Create Account
Log In
Dark
chart
exchange
Premium
Terminal
Screener
Stocks
Crypto
Forex
Trends
Depth
Close
Check out our API

ONEUSD
Harmony / United States dollar
crypto Composite

Real-time
Jan 1, 2026 11:32:34 PM EST
0.004030USD+17.288%(+0.000594)876,022ONE3,332USD
0.003927Bid   0.003945Ask   0.000018Spread
OverviewHistoricalDepthTrendsNewsTrends
Composite
0.004030
OKX
0.004030
Binance.US
0.003990
ONE Reddit Mentions
Subreddits
Limit Labels     

We have sentiment values and mention counts going back to 2017. The complete data set is available via the API.
Take me to the API
ONE Specific Mentions
As of Jan 2, 2026 1:05:02 AM EST (<1 min. ago)
Includes all comments and posts. Mentions per user per ticker capped at one per hour.
2 hr ago • u/vatai • r/Bitcoin • we_are_still_so_early • C
And I'm sorry, but you're also VERY wrong on this:
\> the higher your chances of guessing the correct string, yes. This helps secure the network against attacks.
This = having a higher chance of guessing = having more compute IN ONE PLACE actually makes it less secure, i.e. if you'd control a mine which has the compute capacity larger than the rest of the compute on the network, you'd have full control of everything that happens on the blockchain, which is the exact opposite of secure.
Security comes from btc being distributed (among independent parties) and verification being O(1) compared to the (super?)-exponential cost of finding a valid hash.
sentiment 0.96
2 hr ago • u/EntrepreneurDue420 • r/Bitcoin • which_is_the_best_broker_for_daily_dca_trading • C
CB ADVANCED OR ONE.
sentiment 0.41
4 hr ago • u/katrav86 • r/wallstreetbets • what_are_your_moves_tomorrow_january_02_2026 • C
That just means that there was at least ONE buyer and seller who agreed upon selling at least one share at $200. -- which means exactly nothing on a time scale more than one second without volume
sentiment 0.51
5 hr ago • u/dumbest-bastard • r/wallstreetbets • what_are_your_moves_tomorrow_january_02_2026 • C
ONE WAY OUT!
sentiment 0.00
6 hr ago • u/According-Tip-457 • r/options • 1m_to_2_million_in_2025_in_options_only • C
No real trader is exposing their edge, what kind of question is this? lol
So yeah... all those discords, and signal chats, are obvious BS. Obvious. No one is sharing their edge, NO ONE.
sentiment 0.12
6 hr ago • u/Minimum-Escape2245 • r/EducatedInvesting • trump_auctions_speed_painting_of_jesus_by_artist • C
It's absolutely bananas. My parents were ballers and that whole world is just one big scramble to hide your dollars and make sure NO ONE ELSE CAN HAS THEMS! NEVAH! Fucking psychos. They're all miserable and insanely, INSANELY negative. Unhappy people.
![gif](giphy|GAQLdJFgOyY9i)
sentiment -0.92
7 hr ago • u/willyhun • r/Revolut • account_closing_after_appeal_with_investments_and • C
>With the right *words*, you may ask a full report from their AML. With that in hand, you could find what trigger the flag, the red *ONE.*
You won't have any answer. It is prohibited by law.
sentiment 0.85
7 hr ago • u/hannahnowxyz • r/WallStreetbetsELITE • whats_going_on_with_sellas_life_sciences_sls • DD • B
https://preview.redd.it/w21b9cuontag1.png?width=1189&format=png&auto=webp&s=125e037f86dc2ea72da9e49facb7667c5872354e
🚨 SMALLCAP BIOTECH WITH 20 MILLION VOLUME EVERY DAY THIS WEEK 🚨
🚨 >500% COST TO BORROW AND NEGATIVE FREE FLOAT 🚨
[Sellas Life Sciences](https://web.archive.org/web/20250802224119/https://s203.q4cdn.com/139585304/files/doc_presentations/2025/Jul/31/Sellas-Corporate-Overview-August-2025.pdf) is a clinical-stage biopharma company advancing novel oncology drugs for WT1 and CDK9, which are both high-value and high-need targets. Currently, Sellas is focused on acute myeloid leukemia (AML), which is the most common acute leukemia in adults and has a 5-year survival of less than 30% across all ages, but it should be noted that both their drugs have high potential for expansion across a wide range of cancers.
🔬 DRUG PIPELINE 🧪
Their lead candidate drug is galinpepimut-S (GPS), a partially synthetic peptide vaccine targeting WT1. GPS is licensed from Memorial Sloan Kettering and is currently in a phase 3 trial ([NCT04229979](https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04229979), codename REGAL).
Their second candidate drug is SLS009, a small-molecule inhibitor targeting CDK9. SLS009 is licensed from GenFleet Therapeutics and has received FDA guidance for advancement into a front-line phase 2 trial in early 2026. It looks likely that accelerated approval will be a viable path for SLS009.
👨‍🔬 SCIENCE TLDR FOR REGARDED APES 🧠❌
By conventional wisdom, biotech plays are high-risk and high-reward. Either a drug works or it doesn't, and most of them fail. But in the case of the REGAL trial, we have access to OVERWHELMING evidence that GPS is working. And not just working, but working better than anyone could have imagined. Better than any cancer vaccine in history.
In 2020, AlphaFold became humanity's best solution to the protein folding problem. In 2024, Demis Hassabis, the CEO of Google DeepMind, won the Nobel Prize in Chemistry for this breakthrough achievement. This is the same technology used to create GPS. There is a protein called Wilms Tumor 1 (WT1), which happens to be highly expressed in AML cancer cells, and which otherwise does basically nothing. This makes it the perfect marker to tell cancer cells apart from healthy ones. GPS teaches your immune system how to recognize these cancer cells better than nature has been able to achieve. So then, what is REGAL's chance of success?
📊 THE DATA WE HAVE 🧩
The most important thing to understand is that REGAL is an event-driven trial with a primary endpoint of overall survival. That means that the final data analysis will be done after 80 of the 126 enrolled patients have passed away. There are two groups in the trial, the control group (who receive best-available-therapy, also known as BAT), and the treatment group (GPS). Another thing you need to understand is that the BAT treatment in this patient population is really, really bad, with a median survival of about 8 months max. And it has severe toxic effects, so it's barely better than doing nothing. There is no FDA-approved maintenance therapy for AML patients in second complete remission (CR2), and most unfortunately relapse. Meanwhile, GPS has reported toxic effects of... injection site irritation... in other words, absolutely NOTHING.
This creates a very interesting situation, where the continuation of the trial itself has become evidence that GPS is extending the patients' lives. It's the only explanation that makes sense.
The timeline:
1. The trial completed enrollment in April 2024.
2. An [interim analysis](https://ir.sellaslifesciences.com/news/News-Details/2025/SELLAS-Life-Sciences-Announces-Positive-Outcome-of-Interim-Analysis-for-its-Pivotal-Phase-3-REGAL-Trial-of-GPS-in-Acute-Myeloid-Leukemia) was done in December 2024, after 60 events. That's about HALF of the patients dying within 8 months, as a most conservative estimate.
3. Finally, we got [another update](https://ir.sellaslifesciences.com/news/News-Details/2025/SELLAS-Life-Sciences-Provides-Update-on-Pivotal-Phase-3-REGAL-Trial-of-Galinpepimut-S-GPS-in-Acute-Myeloid-Leukemia-AML) on Monday. The number of events as of December 2025, one year later, is only 72.
Let me say that again:
THE RATE OF ALL PATIENT DEATHS DROPPED BY 87% AFTER HALF HAD ALREADY DIED.
🧩 Hmm, I wonder what could have caused that? Would you care to guess what the immune response rate was at interim analysis (the percent of patients who responded to treatment)? It was 80% 🤯. These numbers speak for themselves. The success of previous trials is replaying right before our eyes.
[Previous trial data: https:\/\/pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov\/articles\/PMC4617516](https://preview.redd.it/0uqulvyintag1.png?width=1157&format=png&auto=webp&s=22a71020c995441855ad7818cc7ec3cfedf2668d)
It has become IMPOSSIBLE to ignore this growing evidence, to the great despair of short sellers who are now trapped in a nightmare situation. They just got caught shorting what appears to be a MIRACLE cancer treatment. Not only for AML, but potentially ANY cancer which uses WT1 to survive. How many cancers is that? The National Cancer Institute identified WT1 as the [NUMBER ONE](https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3286174) target out of 75 known cancer antigens. Uh oh, they got caught shorting the next Keytruda! 😬😬😬 And not to forget, of course, that $SLS has ANOTHER miracle drug in their back pocket, just in case.
"So it is clear now that the median overall survival for the whole group of patients that are enrolled in the REGAL study, it will be more than 2.5 years. So this is really, really important. And you will allow me to say that I'm totally convinced that this is not due to the best available treatment because we know Professor Omer Jamy said before that if you use ven/aza in the setting of CR2 as maintenance, then I mean, the median overall survival is just a few months."
>\- [Dr. Panagiotis Tsirigotis](https://youtu.be/nCtrZavKCuM?t=2837),
Professor of Hematology,
National University of Athens School of Medicine,
REGAL trial investigator.
Dr. Tsirigotis has enrolled the greatest number of patients in REGAL out of anyone involved. He would know better than anyone.
After hours, days, months trying to find reasons REGAL could fail, I have nothing. I've burned so many LLM tokens that the models have told me to stop running autistic simulations and touch grass. The update on Monday was the nail in the coffin. What is the bear thesis? THERE IS LITERALLY NONE 🧸❌.
🚨 RETAIL OWNS THE STOCK 🚨
🖕 FUCK CANCER 🖕
sentiment 0.94
8 hr ago • u/Such_Sector_2375 • r/Trading • the_1_rule_saved_my_trading_heres_how_i_actually • C
If you buy options, make sure to buy ONE contract per trade. Try to end each transaction with one contract, too. Typically, you can collect 30-50 dollars per contract, at which time you must absolutely close your position, or you're gonna see quick reversal and loss. Yup, you can lose 100 dollars on a single contract if you just watch your contract get cheaper and hope for a recovery.
This is why you should venture to buy 2 contracts - ideally in the range of 200-300 dollars per such contract - ONLY IF you have more than 50k in your account. Until you get there, trade one contract and gain the skills you need and an immense amount of trades you can take as long as you buy one contract. Each contract is a premium you pay for learning how to trade, so paying minimal fee is ideal for gaining valuable many years of trading. Otherwise, you'll be like those who make 50k per one day and then post (or most likely NOT) their disastrous loss and seek mental health.
sentiment 0.93
8 hr ago • u/SaaSGrass • r/wallstreetbets • what_are_your_moves_tomorrow_january_02_2026 • C
IMAGINE BEING A NORTHERNER WITH ONE OF THOSE GOD AWFUL YANK ACCENTS.
AND EVERYONE THERE IS CALLOUS AND RUDE TO EACH OTHER BECAUSE THEIR LIVES SUCK
LMAO 👌👌
sentiment 0.82
8 hr ago • u/fistfucker07 • r/CryptoCurrency • ripple_will_unlock_1_billion_xrp_tomorrow • C
Yeah. Sorry for making YOU be ACCURATE. Because NO ONE GIVES A SHIT that the tokens are coming out of escrow. That’s literally the point. If ripple held them all, you’d complain they hold them all. If they sold them all, You’d complain they sold them all too fast. If they let the entire market know exactly what they’re doing, SOMEHOW they have still done the wrong thing in your eyes.
Tell me you’re an uneducated paid bot without telling me you’re a bot.
sentiment -0.80
9 hr ago • u/Dry_Structure_6879 • r/Daytrading • complete_level_2_trading_guide • Advice • B
# Complete Level 2 Trading Guide
# Table of Contents
1. Prerequisites
2. Understanding Level 2 Data
3. Why Stocks Move: Supply and Demand Mechanics
4. Time and Sales (The Tape)
5. Reading Level 2 Like a Professional
6. Common Mistakes to Avoid
7. Market Structure Differences
8. Risk Management
9. Advanced Concepts
10. Real-World Applications
# 1. Prerequisites
**Required Knowledge:** You should be familiar with basic trading terminology:
· Bullish, bearish, bid, ask
· Long, short positions
· Order types (limit, market, stop orders)
**Why This Guide Uses Technical Terms:** Trading terminology ensures clarity and prevents misinterpretation among traders. If you encounter an unfamiliar term, a quick online search will provide the definition. In the age of AI and internet access, you can verify terms instantly rather than relying on a glossary.
# 2. Understanding Level 2 Data
# What is Level 2?
**Definition:** Level 2 is a market data feed that provides more information than Level 1 data. Instead of showing only the best bid and best ask, Level 2 displays the full list of existing orders for a stock, including how many shares are available at each price level.
**What Level 2 Shows:**
· Where traders are placing their limit orders
· The complete queue of buyers and sellers waiting to execute
· How many shares people are willing to buy or sell at specific prices
· A deeper view of supply (sell orders) and demand (buy orders)
# Importance of Complete Level 2 Data
**Critical Point:** Each exchange provides its own Level 2 data. To see all significant orders and price levels, you need data from **all relevant exchanges**—missing even one exchange could hide large orders that significantly affect price action.
**Complete Level 2 Requires Data From:**
· NYSE, NASDAQ, ARCA, BATS/CBOE, IEX, and 10+ other venues
**Practical Implication:** Ensure your broker/platform provides Level 2 data from ALL exchanges. Professional platforms aggregate all exchanges.
**How to Verify:** Your Level 2 window should show exchange codes next to each order (NSDQ, ARCA, BATS, etc.).
 
**Major Exchanges to Monitor:**
· NYSE
· NASDAQ
· ARCA
· BATS/CBOE
· IEX
· Plus 10+ other venues
**When purchasing market data, ensure you have Level 2 access for all major exchanges where the stock trades.** Only buying Level 2 from one exchange is insufficient and will give you an incomplete picture.
# Level 2 Visualization Tools
**Common Terminology:** When traders refer to "Level 2," they usually mean the visual representation of the Level 2 data feed. The most commonly used tool is called the **market depth window** or **order book**.
**Alternative Visualization Tools:**
· Market depth window (most common)
· Bookmap (Level 2 heatmap)
· DOM (Depth of Market)
· Level 2 chart indicators (like those in NinjaTrader)
Each tool has advantages and disadvantages. This guide focuses on the market depth window because it displays the most comprehensive data, ensuring nothing is missed.
**Market Depth Window Layout:**
· **Left column:** All limit buy orders at different price levels (the top order is the "best bid," also shown in Level 1 data)
· **Right column:** All limit sell orders at different price levels (the top order is the "best ask")
· **Color coding:** Groups orders at the same price level for easier visualization of buyer/seller concentration
# What Level 2 Actually Shows
**Important Limitation:** Level 2, regardless of which visualization tool you use, only shows where people **intend** to buy and sell, not whether trades have actually occurred.
**Key Distinction:**
· **Level 2** = Passive liquidity (orders placed but not yet executed)
· **Time and Sales (Tape)** = Active liquidity (actual real-time executions)
**Level 2 doesn't move the market**—it only displays current orders waiting to be filled. It's a snapshot of intentions, not executions.
**Critical Understanding:** Level 2 alone is helpful only for gauging potential support and resistance. For actual market reading and understanding market depth, **Level 2 is basically useless without the tape (Time and Sales)**, which shows real-time executions.
# 3. Why Stocks Move: Supply and Demand Mechanics
# The Fundamental Principle
**Everything comes down to basic economic supply and demand.** The chart is merely a visual representation. The tape shows where the big money is—who is buying and who is selling. The market is simply a game between buyers and sellers.
# How Price Movement Really Works
**Breaking Above Resistance:** A stock breaks above resistance because buyers rush in to purchase the stock above the resistance point. Without willing buyers stepping in above that level, there is no breakout.
**Bouncing Off Support:** A stock bounces off support because selling ceases and buyers take control, buying all the shares sellers have to offer at the support level. If buyers don't step in, there is no bounce.
**Failed Breakouts:** A stock fails a breakout if there are no willing buyers stepping in above the breakout level. The absence of demand prevents upward movement.
**Breaking Support:** A stock will not hold or bounce at support if buyers don't step in and buy. Without demand absorption, support breaks.
**Core Principle:** All the moves you are looking to catch are ultimately the result of supply and demand—the balance between buyers and sellers.
# Price Movement Mechanics
**Single Price Move:** Occurs when active liquidity on one side fully consumes the opposing side's passive liquidity at that price level.
**Trend Formation:** Forms when this process repeats, with one side consistently removing the other side's passive liquidity while the opposing side does not reciprocate.
**Passive Liquidity Impact:**
· **Thicker layers:** Slow price movement because it takes more active liquidity to remove opposing passive orders
· **Thinner layers:** Make price more sensitive because less active liquidity is needed to remove opposing passive orders
# Trading Application
**When Going Long:**
· Look for strong market buys (green prints on the tape)
· Check that passive liquidity on the ask side is thin (makes it easier for buyers to move price)
· Thick opposing liquidity can slow movement, but if your side's active liquidity is even larger, price can still move
**When Going Short:**
· Look for strong market sells (red prints on the tape)
· Check that passive liquidity on the bid side is thin
**Best-Case Scenario:** Lots of active orders in your favor and small passive liquidity on the opposing side. This maximizes the chance that price moves in your direction immediately.
**Reality:** Even with substantial opposing passive liquidity, strong enough active orders can push through and move price. What matters most is the balance of active liquidity versus passive liquidity at each level.
# Tape Reading Application
**Observe These Elements:**
1. How aggressive orders (market buys/sells) are printing
2. How the passive side reacts—is it getting absorbed quickly, holding, or replenishing?
This analysis tells you whether your side is likely to move price before you enter.
# 4. Time and Sales (The Tape)
# What is Time and Sales?
**Definition:** Time and Sales is a tool used in addition to Level 2, commonly referred to as "the tape." It shows actual executed orders in real time across all exchanges—nothing can be hidden. All executed trades appear as individual prints (horizontal rows).
**Information Displayed:** Each row displays (depending on activated columns):
· Price
· Size
· Exchange
· Execution details
· Color-coded by aggressor side
# Understanding the Aggressor
**Definition:** The "aggressor" means the side that crossed the spread—in other words, who actively forced the trade.
**Color Coding:**
· **Green print:** Someone bought from someone passively selling at the ask (buyer is aggressor, "lifting the ask")
· **Red print:** Someone sold to someone passively offering to buy at the bid (seller is aggressor, "hitting the bid")
· **White print:** Order executed between the bid and ask (not a market order)
**Trading Software Example:** If you place a market buy order:
1. Your order matches with someone passively selling at the ask
2. You are the aggressor (actively buying from a passive seller)
3. Your order shows as a print on the Time and Sales tape
4. The passive order on Level 2 that filled your buy disappears
# Important Terminology
**Common Terms Used by Traders:**
· **Hitting the bid:** Pressing market sell and selling to a passive buyer on the bid
· **Lifting the ask:** Pressing market buy and buying actively from a passive seller on the ask
While this terminology isn't critical for your own trading, it's useful when talking to or learning from other traders.
# What You Need to Know
**For Your Trading:**
· People who press market buy → Green prints on tape
· People who press market sell → Red prints on tape
· People whose orders execute between bid and ask → White prints
**Interpretation:**
· **Green prints = Bullish** (show active buying demand)
· **Red prints = Bearish** (show active selling supply)
· **White prints = Neutral**
**Why This Matters:** It shows actual, real-time commitment—who is actively in control, not just intent. This is your confirmation.
# Reading the Tape
**Three Scenarios:**
**1. Strong Tape (Bullish):**
· Majority of prints are green
· More green than red means more people are buying
· Green prints occur when orders fill at the ask
· Supply is being bought up and disappearing due to strong demand
· **Result:** Buyers in control
**2. Weak Tape (Bearish):**
· More prints are red than green
· More red than green means people are selling to buyers
· Demand is decreasing
· **Result:** Sellers in control
**3. Neutral Tape:**
· Roughly equal green and red prints
· Balance between buyers and sellers
· **This is how the tape appears most of the time**
**Key Insight:** The tape is predictable and repeatable, showing who controls the market in real time and forming consistent patterns.
# Advanced Tape Features
**Especially Aggressive Behavior:** Some programs highlight extremely aggressive participants:
**Sellers Below Bid (Extremely Bearish):**
· Willing to accept worse (lower) price than current bid to sell faster
· Shown with red background and white text
· Indicates particularly strong bearish pressure
**Buyers Above Ask (Extremely Eager):**
· Willing to pay more than the current lowest selling price
· Shown with green background
· Indicates particularly strong bullish pressure
# Why One Print Per Trade
**Common Question:** Why doesn't the tape show two prints for one trade (one for buyer, one for seller)?
**Answer:**
· It shows one print, labeled by who was the aggressor
· The exchange matches one order at a time
· One match = one trade = one print
· Both buyer and seller are included in that print
· The print is colored based on the active side only
**Example:**
· If someone hits the bid → red print (seller aggressive, buyer passive)
· If someone lifts the ask → green print (buyer aggressive, seller passive)
# 5. Reading Level 2 Like a Professional
# First Step: Check the Spread
**What is the Spread?** The spread is the difference between the highest price you can sell (bid) and the lowest price you can buy (ask).
**Why Spread Matters:**
**Example of Large Spread (Bad):**
· Ask = $10.00
· Bid = $9.50
· If you buy at $10.00, you must wait for price to rise above $10.00 to profit
· Price must move from $9.50 all the way to above $10.00
· That's 50 cents of movement just to break even
**Small Spread (Better):**
Takes less price movement for you to be in profit

**When Spreads Should Prevent Entry:**
**For Scalpers:**
· If spread > 5 cents, don't trade
· Your edge is destroyed by spread alone
· **Tight spreads = easier, faster profits**
# Critical Mistakes to Avoid
# Mistake #1: Over-Reading Level 2 and Time and Sales
**Reality:** Most of the time, Level 2 is just noise.
**When Level 2 Actually Matters:** Only at important price areas you identify with the chart:
· Support and resistance levels (for potential breakouts)
· VWAP (Volume Weighted Average Price)
· High of day / Low of day
· Pre-market highs/lows
· Pullbacks or any other chart pattern relevant to your strategy
**Key Principle:** Use chart levels first. Level 2 is for confirmation, never the primary reason for a trade.
# Mistake #2: Focusing on First-Row Imbalance
**What Beginners Are Taught:** Focus on the first-row imbalance in the order book and enter only when bid size is larger than ask size in that first row.
**The Reality:** Once you look at actual Level 2 and the tape, you'll see numbers flashing and first-row sizes changing every millisecond. Most of it is noise:
· Orders are canceled faster than humans can react
· Algorithms spoof, test, and probe
· Market makers constantly rebalance their inventory
**The Trap:** Beginners often think:
· "Resistance = more ask orders (ask-side imbalance)"
· "Support = more bid orders (bid-side imbalance)"
**Why This is Wrong:**
· Large visible orders often disappear
· Market makers fake size to trap traders
· Level 2 data can be manipulated
· Strong moves usually happen when liquidity is pulled, not when it sits there
# What NOT to Focus On
· Which side is larger
· First-row size alone
· Millisecond imbalances (these don't equal real pressure)
# What You SHOULD Focus On
**Behavior and Interaction:**
When beginners see Level 2, they unconsciously assume the order book shows real supply and demand.
**Flawed Logic:**
· More bids → more buyers → price should go up
· More asks → more sellers → price should go down
**Why This Logic Fails:** That logic would be correct in a world where:
· All orders were visible
· Orders were honest
· Orders could not be canceled instantly
**But the market doesn't work like that.**
**Reality Check:**
**Most Real Supply is NOT Visible:** Large traders rarely show full size because:
· It alerts others
· It worsens their fill
· It invites front-running
**They Use:**
· Iceberg orders (show small size, hide large size)
· Hidden orders
· Dark pools
· Rapid cancel/replace strategies
**Meaning:**
· The biggest sellers are often invisible
· Visible asks are often bait
**When you see a big ask:**
· It might be real
· Or it might be fake
· Or it might be only 5% of the real size
**You cannot know from size alone.**
# Market Maker Manipulation
**Critical Understanding:** Market makers deliberately fake size to make retail traders:
· Sell too early
· Short into strength
· Hesitate on breakouts
**How They Do It:**
· Flash large asks to create fear
· Pull them at the last second
· Repost higher
This creates the illusion of resistance. If you short because "there's a huge ask above," you are often the liquidity they wanted.
# Understanding Spoofing
**Definition:** Spoofing is a manipulative practice involving a trader placing large orders on one side of the order book without intending to execute them.
**Purpose:**
· Create artificial imbalance
· Mislead other traders about true market sentiment and potential price movements
**Example:**
1. Mr. A places a large buy order to create the illusion of strong buying interest
2. This influences other traders to enter buy positions
3. Mr. A cancels the order once price starts moving upward
4. Traders who followed the fake signal are trapped
# The Problem with Using Level 2 for Support/Resistance
**What Beginners Are Taught:** Identify potential support and resistance by looking for unusually large order sizes at particular price levels.
**Example:** If a stock normally trades in lots of 1,000 shares but shows an outstanding order for 100,000 shares at a particular price, that indicates the stock may hit support or resistance at that price.
**The Warning:** Be cautious when using Level 2 data this way. A large order at a particular price may disappear as the stock approaches that price.
**Common Scenario - Pulled Bids:** A large bid often:
· Sits there looking supportive
· Gets pulled the moment price approaches
· Traders who bought expecting support → bid vanishes → price drops hard
· **This is one of the most common stop-outs**
**Bottom Line:** You can't know if size is real, fake, or only 5% of actual size from the order book alone.
# Additional Critical Mistakes
**Mistakes to Avoid When Reading Level 2:**
1. Trusting size without execution
2. Trading Level 2 without chart context
3. Chasing stacked bids or asks
4. Ignoring Time and Sales
5. Using Level 2 to predict instead of confirm
6. Forgetting institutions hide size
# 6. How to Analyze the Tape Correctly (Behavior Over Size)
# The Core Principle Shift
**Stop Thinking in Terms of:**
· Which side is bigger
**Start Thinking in Terms of:**
· Interaction
· Response
· Outcome
# The Only Thing That Matters
**The Critical Question:** What happens after orders on the bid and ask interact with aggressive buying or selling?
**Understanding Interaction:**
· A 100k order sitting on the ask is just an advertisement
· A 100k order that actually gets hit is a real execution
· **(An order gets hit when it gets filled/executed by an incoming market order)**
**Interaction is the only truth.**
# How to Read Level 2 with Tape
**Time and Sales (The Tape) Shows:**
· **Aggression** = Market orders (they cross the spread)
· **Passive** = Bids and asks (they sit and wait)
**Everything you watch is about answering ONE question:** When aggressive orders hit, does price move or not?
· **If price moves** → Aggression wins
· **If price doesn't move** → Absorption is happening
All "signals" reduce to this.
**Use imbalance as one input, but confirm it with behavior:** Does price actually move when aggressive orders hit that liquidity?
# Why Markets Move
**The Fundamental Reason:** Markets move because aggressive orders overpower passive liquidity.
**Definitions:**
· **Aggressive orders** = Market buy or sell orders that execute immediately (buyers hitting asks, sellers hitting bids, shown as red or green on the tape)
· **Passive liquidity** = Limit orders sitting on the book waiting to be filled (the bids and asks you see in Level 2)
**Price Movement Mechanism:** Price only moves when aggressive market orders consume all the passive limit orders at a price level.
**Example:**
1. $100.00 has 1,000 shares of passive liquidity (limit sell orders sitting there)
2. Aggressive buyers send market orders totaling 1,200 shares
3. The 1,000 shares at $100.00 get consumed
4. Price moves to $100.50 because the aggression overpowered what was available
**If Aggression Can't Overpower:** If only 500 shares hit that 1,000-share wall, price doesn't move—the passive side absorbed it.
# Complete Explanation: Why Size Alone Doesn't Mean Resistance
**Now you understand why huge ask stacking (ask-side imbalance) alone does not mean resistance:**
You don't know if aggression can or cannot overpower that passive liquidity.
**Large Ask Stacking Only Shows Potential Resistance Because:**
1. **Strong buy aggression can still overpower it** – Even a large ask can be consumed if aggressive buyers are determined enough
2. **It might be a fake order** – The ask could be pulled before price reaches it, creating only the illusion of strong sell intent when there's actually no real resistance at all
**Whether it's truly resistance, you only find out once price interacts with those orders.**
# Why Strong Breakouts Often Happen INTO Large Asks
**This Seems Counterintuitive Until You Understand the Mechanics:**
**Scenario:**
· Stock approaches resistance
· Large ask stack appears above price
· Beginner thinks: "Too much resistance, breakout will fail"
**What Actually Happens:**
**1. Aggressive Buyers Need Liquidity:**
· They use market orders and won't wait for pullbacks
· You can't buy aggressively if there are no sellers
· Large asks provide something to hit
**2. The Asks Get Consumed:**
· Tape prints rapidly
· Ask size shrinks or reloads
· Price keeps pushing
**3. Once Liquidity is Gone, Price Jumps:**
· Nothing left to trade against
· Price accelerates
**Key Concept:** The large ask wasn't resistance—it was a magnet and fuel.
· **Magnet:** Liquidity attracts price (buyers go where sellers are to get filled)
· **Fuel:** Aggressive buying consumes the wall, then absence of sellers allows price to fly
**A displayed ask is only an invitation, not a commitment.** Until buyers actually trade with it, you don't know if the size is real, if the seller is strong, or if the demand is deep.
# Determining: Fuel or Real Resistance?
**The Real Question:** How to tell if a large seller on ask or lots of sell orders on ask is fuel or real resistance?
**Definitions:**
· **Fuel** = Sellers are not in control despite the size
· **Resistance** = Sellers are in control and absorbing demand
**Don't interpret a stacked ask or large seller as automatic resistance.** Instead, see it as potential supply that can be:
1. Fake (pulled before hit)
2. Real resistance (absorbs demand)
3. Fuel (absorbed by strong demand)
**Wait and react to the outcome.**
# Step 1: Is the Ask Even Being Hit?
**Watch For:**
· Green prints on tape = buy aggression
· Ask order size decreasing = buyers are trying
**This First Hit Answers Only:** "Will buyers even try? Is this sell order real or fake?"
**It Does NOT Answer:** "Who wins the auction?"
**Watch for Pulling Behavior:**
· Large ask order appears
· As price moves up, it vanishes
· **= Fake resistance (spoof)**
· **Bullish signal** — seller wasn't real, level is weak
# Step 2: The Commitment (The Fight - Who Wins the Auction?)
**This Answers THE Question:** When aggressive orders hit, does price move or not? Do aggressive orders overpower passive liquidity?
**The Fight Can End in 2 Scenarios:**
# SCENARIO 1: Buyers Lose (Real Resistance)
**What Happened:**
· Large ask order was real resistance (supply stronger than demand)
· Ask decreases but refreshes with new size at the same price level or even lower after being hit
· **This is called absorption** — sellers are in control
**How This Looks in Real Time:**
**Phase 1: Initial Test**
· Buyers hit it (green on tape) → demand tests the level
**Phase 2: Stall**
· Tape slows → buyers lose urgency
· Ask refreshes at same price or simply does not continue to get hit → auction stalls
**Phase 3: Rejection**
· Seller is committed and replenishing, now in control
· Price backs off → buyers give up and are now the ones defending
**The Key Behavior:** The size on Level 2 does not go down, or it refills.
**Example:**
· L2 Size: Starts at 100k
· Buyers eat 10k
· Size refreshes back to 100k
**Conclusion:** This is absorption/dilution. Someone has unlimited shares to sell. **DO NOT BUY.** The price will likely reject and flush.
**Aggressive Seller Sign:** If price is pressing up against $100.00, and the ask reloads lower (at $99.98 or $99.99), the seller is not retreating; they are attacking. No more green on tape, more white and red.
**Interpretation:** The ask is absorbing demand. A real seller is defending the level.
**Summary:** Ask gets eaten, then reloads at same price → **this is RESISTANCE**
**What This Means:**
· Seller is committed
· Supply is being replenished
· Buyers failed to move the auction
· **This is real resistance**
# SCENARIO 2: Buyers Win (Break of Resistance/Fuel)
**What Happened:**
· Large ask order was fuel for stronger demand (demand larger than supply)
· Ask order decreases and once gone, refreshes at a higher price
· Buyers overpowered the sellers
**Example:** If a large institution wants to buy 50,000 shares now, they need a seller with 50,000 shares. If they see a "wall" of sellers on Level 2, they don't see it as "resistance"; they see it as a buffet. They can fill their entire order instantly at that price. Once they eat that wall (Aggressive Buy > Passive Sell), the "resistance" vanishes, and the price often pumps because the "ceiling" is gone.
**How This Looks (Fuel):**
**Phase 1: Consumption**
· Buyers hit ask repeatedly → aggressive demand
· Tape stays fast → buyers aren't hesitating
· Ask shrinks → sellers are getting depleted or stepping back
**Phase 2: Breakthrough**
· After sellers have been eaten up, ask moves higher
· This is confirmation: demand > supply
· The ask is being consumed, not defended
· Sellers are weak or backing off
· That liquidity becomes a stepping stone
**Phase 1 — Consumption (Proof):** This is what confirms it's fuel. What you want first:
· Buyers hit the ask
· Tape stays fast
· Ask shrinks or disappears
· Price keeps pressing
**This answers the key question:** Can buyers overpower this seller?
**Acceptance Higher (Confirmation):** After the ask is eaten:
· New ask appears higher
· Buyers continue to lift
· That higher ask does not immediately cap price
**This signals:**
· Sellers have retreated upward
· The auction moved
**Important Note on "Reload Higher":** "Reload higher" is not the initial requirement. If you require reload-higher immediately, you'll miss good moves.
**Reasons:**
· Sellers often get cleaned first, then reposition
· Sometimes they vanish completely (thin book → fast pop)
· Sometimes the next ask is small, not large
**Better Approach:** Get in if you see demand is strong and ask is being eaten up, then adjust depending on the confirmation or what happens after break of the large seller:
· If ask refreshes higher and tape stays fast with green → you were right
· If ask refreshes lower or at same level with size → you were wrong, get out fast
# What Happens After the Ask is Consumed?
**The Decisive Signal:** The decisive signal is not "was the ask eaten," but what price does next.
**1. Reloads at Same Price → Resistance**
**Meaning:**
· Sellers are committed at that level
· Supply is being replenished
· Buyers are not strong enough to force higher prices
· **This is real resistance**
**2. Reloads Lower → Resistance (Often Stronger)**
**What Happened:**
· After the liquidity at $100 clears, buyers do not continue bidding
· Sellers are now willing to sell cheaper
· The auction failed upward
· **This is rejection, not fuel**
**3. Next Ask Appears Higher → Fuel (The Only Bullish Case)**
**What Happened:**
· Buyers accepted higher prices
· Sellers retreated upward
· The auction moved
# General Trading Rules
**Tape Shows Heavy Buying (Green) but Price Isn't Moving Up:** **= Bearish** (absorption happening)
**Tape Shows Heavy Buying (Green) AND Ask is Being Eaten Up:** Get in and react to what happens after break.
**Treat Wall as Real Resistance:** Do not buy until you see the wall breaking.
# Practical Entry Example
**Step 1: Spot the Wall** You see a huge seller at $4.00 (e.g., 50,000 shares)
**Step 2: Watch Time & Sales** Are you seeing green prints eating the wall?
**Bad Sign:**
· Prints are red (hitting the bid)
· OR small green prints (100 shares) that aren't denting the 50k size
**Good Sign (The Entry):** You see rapid-fire green prints: 1000, 500, 2000, 5000
· The wall drops from 50k → 40k → 25k → 10k
**Step 3: Entry** Buy right as the wall is about to crumble (e.g., when 5k is left)
· Once that real seller is gone, supply is gone
· Stock "squeezes" higher (The Fuel concept)
**Step 4: React After Break**
· If after break it refreshes or doesn't squeeze, get out
· If price continues higher with fast green tape, stay in
# Core Trading Principle
**Treat "big bid/ask" as a testable hypothesis, not as automatic support/resistance.**
**The test is always:** What happens when aggression hits it?
**Entry Logic Should Always Include Both:**
1. Evidence of strong aggression
2. Evidence that the opposing liquidity is either being eaten (fuel) or pulled (fake)
**Exit Logic Should Be Quick When:**
1. A wall holds and tape flips against you
2. OR a wall is eaten but price fails to expand and instead stalls or rotates back
**This is where the auction chooses direction.**
# Quick Analysis Questions
**Is the ask being eaten or refilled faster?**
· Eaten faster → fuel
· Refilled faster → resistance
**Large Ask is Fuel ONLY If:**
· It gets eaten
· Price trades above the level
· Next meaningful ask is higher
· Buyers continue lifting
**Large Ask is Resistance If:**
· It reloads at same price
· OR reloads lower
· OR price fails to hold above the level
**After the Ask Interaction, Did Price:**
· Stay above → fuel (even if ask reloads lower during the fight)
· Stall at → resistance
· Fall below → resistance confirmed
**Reload location only matters relative to price behavior.**
**Depending on the Result of the Fight:**
· If buyers got absorbed → go short
· If buyers pushed through (sellers got absorbed) → go long
# 7. Reading Support Levels (Opposite of Resistance)
**Same principles apply, just reversed:**
· Focus on red prints and large bid orders
· If bids refresh or are broken and go lower → bearish
# Absorption at Support with Rising Aggression
**Scenario:** Price pulls back to a key support zone. You see repeated selling into the bid—but price doesn't break.
**The Nuance:** Sometimes, an entity "absorbing" orders is not a smart buyer, but a desperate market maker providing liquidity on the way down.
**Justification:** You might see a bid absorbing selling for 10 minutes. You buy. Suddenly, the buyer steps away (pulls liquidity), and the floor collapses.
**Critical Rule:** Absorption is only bullish if it results in a price rotation (price ticks up away from the level). If price absorbs for too long without bouncing, the buyer often gives up.
**Tape Behavior:**
· Large red prints hit the same bid level
· Level 2 shows bid replenishing (iceberg)
· Eventually, green prints lift the ask with size
# Entry Logic: Enter long once the ask starts lifting—the absorption phase is complete.
# Risk of Buying Into Absorption
**The Trap:**
· You see heavy green prints (looks bullish!)
· You buy, expecting price to lift
· But price doesn't move (absorption)
· Suddenly tape flips to red
· Price dumps, you stop out
**Why This Happens:**
· Large seller was absorbing all buying
· Once buyers exhausted, no one left to buy
· Seller now in control, price dumps
**How to Avoid:**
**DON'T Enter During Absorption:**
· If price isn't moving despite heavy green, stay out
· You don't know if absorption is bullish or bearish until it resolves
**WAIT for Resolution:**
· Price lifts away = absorption was accumulation = enter long
· Price dumps = absorption was distribution = enter short
**Signs Absorption is About to Fail:**
· Green prints slowing
· More white/red prints appearing
· Price starting to tick down
· Bids pulling on Level 2
· **Action:** If you're in, exit immediately
**Signs Absorption Succeeded:**
· Red prints stop
· Green prints accelerate
· Price lifts 5-10 cents away from level
· Asks thinning above
· **Action:** Enter long on first pullback
 
# 8. Understanding Empty Books
# Why Empty Books Create Weak Moves
**Scenario:**
· Thin order book
· Few bids, few asks, wide gaps
· Beginner thinks: "Easy breakout, no resistance"
**What Actually Happens:**
· No one is selling, but no one is buying aggressively either
· Small orders move price a little, but there is no follow-through
· This creates slow drift, fake breakouts, and immediate reversals
**Why:** There was no real fight. No side proved commitment.
# Why Empty Books Can Create Explosive Moves
**After Absorption Clears Liquidity:**
**Example:**
· Heavy selling into $10.00 support for 5 minutes
· Buyer absorbs 50,000 shares
· All sellers exhausted
· Book now shows thin asks: 200 shares at $10.05, 100 at $10.10, 300 at $10.15
· New buyer enters 2,000 shares
· Stock instantly $10.20 because there's no supply
**Breakouts from Consolidation:**
· Stock consolidates in tight range
· During consolidation, book empties (no one wants to trade)
· Breakout begins with aggressive buyer
· Thin book offers no resistance
· Price explodes 20-30 cents in seconds
**Short Squeezes:**
· Stock heavily shorted
· Positive catalyst hits
· Shorts try to cover (aggressive buying)
· No one willing to sell (book is empty on ask side)
· Price gaps violently upward
# How to Distinguish
|**Empty Book = Weak Move**|**Empty Book = Explosive Move**|
|:-|:-|
|No tape activity|Recent heavy tape activity that cleared liquidity|
|Wide spreads (5-10 cents)|Tight spread but thin size|
|No chart pattern|At key breakout level|
|Mid-day, low volume period|At open, or after news|
|Price drifting slowly|Price at inflection point|
**Key Takeaway:** Empty books are not inherently weak or strong. Context matters:
· Empty book + recent absorption + breakout level = explosive potential
· Empty book + no context + mid-day = avoid, likely weak/random
# 9. Why Large Asks Attract Buyers (Counterintuitive)
**Strong buyers prefer visible liquidity because:**
· It lets them enter size without chasing
· It disguises their intent
· It keeps price from spiking too early
· They want fills, not jumps
**So they:**
· Let asks stack
· Absorb them
· Then release price
# 10. How to Tell Fuel from Real Resistance
# Large Ask = FUEL If:
· Buyers hit it repeatedly
· Tape stays fast
· Ask shrinks or reloads HIGHER (seller is retreating)
· Price keeps pressing upward
# Large Ask = RESISTANCE If:
· Buyers hit it
· Tape
slows
· Price stops advancing
· Ask reloads at SAME price (iceberg) or LOWER (aggressive seller)
· Price backs off
**Key Difference:**
· **Fuel** = Seller retreats (ask moves up)
· **Resistance** = Seller digs in (ask stays or moves down)
# 11. What You Should Actually Watch (Priority Order)
**When Price Hits a Level:**
**1. Tape Speed (Highest Priority):**
· Fast = aggression
· Slow = hesitation
**2. Price Response:**
· Does price advance?
· Or stall?
**3. Liquidity Behavior:**
· Pulled?
· Reloaded?
· Absorbed?
**Note:** Level 2 (the size itself) is third priority, not first.
# 12. Practical Entry Logic (Simple and Usable)
# Breakout Long Entry
**Setup:**
· Known resistance level
· Large asks present
· Buyers keep lifting
· Price holds near highs
· Ask begins to thin or lift
**Entry:** On the first shallow pullback OR when speed surges through the level
# Failed Breakout Short
**Setup:**
· Same initial setup
· Buyers hit asks
· Price doesn't move (absorption)
· Tape slows
· Ask reloads
**Entry:** Short the failure, not the size
# 13. Final Mental Model
**Lock This In:**
· Empty books = No commitment
· Size alone = Meaningless
· Aggression + Absorption = Information
· Large asks are not walls—they are test points
· The market only reveals truth when orders collide and one side fails
#
sentiment -1.00
9 hr ago • u/stonkmc • r/wallstreetbets • daily_discussion_thread_for_january_01_2026 • C
The game is rigged as fuck. Even if you max your 401k you can't touch that shit till 59.5 without tax and irs penalties.
Mfers just want us to work our entire fucking lives.
Yolo is the ONE WAY OUT!
ONE WAY OUT!
sentiment -0.25
9 hr ago • u/deli_phone • r/Silverbugs • lot_of_mixed_emotions_regarding_these • C
lol one mint ONE MINT got wild with their limited run of baseball coins and y'all just been insane with it since
sentiment -0.20
10 hr ago • u/2themoon4 • r/stocks • reddits_2026_stock_picks • C
How in the duck is the ONE stock on this list?
sentiment 0.00
10 hr ago • u/Real-Strategy313 • r/dogecoin • es_ist_nur_ein_hund • C
ONE DOG pic can change someones life
sentiment 0.00
11 hr ago • u/fistfucker07 • r/CryptoCurrency • ripple_will_unlock_1_billion_xrp_tomorrow • C
They sell an average of 300,000 tokens per month. With advanced notice. And preprogrammed release dates.
Literally NO ONE is shocked at these monthly unlocks except bots.
Every single actual HUMAN BEING realizes that XRP is a product. And RIPPLE is a company. And their fucking responsibility to their shareholders is to sell XRP.
ONLY A PAID ATTACKER WOULD BE ABLE TO IGNORE REALITY HERE.
sentiment -0.86
11 hr ago • u/orcvader • r/Bogleheads • do_you_own_individual_stocks_for_any_weird_reasons • C
After selling over time from employee benefit programs etc, and cleaning up old portfolios, I am left with ONE individual Berkshire Hathaway share (symbolic) and a decent sized bundle of Rivian shares with a too long to tell story of how I ended there.
I don’t count them on any portfolio analysis. They are just there… almost digital collectibles out of view on a Fidelity basket alongside all my retired ETF’s.
Side story:
I lucked with the meme stock frenzy with AMC myself. Shamed as I am to admit now, I got caught up the meme stock fever - even as I was more or less a Boglehead already. Never again, as I know I dodged a bullet. But part of my luck is that AMC play was inside a Roth IRA. So my oversized Roth account is mostly AMC-infused meme stock frenzy luck. Crazy that I was gambling with IRA money. Ugh. Never again. But let’s just say I was one of the lucky few who sold near the top!
sentiment 0.91
12 hr ago • u/fagulhas • r/Revolut • account_closing_after_appeal_with_investments_and • C
With the right *words*, you may ask a full report from their AML. With that in hand, you could find what trigger the flag, the red *ONE.*
Esquece e segue em frente, agora mover esses 200k plus, para um local seguro. Espero que não seja caso de AT a perseguir.
Good luck mate.
sentiment 0.94
12 hr ago • u/AdExternal209 • r/Bitcoin • one_typo_cost_me_7_years_of_access_to_my_btc • B
TITLE: Finally recovered my BIP38 wallet after 7 years - sharing what worked
---
Hey everyone,
Just wanted to share my experience in case it helps someone.
In 2017 I encrypted a paper wallet with BIP38. Was paranoid about security.
Used what I thought was a memorable password based on my favorite band.
Fast forward to 2024... I couldn't unlock it. Tried for MONTHS.
The password was right in my head but nothing worked. I thought maybe:
- Wrong capitalization?
- Typo I never noticed?
- Keyboard layout issue? (I switch between AZERTY and QWERTY)
Tried btcrecover, hashcat... too slow for BIP38 EC-multiply. We're talking
like 5-10 passwords per second. My wordlist had millions of variations.
So I started building my own tool. Focused on generating SMART variations
based on how I actually type:
- Keys I often hit by accident
- Caps lock mistakes
- Missing characters
- Doubled letters
Long story short: found it. The password had ONE wrong character.
A key right next to what I meant to press.
7 years. Thousands of attempts. One stupid typo.
sentiment -0.94


Share
About
Pricing
Policies
Markets
API
Info
tz UTC-5
Connect with us
ChartExchange Email
ChartExchange on Discord
ChartExchange on X
ChartExchange on Reddit
ChartExchange on GitHub
ChartExchange on YouTube
© 2020 - 2026 ChartExchange LLC