ONEUSD
Harmony / United States dollar
crypto Composite

he hasn't beaten the s and p over the last 20 years
ONE OF US ONE OF US ONE OF US

Meta has made some amazing strides in terms of workflows using machine learning - specifically for use with biological research. I use 2 of their modeling tools myself regularly and have had great success with both - ESM for protein sequences and SAM3D for tissue image processing.
I know people LOVE to shit on Meta and Zuckerberg, but I as a user of these two AMAZING products out of Meta research, have great expectations from them in the coming years. Most of the time, when. I see people making the stupid jokes about meta and Zuckerberg, etc and how NO ONE uses their products anymore, makes my eyes roll back into my head. Clearly these people have not used everything that Meta is doing and have perhaps just looked at other comments on Reddit that talks smack about Meta and then just parrots that.
I am buying Meta hand over fist at these prices

https://preview.redd.it/bo4nlm0b6krg1.png?width=1441&format=png&auto=webp&s=46da7f6726ff47467552d7a33e9b386dc370a369
I bought her course back when it was around $4k. Her whole YouTube sold me a story that felt legit: trained by her uncle for years, simplifying something complex with just lines on a chart. I ended up getting a refund because the “accountability” wasn’t there and the coaches were honestly terrible.

I learned very little from them. But it taught me a huge lesson. I came into trading knowing very little, in a fragile mindset, looking for a shortcut, and I thought a course was the answer. I left feeling lied to and burned.
That experience made something very clear: no one is going to sell you a system that actually works. If it truly worked, they’d just use it to make money.
After that, I got my shit together. I went through everything, ICT (which I don’t rate), Wyckoff, Brian Shannon, Qullamaggie etc.. I learned every indicator, Bollinger Bands, VWAP… all of it. I had a ton of ideas, but instead of trading all of them, I picked ONE the one I liked the most.
Then I went deep, 1500+ days of market data. Not just backtesting, but actually studying behavior, building a framework around a specific setup, a specific session, something that realistically shows up often.
That became my system my FRAMEWORK. I stopped using real money and focused on proving it first. Now I’ve passed 2 evals, and I’m finally seeing results I am very close to my first Payout and my first time ever making money from trading properly.
No one gave me this strategy. I built it. This is my third attempt at a playbook, and it’s still not perfect, but it’s real.
I’m posting my last 3 weeks of trading, you’ll see I’m not perfect. I’m human, I still mess up, and it usually happens when I break my rules and get emotional. But I can tell you this: if you actually enjoy trading and are willing to put in the work, it will pay off.
And please ignore all the gurus.

The setup:

Approved today! The name. The "relatively speaking" low float. The verification of their genetic process ( must valuable imm). The rare voucher ( they are going for 200 million on the pharma market. The low stock price compared to just a year ago
The Fuse:
Trump laying off for 10 days. he is stoking the market
it's rare times if you know how to take advantage of it. ( the algos are only processing what new news is feeding it, and Trump is feeding it)
The Rocket: RCKT. they are a verified company now. and they have been frugal, while also hiring solid minds;. all while spending less
so even if this does not fly today, you're ( relatively speaking) in a solid company
and just , can I say one thing on this stuff, because I've gotten more approvals right than wrong ( and isn't that the true nature of the game?)
I will give you ONE of my free clues: If a company receives a CRL. Watch VERY closely at what they do. if they resubmit after 6 months, they might be cash hungry and burning out
if a company takes 1.6 years to resubmit.. all while lowering their cash burn ( that company might have one of a few clues that gives them a better chance at approval next time

If this is true, this is the biggest heist that will ever happen to me. Like if we all knew this and being advertise by the agents for sure NO ONE will take this. But I really doubt it, it doesnt make sense, what if I put 500k? Then withdraw them all, does it mean I dont have coverage anymore? I guess this is applicable on the first 2/3 years of the policy.

Depends on your investment goals and time horizon.
You could invest in VOO or VTI and be negative on your initial investment for over a decade, with as much as 50% loss and no particular timeframe for recovery.
Maybe that's appropriate for your investing goals. But there are absolutely safer investments than that.
"Actual investing." Investing just means buying something for the potential of future return. Stocks aren't the only investment asset class out there. Nor do you need to be locked into any ONE of them. Diversification is a thing.

I think the Iranian extremists are more determined to kill us than we thought, and they immediately began moving back toward nuclear capability after we blew up a lot of stuff. By their own declarations, they have super-enriched just under ONE THOUSAND POUNDS of uranium, enough for 10 to 12 nuclear weapons. These aren’t rational actors.

Because the administration BETWEEN his two administrations showed that there was no institutional will to punish him.
Reality Winner gave a journalist ONE classified document to show that democracy was at risk and was immediately thrown in prison, without bail, for over a year because she was supposed to be a huge threat to national security and a flight risk because she spoke more than one language.
Compare that with what Trump did and what happened to Trump.
It's very obvious that there is no desire within the political class in DC to actually punish Trump or any of his cabal. Nothing will happen to him, his inner circle or his family because it might "look political".

Oh yea bro? So if China invaded Texas the other states wouldn’t do anything?
Some of you are really retarded. Like really.
“WERE JUST GONA TAKE THIS ONE ISLAND”

Consecutive Weeks Closing AT/UNDER ( +/- <0.50) Max Pain — 2
Last Run OVER: — 3 Weeks
Last Run AT/UNDER: — 1 Week
Longest Consecutive Weeks Closing OVER (>0.50) Max Pain — 5
Longest Consecutive Weeks Closing AT/UNDER (+/- <0.50) Max Pain — 14
[03/25/2026](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/1s3sgk2/iv_max_pain_volume_and_oi_data_every_day_until/)
[First Post (Posted in June, 2024)](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/1ddi3oq/heres_your_proof_and_all_it_cost_me_was_4_shares/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web3x&utm_name=web3xcss&utm_term=1)
IV30 Data (Free, Account Required) — [https://marketchameleon.com/Overview/GME/IV/](https://marketchameleon.com/Overview/GME/IV/)
Max Pain Data (Free, No Account Needed!) — [https://chartexchange.com/symbol/nyse-gme/optionchain/summary/](https://chartexchange.com/symbol/nyse-gme/optionchain/summary/)
Fidelity IV Data (Free, Account Required) — [https://researchtools.fidelity.com/ftgw/mloptions/goto/ivIndex?symbol=GME](https://researchtools.fidelity.com/ftgw/mloptions/goto/ivIndex?symbol=GME)
And finally, at someone's suggestion —
# WHAT IS IMPLIED VOLATILITY (IV)? —
(Taken from [https://www.investopedia.com/terms/i/iv.asp](https://www.investopedia.com/terms/i/iv.asp) ) —
Dumbed down, IV is a forward-looking metric measuring how likely the market thinks the price is to change between now and when an options contract expires. The higher IV is, the higher premiums on contracts run. The more radically the price of a security swings over a short period of time, the higher IV pumps, driving options prices higher as well.
The longer the price trades relatively flat, the more IV will drop over time.
IV is just one of many variables (called 'greeks') used to price options contracts.
# WHAT IS HISTORICAL VOLATILITY (HV)? —
(Taken from [https://www.investopedia.com/terms/h/historicalvolatility.asp](https://www.investopedia.com/terms/h/historicalvolatility.asp) ) —
Dumbed down, I'm not fully sure. Based on what I read, it's a historical metric derived from how the price in the past has moved away from the average price over a selected interval. But the short of it is that it determines how 'risky' the market thinks a stock (or an option I guess) is. The higher the historical volatility over a given period, the more 'risky' they think it is. The lower the HV over a period of time, the 'safer' a security (or option) is.
And if anyone wants to fill in some knowledge gaps or correct where these analyses are wrong, please feel free.
# WHAT IS 'MAX PAIN'? —
In this context, 'max pain' is the price at which the most options (both calls and puts) for a security will expire worthless. For some (or many), it is a long held belief that market manipulators will manipulate the price of a stock toward this number to fuck over people who buy options.
# ONE LAST THOUGHT —
If used to make any decision. which it absolutely should NOT be (obligatory #NFA disclaimer), this information should not be considered on its own, but as one point in a ridiculously complex and convoluted ocean of data points that I'm way too stupid to list out here. Mostly, this information is just to keep people abreast of the movement of one key variable options writers use to fuck us over on a weekly and quarterly basis if we DO choose to play options.
Just thought I should throw that out there.

You got ONE emergency flare to pull and that’s what you went with? Lmao
Abuser says abuse is rescheduled. 👍🏼

This is a UK offer. And yes, someone did get in touch with me, due to my engagement with Reddit.
It's about transferring existing portfolios in from another platform. And you can, you really can, make £10k. But there's a fly in the ointment (surprise!): it has to be transferred in in the form of cash, they can't do it in specie (i.e. keeping the investments as ETFs or whatever).
This is problematic for 2 reasons: firstly it means time out of the market. But much, much more problematic is that, in the UK, brokers are covered by the (backstop) government compensation scheme, known as FSCS, only up to £85k (for banks it's just gone up to £120k, but not for brokers) for cash assets held by them.
Furthermore, you can only do ONE such transfer-in ... after that you're considered to be doing a second transfer-in.
I would have done the full amount £333k in assets. But because of the protection thing I'm only going to do £85k.

I started trading in 2023. Was just clicking buttons, no discipline, no real understanding, just getting cooked.
Tried probably 1000s different strategies, was losing money, losing my time, nothing worked…
In 2025, I Started paper trading here and there and started focusing on ONE approach, Spent the last 6–7 months refining it and actually sticking to it.
Started tracking everything on December 18. Now March 26, this is the result:
📊 TRADING DASHBOARD
Start Balance: $5,000
Current Balance: $8,222.13
Total P&L: +$3,222.13
Return: +64.44%
Total Trades: 56
Wins: 30
Losses: 26
Win Rate: 53.57%
Average Win: +$178.19
Average Loss: -$81.68
Risk:Reward: 2.18 : 1
Expectancy: +$57.54 per trade
Largest Win: +$817
Largest Loss: -$257.50
📅 MONTHLY
December:
Trades: 9
Win Rate: 66.7%
P&L: +$869.34
January:
Trades: 30
Win Rate: 43.3%
P&L: +$642.13
Current:
Trades: 17
Win Rate: ~66%
P&L: +$1,710.66
What actually made the difference:
- Understanding the market instead of reacting.
- Following the money, not emotions.
- Discipline!
- No overtrading.
- No revenge trades.
- No thinking you’re smarter than the market.
Every trade can fail:
Risk management is everything.
If you can’t take a loss, you won’t survive long enough to catch the winners.
The biggest thing I realized is trading isn’t about being right all the time… it’s about staying in the game long enough for your edge to play out.
Anyone can win a few trades:
But if your losses are uncontrolled, one bad trade wipes out everything.
This is a probability game:
You’re not trying to win every trade… you’re trying to execute the same system over and over and let the numbers work.
Some days you win, some days you lose, some weeks feel slow, sometimes you question everything.
But if your risk is controlled and your edge is real, the curve goes up over time
That’s the difference between gambling and trading and for the first time I can look at my stats and know it’s not luck!

ANOTHER ONE BITS THE DUST

Just fucking lmao. AAPL was the ONE stock I wanted to dump so I could load up on the cheap.

Can we have ONE green Thursday or Friday jfc

> users move fast
Are you joking?!
Try moving ONE group from Whatsapp to Signal. Or from iMessage to Whatsapp/Signal. Just one of your groups

***NO ONE COULD HAVE EXPECTED THIS***

I started trading in 2023. Was just clicking buttons, no discipline, no real understanding, just getting cooked.
Tried probably 1000s different strategies, was losing money, losing my time, nothing worked…
In 2025, I Started paper trading here and there and started focusing on ONE approach, Spent the last 6–7 months refining it and actually sticking to it.
Started tracking everything on December 18. Now March 26, this is the result:
$5K → $8.2K
Win rate ~53%
R ~2.18…..
*see pictures for reference.
What actually made the difference:
- Understanding the market instead of reacting.
- Following the money, not emotions.
- Discipline!
- No overtrading.
- No revenge trades.
- No thinking you’re smarter than the market.
- Every trade can fail:
Risk management is everything.
If you can’t take a loss, you won’t survive long enough to catch the winners.
The biggest thing I realized is trading isn’t about being right all the time… it’s about staying in the game long enough for your edge to play out.
- Anyone can win a few trades:
But if your losses are uncontrolled, one bad trade wipes out everything.
- This is a probability game:
You’re not trying to win every trade… you’re trying to execute the same system over and over and let the numbers work.
Some days you win, some days you lose, some weeks feel slow, sometimes you question everything.
But if your risk is controlled and your edge is real, the curve goes up over time
That’s the difference between gambling and trading and for the first time I can look at my stats and know it’s not luck!

So? Who tf cares? It's my ROI that ONLY MATTERS! Why is so hard to understand. 
I don't buy stocks to fight for them, lol.  Idc what the price was 8 years ago. It's my entry price and ROI when I sell is THE ONE AND THE ONLY THING THAT MATTERS as an investor. 
These maxies are truly insane, lol. I mean if you gotta fight for Link to pay your bills, I guess I understand. But why marry to a crypto. It's an investment asset. I made lots money trading failing companies too. Just buy low n sell high. That's all, bud