IQ
iQIYI, Inc.
stock NASDAQ ADR

Has anyone verified Musk's allegedly high IQ, or we just taking his word? He seems VERY...dull.

I think bots are interesting and it's interesting to see how they operate.
I hope someday your programmers upgrade you to emulate an IQ above 60.

Yup dude bought at 45$ and is crying now that its RC fault lol.
65 IQ is probaly to high.

Använd barnbidrag för att daytradea. 200 IQ.

Good morning fellow High IQ, cute, sexy and bullish Europeans

Symptoms of holding SPY puts include: fever, muscle aches, fatigue, vomiting, dry mouth, low testosterone, saltiness, pathetic whining, and low IQ.
If you have any of these symptoms, stay in your basement like you always do.

calm down. It could be a good trade. A dude with twice your IQ thinks so [https://x.com/CHItrader/status/2052422524445560988](https://x.com/CHItrader/status/2052422524445560988)

Wow man you’re one of those bottom 1% outlier cases when it comes to IQ huh? 
You’re really sitting here asking me to infer what board members, politicians and policy makers are thinking as if I’m a damn psychic or something 😂😂😂

No puts printed on the spy today I’m fine, I just find it comical you guys think AV and Shad have a combined IQ higher than room temp. They are an echo chamber of shit that doesn’t matter, they don’t read filings they read a headline and base their whole opinion off that, they aren’t professional, & they are paid promo for industry companies for example wtf would you have a link to MSOS or YOLO or CannaFund?? While also having those guest on?
I wouldn’t be surprised if Dan Aherns didn’t create or “fund” TDR to help with liquidity within the sector to help make cash swaps easier to create.

Yay - The current eBay owners also get to be run by a company who isn't making an operational profit and who's stock is down 40% in 5 years with massive dilution over that time....meanwhile eBay is operationally profitable and their stock is at all time highs being up 75% (with no dilution) over the same timeframe.
Makes sense, - if you're a complete and utter moron with a room temp IQ.

did you know the avg iranian is like objectively way smarter than the avg american, and its prob like 20x if u did some kinda GDP per IQ or something lol

If there is any escalation it will never be announced, threats, talks, deadlines are all single digit IQ noise.
You will read about the attacks after it happened.

Wow, the average IQ of this thread went up a few points in the past 2 hours.
# Weird.

Half the population has an IQ lower than average.
Makes for a good market!

The moron unironically posts on Wallstreetbets - poor guy is working with a single digit IQ. Probably blames women for why he squandered away his college tuition on weed stocks. 

It it indicative of IQ and thus the value of your opinion.

So for many things that look impressive it is mimicking.

But with IQ 80 they can comprehend much more than people think, but most people do not use Opus and they use a model of IQ 20 let's say. So, they are not Enstein because they are impressive, but their logic is much more advanced to what people believe. They can keep together a big amount of instructions and understand many nuances of them at the same time. This is where you see the difference between a 20b and a 1000b parameter model.
If you ask, make me this recipe, you may understand no difference. If you ask turn the light on if dark, again 20b will be sufficient. But if you want it to keep up with multiple and nuanced instructions then the 1000b will do the work and 20b will fail.

Good points. They don't have real comprehension as you would from human logic. They mimic logic via pattern recognition. Though this is good for, like you said, low IQ stuff like "If dark, turn on lights".
The wild card here is what if 5 years from now, they gain real comprehension via a new architecture? Or turning the question around, what is the chance that 10 years later, there's no breakthrough in architecture? Assume high change of breakthrough, all those stuff listed by OC above is at play.
On your point on compute, it seems 50:50 to me. There could be more efficient compute (Google small Gemma4-e2b models are really good) or most requests are so similar they are cached (which favors big boys like Google).

I would say that LLMs hold a blurry knowledge of almost everything and can act as parrots of a person that knows everything and mimic it. However they also have some pure logical ability let's say of IQ 80.
So, in many setups you do not use them for the knowledge they have, but for this basic logic. They cannot run a whole factory yet, but they can create software that build the workflows. Then if you put those limited workflows and orchestrate them (also big organizations work like this), the amount of cogintive labour you can achieve is mind blowing.
About 1% of people that have understood this and building on this are responsible for 50% of usage that others cannot even understand how it can work. This through the next years will expand, and easily we have a 10x to 100x in computational needs from the current level. I do not think that people get this yet. Inference will be a few trillion to a few dozens of trillions of compute a year.
With ups and downs this will be a mega cycle that will make semiconductors as big as energy in the next 5-10 years. Many doublings of semiconductor revenue are ahead. Semiconductor companies will become the biggest companies in the world in terms of revenue, earnings and market cap in the next 5-10 years. Plenty room for growth ahead.

I just visited the cultist sub, and I think I lost IQ. Never again. Puts it is.