ICPUSDT
ICP / Tether USD
crypto Composite

Nobody becomes a millionaire just by sitting on their ass collecting eggs.
1. **Real adoption you can see:** Most activity on Solana is DeFi, trading, and gambling. It *looks* like adoption because there are lots of transactions, but most of it is speculative churn. Actual businesses using the chain for daily operations are rare across *all* chains, not just Solana.
2. **Speed + cost is what crypto should’ve been:** You been here a minute, how do you even know what crypto should've been? Yes. Solana is fast and cheap. But that’s not unique anymore; TON, Sui, Aptos, Avalanche subnets, and even L2s all hit similar numbers. Speed is easy to market but not a moat.
3. **The dev ecosystem is insane:** It’s active, but activity follows incentives. Foundations give grants, hype brings attention, and devs chase the next wave. That’s why ecosystems boom and bust. Activity ≠ durable value.
4. **They’re always building, not just marketing:** Every chain claims this during their hot cycle: Ethereum in 2017, Binance in 2021, Terra before it collapsed, Avalanche during rush, Cosmos during airdrop season. Builders show up when incentives are flowing, and vanish when they dry up. Solana isn’t immune to that.
5. **SOL survived the worst-case (FTX):** Most major chains survived FTX because it wasn’t their tech failing—it was an exchange blowing up. Bitcoin, ETH, Avalanche, Polygon, Atom, etc. all survived it. SOL got hit harder only because FTX held a ton of it. It didn’t “survive due to strength”; it just wasn’t dead in the first place.
6. **It fits my disciplined mindset:** Nothing wrong with that. But discipline isn’t the same as fundamentals. A clean UX doesn’t predict long-term sustainability. Big collapses (Terra, EOS, NEO, ICP, etc.) also had passionate communities who “felt” like the tech clicked.
7. **I diversify so I’m not putting all eggs in one basket:** Good. But if you’re spreading across six coins anyway, then your confidence in the Solana narrative probably isn’t as solid as you think. And that’s fine. Just call it what it is: personal preference, not deep due diligence.

ICP is the only one to deliver and produce functional products that produce revenue outside of a meme coin casino. Caffeine A.I will turn ICP deflationary, Utopia will collect the institutions.

HBAR can scale to a million TPS without any frontrunning that'd what I call scalable. ICP and ALGO are also great. ICP is completely different. I'll check the founders background.

HBAR is effectively centralized - with nodes managed by a relatively small group of large corporations ([and they can disable access to the chain when they choose](https://hedera.com/blog/analysis-remediation-of-the-precompile-attack-on-the-hedera-network)).
ICP is highly dubious, and incomparable to Algorand on its merits. Look at the founder's background and that should tell you everything you need to know about ICP.
Silvio Micali has been doing groundbreaking work in cryptography since the 80s ([and was one of the creators of zk-proofs](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zero-knowledge_proof#History)).
Algorand as a technology is more advanced than the vast majority of the market, and possibly the sole tech leader as far as functional and truly decentralized blockchains.
Try doing a real analysis, then ask who is being honest.

Nobody becomes a millionaire just by sitting on their ass collecting eggs.
1. **Real adoption you can see:** Most activity on Solana is DeFi, trading, and gambling. It *looks* like adoption because there are lots of transactions, but most of it is speculative churn. Actual businesses using the chain for daily operations are rare across *all* chains, not just Solana.
2. **Speed + cost is what crypto should’ve been:** You been here a minute, how do you even know what crypto should've been? Yes. Solana is fast and cheap. But that’s not unique anymore; TON, Sui, Aptos, Avalanche subnets, and even L2s all hit similar numbers. Speed is easy to market but not a moat.
3. **The dev ecosystem is insane:** It’s active, but activity follows incentives. Foundations give grants, hype brings attention, and devs chase the next wave. That’s why ecosystems boom and bust. Activity ≠ durable value.
4. **They’re always building, not just marketing:** Every chain claims this during their hot cycle: Ethereum in 2017, Binance in 2021, Terra before it collapsed, Avalanche during rush, Cosmos during airdrop season. Builders show up when incentives are flowing, and vanish when they dry up. Solana isn’t immune to that.
5. **SOL survived the worst-case (FTX):** Most major chains survived FTX because it wasn’t their tech failing—it was an exchange blowing up. Bitcoin, ETH, Avalanche, Polygon, Atom, etc. all survived it. SOL got hit harder only because FTX held a ton of it. It didn’t “survive due to strength”; it just wasn’t dead in the first place.
6. **It fits my disciplined mindset:** Nothing wrong with that. But discipline isn’t the same as fundamentals. A clean UX doesn’t predict long-term sustainability. Big collapses (Terra, EOS, NEO, ICP, etc.) also had passionate communities who “felt” like the tech clicked.
7. **I diversify so I’m not putting all eggs in one basket:** Good. But if you’re spreading across six coins anyway, then your confidence in the Solana narrative probably isn’t as solid as you think. And that’s fine. Just call it what it is: personal preference, not deep due diligence.

ICP is the only one to deliver and produce functional products that produce revenue outside of a meme coin casino. Caffeine A.I will turn ICP deflationary, Utopia will collect the institutions.

HBAR can scale to a million TPS without any frontrunning that'd what I call scalable. ICP and ALGO are also great. ICP is completely different. I'll check the founders background.

HBAR is effectively centralized - with nodes managed by a relatively small group of large corporations ([and they can disable access to the chain when they choose](https://hedera.com/blog/analysis-remediation-of-the-precompile-attack-on-the-hedera-network)).
ICP is highly dubious, and incomparable to Algorand on its merits. Look at the founder's background and that should tell you everything you need to know about ICP.
Silvio Micali has been doing groundbreaking work in cryptography since the 80s ([and was one of the creators of zk-proofs](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zero-knowledge_proof#History)).
Algorand as a technology is more advanced than the vast majority of the market, and possibly the sole tech leader as far as functional and truly decentralized blockchains.
Try doing a real analysis, then ask who is being honest.

ICP....Internet computer?

Because XRP's market cap is over $120 billion all on speculation. We can thank Sam Bankman-Freid for giving us the opportunity to load up on $ICP at $2b mc as, if it weren't for him, $ICP would be over $120b mc. So, as it looks like $ICP is going to earn it's way to the top and real soon so, if you missed the Solana run, put it all on $ICP. Dyor

A few others can scale well too. HBAR and ICP for example. Be honest.