BSVUSDT
Bitcoin SV / Tether USD
crypto Composite

My thesis is short sellers want to see the price go down for profit, regardless of humanities best interests, sacrificing the antidote Bitcoin to curtail growing wealth inequality caused by Cantillon effect.
>What do you mean? Both shorts and longs are exposures,
I said Bitcoin Bulls Bears are just as "cueless" They are both speculating on value growth expressed as price. (the majority of longs don't actually care about value, and only care about price, hence they are clueless useful idiots.) price is what you pay, value is what you get.
BTC demand is 100% speculative. People are speculating on many things, speculating on value (regardless of price) requires vision and imagination and understanding, and one to take a long position putting capital/reputation at risk.
Price appreciation is common in the crypto space, most are speculating on price going up (understandable) and so some speculate on Price going down.
Speculating on price going up is a zero-sum game eventually money moves to those who manage it most effectively over the long run (unless you can just print it), so unabated I don't care for the useful idiots unless they but the Bitcoin experiment at risk). I dislike Short sellers because they can push the price down, and kill the long-term value vision of Bitcoin, and benefit financially by doing that.
BTC is a Schrodinger cat scenario. BTC is both a Ponzi, and has potential to change how we use money at the same time. Short sellers lack the value proposition vision, or they don't want sound money, Short sellers see BTC as a Ponzi and want to profit off its death. HODLers see BTC among other things as Sound Money. Even though many just see it as a "number go up" Ponzi, they call BTC "not a Ponzi". Here I subscribe to the BCH and BSV vision for Bitcoin.
>On the short term, shorts have higher risk unless they have a lot of money to back up their short position.
Those who want to see the Fiat Ponzi continue and want to maintain TPTB have an almost infinite amount of Fiat, what you are calling "money", when they print "money" and short BTC and BTC goes up, they get punished. As a result, those who would like to see the separation of Money and State get a little more economic energy at the cost of the short sellers.

My thesis is short sellers want to see the price go down for profit, regardless of humanities best interests, sacrificing the antidote Bitcoin to curtail growing wealth inequality caused by Cantillon effect.
>What do you mean? Both shorts and longs are exposures,
I said Bitcoin Bulls Bears are just as "cueless" They are both speculating on value growth expressed as price. (the majority of longs don't actually care about value, and only care about price, hence they are clueless useful idiots.) price is what you pay, value is what you get.
BTC demand is 100% speculative. People are speculating on many things, speculating on value (regardless of price) requires vision and imagination and understanding, and one to take a long position putting capital/reputation at risk.
Price appreciation is common in the crypto space, most are speculating on price going up (understandable) and so some speculate on Price going down.
Speculating on price going up is a zero-sum game eventually money moves to those who manage it most effectively over the long run (unless you can just print it), so unabated I don't care for the useful idiots unless they but the Bitcoin experiment at risk). I dislike Short sellers because they can push the price down, and kill the long-term value vision of Bitcoin, and benefit financially by doing that.
BTC is a Schrodinger cat scenario. BTC is both a Ponzi, and has potential to change how we use money at the same time. Short sellers lack the value proposition vision, or they don't want sound money, Short sellers see BTC as a Ponzi and want to profit off its death. HODLers see BTC among other things as Sound Money. Even though many just see it as a "number go up" Ponzi, they call BTC "not a Ponzi". Here I subscribe to the BCH and BSV vision for Bitcoin.
>On the short term, shorts have higher risk unless they have a lot of money to back up their short position.
Those who want to see the Fiat Ponzi continue and want to maintain TPTB have an almost infinite amount of Fiat, what you are calling "money", when they print "money" and short BTC and BTC goes up, they get punished. As a result, those who would like to see the separation of Money and State get a little more economic energy at the cost of the short sellers.