BNBGBP
Binance Coin / Pound sterling
cryptoComposite

[](https://www.bing.com/copilotsearch?q=binance+transactions+fee&form=CSBRAND)Binance Transaction Fees — 2026 Overview **Binance’s default spot trading fee is 0.10% maker and 0.10% taker, reduced to 0.075% with a BNB payment discount, and further lowered for VIP tiers**

With CZ getting jailed (a long while ago), now Binance exchange getting hacked. how is BNB token still so far up the ladder? it doesn't make sense to me. CRO should be where BNB is right now.

Snapshots occur monthly. Ideally it would be at every block, or at least include a block range between snapshots that covers the gaps, but I'm very skeptical that Binance would be borrowing some big chonk of funds against their BNB or whatever every month. Of course we're not talking about off-chain pinky promises here. The important part is that the number if the vaults is greater than or equal to customer funds.

I'm looking to hire an experienced crypto trader and an experienced researcher for paid work on Tessaro, a lending market on BNB Chain. The trader runs strategies on the markets. The researcher maps where the yield actually is and which collateral is worth trusting. Work is remote and async. You'd report on what you run, note what worked and what didn't, and flag risk before it bites. Budget is up to $1,500 usd per month per role, plus a share of fees. Include your rate and a short plan for the first 30 days inside that budget. Contact me on discord at *honoringg* with experience, markets you work with, examples of past positions or research, availability.

A Merkle tree Proof of Reserves only proves Binance had custody of specific tokens at a single moment—it ignores off-chain debt, unlisted liabilities, and potential snapshot borrowing, while dangling over $30 billion in self-issued BNB to make the exchange look massively well-capitalized without proving how those proprietary tokens are pledged behind closed doors, mirroring the exact optical playbook FTX ran with FTT before collapsing.

BNB climbing all day so yeah no.

And 90% has already been replenished (from Binance): "Since our last update, the covered amount has risen from approximately 80% to 90%. All BTC, ETH, USDT, BNB, SOL, USDC, XRP, USD1, RLUSD and ZEC are fully backed at 100%. We'll keep purchasing the remaining assets through market and OTC channels until the covered amount reaches 100% for all tokens."

Looks open, at least for USDT withdrawals on Ethereum. On our node Binance's published wallets went quiet for about two and a half days, then from 07:00 UTC today sent about 28,700 USDT payments by 12:35, more than a normal full day in under six hours. The median was about $140 against the usual $95, so it's ordinary users getting through. P2P and internal transfers happen inside Binance, and we don't run Tron or BNB Chain nodes, so those I can't confirm, but USDT is clearly leaving again.

USDT, USDC, BNB & BTC shows can withdraw on my end. My other coins shows suspended but I guess they will all be allowed soon. No worries on my end.

Because there is no real impact on BNB. The cryptocurrency is only affected if Binance decides to issue more tokens to cover its losses which is not happening because BNB supply is fixed at 131 million.

Sorry, misinterpreted their announcement. Still, probably could've been phrase a little bit better. "Binance said phase would start between 0600 and 0900 GMT on Sunday and include bitcoin, ether, BNB, ⁠Solana, XRP, dogecoin and other tokens."

If you just look at the chart of BNB you immediately realize that it barely moved since the hack, and it has been holding above 600 for two years, yet you claim here that it can become of no value in a week. You have 'delusional' written on your head.

In my tests TA couldn't predict direction after costs: crypto 15m to daily, FX majors, gold, S&P/NQ intraday. ICT on gold, stop-runs on S&P, VWAP fades on NQ, S/R levels on crypto all came out same as random entries or worse. But TA is very useful for sizing, stops and execution. The edge comes from somewhere else. The one question: who is on the other side, and why are they ok losing to u ? For an RSI oversold long the answer is "nobody in particular". The seller is looking at the same chart. Real edges have an answer, and it's one of 3 things. "But if everyone buys at RSI 30, isn't it self-fulfilling ?" No, it kills itself. If 30 reliably bounced, people would buy at 32, then 35, until the bounce is gone. And chart traders disagree (one sees oversold, another sees a breakdown) and use different settings and timeframes. They're also small next to funds, hedgers and liquidations who don't care about RSI. The one part that's real is stop orders clustering just past obvious levels and round numbers, so price can speed up through them. That's order flow, it lasts seconds, and fast traders take it before ur candle closes. My data agrees: stoch/RSI oversold longs failed validation, and stop run trades on S&P lost. ***1. Structure: a rule or contract forces the price*** Stocks: merger arb. Deal at $50, stock at $48, it has to go to 50 if the deal closes. Ur risk is the deal breaking, not the chart. Forex: forward prices are set by the interest rate gap. My USDINR long trend trade looked fine on spot, but was -1.4%/yr after the forward premium. ***2. Flows: someone HAS to trade*** Crypto: exchange delistings, holders have to sell or move coins. My best lead, passed build data, but the holdout was too small and failed, so it's paper trading forward currently. Stocks: index adds and Russell reconstitution, index funds MUST buy on that date at any price. Forex: the 4pm London fix, month end, Japanese importers buying USD on the 5th/10th ("gotobi"). But forced isn't enough, it has to be a surprise. FX month end, gotobi, the fix, carry: 0 of 13 passed. Crypto token unlocks: 0 of 9. The S&P inclusion effect is way smaller than in the 90s. Known date = priced in. **3. Costs: u're cheaper than everyone else** Crypto: a reversal signal was real but smaller than taker fees. Same USDC signal wins as a maker, loses as a taker. Stocks: HFT and market makers earn the spread + rebates. Retail scalpers pay it. Forex: an edge at a 0.1 pip interbank spread can be dead at ur broker's 1 pip. So what is TA for ? Sizing. Direction isn't predictable but volatility is, big move days cluster in every market. 2x the ATR = half the size. Stops. A swing high or ATR multiple is ur "I'm wrong" level. In my tests stops never raised the average trade, they only cut the tail. That's what keeps u alive: one delisted coin went +2655% after the news. Same for a broken merger or a carry trade when the yen rips. Execution. Don't chase the first spike, use limits for maker fills, avoid CPI/NFP minutes, the open and rollover. A few bps matters a lot on carry or arb. Regime. Price above a long moving average cut drawdowns on BTC/ETH/BNB, but didn't pass significance on the final test. Risk dial, not alpha. **Checklist** Who loses to me and why ? "People who read the chart wrong" = expect random. Is it forced (rule, contract, mandate, liquidation) or opinion ? Is it already priced ? Is the gap bigger than my full round trip cost ? Only then use TA for size, stop and entry. Don't use the chart to find the trade. Find the reason someone has to lose, then use the chart to stay alive while u wait. **Let's work on this together** I'd rather find edges with people than alone. If u have an idea that passes the checklist, or even half an idea, drop it in the comments: **Brainstorm:** who is forced to trade in ur market ? Rules, mandates, deadlines, liquidations, rebalances, anything. **Discuss:** poke holes in each other's ideas. Is it already priced ? Who's the cheapest trader doing it ? **Test:** I'll run the good ones the same way as everything above (real data, real costs, vs random entries, final test on untouched data) and post the results here, pass or fail.