IQ
iQIYI, Inc.
stock NASDAQ ADR

Snowflakes who have no tolerance for dialectic. Anytime you meet anyone in life who is convinced there is only their way or the highway, you know you've found a very low IQ peep. They have like the same 20 people that post there and bots that inflate their upvotes to make themselves feel important. There whole point of existence is anti-bogle and EVERY post is exactly the same. So not only are they intolerant, but they also never change the subject so it never evolves beyond a circle jerk (where you are even grabbing your own).

Das sagt es aber auch beim niedrigsten IQ 😃

Dieses Meme, dass bei hohem IQ sagt: 100% FTSE All-World

Just keep buying to keep everything green. 200 IQ

Silly goose if you think govt decides how companies develop and India doesnt have domestic buying power, then explain to me why Infosys TCS and Wipro have invest 1-1.5 Billion dollars each for the last 2 years in AI research? Why they buying foreign AI startups recently?
According to your high IQ take, they are just wasting all that money right? Surely this is Indian govt fault and not the IT companies being retarded and not taking measures on time according to market trend... in 2017 Infosys removed SIkka for suggesting AI investment, now they do it anyway in 2026. Must be Govt fault too lol

Low IQ people believe everything they hear.

Fake rotation into software. IQ test if you fall for it

IQ literally doesn’t matter you have to understand you’re not solving cancer at a quant firm lol. Most of you will be execution monkeys for like the first 2 years lol

Quant firms don’t care about your leetcode and your IQ is mid. You started thinking too late if you’re asking this now lol try getting into faang equivalent first and you’ll need to probably grind like a monkey to have a serious shot.

IQ don't mean shit. I have 130+ and it's of no use.

Whatever 1 below my IQ is the barrier, anything less than that and you should just become a crash test dummy.

Efficient market hypothesis is for those lacking in the IQ department. In the very first step of investigating the theory you will come to the conclusion that it is not logically or even theoretically possible.
As for backtests, it is our strongest tool for finding ways to profit, but the method itself is weak. Take note that every single day has a different pattern of price, even if slightly, yet we now aim to use previous days to predict future days.

Part of the issue is that factors that moved price yesterday do not show up on price history, so part of the solution is finding the missing pieces that will move price tomorrow. That does not invalidate backtesting, just means you should be aware of its limitations.
Good luck.

Low IQ people are the only one who is recruited by UPSC mate. They don't have brain to run the administration. There brain are only good for remembering dates & history lol

Are you this new to investing or lower IQ? All but his new media company is privately owned. As far as what stocks he owns yea I guarantee we have some of the same but I’ve never checked what he holds, I just dont care that much.

I think the word you’re looking for is Anti-BJP. We live in a “democracy” where you’re labelled anti nationalist for speaking about the problems in our country.
But dont worry i dont expect low IQ individuals like yourself to understand

how low is your IQ? to not know the kind of supply chain optimizations required for cold chain logistics?

Who is actually smarter - Paul who prefers stocks over ETFs and overthinks and overanalyzes everything and who is so confident that he thinks in the long term he can select the right stocks at the right time and sell them at the right time,
or Daniel, who knows that always selecting the right stocks in the long term is very hard even for high IQ people, so he prefers to just buy a world index fund.

Its often said that smarter people are bad at investing (Paul), but is Paul really the smarter one? After all, he fails to think further, he fails that his plan is pretty naive and that an EFT would probably be better for him in the long term.

Ignore the downvotes. The reddit discourse about space data centers is extremely low IQ. It's full of people with surface level knowledge.
Like looking at ISS as an example is extremely misleading, since an AI satellite would operate at a far higher temperature (likely using GPUs specifically designed to run hotter), which dramatically reduces the amount of radiator mass you need.

Hey man, I appreciate the dialogue and back and forth. By no means am I an expert in the area. If I'm getting something wrong, I want it to be called out so I can learn, too. That said, I'm going to go bullet by bullet with my thoughts.
Re: Margin. Absolutely, as you said, Bloom gets 25-30% margins because they manufacture proprietary tech. There is no debating that. Fluence is at 12% or so solely from their hardware. But the market is still missing that Fluence's margin expansion is actually coming from their software. I mentioned this in a previous reply - they are on track to hit $180M in ARR this year from Fluence IQ. Even if they settle as a 15% blended margin business, paying 1x forward sales for a company growing top-line revenue at 50% year-over-year is pretty insane in this market.
Re: MSAs, you are right that MSAs aren't firm purchase orders. That said, the hyperscaler MSAs are actually not in the $5.6B backlog. That $5.6B is firm, contracted utility and developer revenue. The hyperscaler deals are entirely incremental upside, and Fluence guided in their latest ER that the initial purchase orders from those orders will appear in their Q3 report.
Re: Siemens, I’d agree with you if Siemens got rid of all their shares. They sold 20 million shares but retained 41 million. As you alluded to, this was most likely Siemens AG and their trust taking a liquidity cut after holding for more than 3 years. IMO, you don't hold nearly a quarter of a company’s entire equity if you think the pipeline is broken.
Re: cash burn, they aren't bleeding cash anymore. They have $900M in liquidity and just reaffirmed $40M-$60M in positive adjusted EBITDA for this year in their ER. Because their revenue is heavily back weighted, the catalyst is really Q3 and Q4. IMO, when they print positive EBITDA and announce the first hyperscaler POs this summer, the cash-burning narrative will be done and dusted.
I always lean more bullish with my PTs, and it's not always about the company or stock itself, but rather the sector and other external factors at play. Energy is having a moment right now (Bloom being the perfect example), and while some of the float has changed hands here, it hasn't actually changed structurally. FLNC was above $32 in February at a time when I'd argue it was far less of a "sure" thing than it is right now. Again, just my thoughts.

yeah higher IQ peeps make more money than low IQ peeps