Create Account
Log In
Dark
chart
exchange
Premium
Terminal
Screener
Stocks
Crypto
Forex
Trends
Depth
Close
Check out our API

DOGEUSDT20241224C102000
Dogecoin / Tether USD Dec 24 2024 102000.00 Call
crypto

Inactive
Dec 23, 2024 10:36:00 PM EST
10.00USDT0.000%(0.00)80
OverviewHistoricalDepthTrends
DOGE Reddit Mentions
Subreddits
Limit Labels     

We have sentiment values and mention counts going back to 2017. The complete data set is available via the API.
Take me to the API
DOGE Specific Mentions
As of Jul 9, 2026 12:59:13 PM EDT (<1 min. ago)
Includes all comments and posts. Mentions per user per ticker capped at one per hour.
10 hr ago • u/SkyEnvironmental7746 • r/CryptoCurrency • im_down_on_every_investment_i_have_locking_away • C
Flare is a Crypto currency built by a legit team focusing on bringing defi to Bitcoin and XRP, XLM, DOGE, Litecoin, WETH.
I have sent tons of transactions on blockchain Flare pays you a passive income. I’m making about $7K a year at current prices. For every penny Flare moves after $0.009964 which is my average buy price. My net worth explodes $100K. At $0.02 I make $100K profit. $0.03 another $100K profit.
sentiment 0.84
13 hr ago • u/Low-Hold-8563 • r/dogecoin • this_is_it_last_call_at_007 • C
HODL friend. If you are holding 0 DOGE what are you doing here?
sentiment 0.49
14 hr ago • u/NoBrosCrypto • r/CryptoCurrency • help_with_portfolio • C
No I won’t recommend things I’m not sure of. BTC and ETH are my only conviction plays. The rest, make sure you look at the use case, developer adoption (who’s building on it), TVL (total value locked) but be careful this is more a metric around DeFi, and tokenomics. Also check whether it’s growing or dying - not by price but by activity. Developers, Dapps, unique wallets, unique wallets, etc. Just steer clear of all memecoins as they literally have no utility. Only the big ones like DOGE if you must, since it’s been around long enough and has at least ongoing transactions and activity. Otherwise consider that pure gambling if you’re playing down that end.
sentiment 0.88
16 hr ago • u/Roux_My_Burgundy • r/teslainvestorsclub • california_snubs_tesla_in_its_newly_passed_ev • C
Elon has shit on California over and over. He used DOGE to destabilize the EV industry knowing it would help Tesla. This is fair play.
sentiment 0.42
16 hr ago • u/Exact_Entrepreneur66 • r/wallstreetbets • what_are_your_moves_tomorrow_july_9_2026 • C
ABC: Iran downed 30 U.S. MQ-9 Reaper drones since the start of the war, U.S. official says.
LOL, that's $9 Billion of taxpayer money! Where is DOGE when we need them?
sentiment -0.17
17 hr ago • u/FamouslyGreen • r/FluentInFinance • taking_our_tax_money • C
Who used DOGE to doge accountability for said fraud.
sentiment -0.59
1 day ago • u/MrNo_Balls • r/wallstreetbets • daily_discussion_thread_for_july_8_2026 • C
where are our DOGE stimulus checks?
sentiment 0.00
1 day ago • u/Sanpaku • r/ValueInvesting • when_the_bull_case_is_8x_the_bear_case_theres_no • C
Sell-side analysts serve their employer's interests, not outside investors. Their job is increasing transaction volume and fees, often through rationalizing absurd valuations.
No indication SPCX has ever made a GAAP profit, and there's a good chance it won't even have positive free cash flow net of adjustment for SBC dilution this decade. Near saturated markets for launch and connectivity that will face increasing competition near term. We're watching in real time the deflation of the AI bubble: so much malinvestment in a tech with little moat that will be commoditized. My price target is under $40/share.
Not really a concern for me. Musk's companies have in aggregate not made a dime in 22 and 24 years respectively (see retained earnings), nor have they returned a dime to shareholders via dividends or buybacks. That's long enough, so zero investment appeal. After Musk's relentless promotion of reactionary racism and DOGE's unconstitutional cuts to USAID, I'll never invest in SPCX due to moral revulsion.
sentiment 0.52
2 days ago • u/AyDylo • r/wallstreetbets • calls_and_im_sorry • C
Interesting to see DOGE in the 7 cent range. I haven't followed in a while and just checked on it after seeing your portfolio.
Man what a dump lol. So glad I haven't looked back
sentiment 0.73
2 days ago • u/cuteman • r/stocks • spacex_is_complete_garbage • C
>A thousand cuts bring down a mountain. It is a simple premise.
Which mountain has been brought down?
>Of course I utilize billionaire owned corporations like amazon, google etc. That is the point. They have ALREADY won.
It's just as easy not to sure them, you cope to not do that because you enjoy the luxury they provide, hence the value of the creation and why they're billionaires in the first place.
Go shop at your mom and pops! But you wont, Amazon is easier.
Go use duck duck go! but you won't, google is better.
Go use craphone! but you won't because Samsung and Apple are superior
>Every time we change a "lil norm" like NASDAQ did, it is another important part of the any chance we have to pretend the system is not already incredibly favoring them and their insane wealth and giving them an advanatage others do not get. Why would they make that little choice? Was it necessary? Not even a little. It makes no sense. Keeping things as they were made so much more sense, for as you say, a product that needs to be measured in decades. It could be a great stock, but here we are back at $155. The stock market does not need to be manipulated more than it is.
What's even crazier is random peons commenting on rule changes as if you know what you're talking about.
>The presidency existed before D T but previous POTUS did nothing like this one. It isn't even close. The level of corruption is not remotely comparable. He brags about it. He tells people to buy certain stocks, shares info with his family and others, accepts bribes, accepts bribes for pardons. It is madness to watch.
The hysterics of leftists is a thing of wonder.
>DOGE did not exist until Elon Musk came along and named it as such.
Elon Musk didn't change the name, the trump administration did. The organization however absolutely existed. Just like department of defense changed to department of war. The executive branch can be organized in numerous different ways.
>You're arguing semantics. Another government agency tasked with the same type of thing existed but would have gone about it very differently and much more effectively than a guy who just wanted to make noise and exclude himself from accountability and get his hands deeply into the countries data with his army of hackers. That you would defend this is disheartening.
Your ideas of what should or shouldn't occur aren't gospel nor truth. Just because you can't understand it doesn't make it less valid.
>By every measure DOGE failed in its mission to save money, cut waste or help the country at large. Remember that DOGE refund thingy? I knew it was BS but idiots salivated at getting a measly few grand so he could clear his legal issues. USAID needing review, and there was fraud, but it did a lot of good as well. Taking an axe to it was not the solution.
Again, it was hard to get anywhere because it threatened the largest corruption system in the world. Bipartisan support quickly fell as everyone felt their own pocket book get lighter. Elon himself bowed out because of threats against him personally and his businesses.
>What a load of crap this country is accepting right now. You are still defending wrong doing and corruption and acting like it is no big deal. Just watch... shit is getting measurably worse daily.
Not defense, just trying to help you understand buddy. You see, leftists seem to jump from one outrage to the next.
>Talk to you in 6 months. This conversation not productive. You don't agree with me, concede no points, and it is a waste of my time.
Go touch some grass buddy. either that or up your SSRI
sentiment -0.98
2 days ago • u/mceehops • r/stocks • spacex_is_complete_garbage • C
A thousand cuts bring down a mountain. It is a simple premise.
Of course I utilize billionaire owned corporations like amazon, google etc. That is the point. They have ALREADY won. Every time we change a "lil norm" like NASDAQ did, it is another important part of the any chance we have to pretend the system is not already incredibly favoring them and their insane wealth and giving them an advanatage others do not get. Why would they make that little choice? Was it necessary? Not even a little. It makes no sense. Keeping things as they were made so much more sense, for as you say, a product that needs to be measured in decades. It could be a great stock, but here we are back at $155. The stock market does not need to be manipulated more than it is.
The presidency existed before D T but previous POTUS did nothing like this one. It isn't even close. The level of corruption is not remotely comparable. He brags about it. He tells people to buy certain stocks, shares info with his family and others, accepts bribes, accepts bribes for pardons. It is madness to watch. DOGE did not exist until Elon Musk came along and named it as such. You're arguing semantics. Another government agency tasked with the same type of thing existed but would have gone about it very differently and much more effectively than a guy who just wanted to make noise and exclude himself from accountability and get his hands deeply into the countries data with his army of hackers. That you would defend this is disheartening. By every measure DOGE failed in its mission to save money, cut waste or help the country at large. Remember that DOGE refund thingy? I knew it was BS but idiots salivated at getting a measly few grand so he could clear his legal issues. USAID needing review, and there was fraud, but it did a lot of good as well. Taking an axe to it was not the solution.
What a load of crap this country is accepting right now. You are still defending wrong doing and corruption and acting like it is no big deal. Just watch... shit is getting measurably worse daily.
Talk to you in 6 months. This conversation not productive. You don't agree with me, concede no points, and it is a waste of my time.
remindme6months!
sentiment -0.97
2 days ago • u/azure275 • r/stocks • spcx_finally_joined_the_nasdaq100_the_first • C
There's no rule Dems need to continue any of these launch programs if they don't want to honestly
I expect at some point there to be a Dem DOGE equivalent to get rid of programs that are not perceived as benefiting Americans, especially defense
sentiment -0.48
2 days ago • u/cuteman • r/stocks • spacex_is_complete_garbage • C
> Yeah, no reason to even try to stop the billionaire class from destroying our world.
Better than the softheaded believing you can transfer from then productive to the unproductive
>Have you watched "Ready Player One" or any other of a myriad of sci fi from decades past. These movies are far more accurate than you think.
I can tell your logic is really strong by use of a fictional example
>It isn't conspiracy, it is reality. Look at DOGE. What a dismal failure of our system. He stole our data, likely sold it, allowed his staff to run off with it, killed his lawsuits and investigations into him, and accomplished literally nothing positive. Nothing.
DOGE already existed as a digital audit system under the Obama administration, they merely renamed it.
The only failure is that it was stopped before completion because it directly threatened the corruption industrial complex.
>Yeah, keep trusting people like him. It leads to our downfall.
Trust has nothing to do with it.
>Cheers.
Maybe you'll get it one day that there are people who produce and governments who absorb.
You cannot tax your way to prosperity
sentiment -0.43
2 days ago • u/mceehops • r/stocks • spacex_is_complete_garbage • C
Yeah, no reason to even try to stop the billionaire class from destroying our world.
Have you watched "Ready Player One" or any other of a myriad of sci fi from decades past. These movies are far more accurate than you think. It isn't conspiracy, it is reality. Look at DOGE. What a dismal failure of our system. He stole our data, likely sold it, allowed his staff to run off with it, killed his lawsuits and investigations into him, and accomplished literally nothing positive. Nothing.
Yeah, keep trusting people like him. It leads to our downfall.
Cheers.
sentiment -0.87
2 days ago • u/0liviuhhhhh • r/FluentInFinance • taking_our_tax_money • C
Ya know what, you got me there.
And he didn't *buy* DOGE, he was *gifted* DOGE
You might be on to something
sentiment -0.10
2 days ago • u/SHIBashoobadoza • r/wallstreetbets • daily_discussion_thread_for_july_7_2026 • C
When DOGE check coming?
sentiment 0.00
2 days ago • u/DeadInternetVoid • r/wallstreetbets • daily_discussion_thread_for_july_7_2026 • C
SPCX gonna have a dividend like DOGE....?
Heheheheheheeeeeeee
sentiment 0.36
2 days ago • u/namgei • r/CryptoCurrency • im_down_on_every_investment_i_have_locking_away • C
I don't think you will ever recover this loss if you keep holding these. None of these coins are good, maybe DOGE and XRP can stay alive but the rest will be slow-bleeding to the bottom. Remember there are cycles in the market, and there are money flows in the market, you stick close to those you will be good, otherwise it's just speculating.
sentiment 0.70
3 days ago • u/TheseBit7621 • r/ValueInvesting • spacex_has_borrow_going_into_initial_lockup • Discussion • B
The maintenance margin is high so this cannot be levered, but shares of Space X are remarkably cheap to borrow in sizes that dwarf the majority of retail account sizes. I was surprised to see the cost to borrow shares on IBKR wasn't above 1%. I doubt SpaceX is going to suddenly trade lower as is desireable in most circumstances when going short stock, but I wouldn't be shocked to see it bleed lower for a long time. I think the rockets landing are pretty cool but this thing isn't worth 400x its TTM ebitda.
The business without the AI stuff puts a floor on SpaceX (alongside their girthy balance sheet) because that segment actually has positive operating margins, but even a 300x multiple on those earnings makes SpaceX worth significantly less than what it is trading for today. It also remains tbd how good starlink actually is as a businessness due to their short lifespan & the depreciation of literal rockets. If the maintenance capex is overwhelming it could make that operating income an illusory figure.
The sheer size is also at a point where discount rates as low as 5% require SpaceX to generate quantities of free cash flow that seem mathematically impossible. And in an attempt for buying revenue alongside the underwriters essentially betraying society by lying for fees in the S-1 investment banks signed off on, SpaceX is smashing their balance sheet into hastily building poorly managed AI data centers powering Grok and twitter subscriptions. This is turning out to not be a great business, so I do not think it will be what SpaceX does forever but it doesn't help the valuation.
Going into the unlock next month, almost everyone that made off well here is the stock markets version of being house rich and cash poor. A lot of them will start selling into bids that have only been propped up by a low float speculative bid on a super hot IPO thats been advertised globally.
Silly as it is Musk also represents key man risk insofar as the center piece of the cult of musk & his businesses prices. The man is growing increasingly erratic, he probably broke federal law with DOGE (not that I expect it to be enforced against him), and in the event he ends up passing away or getting in actual legal trouble for the first time ever it would probably cut the stock in half. I do not have a large position against SpaceX but I am short shares.
sentiment 0.21


Share
About
Pricing
Policies
Markets
API
Info
tz UTC-4
Connect with us
ChartExchange Email
ChartExchange on Discord
ChartExchange on X
ChartExchange on Reddit
ChartExchange on GitHub
ChartExchange on YouTube
© 2020 - 2026 ChartExchange LLC