IQ
iQIYI, Inc.
stock NASDAQ ADR

We do have the IQ for tech. Semiconductors are on of our best exports.
And it is the government's job to help investors. That's why they try to set up favorable conditions for investors like the PEZA zones in Clark and other places

Get a new husband. One with a higher IQ.

Nah we do have the IQ for tech. What we lack is the salary to justify to stay here locally.

Easy said than done. We don't have the IQ for tech. Investing is not the job of leaders/Gov't, it is the role of private citizens.

Still waiting for a valid argument with data or stats. But you’ve got nothing apart from the low IQ “these guys must just hate Trump” horseshit. Carry on. 

A mistake every smart person makes. That’s why Buffett says if you have 160 IQ, give 30 points back, you don’t need them.

The US has always been the "global police" like the British Empire before them, and the French Empire before that...
History books have sanitized what those governments did so we could tell children that the good guys always win, but 10 minutes online and an IQ above 70, and money-addicted lunatics with no regards for human life describes them better than "police".

So someone posts it here, then someone goes on X to post it there, then someone screenshots it to post it here. WTF are we doing, guys? Nobody knows what RC is up to. LC is 10x the IQ of the average ape, and HE DOESN'T EVEN KNOW WHAT LEVEL OF CHESS RC IS UP TO (hint: it's 69D chess).

AI bros worrying about VIKI wiping out humanity while America gives the nuclear codes and control of the world's largest military to a real estate developer with a sub 80 IQ.

they're saying my IQ is somewhere between 300 and 400

Negative IQ more like

trade embargo on spain is bullish.
my IQ is slightly below room temp, but i have no idea whats is positive news or negative news anymore.
luckily my portfolio says living past 40 is a bad idea.

It's in IQ trends 10 to watch. I looked at the financials and I don't really see why it's been getting so beat up. 5% dividend, 40 years of dividend growth, battered stock with what looks like strong financials to me, I bought a few shares today.

Answer my question. Don’t expend your limited IQ to create unnecessary details in a hypothetical question, save it for important tasks in your life.

This is such a single digit IQ comment, I don't even no where to start and won't even bother since you've read nothing, none of the due diligence, or anything about GPS. It's just completely ignorance, intentionally being ignorant.
You can bring a horse to the water but you can't make it drink the water.
I'll probably get some flack for saying this, but it's mind-blowing the amount of people that are going to miss out on accumulating sizeable positions of such an asymmetric opportunity, with insane margin of safety (for what BAT has to be for the trial to fail, which is beyond 18 median overall survival, and the clinical/biological cap in this patient population is 6 to 12 median overall survival), with 5.5X to 32X upside from current share prices at $5.00, simply due to the fact that they don't read or look through any of the due diligence.

Autonomous motor vehicles are a completely different thing (and value proposition) than what you describe. Once we change the layout of the field - insert "moving the goalposts here" - then we have to at least consider that we are talking about something completely different than the goal(s).
Whether certain forms of driver assistance are worthwhile to certain people....is really dependent on two things. First, do some people even want it? Secondly, is it at least par in safety.
I find myself turning off most driver assistance features. But if I did 80% highway miles and a lot of them. Adaptive Cruise control would be my most appreciated of the basic group.
The entire premise of Motor Vehicles is that most of us - whether our IQ is 85 or 125, can get in one and drive it. The UIs are pretty damn good.
Even so, a technologist such as myself...I end up owning cars for a decade in which I don't even learn the very basics of their "extra" features such as Voice controls and so-on. Not worth my time to even learn them....(of course I use CarPlay that way).
I'd be amazed if even a tiny percentage of buyers used - for example - all the little Toyota apps...unless forced into it by the sales person and not understanding that they don't need it.
The Chicken and Egg problem is very foundational to autonomous driving. The dream - saving 10's of thousands (millions, worldwide) of lives and suffering....requires that all vehicle on the road are autonomous.
It's all speculation but my thinking is that IF we had truly perfected low cost autonomous driving, a government would set in motion a plan to replace all light vehicles within 6 years or so. The value would be there to do so.

https://preview.redd.it/req9prgkvumg1.jpeg?width=1320&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=20cfef3927dcd4c8c9a05110c81327e24b5c53ed
Really makes me want to petition for some law preventing pol talk with an IQ less than 60

Buying calls and puts should really have a IQ test before purchase, I would’ve saved so much money by now

Low IQ muricans calling Canada and Greenland 51st states, when they themselves are Israel’s dogs. LMAOO

Im guessing the IQ might be low too from low badger 9430