ET
Energy Transfer LP Common Units representing limited partner interests
stock NYSE

Thank you for sharing that.
Since this seems specific to the account versus a bug on the app, I recommend you reach out to our 401(k) associates for assistance with looking at your plan. They are available Monday through Friday from 8:30 a.m. to midnight, ET.
[Contact us ](https://www.fidelity.com/customer-service/contact-us)
Let us know if you have any other questions.

Thanks for following up. Currently, connections to UBS have restrictions in place on when they can be updated. UBS does not allow refreshes between 9:00 AM and 5:00 PM ET., so please ensure you're refreshing outside that time frame. Do you know the approximate time when you last tried to refresh?

Something I keep running into on NQ and I'm curious how others resolve it.
This morning a bearish FVG formed at 10:55 ET, 29135.75 – 29141.25. The structure behind it read as clean as I could ask for — trending down, four stacked bearish FVGs, roughly −69pts over 20 bars, RSI decaying 65 → 36 with no volume divergence to contradict it, three consecutive red closes accelerating through a prior level.
But the broader session sentiment was choppy. Overlapping bodies, no sustained follow-through on either side for most of the morning.
Two ways to treat that:
1. Structure is structure. The stacked gaps and the RSI decay are the signal; chop is noise you filter out.
2. Chop is information about *how* the move will behave. A trend in a choppy tape retraces deeper and takes out shallow stops more often, so you either size down or you don't take it.
I've landed on a third option, which is to take it but cap the conviction — treat it as a medium-confidence setup rather than a high-confidence one, and require price to come back to the gap edge rather than entering on the break. The reasoning being that if the tape is chopping, a retest is more likely than not, so paying up 5.5pts past the edge is the actual mistake, not the direction.
I've been building this logic into an indicator that writes out its reasoning for each call, mostly so I can go back and audit whether the confidence cap is doing anything or just making me miss entries. Still not sure it's the right call.
How do you handle it? Skip entirely, size down, or ignore the sentiment read and trade the structure?

Thanks for confirming. I'd recommend first deleting and reinstalling the program on your device first and if you continue to experience abnormal lag time, reaching out to our Technical Support team, so they can troubleshoot the issue with you further.
Associates are available Monday through Friday from 8:30 a.m. to 9:00 p.m. ET. Please say "technical support" when prompted by the automated system to be connected to the right group. If you have additional questions for us here on the sub, don't hesitate to reach out.
[Contact Us](https://www.fidelity.com/customer-service/contact-us)

Tweet Mirror:[pelositracker](https://twitter.com/pelositracker/status/2095149333024768439)
>Breaking: The US Mint announces that the "2026 President Donald J\. Trump $1 Coin" officially launched
>
>
>
>Coins will be available for purchase at 12PM ET
>
>[\[Twitter Image 1\]](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/HRN26mqWMAAvm11.jpg:large)

Good morning, SqueezeFinders.

Yesterday's action on the $QQQ tech index was the direct result of escalation in the Middle-East after a back-and-forth of missiles and drones were propelled by both Iran and the US as negotiations are deemed “as worthless as the paper they were written on” by President Trump. The $QQQ tech index closed down 1.27% to 707.64, which leaves us only 1% above the 700 psychological level, and ultimately back into precariously bearish territory. Until the bulls can reclaim 722 level, I would suggest sticking to plays in the oil/energy sector that will benefit from surging oil prices (as shown below), and also plays in the agriculture sector (as they will also benefit from forecasted food shortages, particularly fertilizer). The main directional sentiment determinants today are a mix of the below-detailed economic data releases, further developments in the Middle-East, and also some big earnings reports ($AVGO, $HPE, and $SNOW). This market is very dynamic and has been unpredictable as far as risk-tolerance goes, as one day we're running, and the next we're crashing. Stay tuned for what's squeezy. Regardless of broader market sentiment, you can always locate relative strength by checking SqueezeRadar to track irregularities in our data, and find winners you may not have spotted before without our scanners. Also, make sure to check out our newest tool (developed by me), "Dracula's Library"! This tool allows you to quickly gather information on recent catalysts, and analyst/Institutional price targets all in one small graphical interface on our platform, all powered by AI.
🥇 Gold: \~$4,310/oz (-0.5%)
🥈 Silver: \~$64/oz (-0.9%)
🪙 Bitcoin: \~$77.5k/coin (-1.6%)
🛢️ Oil: \~$90.60/barrel (+0.4%)
Today's economic data releases are:
🇺🇸 ADP Nonfarm Employment Change (Aug) @ 8:15AM ET
🇺🇸 Factory Orders (Jul) @ 10:00AM ET
🇺🇸 Crude Oil Inventories @ 10:30AM ET
🇺🇸 Cushing Crude Oil Inventories @ 10:30AM ET
🇺🇸 Beige Book @ 2:00PM ET

📙Breakdown point: BELOW this price, the move will lose momentum significantly in the short-term, as shorts will gain confidence encouraging them to short more. Reducing probability of a squeeze without a catalyst. 
📙Breakout point: ABOVE this price, the move will gain momentum significantly in the short-term, as shorts losses will increase pressuring them to cover. Increasing the probability of a squeeze occurring, especially if with a catalyst.

4. $VIST
Squeezability Score: 33%
Juice Target: 124.9
Confidence: 🍊 🍊 🍊
Price: 74.71 (+4.55%)
Breakdown point: 70.0
Breakout point: 81.5 (continuation)
Mentions (30D): 2
Event/Condition: Peter Thiel’s Thiel Macro disclosed a sizable new stake in the Argentine shale producer drawing incremental investor attention to Vaca Muerta production growth and free-cash-flow generation + the company continued executing its shareholder-approved buyback program including an August repurchase of 50,000 Series A shares as a signal of capital-return discipline + JPMorgan raised its price target while maintaining an Overweight view as production growth and cash generation remain the core investment thesis + Recent price target 🎯 of $94 from JPMorgan + Recent price target 🎯 of $98 from consensus analysts + Recent price target 🎯 of $85 from Morgan Stanley

5. $ZETA
Squeezability Score: 30%
Juice Target: 35.7
Confidence: 🍊 🍊 🍊
Price: 31.56 (+1.91%)
Breakdown point: 28.0
Breakout point: 34.2
Mentions (30D): 3
Event/Condition: Twentieth consecutive beat-and-raise quarter with second-quarter revenue of about $443 million up 44 percent year over year first positive GAAP net income expanded adjusted EBITDA margins and stronger free cash flow + full-year 2026 revenue guidance was lifted to roughly $1.82 billion at the midpoint as Athena AI adoption super-scaled customer count and ARPU continued to improve + partnerships including Palantir integration plus subsequent target increases from Citi BofA and others kept the AI-infrastructure narrative in focus into late August + Recent price target 🎯 of $35 from Citi + Recent price target 🎯 of $34 from Bank of America + Recent price target 🎯 of $32 from B. Riley

To gain access to all our cutting-edge research tools, live watchlists, alerts, and more:
[http://www.squeeze-finder.com/subscribe/](http://www.squeeze-finder.com/subscribe/)

https://preview.redd.it/hxlwcjaps2nh1.jpg?width=664&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=22819e6a0547abc2f61aec3fa66fa8bcb10ff580
August payrolls are dropping this Friday at 8:30 a.m. ET, and for the first time in ages there's zero safe side to this print. After Jackson Hole, September hike odds shot up from \~35% to 58% overnight. Markets expect a rebound after July's shockingly weak number, but both a miss and an overshoot carry real risk. The overall options market barely seems to be pricing in either tail outcome—wild times for anyone holding positions going into this NFP release.

🥭 said something like 8 ET they have deadline. Ceasefire after that, note it down algos

\*\*📊 Key U.S. Economic Data (ET)\*\*
\*\*8:15 AM\*\* | ADP Non-Farm Employment Change | Forecast: 47K | Previous: 44K
⚠️ For informational purposes only. Not financial advice.
📌 #ADPEmployment #JobsReport #SPY #SPX

They say it’s random and maybe it is amongst all customers, but I have quite a few setup and they always start around 1:50pm ET give or take a couple minutes. So other than a minute or two it’s not random for me.

CELH, NFLX, ET, UBER

I want honest opinions on this one because the final percentage sounds much cleaner than the actual trade.
FLYE had already printed $3.97 at 5:38 ET in premarket. Stock Pulse mobile app didn't flag it until 9:54 around $2.47. The next minute hit $2.79, about 13% above the alert. More than 2.6 million shares traded in that candle, so the high was real. The problem is that it immediately dropped toward $2.08. This was a blink-and-you-miss-it scalp, not a comfortable window.
The stock eventually closed at $2.17 after roughly 81 million shares traded through early after-hours. Its estimated float is around 1.46 million and its 30-day average volume was only about 12,700 before today.
The news timeline is strange too. There was no fresh operating announcement during the session. Full quarterly results arrived at 5:38 PM, showing revenue down from $5.3 million to $2.7 million, gross margin falling from 42.4% to 10.9%, and the net loss widening from $2.0 million to $3.9 million.
Results: https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/fly-e-group-inc-announces-first-quarter-of-fiscal-year-2027-financial-results-302866881.html
The revenue decline had actually been previewed in an August 14 late-filing notice, so maybe this was earnings attention colliding with a tiny float rather than anyone discovering good news.
Late filing: https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1975940/000121390026090228/ea0301728-nt10q\_flye.htm
Would you count a one-minute, high-volume window as a valid alert, or was this simply too late to be useful?

Posted this on WSB about an hour ago. It hit 3,067 upvotes and 200 comments, then the mods removed it. So here it is again for anyone who didn't get to read it.
I built an agent that buys whatever WSB is most talking about after the close. It is down 19.2% on the month.
Setup: 17 autonomous agents on a live account, up 15.2% on roughly $3,000, each with its own capital slice and its own strategy. No coordination between them, no human approving trades. 345 real fills over the month. Real broker, real money, not a demo account.
**The WSB agent**
It spreads a token amount across the most discussed tickers on WSB after the close. In August it bought MRNA at $176. Next session: $133. Down 24% overnight, and that single hold is essentially the entire month's drawdown for that agent.
It's a $10 position because I expected roughly this. The useful part is the agent did its job perfectly. It read the signal, sized correctly, executed on time. The signal was just worthless. Agent quality and signal quality are completely separate problems, and a good agent on a bad signal loses money very efficiently.
I keep it running as a control. If my other agents can't beat the one blindly following a message board, that tells me something important about the other agents.
**What actually worked**
Chip and AI-infrastructure basket, biggest allocation at $500, reweighted weekly on 60-day momentum. Currently holding NVDA, DELL, ANET. Up 22.9% for the month. Nothing clever in the construction, it just had the right universe in the right month. It also trimmed MU and SMCI before they gave back gains, which is easy to praise in hindsight.
**The earnings agent, and the trade I'm most impressed by**
It reads news and setup quality ahead of scheduled earnings, takes the trade only on favorable setups, and sits in VOO otherwise. On Aug 26 it sold VOO, bought NVDA near $210, held about a day, sold at $227 and went straight back to the index. Roughly 8% on a sub-24-hour hold.
**The headline-reaction agent, and a question**
It parses political posts and buys the large caps being praised. Worked example: news lands 2:31 PM ET that MU announced a $10B US research lab investment. The agent is filled in MU at $914.86 by 2:47 PM, sixteen minutes later. MU printed $936.81 the next morning, about +2.4%. It's still holding.
So here's what I can't decide. For an attention-driven signal, should the exit be time-based rather than signal-based? The whole premise is that a shout-out is an attention spike with no fundamental content. If that's true the position has a half-life measured in hours and the agent should sell into the next open mechanically. But then it has to be right about the fade horizon instead, and "exactly one session" is an arbitrary number with nothing behind it.
The earnings agent above is already doing the time-based version and it worked. I don't know if that's the right default or just the one that happened to work once.
**Coin Rotator: +77.9%**
The mechanic is stupidly simple. Hold exactly one coin at a time, whichever of 10 liquid coins ranks highest on momentum, volume and volatility. Re-check daily, rotate when the ranking changes. Zero diversification, on purpose.
It only moved four times all month:
* Held LINK, sold Jul 30 at $8.46 (bought at $8.37). Basically flat, +1.1%
* Into ADA at $0.1704, out Aug 8 at $0.199. +16.8%
* Back into LINK at $8.30, out Aug 18 at $9.50. +12.3%
* Into ETH at $1,912, out Aug 22 at $2,423. +26.7% in four days
* Into SOL at $93.87, still holding
Four completed rotations, four winners. The ETH leg is what actually made the month.
**Caveats**
* Real broker fills with real timestamps. Not a backtest, not paper, not a demo account.
* One month, 17 agents, one account. Nothing here is statistically significant and I'm not pretending otherwise.
* The two worst percentages sit on the two smallest allocations, which is a sizing artifact and not risk management working.

ADP nonfarm employment change 8:15am ET tomorrow

I built an agent that buys whatever this sub is most talking about after the close. It is down 19.2% on the month. Posting the whole experiment anyway, because the thing that lost is more interesting than the things that won.
Setup: 17 autonomous agents on a live account, up 15.2% on roughly $3,000, each with its own capital slice and its own strategy. No coordination between them, no human approving trades. 345 real fills on the equity side over the month.
**The WSB agent**
It spreads a token amount across the most discussed tickers here after the close. In August it bought Moderna at $176. Next session: $133. Down 24% overnight, and that single hold is essentially the entire month's drawdown for that agent.
It's a $10 position because I expected roughly this. The useful part is that the agent did its job perfectly. It read the signal, sized correctly, executed on time. The signal was just worthless. Agent quality and signal quality are completely separate problems and a good agent on a bad signal loses money very efficiently.
I keep it running as a control. If my other agents can't beat the one deliberately following this sub, I've learned something important about the other agents.
**What actually worked**
Chip and AI-infrastructure basket, biggest allocation at $500, reweighted weekly on 60-day momentum. Currently NVDA, DELL, ANET. Up 22.9% for the month. Nothing clever in the construction, it just had the right universe in the right month. It also trimmed MU and SMCI before they gave back gains, which is easy to praise in hindsight.
**The earnings agent, and the trade I'm most impressed by**
It reads news and setup quality ahead of scheduled earnings, takes the trade only on favorable setups, and sits in the S&P 500 otherwise. On Aug 26 it sold VOO, bought NVDA near $210, held about a day, sold at $227 and went straight back to the index. Roughly 8% on a sub-24-hour hold.

**Crypto Rotator: +77.9%**
The mechanic is stupidly simple. Hold exactly one coin at a time, whichever of 10 liquid cryptos ranks highest on momentum, volume and volatility. Re-check daily, rotate when the ranking changes. Zero diversification, on purpose.
It only moved four times all month:
* Held LINK, sold Jul 30 at $8.46 (bought at $8.37). Basically flat, +1.1%
* Into ADA at $0.1704, out Aug 8 at $0.199. +16.8%
* Back into LINK at $8.30, out Aug 18 at $9.50. +12.3%
* Into ETH at $1,912, out Aug 22 at $2,423. +26.7% in four days
* Into SOL at $93.87, still holding
Four completed rotations, four winners. The ETH leg is what actually made the month.
**The headline-reaction agent, and a question**
It parses political posts and buys the large caps being praised. Worked example: news lands 2:31 PM ET that Micron announced a $10B US research lab investment. The agent is filled in MU at $914.86 by 2:47 PM, sixteen minutes later. MU printed $936.81 the next morning, about +2.4%.
So here's what I can't decide. For an attention-driven signal, should the exit be time-based rather than signal-based? The whole premise is that a shout-out is an attention spike with no fundamental content. If that's true the position has a half-life measured in hours and the agent should sell into the next open mechanically. But then it has to be right about the fade horizon instead, and "exactly one session" is an arbitrary number with nothing behind it.
The earnings agent above is already doing the time-based version and it worked. I don't know if that's the right default or just the one that happened to work once.
**Caveats**
* Real broker fills with real timestamps. Not a backtest, not paper trading.
* One month, 17 agents, one account. Nothing here is statistically significant and I'm not pretending otherwise.
* The two worst percentages sit on the two smallest allocations, which is a sizing artifact and not risk management working.

In 2021, I had purchased 150 shares of $ENBL for a total of $1,128.51. In Dec 2021, $ENBL was bought by $ET, at which point I received 135 shares of $ET for what I had in purchases and dividends (about 157 shares total).
This gave me 128.94 shares from my own money and 6.06 shares from the dividends I had received previously.
I noticed last week that the dividends I have received from this purchase in 2021 is starting to get close to by original principal purchase. I started to wonder when will the time come that the dividends I have received from this 2021 transaction will surpass my original investment. I receive about $44 each quarter in dividends from this 128.94 shares, and with some simple math and assuming similar dividends growth as in the past (about $0.0025/share/quarter increase), I have calculated that in 9 more dividends payments, I will surpass $1,128.51 in dividends received, essentially doubling my investment amount from just 5 years ago.
8 more payments if I take into account the $55 I received in dividends from when it was $ENBL. This also does not account for the additional dividends I receive from reinvesting those dividends either.
On top of all that, my original investment has now grown to almost 150%, which puts my money at over 3 times its value from when I bought the shares!

Thanks for reaching out. I went ahead and provided some troubleshooting steps below that will hopefully resolve the issue you are running into.
1. Uninstall and reinstall the app
2. Ensure your operating system is up to date
If the problem persists, please contact our Technical Support team for assistance. Our associates are available Monday through Friday from 8:30 a.m. to 9:00 p.m. ET.
[Contact Us](https://www.fidelity.com/customer-service/contact-us)
We are here to help in case anything else comes up.

\*US FORCES BEGAN STRIKING IRGC TARGETS IN IRAN AT 12PM ET TODAY

\*CENTCOM - Today at 12 p.m. ET, U.S. forces began striking Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) targets in Iran. The strikes follow recent attempted attacks by the IRGC against commercial shipping in the Strait of Hormuz and against American service members deployed to the region.

Ranked this morning's pre-market movers at 9:45 by relative volume and options volume instead of by % gain, dumped the list into TradingView, and let it run.
# Here's where all 15 sat pre-market.
[The 9:45 board — 15 pre-market movers ranked by relative volume and options volume, not by gap size.](https://preview.redd.it/dul5vfumlxmh1.png?width=1092&format=png&auto=webp&s=b1020fe6f2633fc646365a0cc5a7501bdf9d44c6)
# Same 15 names at 11:47 ET, sorted by performance:
[ The same names two hours later, sorted by performance](https://preview.redd.it/a746r4tkmxmh1.png?width=444&format=png&auto=webp&s=b6f0543a2390d14a497bbe5185ffbbf499b79342)
# The asymmetry is the whole story:
|Ticker|Pre-mkt|Gap at open|Now (11:47)|Outcome|
|:-|:-|:-|:-|:-|
|FRVO|\+7.09%|\+7.15%|\+24.71%|extended hard|
|CRK|\+9.63%|\+9.63%|\+9.01%|held|
|DUOL|\+7.18%|\+7.85%|\+6.30%|held|
|NVS|\+6.64%|\+6.64%|\+6.10%|held|
|MDT|\+3.70%|\+3.70%|\+1.89%|held, halved|
|MSTR|−3.69%|−3.72%|−3.63%|held|
|NIO|−3.55%|−3.55%|−3.43%|held|
|TSLA|−1.92%|−1.93%|−2.59%|extended|
|AMD|−2.30%|−2.43%|−2.05%|held|
|MRVL|−3.09%|−3.12%|−0.99%|faded|
|INTC|−2.98%|−2.92%|−0.21%|faded to flat|
|IREN|−2.79%|−2.80%|−0.28%|faded to flat|
|XE|−3.60%|−3.60%|−0.43%|faded to flat|
|META|−2.45%|−2.54%|\+1.37%|reversed green|
|SNDK|−2.60%|−2.56%|\+2.45%|reversed green|
All five up-gaps still green. Of the ten down-gaps, four held and six either faded to flat or flipped green.
[FRVO 5-minute — gapped +7% on 5.41x relative volume, now +24.9%. Highest participation on the board, biggest move.](https://preview.redd.it/p6dygamatxmh1.png?width=1762&format=png&auto=webp&s=fef33b598b1669a0d92a60f8549e7ad945d29bb7)
FRVO is the one to look at. Came in with the highest relative volume on the board at 5.41x, gapped +7%, now +24.7%. That's the whole argument for ranking on participation instead of gap size — it was 8th by percentage and first by volume.
[INTC 5-minute — gapped −2.9% on 0.37x relative volume and is back to roughly flat. A gap with nobody behind it.](https://preview.redd.it/4x3lb5oasxmh1.png?width=1760&format=png&auto=webp&s=ce34341de458c4c358959f7c156581855a743e14)
INTC is the mirror image. Gapped −2.92% on 0.37x relative volume — below its own normal — and it's now −0.21%. A gap with nobody behind it.
# Here's where my own thesis only half works.
Relative volume sorted the up-gaps cleanly — the two highest (FRVO 5.41x, CRK 2.83x) are the two best performers. It did nothing for the down-gaps. The six that faded had RVOLs of 1.15x, 0.46x, 0.37x, 0.35x, 0.41x, 0.45x. The four that held: 1.61x, 0.41x, 0.52x, 0.34x. No pattern at all. Low participation predicted a down-gap fading about as often as it didn't.
Caveats: one session, 15 names, and 11:47 isn't the close — some of these will look different at 4pm. And gap direction is confounded by whatever the broad tape did today; a market that rallies off the open flatters every down-gap fade.
Anyone tracked up-gap vs. down-gap hold rates over a real sample? One day tells me nothing, but the split was stark enough that I want to know if it holds.

Today at 12 p.m. ET, U.S. forces began striking Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) targets in Iran. The strikes follow recent attempted attacks by the IRGC against commercial shipping in the Strait of Hormuz