BNBUSDT20241102C590
Binance Coin / Tether USD Nov 2 2024 590.00 Call
crypto

Institutional adoption keeps accelerating and BNB Chain is clearly winning meaningful market share here

BNB Chain takes 61.7% of Franklin Templeton’s Benji platform

We all know that BTC carries a substantial premium over ETH, even after adjusting for its lower supply. There are roughly six ETH in circulation for every BTC, yet one BTC currently costs about 34.5 ETH. That gives BTC a scarcity-adjusted premium of approximately 5.75x over ETH.
But how does ETH compare with the other top crypto assets?
The table below calculates what each token would be worth if its circulating market cap equaled ETH’s, based on its current circulating supply. It then shows the premium ETH currently commands over that token after adjusting for the difference in supply.
Interestingly, ETH carries a significant scarcity-adjusted premium over every token on the list. BNB and XRP come closest, while the premiums over assets such as ZEC, XMR, LTC, AVAX, and CRO are dramatically larger.
|Token|Supply|Supply vs. ETH|Price|ETH-parity price\*|Value vs. ETH|ETH premium|
|:-|:-|:-|:-|:-|:-|:-|
|**BNB**|133.17M|1.10x|$567.50|**$1,708**|**0.332x**|**3.0x**|
|**XRP**|62.47B|517.61x|$1.11|**$3.64**|**0.305x**|**3.3x**|
|**SOL**|582.87M|4.83x|$76.00|**$390.27**|**0.195x**|**5.1x**|
|**TRX**|94.88B|786.18x|$0.3272|**$2.40**|**0.136x**|**7.3x**|
|**HYPE**|252.75M|2.09x|$57.88|**$900.00**|**0.064x**|**15.5x**|
|**DOGE**|155.19B|1,285.96x|$0.06961|**$1.47**|**0.047x**|**21.1x**|
|**LEO**|920.14M|7.62x|$9.71|**$247.22**|**0.039x**|**25.5x**|
|**ZEC**|16.79M|**0.14x**|$505.12|**$13,552**|**0.037x**|**26.8x**|
|**XMR**|18.78M|**0.16x**|$356.00|**$12,111**|**0.029x**|**34.0x**|
|**LINK**|748.10M|6.20x|$8.50|**$304.07**|**0.028x**|**35.8x**|
|**XLM**|34.17B|283.18x|$0.1835|**$6.66**|**0.028x**|**36.3x**|
|**ADA**|36.49B|302.33x|$0.1692|**$6.23**|**0.027x**|**36.9x**|
|**CC**|39.14B|324.33x|$0.1227|**$5.81**|**0.021x**|**47.4x**|
|**BCH**|20.07M|**0.17x**|$211.56|**$11,337**|**0.019x**|**53.6x**|
|**GRAM**|2.73B|22.65x|$1.46|**$83.23**|**0.018x**|**57.0x**|
|**LTC**|77.42M|**0.64x**|$47.43|**$2,938**|**0.016x**|**61.9x**|
|**HBAR**|43.79B|362.86x|$0.07191|**$5.19**|**0.014x**|**72.2x**|
|**SUI**|4.05B|33.58x|$0.7472|**$56.13**|**0.013x**|**75.1x**|
|**AVAX**|431.77M|3.58x|$6.31|**$526.84**|**0.012x**|**83.5x**|
|**CRO**|47.27B|391.72x|$0.05708|**$4.81**|**0.012x**|**84.3x**|
\*ETH-parity price is the theoretical token price if its circulating market cap equaled ETH's, based on its current circulating supply.

At least with BNB its bought back to keep price afloat. It seems to be one of the only foundations with sufficient capital for buy backs. Has ETH foundation ever bought back ETH?

*If liquidity depth and execution matter to you, Uniswap covers both well. Quick take:*
* *Supported acrossmost major EVM chains (Ethereum, Base, Arbitrum, Unichain, Polygon, BNB, and more), so you route to wherever the liquidity is.*
* *No positive slippage capture. Per the API FAQs: "Uniswap Labs never takes positive slippage. All price improvement at execution goes to the swapper. "A lot of routers quietly keep that delta.*
* *Flexible fee tiers. v3 trades through 0.05%, 0.30%, or 1% pools, and v4 supports anything from 0% to 100% including dynamic fees set by hooks. Pick the pool that fits the pair's volatility.*
* *Swap via* [*app.uniswap.org*](http://app.uniswap.org)*, the* [*Wallet*](https://wallet.uniswap.org/)*, or programmatically through the* [*Trading API*](https://developers.uniswap.org/dashboard) *(free to integrate, self-serve keys).*
*\*Full disclosure I work at Uniswap but the facts above still stand :)*

Incident 1: I copied a Gemini BNB Smart Chain deposit address and withdrew BNB from Kraken. Gemini later confirmed that the destination was not associated with Gemini. This was done on a Firefox browser through Gemini and Kraken's website.
Incident 2: Six months later I copied a Kraken USDC/Arbitrum One deposit address and sent from MetaMask. It again went to the exact same unrelated address. This was done through an Opera browser via MetaMask extension.
Both were performed on the same Windows computer, using different browsers. The first incident did not involve MetaMask. I have successfully copied many other crypto addresses without this happening.
Has anyone encountered malware or a clipboard utility that selectively replaces only EVM addresses or triggers only inside crypto transaction forms? What diagnostic tools and persistence locations should I inspect?

Bullionstar, JM Bullion, Apmex and a bunch of others accept crypto payments, Bullionstar accepts a range of other crypto also.
Crypto-native BitHolder accepts BTC, ETH, LTC, XMR, BNB, SOL with no KYC or even Monero if you really want privacy
Another crypto-native Bitgild accepts BTC, ETH, stablecoins across Ethereum, Arbitrum, Base, and Tron
Really depends on your location but that's a start. I use bullionstar, not the best premiums out there but it's quick and easy, they have been accepting crypto for over 10 years.
place order - send crypto - pick up the gold less than 2 days later.

Been wanting to long some gold and tesla but opening a full broker account felt like too much of a headache. paperwork, bank linking, waiting for approval, nah.
realized you can actually trade this stuff with the USDT already sitting in my wallet. some crypto exchanges have TradFi asset perpetuals now settled in USDT. you're basically trading tokenized versions of things like AAPL, TSLA or XAUUSD. get margin, 24/7 access, everything settles in USDT. no need to worry about regular stock market hours.
I actually did this on both binance and bydfi. Both have TradFi sections, and I recently opened a long on TSLA. They both have their pros and cons. Binance is nice because you can use BNB to cut down on fees, plus the liquidity is definitely better. But a mid-tier CEX like BYDFi has a huge advantage with zero trading fees on TradFi assets.
if you just want to capture some stock market moves using your crypto stack without dealing with fiat off-ramps this saves alot of hassle.

If an Air BNB okay lang, but not for investment. Hindi maayos ang palakad ng PMO, cannot enforce their own house rules, may mga open issues like RFID toll barrier since 2021, mano-mano pa din ang pagbubukas. Besides sa bayad na ng bumili ang owner ang RFID toll barriers as Deliverables, still they are paying the contractor P40k a year. May mga water leak dahil may efflorescence na sa mga floors. So sa turnover nyan sa unit owners at least P10million ang gagastusin dyan.