BNBGBP
Binance Coin / Pound sterling
crypto

Mevolaxy is quickly becoming known as a next-generation solution for passive income seekers. What sets it apart is its use of MEV (Maximal Extractable Value) bots to generate daily returns from staked assets, rather than relying on traditional network rewards that often fluctuate with broader market movements. Instead of requiring users to actively manage pools or constantly monitor rewards, Mevolaxy’s approach is much more hands-off and predictable.
The platform’s MEV bots actively survey multiple blockchains, including both Ethereum
and BNB Chain, to identify unique opportunities. By leveraging advanced algorithms, these bots can time transactions to exploit market inefficiencies such as arbitrage and optimal sequencing. This allows staked funds to participate in frequent, profitable trades behind the scenes, translating into steady yields for users. The smart automation removes much of the complexity usually associated with DeFi strategies, giving participants a more consistent income stream even during periods of high volatility.
Simplicity and accessibility are at the core of Mevolaxy's offering. With daily returns up to 0.87 percent compounding to potentially significant APRs, users can start with a small amount and see their holdings grow over time. The interface is designed for easy navigation and automated smart contracts provide transparency on all transactions and earnings. Whether you’re a DeFi veteran or someone just looking for reliable growth without constant management, Mevolaxy aims to make earning in crypto as straightforward as possible.
Follow ***@Mevolaxy*** on X!

I have been invested in QTUM since 2019 and it is by far my greatest investment besides my early crypto bags (BNB @ .10 cents and BTC @ $300). I still DCA into QTUM and don't plan to stop for the next decade.

So do you and me and everyone. Remember when ETH went ICO, Solana and BNB and we all could buy for less than a dollar each???

I'm trying to do just that, but I keep getting this recommended reserve on BNB needed, which appears to be higher than my balance.

Widget only showing BNB coin

For alts, I check on the status of the project and what is it abou Went for COPI and RYO.
For established ones, I went for SOL. BNB. ADA

Mevolaxy is quickly becoming known as a next-generation solution for passive income seekers. What sets it apart is its use of MEV (Maximal Extractable Value) bots to generate daily returns from staked assets, rather than relying on traditional network rewards that often fluctuate with broader market movements. Instead of requiring users to actively manage pools or constantly monitor rewards, Mevolaxy’s approach is much more hands-off and predictable.
The platform’s MEV bots actively survey multiple blockchains, including both Ethereum
and BNB Chain, to identify unique opportunities. By leveraging advanced algorithms, these bots can time transactions to exploit market inefficiencies such as arbitrage and optimal sequencing. This allows staked funds to participate in frequent, profitable trades behind the scenes, translating into steady yields for users. The smart automation removes much of the complexity usually associated with DeFi strategies, giving participants a more consistent income stream even during periods of high volatility.
Simplicity and accessibility are at the core of Mevolaxy's offering. With daily returns up to 0.87 percent compounding to potentially significant APRs, users can start with a small amount and see their holdings grow over time. The interface is designed for easy navigation and automated smart contracts provide transparency on all transactions and earnings. Whether you’re a DeFi veteran or someone just looking for reliable growth without constant management, Mevolaxy aims to make earning in crypto as straightforward as possible.
Follow ***@Mevolaxy*** on X!

I have been invested in QTUM since 2019 and it is by far my greatest investment besides my early crypto bags (BNB @ .10 cents and BTC @ $300). I still DCA into QTUM and don't plan to stop for the next decade.

So do you and me and everyone. Remember when ETH went ICO, Solana and BNB and we all could buy for less than a dollar each???

I'm trying to do just that, but I keep getting this recommended reserve on BNB needed, which appears to be higher than my balance.

Widget only showing BNB coin

For alts, I check on the status of the project and what is it abou Went for COPI and RYO.
For established ones, I went for SOL. BNB. ADA

crypto is all about moving money, gambling, speculation. everything else is fugazi and dreams. maybe SOL and BNB are woth holding long term

Watching this latest round of volatility, I keep coming back to a simple split.
On one side you have stablecoins – boring by design, low volatility, predictable settlement. On the other side you have everything else – coins that can 3× or 10× in a good cycle, but can just as easily nuke 40–60% on the way down.
For most non-stablecoins the mechanics are simple: price is basically a function of speculation and number of holders. There are no meaningful reserves behind the token. When demand dries up, there’s nothing structural supporting the market – the chart just keeps bleeding until someone decides it’s “cheap enough”.
I’ve been wondering if there is room for a third category:
tokens that automatically build real on-chain reserves (in stablecoins) every time they are traded.
Idea in plain terms:
•    every buy/sell has a transparent fee;
•    the main role of that fee is to grow protocol-owned stablecoin reserves;
•    those reserves sit in liquidity pools and in a dedicated vault and cannot be withdrawn for arbitrary team spending – only used to deepen liquidity or support the market.
Over time you end up with more and more stablecoins sitting on-chain as collateral.
It’s not a hard peg like a stablecoin – the price can still move with the market – but every trade pushes real reserves up and makes the system structurally better capitalised instead of just filling a dev wallet.
We’re trying this approach with a project I’m involved in called MarsLibertyCoin (MarsLC) on BNB Chain.
I’d really like a sanity check from people here:
•    Have you seen other projects seriously trying this “fee-funded reserves” model as collateral?
•    In practice, do you think this can meaningfully reduce volatility vs typical non-stablecoins?
Genuinely interested in public opinion.

🚨 Exclusive 1-Month Outlook: XRP, ADA, BNB, BTC, BCH Analysis

Watching this latest round of volatility, I keep coming back to a simple split.
On one side you have stablecoins – boring by design, low volatility, predictable settlement. On the other side you have everything else – coins that can 3× or 10× in a good cycle, but can just as easily nuke 40–60% on the way down.
For most non-stablecoins the mechanics are simple: price is basically a function of speculation and number of holders. There are no meaningful reserves behind the token. When demand dries up, there’s nothing structural supporting the market – the chart just keeps bleeding until someone decides it’s “cheap enough”.
I’ve been wondering if there is room for a third category:
tokens that automatically build real on-chain reserves (in stablecoins) every time they are traded.
Idea in plain terms:
•    every buy/sell has a transparent fee;
•    the main role of that fee is to grow protocol-owned stablecoin reserves;
•    those reserves sit in liquidity pools and in a dedicated vault and cannot be withdrawn for arbitrary team spending – only used to deepen liquidity or support the market.
Over time you end up with more and more stablecoins sitting on-chain as collateral.
It’s not a hard peg like a stablecoin – the price can still move with the market – but every trade pushes real reserves up and makes the system structurally better capitalised instead of just filling a dev wallet.
We’re trying this approach with a project I’m involved in called MarsLibertyCoin (MarsLC) on BNB Chain.
I’d really like a sanity check from people here:
•    Have you seen other projects seriously trying this “fee-funded reserves” model as collateral?
•    In practice, do you think this can meaningfully reduce volatility vs typical non-stablecoins?
Genuinely interested in public opinion.

**Why Every Major Chain Burns Tokens… Except Cardano (And Why It Matters More Than You Think):**
Burning tokens is actually a smart design choice, and it’s becoming standard across most major ecosystems.
People sometimes underestimate why burns matter, but the logic is simple:
**1.** **Higher demand creates higher network interest.**
When a token becomes more valuable, more developers show up, more infrastructure gets built, and even the CT bot-farm economy starts orbiting the project. It pulls attention.
**2.** **Pumpamentals aren’t a meme — they’re part of competitive monetary policy.**
Projects like Hyperliquid were built around token mechanics that constantly balance supply and demand. Ethereum had to adapt its monetary policy with EIP-1559. BNB burns. Tron adjusts incentives. Even Polkadot is rethinking its entire model.
Whether we like it or not, crypto networks are competing on monetary policy, not only on decentralization or throughput.
**3.** **Burn mechanics exist outside crypto too.**
Traditional markets use share repurchase and cancellation for the same purpose. “Limited supply” alone isn’t a moat — everything that represents value functions like a token in economic terms.
**4.** **Tokenomics can and should account for long bear markets.**
Projects that plan for multi-year downturns survive. Those that don’t… don’t.
**5.** **Cardano isn’t digital gold — and doesn’t need to be.**
Bitcoin already owns the “store of value” narrative. Because BTC exists, every other asset is inflationary relative to it. That’s fine. Not every chain should try to compete on “hard money.”
**6.** **No one is asking to burn your tokens.**
The idea is to do it at the protocol level, the same way Ethereum/Hyperliquid burns part of its fees. It’s a shared contribution that benefits everyone by strengthening the economic base of the network.
**7.** **Once a price structure breaks, investor confidence rarely recovers.**
When a token keeps forming lower highs across cycles, it signals structural weakness. Markets remember this permanently: every future rally gets sold earlier, long-term holders rotate out, and new investors hesitate. Good monetary policy exists precisely to prevent this irreversible erosion of confidence.
In short: we are competing not only on decentralization and speed, but on monetary policy — and burns are a powerful tool in that arena and should at least be discussed responsibly to be implemented at the protocol design.

First thing to know. It’s not too late.
Crypto is still early. The majority of the world isn’t using it yet, adoption keeps growing, tools keep improving, and the movement behind it gets stronger every cycle. Essentially that’s one of the reasons long term believers never stepped away.
The real value in crypto comes from people, not the fake utility/tech
That’s why I don’t chase hype from paid promotions on YouTube or TikTok.
SPX6900 is a perfect example of that.
It’s a community of people who are tired of gated financial systems and legacy markets. Anyone can join. Anyone can contribute.
It’s multi chain on Base, Ethereum, Solana, BNB, and SUI.
SPX6900 shows exactly what happens when thousands of people align around one simple idea:
Stop Trading and Believe in Something
Flip the Stock Market
So is it worth getting into crypto. Yes.

You are ignoring the macro context because this isn't 2017 anymore. Back then capital was concentrated in just a few assets so when BTC pumped the money flowed directly into XRP or ETH since there was nowhere else to go. Today liquidity is severely diluted across thousands of chains and L2s plus massive meme sectors and competing Alt-L1s like Solana or Sui.
​You are also falling for the "early" fallacy because buying XRP at $0.006 was buying a micro-cap while buying Monad today at a $3B FDV is not getting in early like back then. The easy 100x has already been captured by VCs at seed valuation.
​For Monad to hit $1 it needs a $100B Market Cap which implies flipping BNB or Solana. It is not just about ecosystem growth anymore but about aggressively stealing market share in an oversaturated market.. Betting on a 2017 style rally in a 2025 fragmented market is dangerous.

Not to mention you shoulda also all inned BTC in december 2018, hold till summer 2019 peak and sell, all in during the exact ETH bottom of the covid crash, hold till 4K, swap to BNB, all in that to a doge 100x long, dump (100x short preferred) when Elon was in SNL, buy back in at the bottom of 2021 summer, sell at 69K, go 100x short at the absofucking lute peak, hold that till ftx crash, then all in btc, hold till 100k, swap to gold ETF with 100x leverage. It was all so obvious, why did you not do it??