Create Account
Log In
Dark
chart
exchange
Premium
Terminal
Screener
Stocks
Crypto
Forex
Trends
Depth
Close
Check out our Level2View

BNBGBP
Binance Coin / Pound sterling
crypto

Inactive
Dec 28, 2023 9:58:00 PM EST
267.40GBP-2.087%(-5.70)980
OverviewHistoricalDepthTrendsNewsTrends
BNB Reddit Mentions
Subreddits
Limit Labels     

We have sentiment values and mention counts going back to 2017. The complete data set is available via the API.
Take me to the API
BNB Specific Mentions
As of Feb 16, 2026 12:31:48 PM EST (<1 min. ago)
Includes all comments and posts. Mentions per user per ticker capped at one per hour.
3 hr ago • u/KazuFromUniswap • r/UniSwap • need_help_please • C
It means that you don't have enough BNB in your wallet to cover gas fees for the transfer. Just send some more BNB to yourself
sentiment 0.00
9 hr ago • u/InsaneChemical_720 • r/Vechain • stablecoin_access_on_vechain_is_broader_than_most • B
One of the more overlooked aspects of the VeChain ecosystem is its robust stablecoin connectivity. Through the [Wanchain Bridge](https://bridge.wanchain.org/AssetBridge), VeChain is directly linked to 17 different blockchain networks. This integration enables support for both USDC and USDT across multiple chains, including Ethereum, BNB Chain, Avalanche, Arbitrum, Optimism, Polygon, and more.
This connectivity creates a significant strategic advantage by allowing:
* **External liquidity to enter the VeChain ecosystem.**
* **Capital to move freely, unrestricted by a single chain.**
* **DeFi composability to expand, unlocking new possibilities.**
The attached infographic visualizes every supported route and asset pairing. 

**This perspective shifts VeChain from a standalone project to an active participant in the multi-chain liquidity landscape.**
Which of these routes do you think adds the most strategic value?
sentiment 0.98
12 hr ago • u/Big_Papaya_6974 • r/binance • safepal_swap_failure • News • B
SafePal Swap Failure – Funds Lost – Support Ignoring Case – Need Guidance
Hello everyone,
I am sharing my experience to warn users and seek guidance.
I performed a swap using SafePal internal swap system:
BTC → BNB → DOG (Runes)
Order ID: 10036e31-efaa-3892-ddd9-2e638fb57bae
During the transaction, my BTC was debited, but the DOG (Runes) tokens were never credited to my wallet.
Despite multiple detailed support requests, SafePal keeps sending generic responses, without addressing the technical evidence, transaction hash, or providing any resolution timeline.
This appears to be a platform operational failure, not user error.
Has anyone faced similar issues with SafePal swaps?
What is the best escalation path to recover funds?
I will keep this thread updated.
sentiment -0.42
2 days ago • u/Tiny_Mathematician94 • r/phinvest • crypto_port_down_30 • C
I started DCA in August with 35% BTC, 25% ETH, 15% SOL, 15% AAVE and 10% BNB and I'm down 34%. Still depositing 100usd weekly.
I also made an excel sheet programmed to determine allocation of the 5 coins based on the latest price movement. So the allocation is dynamic, like for the next week, the 100usd would be distributed accordingly, for example: 32%-19%-18%-16%-15%.
sentiment 0.78
2 days ago • u/Sos418_tw • r/binance • binance • C
How about BNB?
sentiment 0.00
2 days ago • u/Pleasant-Ambition-41 • r/UniSwap • need_help_please • C
You probably don’t have gas. If your funds are on BNB, you need gas so buy a bit via ChainATM and send it there.
sentiment 0.25
2 days ago • u/CryptoForecast1 • r/Bitcoincash • bitcoin_cash_bch_forecast_and_price_analysis • Discussion • B
we analyze **Bitcoin Cash (BCH)** as it trades around **$560**. Our Portfolio Builder officially flags BCH as a "Gem" (High Return/High Volatility), but the Bear Market models predict a potential **70% crash** to $172.
* 💎 **Gem Status:** BCH sits in the "Gem Zone" of our Portfolio Builder with **32% Annualized Returns** and **85% Volatility**, performing similarly to BNB and Tron.
* ⚠️ **Risk Signal:** The Composite Risk Score is **0.35 (35%)**, which is higher than Bitcoin (39%) and ETH (50%), signaling it is currently in "Neutral" territory, not deep accumulation.
* 🎯 **Bear Market Targets:**
* **Base Case:** **$260** (53% Drop / Machine Learning Forecast)
* **Panic Bottom:** **$200**
* **Recession Case:** **$172** (70% Crash)
* 🐂 **Bull Market Potential (2028/29):**
* **Target:** **$1,500** (approx. 7x from the bottom).
**Disclaimer:** This content is Not Financial Advice (NFA). All charts and proprietary models are available for free at **cryptoweeklies.com**.
sentiment -0.97
2 days ago • u/TychiLabs • r/CryptoMarkets • why_does_crypto_still_require_holding_5_different • DISCUSSION • B
This is something that’s always bothered me.
If I want to use Ethereum → I need ETH.
BNB Chain → BNB.
Base → ETH on Base (not the same ETH).
TON? Different gas.
Sui? Another one.
At this point it feels normal. But if you step back, it’s kind of insane.
You can literally have $5,000 in USDC and still fail a transaction because you don’t have $0.50 of the “right” native token.
So what do people do?
* Bridge just to get gas
* Keep random small balances on every chain “just in case”
* Top up native tokens over and over
* Explain to new users why they need one token just to move another token
We’ve optimized throughput.
We’ve launched rollups and modular stacks.
Cross-chain messaging is getting better.
But at the user level, we still have to manually manage gas per chain.
Is this just the cost of decentralization?
Or is this something we’ve normalized that actually doesn’t need to exist?
Curious how others here see it.
sentiment 0.70


Share
About
Pricing
Policies
Markets
API
Info
tz UTC-5
Connect with us
ChartExchange Email
ChartExchange on Discord
ChartExchange on X
ChartExchange on Reddit
ChartExchange on GitHub
ChartExchange on YouTube
© 2020 - 2026 ChartExchange LLC