TER
Teradyne, Inc. Common Stock
stock NASDAQ

Bruder, warum so aggressiv? Unterschiedliche Anbieter können unterschiedliche TER und Tracking Differenzen auf den gleichen Index haben. Außerdem MSCI USA != MSCI USA Screened

also the TER of the weekly etf is 0.5% p.a. which is too expensive even for an actively managed covered call etf (compared to WINC and the jpmorgan cc etf's 0.35% p.a.)
obviously paying weekly is more work? but that's still expensive

It's a popular beginners pie because it became popular which means it's highly scored on the T212 social pie ranking which makes it a popular beginner pie, etc, etc.
It's popularity is mostly psychological, but it is also technically interesting if you follow along with the pie developers YT channel.
Frequency of payment is only marginally more interesting than the TER in choosing a dividend paying fund. There is not a lot detail available about this new fund as yet. But what we do know is that it's still a very small fund. It's heavily US biased (\~80%). It's a covered call fund. That last detail caps the up-side potential, so whilst you can see the big Mag 7 stocks in the holdings it's not going to match their performance if that's what you're looking for.
I'll stick with LDGG and UK-based Investment Trusts for dividends with monthly and quarterly payments.

MSCI World (developed) is more diversified than pure SP500 asked by OP.
Whole world (with emerging) like VALL with TER 0.07% is also OK.

Stavo valutando seriamente L&G Global Quality Dividends UCITS ETF (LDGL – IE0005AJA0P1) come ETF dividend da affiancare alla parte core del portafoglio.
Sulla carta mi sembrava quasi perfetto per quello che cercavo: esposizione globale, approccio quality + dividend growth, TER abbastanza contenuto e soprattutto distribuzione mensile.
Leggendo però più attentamente la documentazione del fondo ho trovato un dettaglio che mi ha fatto rivalutare un po' la cosa.
La politica distributiva prevede infatti che il fondo possa effettuare le distribuzioni utilizzando reddito e/o capitale. L'obiettivo sembra essere quello di mantenere una distribuzione mensile relativamente stabile e, qualora il reddito generato dal portafoglio non fosse sufficiente, una parte della distribuzione potrebbe quindi provenire dal capitale.

which one is cheaper. spyl.de is 0.03% TER