APOP
Cellect Biotechnology Ltd.
stock NASDAQ

My man, I have spent the past 25 years working in datacenters for critical systems (telecommunications, emergency services, hospitals). I know I know what I'm talking about because I do it every single day, at scale, whereas you seem to be making up BS as you go.
>if you think there’s a whole Data Center cannot blow up and for the customers to be OK
First, it depends entirely on the datacenter. The fact you don't know that would seem to indicate you're talking out of your ass. If it's a collocation facility, or carrier neutral facility, or APOP, the equipment inside of it is owned by the customers, not the datacenter. You're assuming everything is a "cloud" which is a dumb, ignorant assumption to make. And even if it is a cloud, that doesn't mean anything is replicated unless customers have very specifically opted to have data replicated, which is a monetized feature they add to their account. Further, buried in the cloud owner's TOS is almost certainly a weasel clause ("force majeure") that exempts them in the case of war or natural disaster or other events outside of their control.
Second, as I mentioned, data does not magically exist multiple places in datacenters without purposely created cross-site replication. It is not the default. Customers must pay for it in advance. It is expensive and adds latency that may or may not be acceptable for a given use case. Not every company is willing to suffer the costs. If it is destroyed and hasn't been replicated, it doesn't magically just appear elsewhere unless that was the state beforehand. That's just not how data replication works.
Third, simply moving the data to another location does not mean that all of the equipment needed to process that data is magically available at the other location. There are worldwide supply constraints on equipment like GPUs, tensor units, etc. If 10,000 of them get destroyed with a datacenter, it doesn't matter that you have another copy of the data, you likely don't have the processing capacity to do much with it.
You are out of your depth and confidently wrong.
>You can argue it all you want, but that’s a really stupid fucking argument
Every comment you've made here seems to suggest "really stupid" is something you're well acquainted with.

My man, I have spent the past 25 years working in datacenters for critical systems (telecommunications, emergency services, hospitals). I know I know what I'm talking about because I do it every single day, at scale, whereas you seem to be making up BS as you go.
>if you think there’s a whole Data Center cannot blow up and for the customers to be OK
First, it depends entirely on the datacenter. The fact you don't know that would seem to indicate you're talking out of your ass. If it's a collocation facility, or carrier neutral facility, or APOP, the equipment inside of it is owned by the customers, not the datacenter. You're assuming everything is a "cloud" which is a dumb, ignorant assumption to make. And even if it is a cloud, that doesn't mean anything is replicated unless customers have very specifically opted to have data replicated, which is a monetized feature they add to their account. Further, buried in the cloud owner's TOS is almost certainly a weasel clause ("force majeure") that exempts them in the case of war or natural disaster or other events outside of their control.
Second, as I mentioned, data does not magically exist multiple places in datacenters without purposely created cross-site replication. It is not the default. Customers must pay for it in advance. It is expensive and adds latency that may or may not be acceptable for a given use case. Not every company is willing to suffer the costs. If it is destroyed and hasn't been replicated, it doesn't magically just appear elsewhere unless that was the state beforehand. That's just not how data replication works.
Third, simply moving the data to another location does not mean that all of the equipment needed to process that data is magically available at the other location. There are worldwide supply constraints on equipment like GPUs, tensor units, etc. If 10,000 of them get destroyed with a datacenter, it doesn't matter that you have another copy of the data, you likely don't have the processing capacity to do much with it.
You are out of your depth and confidently wrong.
>You can argue it all you want, but that’s a really stupid fucking argument
Every comment you've made here seems to suggest "really stupid" is something you're well acquainted with.