IQ
iQIYI, Inc.
stock NASDAQ ADR

The IQ has to be below room temperature to be brain washed enough to vote for this clown. Hitler wasn't that obviously stupid.

👆 low IQ animal

Not my point, you don't need 150 IQ to be a quant, you do need to be smart but not that much of an outlier.

Not really, IQ 150+ is the top 0.05%, which still amounts to millions of people across the world.

My favourite creators nowadays are quant guys because it’s fascinating how much they IQ mog me

300 IQ kid.

> To be fair, you have to have a very high IQ to understand GME play.

Eventually even mid range IQ Americans will figure out who pays the tariffs. Hopefully by the mid terms.

Your comparison is nowhere near the same as warrants that are already in place and woefully out of reach for both holders and the company to profit. There’s true upside to extending something already in place.
And to answer your embarrassingly low IQ question, an immediate downside to buying back 2bn worth of shares tomorrow would be that it’s completely against the law, the securities law 10b-18 would prevent anything more than 25% of the daily average volume during this VWAP period be up for purchase by GME. Does that help you out?

Nope, that's a ridiculously high percentile, bar is certainly lower than that. I suggest you focus on sth other than IQ with that post history.

Yes. the simple one, that anyone with an IQ above room temperature can understand, that you compete in with 95% of the global population. Those are for you. Yes.
We are not you. You are you.
If you understand why GME is a good investment, GME is for you. If you do not understand why GME is a good investment, GME is not for you.
You do not understand why it is a good investment, therefor it is not for you.
We agree with you on this. The only point we disagree on is that we are like you. We are not like you. You are not like us.

If you have a room temperature IQ then yes we are all winning incredibly bigly right now

for whatever reason, the braindead losers who try to forget their micro penis Problem seem to think that whatever stock or etf they made money on is proving gme is bad. it doesn't.
a play that is over being over while one that is still ongoing, not being over, is a simple concept that bashers keep failing to understand.
gme is a great stock and if you can't understand why, you're probably just too stupid to understand it.
yes, the price is down. someone with an IQ of 70 can see that. why that doesn't matter and why the stock is good, even if simple plays, uneducated retail gamblers would not take it, are incapable of understanding it.
we told you in 2021 that it was a high risk, non traditional play that no one should take, unless they know what they are doing.
you thinking you know what you do, was you overestimating your skills, not is being wrong...

bears really got a IQ of 50

I'm building a US merger-arbitrage backtest and the strategy itself is turning out to be much easier than building a clean historical deal database.
I need public targets with:
`announcement date | target | acquirer | offer price | cash/stock | revisions | completed/failed | terminal date`
The critical requirements are **failed deals** and point-in-time terms. Using only completed/resolved acquisitions obviously contaminates the backtest.
I built an SEC EDGAR pipeline using 8-K/EX-99/25-NSE/Form 15 filings, but correctly distinguishing completion, termination and target/acquirer-side filings is a lot harder than it first appears.
Before I keep reinventing SDC: has anyone here done this?
What did you use — LSEG/SDC, FactSet, Capital IQ, PitchBook, WRDS, SEC, another API, academic replication data?
Particularly interested in anything accessible to an individual researcher rather than a large institution.

\>outrageous price target
\>timing pop of bubble that's half a decade or more away
\>IQ below 60

1. Stick with low cost index funds
2. Never use an financial advisor who takes a percentage to do what any living person with an IQ above room temp could do.
3. Stay away from trading options.

Yeah sure. Trading is just this low IQ profession anyone can do if they just had money they aren't attached to.
Tell me you know nothing about trading without telling me you know nothing about trading.

He absolutely is low IQ and I think it's hilarious that people rag on him so much as he's probably the most relatable billionaire. It's like if you took some autist in this thread and gave them a billion dollars

I'm 95 IQ