Create Account
Log In
Dark
chart
exchange
Premium
Terminal
Screener
Stocks
Crypto
Forex
Trends
Depth
Close
Check out our Dark Pool Levels

VC
VISTEON CORPORATION
stock NASDAQ

At Close
Dec 26, 2025 3:59:55 PM EST
97.34USD+0.392%(+0.38)190,661
0.00Bid   0.00Ask   0.00Spread
Pre-market
0.00USD-100.000%(-96.96)0
After-hours
Dec 26, 2025 4:00:30 PM EST
97.30USD-0.041%(-0.04)4,037
OverviewOption ChainMax PainOptionsPrice & VolumeDividendsHistoricalExchange VolumeDark Pool LevelsDark Pool PrintsExchangesShort VolumeShort Interest - DailyShort InterestBorrow Fee (CTB)Failure to Deliver (FTD)ShortsTrendsNewsTrends
VC Reddit Mentions
Subreddits
Limit Labels     

We have sentiment values and mention counts going back to 2017. The complete data set is available via the API.
Take me to the API
VC Specific Mentions
As of Dec 27, 2025 7:35:35 AM EST (9 minutes ago)
Includes all comments and posts. Mentions per user per ticker capped at one per hour.
10 hr ago • u/Darth_Meowth • r/gme_meltdown • steam_is_now_planning_to_close_hundreds_of_stores • C
That’s still not 100% which digital IS. Are you scared Nintendo might not exist? I can still redownload Wii VC games I purchased back in 2006.
sentiment -0.44
13 hr ago • u/SEBI-bot • r/IndianStreetBets • weekly_portfolio_review_weekend_discussion_thread • Daily Discussion Thread • B
This is the Weekend Portfolio Review Thread! You can post your portfolios for review here. You can comment list of stocks in your portfolio or use a free image hosting site like [ImgBB](https://imgbb.com/) or [Imgur](https://imgur.com/) to share your screenshots.
**Any other individual posts made on Portfolio Review will be removed.**
You can use this thread to discuss whatever you have been thinking of buying or trading.
Also, use this thread to discuss any query related to Stock Market & Trading.
[Join the Discord](https://discord.gg/8MrqS6CASz) if you haven't already! Here you can talk to mods and fellow autists about the market.
Link to ISB's [Discord VC recordings](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ViRwd90ASOM&list=UUTOPdSUjqfKTaUXRj3MYnsQ&index=2)
sentiment 0.80
13 hr ago • u/c-u-in-da-ballpit • r/ValueInvesting • 2026_my_readjustments_for_the_ai_trade_deflation • B
Hey y'all
I'm wrapping up my plans for 2026 reallocation. I usually invest in index funds but it’s my personal conviction that the AI trade will begin to deflate if not fully crash next year. I know people have strong convictions about this and I don't want to seem like I am an expert. I can predict as much as the next person, but I do think the numbers have gotten to a point where something has to break. I may miss another year to two of run up if the trade continues, but im looking for a more conservative approach this year. Most of my picks have followed a GARP strategy (Growth at a Reasonable Price) with some bellwethers and some speculative trades
I work as an AI engineer at a relatively large US company (with a $5 billion market cap), and I believe the lead held by frontier US models is less stable than it appears. On my research team, we're exploring how to integrate generative AI into our workflows, and we've found that small open-source models from China actually perform much better for our needs. Most of our use cases don't require frontier model capabilities. For workflows that operate within a fairly finite, non-deterministic scope, open-sourced, fine-tuned Chinese models often outperform their larger counterparts at about one-tenth the costs. And this isn’t just at my firm. Andreessen Horowitz reported that 80% of startups applying for VC money with them are suing these open source Chinese models instead of closed US Frontier models. As Chinese models get better (and they are getting much better) the US models are going to start feeling major pricing pressures.
Second, the energy is simply not there. To meet OpenAI's financial commitments, the US grid would need to grow by 20%—equivalent to 250 nuclear power plants at a cost of $10 trillion. Right now, there's a 5 to 8 year wait just to connect a new data center to the power grid. Meanwhile, China already has twice the energy capacity of the US at half the cost. We're also seeing new regulations emerge to protect consumers from these expenses. In July 2025, Ohio regulators ruled that data centers must pay for at least 85% of the energy they reserve for 12 years, regardless of actual usage. This prevents the industry from shifting the cost of grid upgrades onto ordinary households.
Third, the math is broken. OpenAIs disconnect between ambition and arithmetic is the most pronounced. OpenAI is committing $1.4 trillion to infrastructure against $20 billion in annual revenue. That's a 70:1 capital-to-revenue ratio. To generate even a modest 20% return on that $1.4 trillion investment, they would need $280 billion in annual revenue—fourteen times their current run rate. At a 25% gross margin, that means $1.12 trillion in total revenue would be required just to cover depreciation and hit target returns. The current AI market isn't even generating $20 billion collectively, yet one company alone needs to find over a trillion dollars in revenue to justify its infrastructure spend.
Because of this I have decided to reallocate toward companies with good cash flow, reasonable prices relative to their growth, and visible backlogs. I also tried to deallocate away from the US. I would rather be early to a more defensive position than late to a crash.Enough of my rambles:
Here are my picks for 2026 along with summaries and allocation percentage.
**Airbus** : 4.00%
- Global aerospace duopoly leader with 8,600+ aircraft backlog. Trading at 21x Forward P/E. Supported by €10B net cash and 60%+ share in high-margin narrow-body jets.
**Rheinmetall AG** : 4.00%
- Primary supplier for European re-armament with €83B backlog. Trading at 0.7 PEG with 35%+ earnings growth. Targeting €50B revenue by 2030 with 30% ROE.
**MDA Space** : 3.50%
- Monopoly on Canadarm3 robotics with C$4.4B backlog. Trading at ~16x Forward P/E. Expanding capacity to two satellites per day in early 2026 to serve Telesat/Globalstar.
**ABB** : 3.50%
- Automation leader with $23B backlog. 0.5x Net Debt/EBITDA. 20% of electrification growth driven by data centers; divesting Robotics in 2026 to focus on high-margin power.
**Hammond Power** : 3.50%
- North American transformer leader with $1.2B capacity target for 2026. Trading at 24.5x P/E. 28% backlog.
**MPLX LP** : 3.50%
- Midstream operator with 8.0% yield and 3.1x leverage. 90% fee-based earnings. Completing Harmon Creek III and Blackcomb pipelines in H2 2026.
**Novo Nordisk** :3.50%
- 71% GLP-1 market share with 80%+ ROE. Trading at 12.7x P/E. 2026 catalyst is the Wegovy pill launch, supported by tripled manufacturing capacity via Catalent.
**Prysmian** : 3.50%
- Global cable leader with 28% market share and €16B backlog. Trading at 16.4x P/E. Capturing the "Great Grid Upgrade" through subsea interconnectors and Encore Wire acquisition.
**L'Air Liquide** : 3.00%
- Global industrial gas leader with 18.5% margins. €4.4B investment backlog. Targeting €16B in energy transition and healthcare investments through late 2026.
**Kongsberg** : 3.00%
- Record NOK 142B backlog with 38% growth in defense. Trading at 32.5x P/E with an exceptional 35.8% ROE. Strategic leader in NASAMS missiles and maritime autonomy.
**Thales** : 3.00%
- European leader in defense electronics and cybersecurity. Trading at ~1.2 PEG with 17% annual growth forecast. Supported by €50B backlog and Imperva integration synergies.
**First Solar** : 3.00%
- US thin-film solar leader with a sold-out backlog through 2027. Trading at 11x Forward P/E with 0.4 PEG. Massive 100% domestic manufacturing moat and net cash position.
**Nexans** : 3.00%
- Pure-play electrification leader with €7.9B backlog. Debt-free balance sheet (0.06x leverage). Record 13.7% EBITDA margins driven by high-voltage subsea grid hardening.
**Valmont** : 3.00%
-40% global share in precision irrigation and utility poles. Trading at 36x P/E with 23% ROE. 47-year dividend streak supported by $1.5B grid-infrastructure backlog.
**Preformed Line** : 3.00%
- Global leader in transmission hardware. Net cash position with 10% debt-to-equity. 36% YoY EPS growth driven by global grid hardening and fiber-optic build-outs.
**Amphenol** : 3.00%
- 33% share in AI data center interconnects. Trading with 33.5% ROE and 0.7x leverage. 52% dividend increase in late 2025 following record 27.5% operating margins.
**CATL** : 3.00%
- 38% global EV battery share with $15B net cash. 25% ROE. Shifting focus to Energy Storage Systems (ESS) with 1,300 GWh production target for 2026.
**ASM International** : 3.00%
- 60% share in ALD semiconductor tools. Trading at 32x P/E with €1.1B net cash. Primary winner in the 2026 transition to Gate-All-Around (GAA) transistor architecture.
**Constellation Software** : 3.00%
- VMS aggregator with 24% ROE and $2.7B cash for M&A. Late 2025 results showed 46% FCF growth. Reinvests 100% of FCF into mission-critical niche software.
**Marvell Tech** : 3.00%
- Data infrastructure chip leader with AI driving 75% of revenue. 31% projected 2026 growth. Dominant in photonic fabric interconnects and custom AI ASICs.
**Amazon** : 3.00%
- Amazon
**Novartis** : 3.00%
- Pure-play medicine leader with 32.6% ROE and 3.0% yield. Trading at 14.0x P/E. Management confirmed 6% annual sales growth through 2030 via oncology/immunology.
**Baker Hughes** : 3.00%
- Dominant 95% share in LNG turbines with record $31.3B IET backlog. Trading at 15.4x P/E. Booked $700M in data center orders YTD; targeting 20% EBITDA margins by 2026.
**Kawasaki Heavy** : 3.00%
- Japan’s 2026 defense champion with ¥700B sales target by 2031. Trading at 18.5x P/E with PEG below 0.5. World-first liquified hydrogen infrastructure and 787 supply chain leader.
**Northrop Grumman** : 3.00%
- Monopoly on U.S. nuclear triad's air leg. Trading at 19.6x P/E, 26.2% ROE, and 2.3% FCF yield. 22-year dividend growth streak with $4 billion FCF target by 2028.
**Leonardo** : 3.00%
- 22% global share in civil helicopters with €47B backlog. Trading at 0.96 PEG. Participating in the structural re-armament of European land and air defense infrastructure.
**MTU Aero Engines** : 3.00%
- Critical partner in A320neo ecosystem with €24B backlog. Trading at 0.86 PEG and 25.6% ROE. High-margin MRO business captures the full lifecycle of the GTF engine.
**NextEra Energy** : 3.00%
- Largest U.S. renewable developer with 36GW backlog. Trading at 18x Forward P/E. Consistent 10% dividend growth supported by Florida’s regulated utility growth.
**ONEOK** : 3.00%
- Midstream giant with 5.6% yield and >15% projected EPS growth. Supported by $500M in synergies from EnLink/Magellan acquisitions and 90% fee-based revenue.
**Argenx** : 3.00%:
- Immunology leader with $4.3B cash. Vyvgart quarterly sales surpassed $1B in late 2025. Positioned for five registrational readouts across autoimmune niches in 2026.
**Arcosa** : 2.50%
- Infrastructure leader with 30% EBITDA margins in Construction Products. Trading at 34x P/E. Backlogs in utility structures and wind towers support 41% earnings growth in 2026.
**Array Tech** : 1.50%
- US solar tracker provider with $1.9B backlog. Trading at 14x P/E. Strategic pivot to domestic manufacturing to capture legacy tax credit demand through 2026.
**Shoals Tech** : 1.00%
- Solar EBOS leader with $720M backlog and 27% growth. High-margin "Big Lead Assembly" model reduces on-site labor. Expanding into BESS revenues in 2026.
sentiment 1.00
14 hr ago • u/ZhenyaV • r/CryptoCurrency • aave_just_killed_decentralization_2026_outlook • DISCUSSION • B
My previous post, “[Altcoin Season Is Canceled](https://www.reddit.com/r/CryptoCurrency/comments/1pr0d56/altseason_is_canceled_forever)” got 240K views. Clearly, many people are wondering what is happening with altcoins and what their future looks like.
Most commentators debated whether we actually had an altcoin season at all. One user, u/MaximumStudent1839, identified my pain point and argued that the whole "ownership", "equity", and "cash flow" was misleading and "brain hemorrhage". His view was simple: tokens should be treated as store-of-value assets driven purely by consensus. No future cash flows, no fee growth, no usage-based valuation. Just owning tokens based on their role and necessity within a given blockchain. Bullish on network-effect assets and bearish on some DeFi tokens, "ICM" tokens, etc.
In that framing, crypto is not a security, registered or unregistered. It is a collectible, sometimes with utility tied to an adjacent protocol.
While I was responding to comments, Stani, the founder of Aave landing protocol, was effectively demonstrating how this theory plays out in practice.
The moment the SEC dropped its investigation early Dec '25, Aave Labs switched the swap provider on its frontend and redirected fees away from the DAO. The amount is not huge - $10m, roughly one ninth of total Aave fees. Still, the principle matters. AAVE token holders do not benefit if fees accrue anywhere outside the DAO treasury.
This raised a key question. Should the DAO control all Aave IP and all fees generated by its storefront? Some may think this is not very important, but what if storefront fees eventually exceed protocol fees? AAVE holders should care where value is created and where it flows.
The vote happened, and Stani voted against the initiative, carrying about 33% of the voting power. Days before the vote, he spent roughly $12M buying AAVE. Good for price, bad for decentralization. Other large holders abstained. And realistically, why would they vote against the founder? He is responsible for their gains and has the most skin in the game.
Now consider the real risk. What if tomorrow there is a decision to funnel protocol fees to another wallet and cut off the DAO entirely? Would the minority be able to unite and vote against it?
DAOs are a compelling idea, but in practice the founding team has the final say. If they decide to sell the labs, as we saw with Axelar, Padre, and Tensor, token holders have no real way to intervene.
So you can throw most of the decentralization and governance narrative out the window. It does not work in the real world. Like communism, it sounds good on paper. When trying to make everyone equal - someone will always be more equal than others.
To be precise, it does work, just not the way it is advertised. DAOs simplify corporate governance, make it transparent, and put voting onchain. But they only cover the technical layer of governance, not ownership or control.
At the end of the day, crypto tokens function like unregistered securities. The best outcome we can realistically hope for is that the current SEC administration under Paul Atkins carves out a niche with more relaxed rules for digital securities.
That would simplify development and further integrate TradFi. At the same time, it would likely compress valuations, as criminal and scam capital would be forced out toward privacy chains that even most DEXs do not support.
Forget about altcoin season. Forget about “the next cycle.” Pumps will still happen, but only for a select few, mostly new tokens with the right timing, the right narrative, heavy marketing budgets, and VC or cabal bundling. Do not hold, and definitely do not DCA into any project tokens.
2024–25 taught me that, in the long run, capital preservation matters more than capital growth. In 2026, I’m bullish on L1/L2 ecosystems and platform tokens with strong network effects, and bearish on most project coins.
Merry Christmas and Happy New Year.
sentiment 0.99
16 hr ago • u/IcezMan_ • r/AllCryptoBets • rebate_is_gearing_up_to_front_run_the_narrative • Solana • B
Quick update for Rebaters and anyone curious about the narrative play. We are positioning REBATE to capture organic attention around the potential Trump $2,000 tariff rebate announcement in Q2 2026. This is a narrative-driven approach anchored in fair launch fundamentals and a community-first ecosystem.
Why this matters
- Narrative power works in crypto. 2021 stimulus checks helped fuel major meme coin rallies. For context, DOGE saw massive moves during that period. We are building REBATE to be the Solana narrative token tied to the tariff rebate story.
- We are not promising outcomes or price targets. This is about being ready with a community, tools, and utilities if the narrative gains mainstream traction.
What REBATE is
- Token: REBATE (SPL on Solana)
- Contract: J1pLHsz1uCZQuYX7tbt2Q79VEDJxVhSgwGz2hRmSpump
- Fair launch on pump.fun (silent launch on November 14, 2025)
- Bonded December 13, 2025
- Total supply: 1,000,000,000
- Team allocation: 0%
- VC allocation: 0%
- KOL/influencer allocation: 0%
- Community ownership: 100%
Silent launch and fair launch mechanics
- We launched silently on pump.fun to reduce sniper activity and bot issues. No promotion for the first 30 days kept things clean and fair.
- Bonding curve mechanics were used to establish the pool and initial distribution. That structure supports long-term community alignment.
Live utilities powering organic growth
We already have a live ecosystem that focuses on engagement and raids instead of paid promo.
- RaidBate - custom raid coordination bot for organized organic raids
- Game Bot - CoinFlip and Rock-Paper-Scissors for community fun and retention
- Buy Bot - tier-based tracking for buys and engagement rewards
- PILLY - custom AI community chat bot
- Bella - conversation summarizer to keep Rebaters up to speed
Q1 2026 outlook (what’s coming)
- Staking
- 47 million token airdrop
- Earn2Raid rewards
- Rebate Swap - hybrid platform
- Referral system
Community and traction
- Telegram: 400+ members active and growing (come hang out in Telegram to meet Rebaters)
- Holders: 150+ holders onchain
- Milestones: Bonded Dec 13 2025, ATH market cap $146K, peak volume 40K+ (historical)
- Current listings: PumpSwap, DexScreener, DexTools, GeckoTerminal, Birdeye, Photon, GMGN, Capitoday, Lewk, MEXC DEX+
- Pending listings: Jupiter, CoinMarketCap, CoinGecko, Raydium
- CEX conversations: active talks with Tier 2 and Tier 3 exchanges
- Lead developer contact (public): icezman1 on Telegram
Live market snapshot (from our latest on-chain and market feeds)
- 24h change: +19.88%
- Market cap: $70.71K
How we grow organically
- Rebaters focus on coordinated raids through RaidBate rather than paid influencers
- Gamified engagement via Game Bot and Buy Bot to reward activity
- Community-first decisions because ownership is 100% with Rebaters
- No paid promotions, no KOL allocations, no VC bags
How to get involved
- Read more: https://tariffrebate.xyz/
- Join the conversation on Telegram to meet Rebaters and participate in raids and games
- Follow our Twitter: REBATE_TARIFF for quick hits and announcements
- Check the contract: J1pLHsz1uCZQuYX7tbt2Q79VEDJxVhSgwGz2hRmSpump
Final notes
- We are preparing infrastructure and community energy to be ready if the Trump tariff rebate narrative gains traction in Q2 2026. This is a narrative play built on fair launch principles and live utilities.
- No financial advice here. Do your own research. This is a community token with real utilities and a clear roadmap, but all participants should DYOR and manage risk.
NFA - DYOR. See you in Telegram, Rebaters.
sentiment 0.98
17 hr ago • u/schmidd11 • r/Finanzen • wieso_denkt_jeder_das_problem_würden_sich_mit • C
Hier gibt es nicht zu wenig mut und das geringe VC geschäft in europa ist aufgrund des überzogenen bürokratischen Aufwands selbst geschuldet
Jeder der viel veld und neue Innovationen vorantreiben möchte geht halt in die USA, weil dir in Europa steine in den weg und das leben schwer gemacht wird
sentiment -0.60
18 hr ago • u/SoggyGrayDuck • r/Bitcoin • why_is_bitcoin_going_down_while_gold_and_silver • C
Blackrock and other VC got involved and stole the peak of what should have been the 4 year cycle for themselves
sentiment 0.00
21 hr ago • u/thanksvitalik • r/ethereum • daily_general_discussion_december_26_2025 • C
Always look at the bright side... 2025 gave us an ATH and a bear market in the ~3000 USD levels. I would have happily taken this outcome any time for the previous 3 years... We were at 1500 not long ago with an eth foundation saying that the culture of winning had to be cancelled and everyone else saying we were a useless dead shitcoin managed by the VC type who were living like rock stars while dumping on us at the same time BTC was mooning. I'm cool as a cucumber with what 2025 brought us.
sentiment 0.32
23 hr ago • u/callsonreddit • r/wallstreetbets • daily_discussion_thread_for_december_26_2025 • C
VC's love these charts
sentiment 0.64
24 hr ago • u/SwimOld5053 • r/CryptoCurrency • midnight_to_launch_night_token_cardanos_native • C
Yeah, but listings often act as the catalyst for sell pressure. Once liquidity and price discovery are live, early holders finally get an exit.
Looking at the on-chain data, the concentration here is pretty heavy. **The top 7 wallets alone hold around 80% of the total supply**, for example:
* Top holder: **30.8%**
* 2nd: **17.6%**
* 3rd: **15.8%**
* 4th: **5.0%**
* 5th: **4.2%**
* 6th: **3.5%**
* 7th: **3.3%**
That level of concentration means even a single wallet moving can significantly impact price.
Even if these aren’t VC wallets specifically, early insiders, team wallets, or private round participants often start distributing once liquidity and visibility improve. So the sell pressure risk is very real regardless of whether it’s “official” VC vesting or not.
Just something people should be aware of when evaluating tokenomics.
sentiment 0.38
1 day ago • u/Dry_Act6001 • r/stocks • which_sectors_do_you_plan_to_buy_in_in_2026_which • C
I'm not offended. I got paid to do PME for War Colleges. I'm not reading slides or being duped by some VC Techbro. Air superiority has nothing to do with whether or not drones will be used. We aren't talking about MQ-9s here. You mentioned Anduril in your other response to me, and CCA are a prime example of how he's wrong.
You may not agree with it, but Defense rarely does the smart thing. Whether killing the F/A-XX program like it never existed, or doubling down on previously existing relationships if you were in defense (I'm not saying you weren't) you'd be able to see that.
sentiment -0.86
10 hr ago • u/Darth_Meowth • r/gme_meltdown • steam_is_now_planning_to_close_hundreds_of_stores • C
That’s still not 100% which digital IS. Are you scared Nintendo might not exist? I can still redownload Wii VC games I purchased back in 2006.
sentiment -0.44
13 hr ago • u/SEBI-bot • r/IndianStreetBets • weekly_portfolio_review_weekend_discussion_thread • Daily Discussion Thread • B
This is the Weekend Portfolio Review Thread! You can post your portfolios for review here. You can comment list of stocks in your portfolio or use a free image hosting site like [ImgBB](https://imgbb.com/) or [Imgur](https://imgur.com/) to share your screenshots.
**Any other individual posts made on Portfolio Review will be removed.**
You can use this thread to discuss whatever you have been thinking of buying or trading.
Also, use this thread to discuss any query related to Stock Market & Trading.
[Join the Discord](https://discord.gg/8MrqS6CASz) if you haven't already! Here you can talk to mods and fellow autists about the market.
Link to ISB's [Discord VC recordings](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ViRwd90ASOM&list=UUTOPdSUjqfKTaUXRj3MYnsQ&index=2)
sentiment 0.80
13 hr ago • u/c-u-in-da-ballpit • r/ValueInvesting • 2026_my_readjustments_for_the_ai_trade_deflation • B
Hey y'all
I'm wrapping up my plans for 2026 reallocation. I usually invest in index funds but it’s my personal conviction that the AI trade will begin to deflate if not fully crash next year. I know people have strong convictions about this and I don't want to seem like I am an expert. I can predict as much as the next person, but I do think the numbers have gotten to a point where something has to break. I may miss another year to two of run up if the trade continues, but im looking for a more conservative approach this year. Most of my picks have followed a GARP strategy (Growth at a Reasonable Price) with some bellwethers and some speculative trades
I work as an AI engineer at a relatively large US company (with a $5 billion market cap), and I believe the lead held by frontier US models is less stable than it appears. On my research team, we're exploring how to integrate generative AI into our workflows, and we've found that small open-source models from China actually perform much better for our needs. Most of our use cases don't require frontier model capabilities. For workflows that operate within a fairly finite, non-deterministic scope, open-sourced, fine-tuned Chinese models often outperform their larger counterparts at about one-tenth the costs. And this isn’t just at my firm. Andreessen Horowitz reported that 80% of startups applying for VC money with them are suing these open source Chinese models instead of closed US Frontier models. As Chinese models get better (and they are getting much better) the US models are going to start feeling major pricing pressures.
Second, the energy is simply not there. To meet OpenAI's financial commitments, the US grid would need to grow by 20%—equivalent to 250 nuclear power plants at a cost of $10 trillion. Right now, there's a 5 to 8 year wait just to connect a new data center to the power grid. Meanwhile, China already has twice the energy capacity of the US at half the cost. We're also seeing new regulations emerge to protect consumers from these expenses. In July 2025, Ohio regulators ruled that data centers must pay for at least 85% of the energy they reserve for 12 years, regardless of actual usage. This prevents the industry from shifting the cost of grid upgrades onto ordinary households.
Third, the math is broken. OpenAIs disconnect between ambition and arithmetic is the most pronounced. OpenAI is committing $1.4 trillion to infrastructure against $20 billion in annual revenue. That's a 70:1 capital-to-revenue ratio. To generate even a modest 20% return on that $1.4 trillion investment, they would need $280 billion in annual revenue—fourteen times their current run rate. At a 25% gross margin, that means $1.12 trillion in total revenue would be required just to cover depreciation and hit target returns. The current AI market isn't even generating $20 billion collectively, yet one company alone needs to find over a trillion dollars in revenue to justify its infrastructure spend.
Because of this I have decided to reallocate toward companies with good cash flow, reasonable prices relative to their growth, and visible backlogs. I also tried to deallocate away from the US. I would rather be early to a more defensive position than late to a crash.Enough of my rambles:
Here are my picks for 2026 along with summaries and allocation percentage.
**Airbus** : 4.00%
- Global aerospace duopoly leader with 8,600+ aircraft backlog. Trading at 21x Forward P/E. Supported by €10B net cash and 60%+ share in high-margin narrow-body jets.
**Rheinmetall AG** : 4.00%
- Primary supplier for European re-armament with €83B backlog. Trading at 0.7 PEG with 35%+ earnings growth. Targeting €50B revenue by 2030 with 30% ROE.
**MDA Space** : 3.50%
- Monopoly on Canadarm3 robotics with C$4.4B backlog. Trading at ~16x Forward P/E. Expanding capacity to two satellites per day in early 2026 to serve Telesat/Globalstar.
**ABB** : 3.50%
- Automation leader with $23B backlog. 0.5x Net Debt/EBITDA. 20% of electrification growth driven by data centers; divesting Robotics in 2026 to focus on high-margin power.
**Hammond Power** : 3.50%
- North American transformer leader with $1.2B capacity target for 2026. Trading at 24.5x P/E. 28% backlog.
**MPLX LP** : 3.50%
- Midstream operator with 8.0% yield and 3.1x leverage. 90% fee-based earnings. Completing Harmon Creek III and Blackcomb pipelines in H2 2026.
**Novo Nordisk** :3.50%
- 71% GLP-1 market share with 80%+ ROE. Trading at 12.7x P/E. 2026 catalyst is the Wegovy pill launch, supported by tripled manufacturing capacity via Catalent.
**Prysmian** : 3.50%
- Global cable leader with 28% market share and €16B backlog. Trading at 16.4x P/E. Capturing the "Great Grid Upgrade" through subsea interconnectors and Encore Wire acquisition.
**L'Air Liquide** : 3.00%
- Global industrial gas leader with 18.5% margins. €4.4B investment backlog. Targeting €16B in energy transition and healthcare investments through late 2026.
**Kongsberg** : 3.00%
- Record NOK 142B backlog with 38% growth in defense. Trading at 32.5x P/E with an exceptional 35.8% ROE. Strategic leader in NASAMS missiles and maritime autonomy.
**Thales** : 3.00%
- European leader in defense electronics and cybersecurity. Trading at ~1.2 PEG with 17% annual growth forecast. Supported by €50B backlog and Imperva integration synergies.
**First Solar** : 3.00%
- US thin-film solar leader with a sold-out backlog through 2027. Trading at 11x Forward P/E with 0.4 PEG. Massive 100% domestic manufacturing moat and net cash position.
**Nexans** : 3.00%
- Pure-play electrification leader with €7.9B backlog. Debt-free balance sheet (0.06x leverage). Record 13.7% EBITDA margins driven by high-voltage subsea grid hardening.
**Valmont** : 3.00%
-40% global share in precision irrigation and utility poles. Trading at 36x P/E with 23% ROE. 47-year dividend streak supported by $1.5B grid-infrastructure backlog.
**Preformed Line** : 3.00%
- Global leader in transmission hardware. Net cash position with 10% debt-to-equity. 36% YoY EPS growth driven by global grid hardening and fiber-optic build-outs.
**Amphenol** : 3.00%
- 33% share in AI data center interconnects. Trading with 33.5% ROE and 0.7x leverage. 52% dividend increase in late 2025 following record 27.5% operating margins.
**CATL** : 3.00%
- 38% global EV battery share with $15B net cash. 25% ROE. Shifting focus to Energy Storage Systems (ESS) with 1,300 GWh production target for 2026.
**ASM International** : 3.00%
- 60% share in ALD semiconductor tools. Trading at 32x P/E with €1.1B net cash. Primary winner in the 2026 transition to Gate-All-Around (GAA) transistor architecture.
**Constellation Software** : 3.00%
- VMS aggregator with 24% ROE and $2.7B cash for M&A. Late 2025 results showed 46% FCF growth. Reinvests 100% of FCF into mission-critical niche software.
**Marvell Tech** : 3.00%
- Data infrastructure chip leader with AI driving 75% of revenue. 31% projected 2026 growth. Dominant in photonic fabric interconnects and custom AI ASICs.
**Amazon** : 3.00%
- Amazon
**Novartis** : 3.00%
- Pure-play medicine leader with 32.6% ROE and 3.0% yield. Trading at 14.0x P/E. Management confirmed 6% annual sales growth through 2030 via oncology/immunology.
**Baker Hughes** : 3.00%
- Dominant 95% share in LNG turbines with record $31.3B IET backlog. Trading at 15.4x P/E. Booked $700M in data center orders YTD; targeting 20% EBITDA margins by 2026.
**Kawasaki Heavy** : 3.00%
- Japan’s 2026 defense champion with ¥700B sales target by 2031. Trading at 18.5x P/E with PEG below 0.5. World-first liquified hydrogen infrastructure and 787 supply chain leader.
**Northrop Grumman** : 3.00%
- Monopoly on U.S. nuclear triad's air leg. Trading at 19.6x P/E, 26.2% ROE, and 2.3% FCF yield. 22-year dividend growth streak with $4 billion FCF target by 2028.
**Leonardo** : 3.00%
- 22% global share in civil helicopters with €47B backlog. Trading at 0.96 PEG. Participating in the structural re-armament of European land and air defense infrastructure.
**MTU Aero Engines** : 3.00%
- Critical partner in A320neo ecosystem with €24B backlog. Trading at 0.86 PEG and 25.6% ROE. High-margin MRO business captures the full lifecycle of the GTF engine.
**NextEra Energy** : 3.00%
- Largest U.S. renewable developer with 36GW backlog. Trading at 18x Forward P/E. Consistent 10% dividend growth supported by Florida’s regulated utility growth.
**ONEOK** : 3.00%
- Midstream giant with 5.6% yield and >15% projected EPS growth. Supported by $500M in synergies from EnLink/Magellan acquisitions and 90% fee-based revenue.
**Argenx** : 3.00%:
- Immunology leader with $4.3B cash. Vyvgart quarterly sales surpassed $1B in late 2025. Positioned for five registrational readouts across autoimmune niches in 2026.
**Arcosa** : 2.50%
- Infrastructure leader with 30% EBITDA margins in Construction Products. Trading at 34x P/E. Backlogs in utility structures and wind towers support 41% earnings growth in 2026.
**Array Tech** : 1.50%
- US solar tracker provider with $1.9B backlog. Trading at 14x P/E. Strategic pivot to domestic manufacturing to capture legacy tax credit demand through 2026.
**Shoals Tech** : 1.00%
- Solar EBOS leader with $720M backlog and 27% growth. High-margin "Big Lead Assembly" model reduces on-site labor. Expanding into BESS revenues in 2026.
sentiment 1.00
14 hr ago • u/ZhenyaV • r/CryptoCurrency • aave_just_killed_decentralization_2026_outlook • DISCUSSION • B
My previous post, “[Altcoin Season Is Canceled](https://www.reddit.com/r/CryptoCurrency/comments/1pr0d56/altseason_is_canceled_forever)” got 240K views. Clearly, many people are wondering what is happening with altcoins and what their future looks like.
Most commentators debated whether we actually had an altcoin season at all. One user, u/MaximumStudent1839, identified my pain point and argued that the whole "ownership", "equity", and "cash flow" was misleading and "brain hemorrhage". His view was simple: tokens should be treated as store-of-value assets driven purely by consensus. No future cash flows, no fee growth, no usage-based valuation. Just owning tokens based on their role and necessity within a given blockchain. Bullish on network-effect assets and bearish on some DeFi tokens, "ICM" tokens, etc.
In that framing, crypto is not a security, registered or unregistered. It is a collectible, sometimes with utility tied to an adjacent protocol.
While I was responding to comments, Stani, the founder of Aave landing protocol, was effectively demonstrating how this theory plays out in practice.
The moment the SEC dropped its investigation early Dec '25, Aave Labs switched the swap provider on its frontend and redirected fees away from the DAO. The amount is not huge - $10m, roughly one ninth of total Aave fees. Still, the principle matters. AAVE token holders do not benefit if fees accrue anywhere outside the DAO treasury.
This raised a key question. Should the DAO control all Aave IP and all fees generated by its storefront? Some may think this is not very important, but what if storefront fees eventually exceed protocol fees? AAVE holders should care where value is created and where it flows.
The vote happened, and Stani voted against the initiative, carrying about 33% of the voting power. Days before the vote, he spent roughly $12M buying AAVE. Good for price, bad for decentralization. Other large holders abstained. And realistically, why would they vote against the founder? He is responsible for their gains and has the most skin in the game.
Now consider the real risk. What if tomorrow there is a decision to funnel protocol fees to another wallet and cut off the DAO entirely? Would the minority be able to unite and vote against it?
DAOs are a compelling idea, but in practice the founding team has the final say. If they decide to sell the labs, as we saw with Axelar, Padre, and Tensor, token holders have no real way to intervene.
So you can throw most of the decentralization and governance narrative out the window. It does not work in the real world. Like communism, it sounds good on paper. When trying to make everyone equal - someone will always be more equal than others.
To be precise, it does work, just not the way it is advertised. DAOs simplify corporate governance, make it transparent, and put voting onchain. But they only cover the technical layer of governance, not ownership or control.
At the end of the day, crypto tokens function like unregistered securities. The best outcome we can realistically hope for is that the current SEC administration under Paul Atkins carves out a niche with more relaxed rules for digital securities.
That would simplify development and further integrate TradFi. At the same time, it would likely compress valuations, as criminal and scam capital would be forced out toward privacy chains that even most DEXs do not support.
Forget about altcoin season. Forget about “the next cycle.” Pumps will still happen, but only for a select few, mostly new tokens with the right timing, the right narrative, heavy marketing budgets, and VC or cabal bundling. Do not hold, and definitely do not DCA into any project tokens.
2024–25 taught me that, in the long run, capital preservation matters more than capital growth. In 2026, I’m bullish on L1/L2 ecosystems and platform tokens with strong network effects, and bearish on most project coins.
Merry Christmas and Happy New Year.
sentiment 0.99
16 hr ago • u/IcezMan_ • r/AllCryptoBets • rebate_is_gearing_up_to_front_run_the_narrative • Solana • B
Quick update for Rebaters and anyone curious about the narrative play. We are positioning REBATE to capture organic attention around the potential Trump $2,000 tariff rebate announcement in Q2 2026. This is a narrative-driven approach anchored in fair launch fundamentals and a community-first ecosystem.
Why this matters
- Narrative power works in crypto. 2021 stimulus checks helped fuel major meme coin rallies. For context, DOGE saw massive moves during that period. We are building REBATE to be the Solana narrative token tied to the tariff rebate story.
- We are not promising outcomes or price targets. This is about being ready with a community, tools, and utilities if the narrative gains mainstream traction.
What REBATE is
- Token: REBATE (SPL on Solana)
- Contract: J1pLHsz1uCZQuYX7tbt2Q79VEDJxVhSgwGz2hRmSpump
- Fair launch on pump.fun (silent launch on November 14, 2025)
- Bonded December 13, 2025
- Total supply: 1,000,000,000
- Team allocation: 0%
- VC allocation: 0%
- KOL/influencer allocation: 0%
- Community ownership: 100%
Silent launch and fair launch mechanics
- We launched silently on pump.fun to reduce sniper activity and bot issues. No promotion for the first 30 days kept things clean and fair.
- Bonding curve mechanics were used to establish the pool and initial distribution. That structure supports long-term community alignment.
Live utilities powering organic growth
We already have a live ecosystem that focuses on engagement and raids instead of paid promo.
- RaidBate - custom raid coordination bot for organized organic raids
- Game Bot - CoinFlip and Rock-Paper-Scissors for community fun and retention
- Buy Bot - tier-based tracking for buys and engagement rewards
- PILLY - custom AI community chat bot
- Bella - conversation summarizer to keep Rebaters up to speed
Q1 2026 outlook (what’s coming)
- Staking
- 47 million token airdrop
- Earn2Raid rewards
- Rebate Swap - hybrid platform
- Referral system
Community and traction
- Telegram: 400+ members active and growing (come hang out in Telegram to meet Rebaters)
- Holders: 150+ holders onchain
- Milestones: Bonded Dec 13 2025, ATH market cap $146K, peak volume 40K+ (historical)
- Current listings: PumpSwap, DexScreener, DexTools, GeckoTerminal, Birdeye, Photon, GMGN, Capitoday, Lewk, MEXC DEX+
- Pending listings: Jupiter, CoinMarketCap, CoinGecko, Raydium
- CEX conversations: active talks with Tier 2 and Tier 3 exchanges
- Lead developer contact (public): icezman1 on Telegram
Live market snapshot (from our latest on-chain and market feeds)
- 24h change: +19.88%
- Market cap: $70.71K
How we grow organically
- Rebaters focus on coordinated raids through RaidBate rather than paid influencers
- Gamified engagement via Game Bot and Buy Bot to reward activity
- Community-first decisions because ownership is 100% with Rebaters
- No paid promotions, no KOL allocations, no VC bags
How to get involved
- Read more: https://tariffrebate.xyz/
- Join the conversation on Telegram to meet Rebaters and participate in raids and games
- Follow our Twitter: REBATE_TARIFF for quick hits and announcements
- Check the contract: J1pLHsz1uCZQuYX7tbt2Q79VEDJxVhSgwGz2hRmSpump
Final notes
- We are preparing infrastructure and community energy to be ready if the Trump tariff rebate narrative gains traction in Q2 2026. This is a narrative play built on fair launch principles and live utilities.
- No financial advice here. Do your own research. This is a community token with real utilities and a clear roadmap, but all participants should DYOR and manage risk.
NFA - DYOR. See you in Telegram, Rebaters.
sentiment 0.98
17 hr ago • u/schmidd11 • r/Finanzen • wieso_denkt_jeder_das_problem_würden_sich_mit • C
Hier gibt es nicht zu wenig mut und das geringe VC geschäft in europa ist aufgrund des überzogenen bürokratischen Aufwands selbst geschuldet
Jeder der viel veld und neue Innovationen vorantreiben möchte geht halt in die USA, weil dir in Europa steine in den weg und das leben schwer gemacht wird
sentiment -0.60
18 hr ago • u/SoggyGrayDuck • r/Bitcoin • why_is_bitcoin_going_down_while_gold_and_silver • C
Blackrock and other VC got involved and stole the peak of what should have been the 4 year cycle for themselves
sentiment 0.00
21 hr ago • u/thanksvitalik • r/ethereum • daily_general_discussion_december_26_2025 • C
Always look at the bright side... 2025 gave us an ATH and a bear market in the ~3000 USD levels. I would have happily taken this outcome any time for the previous 3 years... We were at 1500 not long ago with an eth foundation saying that the culture of winning had to be cancelled and everyone else saying we were a useless dead shitcoin managed by the VC type who were living like rock stars while dumping on us at the same time BTC was mooning. I'm cool as a cucumber with what 2025 brought us.
sentiment 0.32
23 hr ago • u/callsonreddit • r/wallstreetbets • daily_discussion_thread_for_december_26_2025 • C
VC's love these charts
sentiment 0.64


Share
About
Pricing
Policies
Markets
API
Info
tz UTC-5
Connect with us
ChartExchange Email
ChartExchange on Discord
ChartExchange on X
ChartExchange on Reddit
ChartExchange on GitHub
ChartExchange on YouTube
© 2020 - 2025 ChartExchange LLC