Create Account
Log In
Dark
chart
exchange
Premium
Terminal
Screener
Stocks
Crypto
Forex
Trends
Depth
Close
Check out our API

IQ
iQIYI, Inc.
stock NASDAQ ADR

At Close
Jul 17, 2026 3:59:48 PM EDT
1.21USD-2.823%(-0.03)8,020,866
0.00Bid   0.00Ask   0.00Spread
Pre-market
Jul 17, 2026 9:28:30 AM EDT
1.19USD-4.032%(-0.05)5,493
After-hours
Jul 17, 2026 4:41:30 PM EDT
1.20USD-0.390%(0.00)439,134
OverviewOption ChainMax PainOptionsHistoricalExchange VolumeDark Pool LevelsDark Pool PrintsExchangesShort VolumeShort Interest - DailyShort InterestBorrow Fee (CTB)Failure to Deliver (FTD)ShortsTrendsNewsTrends
IQ Reddit Mentions
Subreddits
Limit Labels     

We have sentiment values and mention counts going back to 2017. The complete data set is available via the API.
Take me to the API
IQ Specific Mentions
As of Jul 19, 2026 3:38:21 AM EDT (1 min. ago)
Includes all comments and posts. Mentions per user per ticker capped at one per hour.
1 hr ago • u/AlfredCromwell • r/quantfinance • do_i_have_to_be_a_genius_to_break_into_quant • C
Maybe take a psychologist-administered IQ test. It will give you a good idea whether quant is realistic or if you're wasting your time.
I would consider "smart but not genius" anyone with IQ 130–140. In this range, it's possible, but very difficult as you'll be competing with IQ 150+ people who have been training for this path since childhood.
sentiment -0.41
3 hr ago • u/98127028 • r/quantfinance • do_i_have_to_be_a_genius_to_break_into_quant • C
I mean it does appear to be the case that prodigy level performance (like USAMO placements etc) and, by presumption, a high IQ, is somewhat of an at least ‘small’ requirement. It’s not full on IQ, but someone with mediocre IQ and talent, who could not reach USAMO level ability despite years of practice due to lack of out of box thinking and raw insight (that higher IQ people tend to naturally have, and can use it to qualify USAMO or more with much less effort), therefore breaking into quant would be basically out of the picture. It’s not really about the Olympiads themselves, but rather what it reveals about me (my lacklustre innate ability) that is really the final straw.
sentiment 0.81
5 hr ago • u/TylerDurdenEsq • r/stocks • my_dad_just_put_100k_into_spacex_should_i_be • C
Wouldn’t take long to conclude: low IQ
sentiment -0.27
8 hr ago • u/WrexyWrex • r/wallstreetbets • weekend_discussion_thread_for_the_weekend_of_july • C
Low IQ 👆
sentiment -0.21
12 hr ago • u/sparkysprinkles11 • r/wallstreetbets • us_corporate_insiders_are_selling_stocks_at_a • C
What about the rest of us with an IQ of 130?
sentiment 0.00
14 hr ago • u/Medical-Lecture-6053 • r/wallstreetbets • us_corporate_insiders_are_selling_stocks_at_a • C
the answer is 3 times, a regard sees a pattern happen after 2 times but isn't confident in it to act on it, then they wait and see it happen 3 times and then they got their confirmation this is a pattern i can make money from! Then when they go to trade the pattern the 4th time the market does the opposite more often then not. the only person who makes money is 0 IQ who doesn't see the pattern at all or the 150 IQ who sees the pattern on top of the pattern and anticipates the mean reversion. the 100 IQ who thinks they are smart and clever with their analysis are actually the true Regard who maximizes the loss.
sentiment 0.81
17 hr ago • u/SuffiecientSapian • r/wallstreetbets • welp_thats_my_life_screwed_up_forever • C
Now this is VERY retarded and the answer was 0DTE lmao peak low IQ. Thank you I was able to finish to this
sentiment 0.15
18 hr ago • u/Interesting_You6852 • r/WallStreetbetsELITE • i_a_maga_voter_on_medicare_is_coughing_up_blood • C
And trust me they would vote for him again and in the midterms they will all mindlessly go to the poles and vote for who ever orange turd tells them too
There is a psychological reason why people (especially males) who have no income or romantic prospects gravitate to the alt right. They have low IQ most of the time and they need someone to tell them what to do this is why they all dress the same!!
sentiment -0.16
1 day ago • u/taffy_laffy • r/wallstreetbets • weekend_discussion_thread_for_the_weekend_of_july • C
I hated being rich anyway. Too much to lose.
Better to be poor and have nothing because then no one can take anything from you.
Big brain IQ.
sentiment -0.38
1 day ago • u/Affectionate-Cat6644 • r/IndianStockMarket • nifty_has_failed_to_beat_fd_since_oct_2021_peak • C
Low IQ BS post
sentiment -0.27
1 day ago • u/Own-Recipe5908 • r/wallstreetbets • weekend_discussion_thread_for_the_weekend_of_july • C
They are the dumbest motherfuckers on the planet. These are the people who say 'datacenter in space gud cause cold'. The average IQ in a WSB thread is higher. The people who actually know shit are the ones programming the algos and even that's questionable.
sentiment -0.84
1 day ago • u/AHarmles • r/unusual_whales • trump_threatens_to_increase_tariffs_on_canada • C
Lowest IQ administration ever.
sentiment -0.38
1 day ago • u/MonkeyHustler943 • r/wallstreetbets • f_this_im_done • C
You are “investing” with your IQ as a time horizon
sentiment 0.00
1 day ago • u/_Thermalflask • r/gme_meltdown • i_am_surprised_this_is_still_up_with_100_votes • C
"IQ filters" lol
It's true, after every failed catalyst the average ape IQ went down maybe 5-10. At some point we crossed into the negatives, not sure exactly when.
sentiment 0.02
1 day ago • u/PaperHandsTheDip • r/wallstreetbets • weekend_discussion_thread_for_the_weekend_of_july • C
You don't want that bro, I'm regarded. Your IQ is already higher than mine, unless you want to be dumb dumb.
sentiment -0.76
2 days ago • u/RedOctobrrr • r/Superstonk • louder_for_the_shills_screaming_dilution • C
>He said point blank that it will be accretive.
JuSt BeCaUsE hE sAiD iT's AcCrEtiVe DoEsN't MeAn iT aCtUaLLy iS~~~
Completely ignoring everything RC describes as to why he feels confident it's accretive. And when you mention that fact?
He DoEsN't GeT tO dEciDe iF iT's AcCrEtiVe~~~
Some serious room temperature IQ interactions with these Negative Nancy types.
sentiment -0.58
2 days ago • u/Wolvshammy • r/pennystocks • zacks_article_on_eltp_preceded_2600_gain • C
This is not only slop, I feel like your prompt is missing for a reason. This is pure garbage. The CEO DID put money in to the company. More money than anybody else. Where the fuck you think those warrants came from? Where you think the shares came from? He forfeited his salary and got paid in shares. He LENT a company getting manipulated $2 million dollars cash…you don’t own a company. You have no idea the stones it takes to do that.
You specifically asked it to look at my posts, too. That’s fucking weird.
Institutions own 500 shares….LOLOLOLOL bruh, REALLY?!?! Institutional money is precluded from even investing in OTC. That you weren’t EMBARRASSED to post something this stupid either highlights your IQ level or the malicious intent.
Nice hidden posts/comments. 🤡
sentiment -0.91
2 days ago • u/MuricaF_ckYeah • r/Finanzen • wir_haben_unsere_katzen_effektiv_kostenlos_vom • C
Bring jetzt bloß nicht keine 500 IQ Rechnung durcheinander
sentiment 0.00
2 days ago • u/Affectionate_Hat_308 • r/quantfinance • can_anyone_become_a_quant • C
Ultimately it’s all about screening, going to good universities, having good internships, past projects, imo medals or whatever else everyone repeats on loop in this subreddit. All of it means precisely jack shit past screening.
That being said it doesn’t matter what IQ you have, or how much time you devote to learning. If you don’t have a highly quantitative education from a top university you don’t get past screening and dont even get a shot to show off what you have learnt. End of discussion
sentiment 0.67
2 days ago • u/Wolfdemon187 • r/FluentInFinance • the_chinese_exclusion_act_was_openly_racist • C
I love the look IQ rage bait,
The first major federal legislation to explicitly suspend immigration for a specific nationality. It banned Chinese laborers from entering the U.S. for 10 years and prohibited Chinese residents from naturalizing as American citizens.
Labor Ban: The act prohibited both skilled and unskilled Chinese laborers, though specific classes like merchants, students, and diplomats were exempted.
It was only enacted for 10 years in a timeline that none of us were alive in, shall we look at bans on Caucasians going to other countries?
sentiment -0.49


Share
About
Pricing
Policies
Markets
API
Info
tz UTC-4
Connect with us
ChartExchange Email
ChartExchange on Discord
ChartExchange on X
ChartExchange on Reddit
ChartExchange on GitHub
ChartExchange on YouTube
© 2020 - 2026 ChartExchange LLC