 1:19pm ET, while price slid from roughly 66.6k to 65.8k. Funding is still slightly positive (around +0.006% per 8h on BloFin, +0.004% on Bitunix), so shorts aren't crowded yet either. Rising OI into a falling price can mean fresh positions are opening rather than just longs getting closed out, so the flush might not be fully done. That's one venue's data, not the whole market, and not a call. Agree on staying off leverage until the weekly close. (we partner with both of those exchanges)

I’d separate extra access hours from changes to the regular session. The article you linked says the opening/closing crosses remain, and Nasdaq expects most liquidity to stay in traditional hours. It also lists existing extended hours of 4am–8pm ET, so 6.5 hours isn't the full pre-change access window. Separately, 23/6.5 is about 3.54 times as long, or a 254% increase, rather than a 350% increase. For your signals question, my inference is that the first thing to audit is the data definition: does a ‘daily’ bar include overnight trades, what counts as the official close, and is relative volume compared with the same session? A 20-day average or volume spike calculated from different session boundaries wouldn't be a like-for-like test. I'd evaluate regular-session and overnight results separately, including actual spreads/costs, before assuming that more hours either destroys or improves an existing signal. Source for the stated schedule and auctions: [https://www.nasdaq.com/newsroom/nasdaq-explains-what-is-23-5-trading](https://www.nasdaq.com/newsroom/nasdaq-explains-what-is-23-5-trading) . The signal-testing implications are my interpretation, not a claim that a particular strategy will work.

Welcome to our sub, and thank you for reaching out. If you're still experiencing issues, our Workplace representatives are available to help. They can review your situation in more detail and assist with the next steps. Representatives are available Monday through Friday, from 8:30 a.m. to midnight ET. [Contact Us](https://www.fidelity.com/customer-service/contact-us) Feel free to keep us updated here on the sub.

I appreciate you checking in on this. Currently, we do not have anything additional to share regarding the ability to specify lots when placing a conditional order. However, you can specify tax lots after a trade has been completed. For reassigning lots, you have until 9:00 p.m. ET on the trade's settlement date to make changes. This can be done by following these steps: 1. Select "Accounts & Trade," then choose "Account Positions" 2. Switch the "Overview" box to "Closed Positions" 3. Click "Reassign recent lots" and follow the prompts to make your selections Alternatively, if you want to update the method that your account uses to dispose of lots for your account, you can do so by following these steps: 1. Select "Accounts & Trade," then click "Account Features" 2. Under "Brokerage and trading," tap "Manage" next to "Cost Basis Information Tracking" 3. Make any adjustments you like on the following screen Lastly, I have shared your interest in this feature with the appropriate team for further review. If there is anything else we can help you with, please let us know.

Quick update since you posted: as of about 10:30 AM ET, ETH perp on BloFin is around 1,834, so the 1,860-1,890 hourly support you flagged has given way, and the 24h low there is about 1,828. The 9 AM ET hourly candle did most of the damage, roughly 1,893 down to 1,853 on about 13,000 ETH traded versus about 1,700 ETH the hour before, so that was a real volume push, not a slow drift. Funding is the part I'd watch next. It's still slightly positive, about +0.0007% per 8h on BloFin and +0.0012% on Bitunix (public market data; we partner with both). So even after the support break, longs are still paying a little to stay in. If the retest from below fails the way you described and funding flips clearly negative, that would point to shorts piling in rather than longs getting flushed, which can set up a squeeze later, though not always. Until then, waiting for a reclaim instead of catching the knife makes sense to me. Just one data lens, not a call.