BNBGBP
Binance Coin / Pound sterling
crypto

Lately I’ve been paying closer attention to how exchange fees affect trading profits, and it’s interesting how something small can add up over time.
Most major exchanges typically charge around 0.10% spot trading fees. That might seem minimal, but for traders who enter and exit positions frequently, those fees can gradually reduce overall returns. For example, Binance generally charges about 0.1% per spot trade before discounts.
Recently I noticed that BingX introduced a 0 Fee Zone campaign where selected assets can be traded with 0% spot trading fees for a limited time.
From what I’ve seen so far, the campaign includes:
• BTC, ETH, SOL, XRP, BNB, and DOGE with 0 trading fees until March 12
• Spot stocks and tokenized commodities with 0 fees for 30 days
• Newly listed tokens receiving 0 trading fees for the first 7 days after listing
For traders who move capital often, removing trading fees even temporarily can make a noticeable difference over multiple trades.
If you’re already trading some of these pairs, it might be something worth looking into while the campaign is running.

BNB is still high in price?

Most of his wealth is in Binance equity and BNB tokens. Unlike Bill Gates’ diversified portfolio of stocks and real estate, CZ cannot easily "cash out" $110 billion without crashing the price of his own assets. Big difference Crypto Cult!

Have you looked at how well BNB is doing?

Well I don't see why all the hate, since to me ETH is complementary to BTC since it has capcitites that BTC does not, and should not, have.
BTC is decentralized money, while ETH is a system that allows for certain processes/services, for which you needed a centralized trusted third party, to be implemented in a decentralized trustless manner...
Also I really don't see the argument with the rust attacks, since BNB, Solana etc. already have had this problem from the start and it's the natural result of having small transaction fees and no limit per transaction, it can be as little as the smallest fraction or as much as the entire wallet is holding in each transaction. This is necessary for dApps to actually be usable, it allows for more transactions per minute and each becomes cheaper which makes the fees become cheaper which leads to more people - especially people that don't want to do kyc - to use it...
I would maybe start to worry if it was to fall below 1k...

That's not what I am saying. I am thinking exactly what you said:
"ETH-aligned Exchange" takes fees in a variety of cryptos, including BTC and ETH, and occasionally they sell them and buy ETH. Literally. This is not a conspiracy. They report their holdings regularly.
\^\^\^\^\^\^
Could ETH benefit from that?
Go look at the BNB chart since 2017. It hasn’t had the same drama and volatility that ETH has experienced. From an investor’s perspective it has performed extremely well, with far less stress. I want ETH to be like that - and even better.

BNB is centralized. Not the same at all.

That's almost half the market cap of ETH, more than the market cap of BNB and XRP.
Eventually if people trade enough the exchanges will end up with all the money from fees.

CZ and Binance collectively control 60-70% of BNB.
So, if you are asking can an entity come along and entirely manipulate the price of ETH just like BNB, I would say no, wtf are you smoking.

Binance takes fees from a variety of cryptos, including BTC and ETH, and occasionally they sell them and buy BNB. Literally. This is not a conspiracy. They report their holdings regularly.

BNB is not a blockchain, it's not comparable at all.

This is exactly why marketing and narrative matter. You need a community that believes in the asset.
Gold’s value isn’t determined primarily by its use cases. Silver actually has more industrial use. The natural supply ratio of silver to gold is about 16 : 1, yet the market prices gold closer to 50 : 1 versus silver. Narrative matters.
The same thing is happening with crypto.
There are roughly 6 ETH for every 1 BTC, yet BTC trades for more than 30 ETH despite having fewer on-chain use cases. Ethereum also has a higher security budget and a much larger ecosystem.
Where Ethereum comes up short is marketing and the store-of-value narrative that Bitcoin has successfully embedded in people’s minds.
Turn on mainstream media when crypto is discussed - whether it's stablecoins or the Clarity Act - and Bitcoin gets mentioned almost automatically. Ethereum rarely enters the conversation.
That’s why many in the Ethereum community have realized over the last couple of years that marketing actually matters. Technology alone does not determine market value.
People still think in terms of “how can I use ETH?” But “using” ETH often just means trading it or paying gas. That does not necessarily drive price.
What drives price is when people hold the asset because they believe it will be more valuable in the future - the same way people hold gold… or Bitcoin… or even pet rocks.
When I bought, mined, and staked ETH, I assumed that narrative would naturally emerge. From a market perspective, I clearly misread that dynamic. Economically speaking, focusing on BTC or even BNB might have been the better trade.
I’m just being honest.
At the end of the day, life becomes easier when the assets you hold appreciate faster than the cost of living. I’m not here to use ETH purely for the sake of ideological purity.
For now, the joke has mostly been on me.

Have a look at alphasquared thats how I do PnL for btc, ETH, SOL ADA, DOT, BNB LINK... Just plug in deposits and it tracks everything with historical price DCA splits, sells, compounding. The key feature is it doesn’t just spit totals,it actually tells you market risk day by day so you know if your PnL is about to evaporate or not. Stops me from taking blind profits or just holding through dumb cycles.

I dont really care about BCH or TRX but maybe some do. Ads would annoy me wouldn’t pay unless I could track everything portfolio-wide not just BTC. if it works like alphasquared risk + portfolio + history, people will use it. If it’s just wallet lookup and history math, most will stick to their own spreadsheets or what exchanges offer.

NadiFin is a solid option if you want to accept crypto payments without dealing with KYC or KYB requirements. It works well for many types of businesses, including high risk sectors such as online gaming, casinos, subscriptions, CBD, peptides, adult entertainment, SMM panels, dropshipping, replicas, digital products, and agencies.
You can accept payments in cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin, Ethereum, Litecoin, USDT, Monero, Cardano, XRP, USDC, BNB, Tron, Solana, and Dogecoin. Each payment settles instantly to your USDC wallet with zero chargeback risk.
There are no monthly fees, no setup costs, and onboarding is quick. NadiFin also provides payment links, QR codes, and an API, with integrations for WooCommerce, Shopify, and several other platforms.

Fundamentals aren't amazing on BNB, don't get me wrong it's decent for a digital asset, but it's kinda ass compared to BTC and ETH. I care more about long term fundamentals then short/mid term price action

$BNB at $646 while everyone watches Bitcoin — and nobody notices the cleanest support defense this week.
On the 4H chart, buyers defended the $639-$634 zone without breaking structure. No dramatic wick, no panic flush — clean absorption.
Support at $634 held. Major floor at $620-$630 untested. Next logical target is $670 resistance, the nearest liquidity pocket above.
This is not a moonshot call. Defended support with intact structure typically resolves higher. The $670 level is the magnet.
When BNB holds key zones while the broader market stabilizes, the follow-through tends to be decisive.
Do you think $670 gets tagged this week, or does BNB chop sideways until a macro catalyst?

Solana, BNB, HYPE; quite a couple of them.

**Alpha Omega Coin (AOC)** is a unique blockchain project built on BNB Chain that combines innovation, community, and purpose to create a global ecosystem where technology supports development, unity, and positive impact.
Honestly, the biggest issue in crypto right now is manipulation, so seeing AOC launch Market Protection Algorithms is refreshing. The BEP20 V2.1 upgrade seems like a real step forward in preventing price dumping and flooding, which gives me more confidence in the project's long term stability. It’s not just about hype anymore; it’s about building a safer environment for everyone involved.
The Global Testing & Referral Competition with a 10,000 USDT prize pool is a great way to get people involved without just asking for money. I think it’s smart to invite investors, marketers, and KOLs to test the system because real feedback is what makes these algorithms work. It feels like a fair opportunity for the community to earn while helping improve the ecosystem.
https://preview.redd.it/00ogxttzi8og1.jpg?width=680&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=eba62336e8d645949f3b00780a7ac3083a844f13
What really stands out is the global participation aspect, inviting people from all over the world to join the testing phase. This isn’t just a local project; it’s aiming for a worldwide impact where technology supports development and unity. If they can pull this off, it could set a new standard for how other coins handle market integrity and community engagement.
Website: https://web3.alphaomegacoin.com/

Getting into crypto and stuck between Kraken vs Binance. Fees are confusing me.
Binance shows 0.10% maker/taker, Kraken Pro is 0.16%/0.26% . So Binance looks cheaper on paper. But Binance has BNB discounts, withdrawal fees, spreads which feels like hidden costs. It was also a post from last year but it said Kraken was actually cheaper.
Kraken also seems simpler with better security reputation. No major breaches since 2011.
For regular small buys ($100-200), which ends up cheaper in real life? Are there surprise fees I'm missing? Kraken Pro sounds better but is it hard for a beginner? Binance interface feels overwhelming but I think I don't mind since I'll get used to it if I'll be using it regularly.
Just want simple and cheap without hidden stuff. Which one do you use?

In 2026, several cryptocurrencies consistently process significantly higher daily transaction volumes than Bitcoin. While Bitcoin is the most valuable, its network is designed for security and value storage rather than high-frequency throughput.
Based on current network data, the following assets regularly surpass Bitcoin's daily transaction count:
# The Transaction Leaders
* **Solana (SOL):** The current leader in raw throughput. In March 2026, Solana frequently processes between **80 million and 100 million transactions daily**. Its high speed and sub-penny fees make it the primary choice for high-frequency trading and retail apps.
* **BNB Chain (BNB):** Often processes between **10 million and 15 million transactions per day**, driven by its massive ecosystem of decentralized exchanges and gaming applications.
* **Tron (TRX):** A major powerhouse for stablecoin transfers. It consistently clears **4 million to 6 million transactions daily**, largely due to the high volume of USDT (Tether) transfers on its network.
* **Ethereum (ETH):** The leading smart contract platform typically sees between **1.7 million and 2.3 million transactions per day** on its main layer, with millions more occurring on Layer 2 scaling solutions like Arbitrum and Optimism.
# Bitcoin’s Relative Volume
By comparison, **Bitcoin (BTC)** typically processes between **350,000 and 500,000 transactions daily**.
>
https://preview.redd.it/z82djz5ih7og1.png?width=1000&format=png&auto=webp&s=27d3754c9243bba9aede098619a20af5e717d5e9