DJT
Trump Media & Technology Group Corp. Common Stock
stock NASDAQ

AGREE TO A DEAL YOU FUCKIN BASTARDS!!! - DJT

100% DJT

>Your bearish setup is perfect and suddenly Reuters drops news that Iran and the U.S. are in negotiations and the market moves suddenly against you. Did you get in way too early?
>Your bullish setup is perfect and suddenly DJT tweets something that makes the market worry and the market suddenly moves against you. Again, did you get in way too early?
>How do you model for random events if you're only using historical data (charts) which contain no random events because by definition they've all occurred. 
You're trading news, my dude??? Why??? When??? Hooow???
Profitable traders are trading the action on the charts. We care about buys and sells, and the relationship between the two. I couldn't care less about the economy, interest rates, wars, etc. when it comes to trading.
>How do you know the max possible in real-time?
Not in real time. After the dust settles. You look back and see "ah, that went twice as far, I closed too soon." This is basic stuff available for anyone to use.
>This actually happened to me yesterday; I was in a trade and I accurately predicted the ending price of the trade and the exit *however* thanks to something called volatility the trade went against me enough to stop me out so the path dependent nature of the trade is actually meaningful. It doesn't matter that I could have made several thousand dollars on the trade because I got removed from it before that happened. I moved my stop to a point where I didn't lose money though just for safety because of that thing called volatility. And with historical knowledge I would have stopped out at my loss point as well across the trade so I was better off with microprofit unless I removed my stop entirely.
>Do I "stink" for having used stop losses?
>Do I "stink" for not having taken the profits I could have prior to the volatility change?
>Do I "stink" because I was right about the price target but not the path almost 2 hours later?
I don't know why Mr. Statistics is giving me 1 scenario. I thought you work with stats. When did stats care about a single data point?
It's for you to decide what's enough data points. But one you look back and see patterns of closing too soon, managing poorly, etc. how could you not look to improve those things?
>In fact if I did take the max profit at the time prior to the change you could *still* say I "stink" by not knowing that 2 hours later I could have made more if I just took my stop loss off and held. You'd have a perfectly valid historical argument saying that my stop loss of 25% was "too tight" and needed to be almost 40% (38% to be more exact) for it to work out.
I don't think you understand very well how to set and take targets, is my feeling, but I could be mistaken.
>When you look at historical data you're not going to go back and confirm every single point that moved against you was not just random noise. In 8 weeks you won't look at 9/24 and remember the Reuter's article. You may in fact, because of the scalar size of the chart, and even the interval of the chart, miss it. If this is the case how do you know when it's "you" or when it's "the world"? How will you know the difference between "I made a poor decision" and "something actually happened"?
Again, you're talking about lala land and how it's because of them, the market, the news, the rumour, the CEO, that you took a loss. You're trading words. I trade price. I don't care what DJT says, or if a CEO gets fired - if money moves out and I can capitalise, I'm short. If money rotates in, I'm long. I don't know why you're so fixated on words so much. We work with numbers in trading.
>it's really easy to make money *on* randomness
I'm sure you can trade in your sleep, but for the rest of us randomness produces deadly consequences.
>If you're not performing a 100% fidelity check of every trade, pass or fail, meaning that you look for everything including random news events and the possibility that someone knows something you don't or knew it earlier than you did and moved on it, you've got dead data.
Okay, I thought you were in lala land. I've no idea in what universe you're in now.
You're telling people to consider everything including random news events and everybody's 2 cents on what things are and what they're going to do.
I bet you that's something that you don't do. You can't do. Put a whole team on it and they couldn't do it. Do you see what you wrote? How could someone possible include EVERYTHING there is to know about every single trade? I think you care more about winning an argument than actually talking real life.
There is data that matters, data that does not matter. You think news or what happens with the economy, the org. you're trading, or anything else is not heard by anyone other than you? Don't you think people that trade against you already have all that data + more you could never get your hands on. They're better informed, more educated, more of them, more funded, etc.
The biggest reason not to pay any attention to anything other than price is that all that data is already factored into the price. Again, if you know it, you can bet your backside they know it too. And they probably know much more. And they're most certainly spending millions every month to collect data you or I could never due to the shear funds it takes to run that data collection + deciphering it to make an educated decision.
There's also something traders use where if we can use less resources to get the bulk of the results, that is what we do, because that is most times better than to use all possible resources to try to get the all of the result.
It's like if you worked 2 hours to make $10,000 trading. But to make an additional $2,000 you'd have to work an additional 5 hours. It's not logical to go for the whole pie when the cost of doing business is so high.
I use stats every day. I review every trade. I know if my entries were poor, how close or far they were from the perfect entry. For every trade. Same for stops - how wide, good, or poor they were. Same for management. I track my management, plus sever others so I know when it's time to use a hammer and when it's time to use a wrench.
1. You're not doing what you're saying above. You're talking out of your backside, guaranteed. No 100,000 people organisation would be able to gather and analyse ALL data, for every trade, ever, let alone little old you.
2. You're advocating for people to look at stuff that does not matter. That's straight up malice. Not only will it not help them, it will prevent them from being profitable.
3. You're trying to mix 2 things that seem to work well together that work okay-ish together as long as the main task is not drowned by the noise of the 2nd. And clearly, using your approach leaves you absolutely no time to trade, since you have to collect ALL data EVER.
C'mon. Nice theory. Keep it real.
Feel free to provide an example for one, only one for your trades, where you went out and collected ALL data. Please send us the address of the data center where you've stored ALL that data. smh

>Great attempt at flaunting your "expertise". Keep working on those graphs.
Actually you're a great case study as to why traders fail.
>I'm sorry that it's hard for you to look at a chart, see that you got in way too early, and not realise that perhaps you should work on that.
Your bearish setup is perfect and suddenly Reuters drops news that Iran and the U.S. are in negotiations and the market moves suddenly against you. Did you get in way too early?
Your bullish setup is perfect and suddenly DJT tweets something that makes the market worry and the market suddenly moves against you. Again, did you get in way too early?
How do you model for random events if you're only using historical data (charts) which contain no random events because by definition they've all occurred. So when you say this:
>You're not making money, you stink. You're capturing very little of of the max possible amount you could've made, you stink.
I see it as completely backwards. How do you know the max possible in real-time?
This actually happened to me yesterday; I was in a trade and I accurately predicted the ending price of the trade and the exit *however* thanks to something called volatility the trade went against me enough to stop me out so the path dependent nature of the trade is actually meaningful. It doesn't matter that I could have made several thousand dollars on the trade because I got removed from it before that happened. I moved my stop to a point where I didn't lose money though just for safety because of that thing called volatility. And with historical knowledge I would have stopped out at my loss point as well across the trade so I was better off with microprofit **unless** I removed my stop entirely.
Do I "stink" for having used stop losses?
Do I "stink" for not having taken the profits I could have prior to the volatility change?
Do I "stink" because I was right about the price target **but not the path almost 2 hours later**?
In fact if I did take the max profit at the time prior to the change you could *still* say I "stink" by not knowing that 2 hours later I could have made more if I just took my stop loss off and held. You'd have a perfectly valid historical argument saying that my stop loss of 25% was "too tight" and needed to be almost **40%** (38% to be more exact) for it to work out.
Side note:
>A basic understanding is more than sufficient. + There's "a right answer"? As in one? ... You can't possibly be profitable having such a flawed understanding of trading.
Yes, there is one answer to a confidence interval problem, which you clearly don't know what that is. That is basic statistics. It's a level 0 concept.
==============================================
Here's the big picture for people who care. When you look at historical data you're **not** going to go back and confirm every single point that moved against you was not just random noise. In 8 weeks you won't look at 9/24 and remember the Reuter's article. You may in fact, because of the scalar size of the chart, and even the interval of the chart, miss it. If this is the case how do you know when it's "you" or when it's "the world"? How will you know the difference between "I made a poor decision" and "something actually happened"?
This also doesn't consider the fact that your winning trades may also have been affected by random events you couldn't foresee. Ironically you may have actually had a bad entry on yesterday in a long position for example but then the Reuters news comes out and saves you. You'll **never** assess if your own winning trades are down to luck as well. So you're starting with half a picture, solving half a problem, and ignoring well over 75% of the signal itself because historical data does not tell you anything about the future.
Bottom line is that trading logs aren't useless but the weight they should have on your trading is about 30% at most and it's really easy to make money *on* randomness rather than despite it. If you're not performing a 100% fidelity check of every trade, pass or fail, meaning that you look for everything including random news events and the possibility that someone knows something you don't or knew it earlier than you did and moved on it, you've got dead data.

**Breaking News:** DJT has just announced he will be sending PJ Masks to finish the job in Iran.

Damn DJT is making bond yield great again

<< A big day with President Xi of China. Super Intelligence (SI) will be a big topic of discussion, but I want to leave it exactly where it is. That is China’s position also. Our guardrail is the DOJ! President DJT >>

I met President Xi at the plane (Airport!) yesterday and he looks strong, vibrant, and fit - Better than ever. Madam Xi, of course, BEAUTIFUL! President DJT

SPYI generates ROC dividend which means no taxes for about 9 years. After that it is qualified dividends.
GPIX also generates ROC dividend but lower yeild so it ia tax free for about 10 years. And after that it is qualified.
The no tax period of these fund means during that time your taxable income is much lower than your actual income so you get more ACA subsidies .this is assuming we have any ACA in the next 2 years. if DJT has his way there may not be any ACA next year.

DJT. Bet on Trump using govt money to bring it back up

You checkers players don't understand DJT is playing with kids.

DJT -95%, WLFI -95%, TRUMP -98%

Are your initials DJT? Bro wants to nuke everything

UN action and geopolitical news is getting investors nervous. Not to get political but if you heard DJT you would be nervous too. It was insane

I managed to fuck everyone. I win.
Thank you for your attention to this matter. DJT.

Business genius btw. Inflation? What's that? Lower rates to 1% IMMEDIATELY. DJT Truth Social

I think it's something the elderly do these days. My dad ends every text message with "Love, Dad", and while I want to tell him he doesn't have to do that, I'll take "Love, Dad" over "President DJT" any day. Plus it's kinda sweet.

Trump already Taco’ed on this one he cannot get potash anywhere else but Canada although we should not sell any to the USA right now. Carney needs to tell DJT to pound sand.

For DJT that is working.