IQ
iQIYI, Inc.
stock NASDAQ ADR

IQ test for you muhfuckers: How can two identical twin brothers look nothing alike?
Answer: They are twins of other brothers, and the family has 2 sets of identical twin brothers.
Deal with it!

Meh. People lose money all the time.
Only mentally and emotionally unstable people, who over leveraged themselves on a meme stock gamble, can’t walk away.
Besides, it’s clearly not people upset about being down who are engaging. Those people wouldn’t downvote those of us still buying. Because if there is any chance anyone will recoup any of their loses on this stock it’s because of is few true apes who are still dca’ing and staying positive.
No one is dumb enough to be down 90% and think, you know what I’m gonna do all day, every day? I’m gonna spend time and effort making sure this 90% goes even lower!
So, anyone with a hint of rational thought can see what’s happening here. It’s a plain jane misinformation campaign!
Spread fud, foment division, and sow the seeds of a disgruntled shareholder base to scare off any potential buyers.
It’s pretty cut and paste if your IQ is above room temperature.

Don't worry, 🥭 said high gas prices is good for you so just enjoy it. Remember what to do come midterms so we finally have a leash on that low IQ demented orange dog

They are low IQ and will act like the terrorists that they are against their neighbors. They've already destroyed vital infrastructure in other oil producing nations. Major damage has already been done, and we haven't seen the result of that damage play out without these lame intervention attempts, and discounting future damage as well. The price action in the coming week won't last long.

Based on prior posts I’ve seen in here, aren’t you like mega hold and have benefitted from a great few decades of bull runs? Fine, I’ll admit there is a niche subset of room temp or above IQ people buying puts as a hedge.

She’s obviously not very informed about Gold not to say anything about her IQ

Why is CMU a good target when only 100 cs kids from their school is worth recruiting for, and the rest are mediocre students who couldn't get in anywhere else better (like Berkeley or UMich?). If I was a quant firm, I'd go to Berkeley, look at some cs kids, turn around to their math and physics department, and still end up with plenty of qualified individuals.
That being said, I personally don't believe the brand of your school carries that much weight for quant stuff. They care more about your raw IQ/skills, which is better reflected in how well you do in math/CS competitions, rather then how well you gamed admissions as a high schooler. I'd suggest any true quant Believers to grind putnam if they want a shot.

You sound like the most stereotypical low IQ political retard who think there's only 2 sides, they're both dog shit btw. Oh yeah gas supply chain will forgot the strait where majority of the oil is imported from, good one you inbred dumb piece of shit

"You might be particularly retarded, because you have a 160 IQ". -Dr. Alex Karp

I don’t like reading a professor narrative without real long term background in various enterprise dark realities. He brings LED and Kodak as if complexity/IQ level problems are similar to real life use cases. Did he consider disaster recovery, remediation, all hands on deck, best-worst case scenario actions, choosing between 2 evils. How about programming without thorough quality assurance (not just testing coverage)? How about integration bugs? For human we design many what-ifs scenarios, while AI did not encounter them, even if it does/did, it is not portable like a repeatable pattern. Seriously when do we stop believing scientists which try to pivot into enterprise practitioners guru? They are not operational nor human-aware

i know very few people who got "rich" because of Talent, IQ, or hard work.
usually it was inherited, like in 95% of cases, actually. going from 1 million to 2 is so much easier than from 100k to 200k: basically just keep your house in shape, it doubles in value over 10-20 years. is there a possible way to have 10+ in capital and \*not\* profit more than the average, without being retarded?!
Statistics approve of this thesis. As a billionaire, your portfolio grows magnitudes faster than the average. The number of billionaires grows, while the number of poor grows. ever more divided gap.
Some of the brightest minds i know are just living on ordinary salaries, while working very hard.
We are in a Tech-Feudalism and Peasants in Feudalism do not become Kings. If they have a genius idea the Kings will buy it or it depends fully on the kings infrastructure, long before the Peasant is close to becoming a king.

That's his IQ

My advice would be to take the $20k and go outside and light in on fire. If you're trying to turn $20k into $100k in a few months you either have an IQ under 50, are a degenerate gambler or are making this all up to get a reaction. If a person could turn $20k into $100k every 5 years there would be no one left working because everyone would be doing it. Just a ridiculous and unserious post.

Trump can use his exceptional IQ to get out of the messed up situation he got himself into.
Maybe he should recite to himself, Person, woman, man, camera, TV…

Peak low IQ moment right here folks

You should be banned for having too an high IQ for this subreddit.

This quote must hit hard if your IQ is 70 and below.

This is exactly it. Then you get people afterwards trying to invent a rationale for it.
This is post hoc rationalization of the actions of a low IQ, corrupt regime. They aren't 4D cheesing Gyna, lol.

It’s ok I meant the post only for those who tested over 25 for their IQ

The whole setup is wrong because "predicting the future" is not a brainpower problem. If that were even remotely true, IQ would be directly related to winnings in the stock market, but we have 170-IQ people with two PhDs who cannot beat the S&P 500.
Predicting the market is most of the time either insider information or luck; or both. The real "wild" deltas represent a minimal fraction of the people who beat the market.