BNBUSDT20241024P605
Binance Coin / Tether USD Oct 24 2024 605.00 Put
crypto

At least with BNB its bought back to keep price afloat. It seems to be one of the only foundations with sufficient capital for buy backs. Has ETH foundation ever bought back ETH?

*If liquidity depth and execution matter to you, Uniswap covers both well. Quick take:*
* *Supported acrossmost major EVM chains (Ethereum, Base, Arbitrum, Unichain, Polygon, BNB, and more), so you route to wherever the liquidity is.*
* *No positive slippage capture. Per the API FAQs: "Uniswap Labs never takes positive slippage. All price improvement at execution goes to the swapper. "A lot of routers quietly keep that delta.*
* *Flexible fee tiers. v3 trades through 0.05%, 0.30%, or 1% pools, and v4 supports anything from 0% to 100% including dynamic fees set by hooks. Pick the pool that fits the pair's volatility.*
* *Swap via* [*app.uniswap.org*](http://app.uniswap.org)*, the* [*Wallet*](https://wallet.uniswap.org/)*, or programmatically through the* [*Trading API*](https://developers.uniswap.org/dashboard) *(free to integrate, self-serve keys).*
*\*Full disclosure I work at Uniswap but the facts above still stand :)*

Incident 1: I copied a Gemini BNB Smart Chain deposit address and withdrew BNB from Kraken. Gemini later confirmed that the destination was not associated with Gemini. This was done on a Firefox browser through Gemini and Kraken's website.
Incident 2: Six months later I copied a Kraken USDC/Arbitrum One deposit address and sent from MetaMask. It again went to the exact same unrelated address. This was done through an Opera browser via MetaMask extension.
Both were performed on the same Windows computer, using different browsers. The first incident did not involve MetaMask. I have successfully copied many other crypto addresses without this happening.
Has anyone encountered malware or a clipboard utility that selectively replaces only EVM addresses or triggers only inside crypto transaction forms? What diagnostic tools and persistence locations should I inspect?

Bullionstar, JM Bullion, Apmex and a bunch of others accept crypto payments, Bullionstar accepts a range of other crypto also.
Crypto-native BitHolder accepts BTC, ETH, LTC, XMR, BNB, SOL with no KYC or even Monero if you really want privacy
Another crypto-native Bitgild accepts BTC, ETH, stablecoins across Ethereum, Arbitrum, Base, and Tron
Really depends on your location but that's a start. I use bullionstar, not the best premiums out there but it's quick and easy, they have been accepting crypto for over 10 years.
place order - send crypto - pick up the gold less than 2 days later.

Been wanting to long some gold and tesla but opening a full broker account felt like too much of a headache. paperwork, bank linking, waiting for approval, nah.
realized you can actually trade this stuff with the USDT already sitting in my wallet. some crypto exchanges have TradFi asset perpetuals now settled in USDT. you're basically trading tokenized versions of things like AAPL, TSLA or XAUUSD. get margin, 24/7 access, everything settles in USDT. no need to worry about regular stock market hours.
I actually did this on both binance and bydfi. Both have TradFi sections, and I recently opened a long on TSLA. They both have their pros and cons. Binance is nice because you can use BNB to cut down on fees, plus the liquidity is definitely better. But a mid-tier CEX like BYDFi has a huge advantage with zero trading fees on TradFi assets.
if you just want to capture some stock market moves using your crypto stack without dealing with fiat off-ramps this saves alot of hassle.

If an Air BNB okay lang, but not for investment. Hindi maayos ang palakad ng PMO, cannot enforce their own house rules, may mga open issues like RFID toll barrier since 2021, mano-mano pa din ang pagbubukas. Besides sa bayad na ng bumili ang owner ang RFID toll barriers as Deliverables, still they are paying the contractor P40k a year. May mga water leak dahil may efflorescence na sa mga floors. So sa turnover nyan sa unit owners at least P10million ang gagastusin dyan.

At least with BNB its bought back to keep price afloat. It seems to be one of the only foundations with sufficient capital for buy backs. Has ETH foundation ever bought back ETH?

*If liquidity depth and execution matter to you, Uniswap covers both well. Quick take:*
* *Supported acrossmost major EVM chains (Ethereum, Base, Arbitrum, Unichain, Polygon, BNB, and more), so you route to wherever the liquidity is.*
* *No positive slippage capture. Per the API FAQs: "Uniswap Labs never takes positive slippage. All price improvement at execution goes to the swapper. "A lot of routers quietly keep that delta.*
* *Flexible fee tiers. v3 trades through 0.05%, 0.30%, or 1% pools, and v4 supports anything from 0% to 100% including dynamic fees set by hooks. Pick the pool that fits the pair's volatility.*
* *Swap via* [*app.uniswap.org*](http://app.uniswap.org)*, the* [*Wallet*](https://wallet.uniswap.org/)*, or programmatically through the* [*Trading API*](https://developers.uniswap.org/dashboard) *(free to integrate, self-serve keys).*
*\*Full disclosure I work at Uniswap but the facts above still stand :)*

Incident 1: I copied a Gemini BNB Smart Chain deposit address and withdrew BNB from Kraken. Gemini later confirmed that the destination was not associated with Gemini. This was done on a Firefox browser through Gemini and Kraken's website.
Incident 2: Six months later I copied a Kraken USDC/Arbitrum One deposit address and sent from MetaMask. It again went to the exact same unrelated address. This was done through an Opera browser via MetaMask extension.
Both were performed on the same Windows computer, using different browsers. The first incident did not involve MetaMask. I have successfully copied many other crypto addresses without this happening.
Has anyone encountered malware or a clipboard utility that selectively replaces only EVM addresses or triggers only inside crypto transaction forms? What diagnostic tools and persistence locations should I inspect?

Bullionstar, JM Bullion, Apmex and a bunch of others accept crypto payments, Bullionstar accepts a range of other crypto also.
Crypto-native BitHolder accepts BTC, ETH, LTC, XMR, BNB, SOL with no KYC or even Monero if you really want privacy
Another crypto-native Bitgild accepts BTC, ETH, stablecoins across Ethereum, Arbitrum, Base, and Tron
Really depends on your location but that's a start. I use bullionstar, not the best premiums out there but it's quick and easy, they have been accepting crypto for over 10 years.
place order - send crypto - pick up the gold less than 2 days later.

Been wanting to long some gold and tesla but opening a full broker account felt like too much of a headache. paperwork, bank linking, waiting for approval, nah.
realized you can actually trade this stuff with the USDT already sitting in my wallet. some crypto exchanges have TradFi asset perpetuals now settled in USDT. you're basically trading tokenized versions of things like AAPL, TSLA or XAUUSD. get margin, 24/7 access, everything settles in USDT. no need to worry about regular stock market hours.
I actually did this on both binance and bydfi. Both have TradFi sections, and I recently opened a long on TSLA. They both have their pros and cons. Binance is nice because you can use BNB to cut down on fees, plus the liquidity is definitely better. But a mid-tier CEX like BYDFi has a huge advantage with zero trading fees on TradFi assets.
if you just want to capture some stock market moves using your crypto stack without dealing with fiat off-ramps this saves alot of hassle.

If an Air BNB okay lang, but not for investment. Hindi maayos ang palakad ng PMO, cannot enforce their own house rules, may mga open issues like RFID toll barrier since 2021, mano-mano pa din ang pagbubukas. Besides sa bayad na ng bumili ang owner ang RFID toll barriers as Deliverables, still they are paying the contractor P40k a year. May mga water leak dahil may efflorescence na sa mga floors. So sa turnover nyan sa unit owners at least P10million ang gagastusin dyan.

This is my guess. Totally a guess though.
Ethereum (ETH)
BNB (BNB)
Solana (SOL)
Tron (TRX)
Hyperliquid (HYPE)
Aave (AAVE)
PancakeSwap (CAKE)
Sky (SKY)
Jupiter (JUP)
Aerodrome (AERO)
Lido (LDO)
Uniswap (UNI)
Raydium (RAY)
Ethena (ENA)
Curve (CRV)
Pendle (PENDLE)
Meteora (MET)
Jito (JTO)

Quick writeup comparing the three perp DEXs I've spent the most time on, focused on trading real-world assets and not just crypto
**Hyperliquid** is the obvious king of volume. roughly $21B a day, tightest spreads, CEX-grade execution. fees \~0.045% taker. it now offers tokenized US equities and pre-IPO perps, which is genuinely impressive. the catch is onboarding is wallet-only, so it assumes you're already set up.
**Aster** leans into ultra-high leverage, up to 1001x, and multichain support across BNB, ETH, Solana, Arbitrum. fees are low at \~0.005% Pro. it has some tokenized stocks and metals. good platform, just very leverage-focused.
**Canborsa** is where I do most of my RWA trading. it runs on Canton Network, the privacy-first chain used by real financial institutions. biggest practical difference is you can onboard with just an email or X account, easiest of the three to get into. up to 30x leverage.
The asset list is the widest for RWAs specifically: SpaceX, Tesla, Apple, Nvidia, Google, Meta, Gold, Silver, Brent oil, S&P 500, Canton Coin, plus Bitcoin and Ethereum. and the points program actually rewards activity, volume multipliers plus quests, which feels worth it while it's still early.
Just sharing my setup. anyone found a better venue for onchain equities?

There's a guy I've followed on CT for close to two years. Small account, maybe 4k followers, but every few weeks he'll post a token thesis that's so clean it's obvious he's spent hours on it. Chart setup, on-chain data, catalyst timing, all in one thread.
He called an entry a while back that ended up running hard. I watched his replies fill up with people posting their gains. Someone screenshotted a 12x. Someone else said they finally paid off their credit card. He posted a follow-up thanking everyone for the kind words and the interaction reset his account to basically the same place it was before.
The people writing the actual sharp calls earn nothing from the volume their ideas drive. The people who copied the trade walk away with everything. And CT is full of accounts like his, buried under a hundred louder posters who don't know what they're talking about.
We got tired of watching it, so we built the fix.
The idea is simple. Trading conversations and trade execution happen in the same place. If someone posts a thesis and another trader executes against it, a real share of the trading fees routes back to the person who wrote the idea. Not tips, not subscriptions, not ad revenue. The trades themselves generate the earnings.
Multi-chain from day one, covering Solana, Base, BNB, Hyperliquid, Robinhood, plus tokenized stocks. **Posting is free**, no paywall for the people producing the value.
Launching on[ iOS](https://apps.apple.com/us/app/dapital-social-trading-app/id6744035484) today. Not doing a token, not chasing a moonshot narrative, not promising anyone will get rich. Just trying to fix a broken incentive loop that's been ignored for too long.
If you've been posting good calls on CT and getting nothing back, or if you've been trading on other people's calls and losing entries to app-switching, we built this for you.
Full walkthrough: [here](https://x.com/trydapital/status/2079582358957645884)
Appreciate any feedback or comments thank you very much

I am a long time ADA holder mostly because I really trust and respect the technology and engineering process. I went to the source. I cloned the core repositories and read the commit history myself. Honestly, it made me respect the project more. Over the last year the eight main repos logged thousands of real commits from more than 120 contributors, and roughly three-quarters of them touch actual source code, not docs. Close to 40% of the codebase is test code, and there are around a hundred Agda files sitting in there, which are mathematical proofs about how the ledger behaves. Almost nobody builds like that, in crypto or out of it. And it’s not just maintenance: they’re actively building Leios for throughput, Peras for fast finality, and scaffolding the next ledger era. If your fear was that nobody’s home, drop it. People are home, and they’re serious engineers.
But the reality is that technology is not everything. Here’s where it stops being flattering. All of that engineering has not turned into usage. On-chain activity is thin, most of it is just DEX swaps, and in the one market Cardano has made its whole headline pitch, real-world asset tokenization, it doesn’t even appear on the leaderboard. Ethereum, BNB, Solana, and Stellar own that space while Cardano is a rounding error. Worse, there’s barely any commercial muscle behind the push. The Foundation’s careers page right now lists two open roles, neither in sales or business development, and the main engineering company has spent the last couple of years shrinking itself into a smaller research-and-ventures outfit. Deep build, quiet go-to-market. That gap hasn’t budged in years, and if you actually believe in this thing, that should bother you more than the price does.
The partnerships follow the same script. The 2026 deals are real. Fireblocks for institutional custody, the FCA-regulated Archax for tokenization, an actual on-chain audit completed with Grant Thornton. But they’re shallow and non-exclusive. Archax runs the same fund on several chains and keeps its BlackRock-tier assets somewhere other than Cardano, and when Google Cloud or Vodafone “partner” it means they run a Midnight node, which is participation, not commitment. And when a partnership dies, nobody sends a memo. The cleanest example is the Ethiopia deal that was once sold as the largest blockchain deployment on earth, five million student IDs. It got quietly axed, the team was laid off, no official statement, and when pressed the founder reframed it instead of explaining what went wrong. That’s not really a Cardano flaw, it’s how the whole industry operates. Announcements never get retracted, so the only way you learn a partnership failed is by noticing it stopped getting mentioned.

Hey everyone,
I made a mistake while withdrawing VET from Binance to **VeWorld**. I accidentally selected the **BNB Smart Chain (BSC / BEP-20)** network instead of native VeChainThor.
The transaction was marked completed by Binance, and the tokens landed at my exact 0x address on the BSC network.
Here is the issue:
* My VeWorld account was set up using **Google Login** (Smart Wallet / Account Abstraction).
* Because it’s an AA Smart Wallet and not a standard EOA with a traditional seed phrase / private key export, I can’t simply import a key into MetaMask to access the BSC side of that address.
* The address exists on BSC, but the smart contract logic hasn't been deployed on that chain.
I have already sent an email to `veworld` with my TxID and wallet details.
Has anyone with a Google-authenticated VeWorld wallet run into this before? Is there any known cross-chain contract deployment / recovery process available through the VeChain team for BEP-20 transfers?
Appreciate any insight or experience from anyone who's dealt with this. Thanks!