PARA
Parabolic Technologies, Inc. Class A Common Stock
stockNASDAQ

I think PARA will continue running through tomorrow. ER is on Monday. Volume continues to build everyday.

The Market Has Not Priced In Sexual Exposure Risk. Long $SER, Short Everyone's Marriage. I've been doing some extensive research (mostly against my will) and I've come to a conclusion that I believe the market is fundamentally mispricing one of the largest systemic risks in the global economy. Sex scandals. Hear me out. We spend countless hours analyzing P/E ratios, EBITDA, debt-to-equity, interest rates, inflation, geopolitical instability, and whether Jerome Powell is going to fuck us this month. But nobody is pricing in the fact that virtually every major institution in the economy is run by someone who apparently cannot keep their dick in their pants. I propose a new market indicator: Sexual Exposure Risk (SER). And I think we're long overdue. THE HISTORICAL DATA IS ACTUALLY INSANE Let's look at some historical case studies: \- McDonald's ($MCD): CEO Steve Easterbrook gets fired in 2019 for an inappropriate relationship with an employee. Turns out there were additional undisclosed relationships. The SEC eventually gets involved because he misled investors about the circumstances of his departure. Apparently even the Big Mac isn't the only thing getting double-stacked. \- CBS ($PARA): CEO Les Moonves resigns amid sexual misconduct allegations. The fallout eventually contributes to a $30.5 million settlement involving CBS, Moonves, and New York regulators over allegations involving misconduct, concealment, and misleading investors. Nothing says shareholder value like a corporate executive turning the boardroom into a casting couch. \- Barclays ($BCS): Former CEO Jes Staley's relationship with Jeffrey Epstein becomes a massive regulatory problem. The UK financial regulator finds that Staley misrepresented aspects of the relationship. The investigation documented TWO visits to Epstein Island. Apparently due diligence wasn't the only thing happening offshore. \- Astronomer: CEO Andy Byron gets caught on the Coldplay kiss cam embracing a woman widely identified as the company's HR chief. Resigns. Company goes from obscure enterprise software provider to the most Googled infidelity case in corporate America. Bullish on Coldplay, bearish on HR. \- Bill Clinton: President, commander-in-chief, and apparently unable to command his own Oval Office. The Lewinsky scandal leads to impeachment proceedings. Even the most powerful office in the country isn't immune to extracurricular activities. And then there's Epstein. An entire network of billionaires, politicians, financiers, executives, academics, and other influential people orbiting one of the most disturbing scandals in modern history. To be clear, appearing in Epstein's address book, emails, flight logs, or social circle does NOT establish criminal wrongdoing. But the sheer number of powerful people whose reputations, careers, or judgment have come under scrutiny demonstrates that personal relationships can become enormous institutional liabilities. THE INVESTMENT THESIS Here's where I think Wall Street is missing the bigger picture. Power is being wielded through sex at virtually every level of the economy. Corporate boardrooms. Political offices. Investment banks. Media companies. Technology firms. Government agencies. We have spent decades developing sophisticated models to quantify credit risk, liquidity risk, interest rate risk, and geopolitical risk. Yet apparently nobody thought to ask whether the CEO has a secret girlfriend, whether the CFO has a private island connection, or whether the chairman is one leaked text message away from becoming a documentary on Netflix. I believe this creates an enormous opportunity for investors. MY PROPOSED SER FRAMEWORK Every publicly traded company should be assigned a Sexual Exposure Risk rating: \- SER-1: CEO happily married, no known scandals. Probably lying. \- SER-2: Executives have questionable personal lives, but nothing material has surfaced. \- SER-3: Known affairs, workplace relationships, or questionable executive behavior. \- SER-4: Active investigations, lawsuits, settlements, or leaked communications. \- SER-5: Epstein-level exposure. Liquidate everything. Hire lawyers. Delete your browser history. I would also introduce a new volatility measurement: The Broad Market Exposure Index (BMEI). And yes, I'm intentionally using the word broad. Because I'm not just talking about the S&P 500 having exposure across a broad, wide range of industries. I'm talking about broads. Women. You know, broads. The broader the market, the greater the exposure. And I'm beginning to think that exposure to broads is one of the most overlooked systemic risks in modern finance. Diversification is important, but apparently you can diversify your portfolio across 500 companies and still end up holding 47 CEOs with questionable bedroom activities. Think about it: \-SPY? Broad exposure. \-QQQ? Broad exposure with a technology premium. \-IWM? Small-cap exposure, potentially small-cap judgment. \-VTI? Total market exposure. That's a LOT of broads. \-Diversification? Apparently spreading your exposure across 500 companies just means 500 different opportunities to get caught. MY FINAL CONCLUSION At this point, I think it's reasonable to assume that sexual misconduct, affairs, inappropriate workplace relationships, blackmail, and general executive horniness are material economic variables. We should be pricing this into every stock. Every earnings call should include a question about management's personal exposure. Every 10-K should have a section dedicated to undisclosed relationships. Every corporate board should have an Epstein contingency plan. And every investor should be asking themselves one simple question before buying a stock: Is this company fundamentally sound, or is its CEO just one leaked text message away from a 35% correction? Personally, I'm bullish on SER. The only thing I can confidently say is that I have absolutely no insider information on any of these activities. Mostly because nobody is having sex with me. I'm sitting here trying to manage a portfolio while my wife and her boyfriend won't even let me manage the bedroom. Positions: Long $SER. Short my marriage. Puts on my self-esteem.

I really and thought PARA was going to surprise us this afternoon - I guess not … :(

uried in this thing. On November 10, PARA said it paid down $11.6 million and eliminated all its secured debt. One lender filed its own paperwork confirming it got $5.07 million in cash. The company also lists Amazon and Dell as customers. How much did Amazon spend? No idea. The red underline under “Amazon” in the scr

Bring some volume back in to the low float PARA

Well PARA is officially done …

Loving these swings on PARA. Up nicely for the day already

Is it too late to get into PARA?

In PARA F it let’s go!

I think PARA has the potential for a nice big move today

Jumped in and out of PARA for a quick 25%.

Parabolic (PARA) Stock Casino Play

What do you think about investing in the stock being that is hit Rock bottom now. PARA just curious whether it’s worth investing in long-term? Being you can buy it for next to nothing right now. Feedback or concerns in buying the stock. What are your thoughts on it?