BSVUSDT
Bitcoin SV / Tether USD
crypto Composite

You are abso-frickin'-lutely 100% CORRECT. One doesn't have to be a BCH 'fan' to see how spurious, illogical and INCONSISTENT the narratives and rationales behind BTC are.

During the Bitcoin Civil War of 2015, paid trolls, get-rich-quick ppl more interested in number-go-up over utility and a 3rd generation of BTC core devs whose interests were more aligned with Blockstream, the company they founded, rather than the crypto community at large, were all very motivated to destroy BTC's suitability for p2p cash and they managed to drown out the sensible arguments for a straightforward blocksize increase.
Well, BTC got the ticker and the Bitcoin 'brand name' even as it mangled the Bitcoin architecture with endless misfeatures (such as RBF which makes double-spends a lot easier, killing its applicability for PoS) to the point that IT and not BCH should be considered the altcoin.

Then there is Bitcoin SV ('Satoshi Vision') with its very charismatic but ultimately fraudulent figurehead Craig Wright. BSV positions itself as the OG Bitcoin to the point of removing even stuff like P2SH. Its INANE roadmap decisions such as ultra big blocks (offering its blockchain to be used as incredibly inefficient decentralized storage) leads me to suspect that BSV could be the other end of a two-pronged attack vs Bitcoin \[as working p2p\] Cash.

Between BTC, BCH and BSV, it is Bitcoin Cash which reflects the original ethos of the Bitcoin community and its intentions of being p2p cash while also having a sane roadmap.

You are abso-frickin'-lutely 100% CORRECT. One doesn't have to be a BCH 'fan' to see how spurious, illogical and INCONSISTENT the narratives and rationales behind BTC are.

During the Bitcoin Civil War of 2015, paid trolls, get-rich-quick ppl more interested in number-go-up over utility and a 3rd generation of BTC core devs whose interests were more aligned with Blockstream, the company they founded, rather than the crypto community at large, were all very motivated to destroy BTC's suitability for p2p cash and they managed to drown out the sensible arguments for a straightforward blocksize increase.
Well, BTC got the ticker and the Bitcoin 'brand name' even as it mangled the Bitcoin architecture with endless misfeatures (such as RBF which makes double-spends a lot easier, killing its applicability for PoS) to the point that IT and not BCH should be considered the altcoin.

Then there is Bitcoin SV ('Satoshi Vision') with its very charismatic but ultimately fraudulent figurehead Craig Wright. BSV positions itself as the OG Bitcoin to the point of removing even stuff like P2SH. Its INANE roadmap decisions such as ultra big blocks (offering its blockchain to be used as incredibly inefficient decentralized storage) leads me to suspect that BSV could be the other end of a two-pronged attack vs Bitcoin \[as working p2p\] Cash.

Between BTC, BCH and BSV, it is Bitcoin Cash which reflects the original ethos of the Bitcoin community and its intentions of being p2p cash while also having a sane roadmap.