SOLUSDT
Solana / Tether USD
crypto Composite

Turns out your Solana wallet is probably sitting on free SOL — here's how to get it.

$SOL auction rotation shows sellers distributing inside value between 104.879 and 106.196.
🔽 Short setup
📍 Entry: 105.040
🛑 Stop: 106.045 (+1.0%)
🎯 TP1: 103.031 (-1.9%)
🎯 TP2: 102.026 (-2.9%)
⚖️ Half off at TP1 → stop to entry
\#Solana #AuctionTheory

SOL, LINK, HYPE and SUI would be my starting watchlist. not saying they’re going to moon, but at least there are actual catalysts to research

Don't know about moon, but I'm holding SOL and AVAX which are trending in a bullish direction. Both are seeing institutional adoption which will help drive prices higher.
As always, invest at your own risk and never use money you can't afford to lose. Always some bad news away from things turning bearish.

Aurus has launched its Solana wallet aimed at frequent traders.
It charges a flat 0.001 SOL fee on every swap, regardless of size.
Real-time price alerts and a built-in terminal allow quick buys from launchpads while keeping private keys on the user’s device.
The team behind Atlas3 ([Blocksmith Labs](https://x.com/BlocksmithLabs)) developed the app.
[https://x.com/aurus/status/2094827630361297199](https://x.com/aurus/status/2094827630361297199)

**1 - Promotion is NOT allowed on r/solana.**
This includes Telegram groups, Discord servers, NFT projects, token sales, IDOs, referral links, meme coins, bundler/volume bots, etc.
**As such, your post has been removed.**
There are other subreddits **not affiliated with Solana** that serve this purpose, such as r/SolCoins or r/SolanaMemeCoins — **use them at your own risk.**
**2 - Your post is NOT relevant to the Solana subreddit.**
If your content focuses on a broader Web3 topic, please post it in a more suitable crypto subreddit.
**3 - Duplicate content.**
Your post is a duplicate of an existing link or discussion.
**4 - Begging for crypto.**
Requests for SOL or other tokens to cover fees are not allowed.
**Thank you for your understanding.**

comments here are kind of disgusting
i really think if going to look at alts in crypto, need to look at large caps that generate a lot of revenue, and importantly the revenue gets captured into the value of the token.
there really isn't many coins that fit this category, which makes things actually quite simple, yet people will twist themselves into intellectual pretzels coming up with reasons to bid vaporware instead.
HYPE, PUMP, LIT.
profitable stocks on NASDAQ w/ strong crypto exposure - HOOD & PURR
save yourself a lot of time and money and just deeply research these. otherwise you're better off with just BTC, ETH or SOL man.

You don't stake jitosol. It's already staked. It's staked SOL in liquid form. Increases in value against SOL every time staking rewards are distributed. Just open a chart comparing the two assets. Up only.

I've had a wallet for a bit but hasn't gotten much use. (Its at 0.00 rn) and would love if someone would be comfortable to help a newbie by sending any amount of $SOL for me to start because in my situation its a bit complicated to start investing and actually playing and learning with crypto.
If you read till here and want to help me with any amount my SOL adress is:
7efhSWszgVqbPhgTEzVQGRYaC3efMSfgoEE7QvYsFEWA

Good coin too. It doesn't need to be one or the other, 2 coins can coexist and both succeed. For example, we have different L1s like BNB, ETH and SOL doing well.

Oh no what did I drop here! I hope no one sends me some SOL, that would be terrible.

Everyone says SOL is cheaper than Arbitrum. Here’s why Robinhood picked the “expensive” route.

>Go read the TOS. Having handed out the credentials—ever—is a violation and could arguably remove their obligation to compensate you for a loss.
And that's not going to hold up that if you gave out a credential years ago that isn't even valid that it absolves them of a promise to cover losses from unauthorized access to a current account. Probably why I've not heard of it happening.
>I’m not saying you should go change brokerages over this
That's OP's question is should they use multiple brokerages.
>If you’ve used services like that in the past, or still use a service like that today which isn’t using tokenized credentials, you have voided the sticker on the warranty and should at least be aware that your bank or brokerage has a pretty big amount of wiggle room with which to offload liability onto you.
I've never seen something like this hold up where it's an invalid credential from years ago and real money is on the line.
>The odds they use something like this as an excuse to get out of paying goes up with the dollar amounts involved
And that's called bad faith and it voids parts of contracts when it appears one-sided or misleading.
>If Plaid or Yodlee has an old backup with still-active credentials
So we're not talking still-active. We're talking about what I said above, where if you change your login then the one they have isn't valid.
>You still might be SOL, or at least have an uphill legal battle.
That's a "might" so big it's not worth entertaining.

Of course BTC. But also ETH and SOL. Wildcard SUI and ONDO

Well I support as many as I could, digital dollars are digital dollars. ETH, SOL and ADA have the biggest vocal communities.

Aside from Bitcoin and ether, SOL and Link

10k BTC, 7k ETH and 3k SOL 🙂

50% NEAR - 50% SOL
As soon as you double your money (on either), take profit and move it over into BTC - Rinse and repeat.

• Not financial advice :)

Head-Road8869, Proud-Canary-2269 is right, but the interesting part is how badly, and that number is knowable.
Put the edge and the noise on the same scale. Over a 4-hour window SOL moves on the order of 2% standard deviation. A genuinely good discretionary trader's edge over a coin flip is, generously, a fraction of a percent of expected return per trade. So the signal-to-noise ratio on a single trade is somewhere around 0.05 to 0.1. To separate that from zero at t = 2 you need roughly (2 / 0.075) squared trades, which is several hundred to a couple of thousand. One is not a small sample, it is three orders of magnitude short. (Envelope arithmetic, not a measurement of your specific setup, but the conclusion does not depend on getting those inputs exactly right.)
The consequence for the leaderboard is the bit worth internalising: with a hundred entrants and one trade each, the winner is whoever caught the largest favourable move. If five of the hundred have real skill, the chance the winner is one of them is barely above 5%. You would crown almost exactly the same person if you replaced every entrant with a coin.
Two design problems on top of the sample size.
Everyone shares one market. If SOL runs 5% up over the window, every long wins and every short loses, and your ranking measures the day's direction, not anybody's decisions. Fix: score P&L minus the return of simply holding the instrument across the same window. That removes the common factor and leaves the part attributable to entry, exit and direction, which is what you said you wanted to measure.
Your tiebreak is dead letter. With continuous prices, exact P&L ties do not happen. And "closed earlier wins" quietly rewards taking less exposure, which is a real preference, but you are expressing it in a rule that will never fire.
None of this means the one-trade format is wrong. It means one ROUND is wrong. Run the same format daily against the same field and rank on the mean across many rounds, and the arithmetic above starts working for you instead of against you.
And the test that tells you whether any of it is working: enter some bots that flip a coin, and do not tell anyone which ones they are. At the end of the season, look at where they finished. If they are scattered through the table rather than clustered at the bottom, the competition is measuring luck and the scoring needs work. If real traders are consistently above them, you have built something. That check costs nothing and almost nobody runs it.

SOL here for sure