SYNA
Synaptics Inc
stock NASDAQ

**Micron Technology,** Inc. operates within a validated peer group of 29 candidate companies in the semiconductor sector. This active and confirmed peer cohort provides a robust basis for comparative analysis. Right now, in market terms, the company presents itself as an exceptionally high-growth, highly profitable operator that commands a steep trailing valuation relative to peers, contrasted against much lower forward-looking consensus expectations.
Looking at the specific **peer-rank evidence**, the company's **growth metrics** stand at the absolute top of its peer group. It ranks 1 of 30 for 1-year **revenue growth** at 48.9%, 1 of 22 for year-over-year **EPS growth** at 997.6%, and 1 of 30 for **gross profit growth** at 165.0%, based on peer comparisons using the last-twelve-months (LTM) SEC statement contract. Its profitability is similarly dominant, ranking 1 of 29 for **operating margin** at 26.1% and 1 of 24 for **EBITDA margin** at 48.5%, both of which are peer-comparison figures under the LTM SEC statement contract. Additionally, the company ranks 2 of 29 for **net profit margin** at 22.8%, 2 of 29 for **return on equity** at 17.2%, and 2 of 29 for **return on assets** at 11.2%. Trailing valuation metrics are high, with a **trailing P/E ratio** of 140.9 ranking 4 of 29 (lower is better) and a **price-to-book (P/B) ratio** of 22.21 ranking 25 of 29 under the LTM SEC statement contract. Its **forward P/E** of 6.6 and **PEG ratio** of 0.15 are flagged as **consensus analyst estimates** and are not figures filed with the SEC.
Evaluating the company's own ten-year history reveals that despite these top-tier peer rankings, its current profitability sits in a **normal historical range.** Specifically, its gross profit margin, operating margin, net profit margin, EBITDA margin, return on equity, and return on assets are all currently roughly mid-range for its own ten-year history. Its free cash flow margin of 4.5% is also roughly mid-range for its own ten-year history, as is its return on invested capital (ROIC) of 14.7%, which is flagged as having no valid peer or model-specific benchmark active. This indicates that while the company is currently outperforming almost all of its peers, this level of performance represents a mid-range historical position for Micron itself rather than a permanent operational shift.
These dynamics contribute to an **Overall Score of 81 out of 100,** driven by a *Financial Health* score of 96 out of 100, a *Growth score* of 85 out of 100, and a lower *Valuation score of 48 out of 100*. There are no data-consistency flags. One card is missing a computable value, which is the Loss Ratio due to it being unavailable for non-insurers. The peer comparisons also reflect several outlier peers that ranked last because of negative fundamentals, including Intel (INTC), Silicon Laboratories (SLAB), MaxLinear (MXL), Semtech (SMTC), and Synaptics (SYNA) due to non-positive net income, alongside Wolfspeed (WOLF) due to non-positive EBITDA. What this quantitative data does not settle is the duration of the current semiconductor cycle, how sustainable the high-growth margins are over a multi-year horizon, and whether industry supply constraints will persist.
**For more details and whole analysis:** [**https://capitom.co/analysis/MU**](https://capitom.co/analysis/MU)

**Micron Technology,** Inc. operates within a validated peer group of 29 candidate companies in the semiconductor sector. This active and confirmed peer cohort provides a robust basis for comparative analysis. Right now, in market terms, the company presents itself as an exceptionally high-growth, highly profitable operator that commands a steep trailing valuation relative to peers, contrasted against much lower forward-looking consensus expectations.
Looking at the specific **peer-rank evidence**, the company's **growth metrics** stand at the absolute top of its peer group. It ranks 1 of 30 for 1-year **revenue growth** at 48.9%, 1 of 22 for year-over-year **EPS growth** at 997.6%, and 1 of 30 for **gross profit growth** at 165.0%, based on peer comparisons using the last-twelve-months (LTM) SEC statement contract. Its profitability is similarly dominant, ranking 1 of 29 for **operating margin** at 26.1% and 1 of 24 for **EBITDA margin** at 48.5%, both of which are peer-comparison figures under the LTM SEC statement contract. Additionally, the company ranks 2 of 29 for **net profit margin** at 22.8%, 2 of 29 for **return on equity** at 17.2%, and 2 of 29 for **return on assets** at 11.2%. Trailing valuation metrics are high, with a **trailing P/E ratio** of 140.9 ranking 4 of 29 (lower is better) and a **price-to-book (P/B) ratio** of 22.21 ranking 25 of 29 under the LTM SEC statement contract. Its **forward P/E** of 6.6 and **PEG ratio** of 0.15 are flagged as **consensus analyst estimates** and are not figures filed with the SEC.
Evaluating the company's own ten-year history reveals that despite these top-tier peer rankings, its current profitability sits in a **normal historical range.** Specifically, its gross profit margin, operating margin, net profit margin, EBITDA margin, return on equity, and return on assets are all currently roughly mid-range for its own ten-year history. Its free cash flow margin of 4.5% is also roughly mid-range for its own ten-year history, as is its return on invested capital (ROIC) of 14.7%, which is flagged as having no valid peer or model-specific benchmark active. This indicates that while the company is currently outperforming almost all of its peers, this level of performance represents a mid-range historical position for Micron itself rather than a permanent operational shift.
These dynamics contribute to an **Overall Score of 81 out of 100,** driven by a *Financial Health* score of 96 out of 100, a *Growth score* of 85 out of 100, and a lower *Valuation score of 48 out of 100*. There are no data-consistency flags. One card is missing a computable value, which is the Loss Ratio due to it being unavailable for non-insurers. The peer comparisons also reflect several outlier peers that ranked last because of negative fundamentals, including Intel (INTC), Silicon Laboratories (SLAB), MaxLinear (MXL), Semtech (SMTC), and Synaptics (SYNA) due to non-positive net income, alongside Wolfspeed (WOLF) due to non-positive EBITDA. What this quantitative data does not settle is the duration of the current semiconductor cycle, how sustainable the high-growth margins are over a multi-year horizon, and whether industry supply constraints will persist.
**For more details and whole analysis:** [**https://capitom.co/analysis/MU**](https://capitom.co/analysis/MU)