BNBGBP
Binance Coin / Pound sterling
crypto

XRP, ADA, DOGE, TRX, BNB, ZEC, MANA, XLM, NEO, IOTA, VET, ZRX, VTHO, ZIL - a lot of these I picked up back in 2017 or 2018.
DOGE was basically a “house money” trade in 2021. I sold a few ETH, bought DOGE, then sold it a day or so later and bought back my original ETH - plus kept the leftover DOGE as profit.

Most privacy tools in crypto force you into a bad tradeoff. Use a mixer, gain confidentiality, lose fungibility. Exchanges flag your withdrawal address. DApps block your wallet. Your "clean" assets become tainted the moment you touch a privacy protocol.
BlackBox takes a different approach at the cryptographic level, and the testnet is live right now.
THE TECH
BlackBox uses ECDSA One-Time Signature (OTS) keys to sever the on-chain link between your deposit and withdrawal address. This is not zero-knowledge proofs with a trusted setup ceremony. It is not ring signatures with a limited anonymity set. It is a pre-generated key scheme where each key works exactly once, stored in a Merkle tree on-chain, verifiable without revealing any other key in the set.
How it works in three steps:
* You deposit to the BlackBox smart contract on any supported chain. The deposit is public but cryptographically unlinked to any future withdrawal.
* Distributed backend nodes generate your OTS keys in under 2 seconds. No KYC. No IP tracking. No waiting periods.
* You withdraw on any supported chain using your OTS key. The withdrawal has zero on-chain connection to your deposit. Keys never expire. You control the timing entirely.
The backend runs on a 3-of-5 threshold signature scheme. No single node controls anything. Two nodes fail or go rogue and the system stays secure. This removes the single point of failure that kills most centralized privacy services.
CROSS-CHAIN
Deposit on Ethereum. Withdraw on Solana. Split your withdrawal across Polygon and Base simultaneously. The protocol handles cross-chain liquidity through a unified virtual balance pool managed by the backend nodes. OTS keys are chain-agnostic, meaning you do not lock yourself into a chain at deposit time.
Supported chains at testnet: Ethereum, Solana, BNB Chain, Polygon, Optimism, Base.
Supported tokens include ETH, SOL, USDC, USDT, DAI, BNB, MATIC, and BUSD depending on chain.
THE FUNGIBILITY PROBLEM
This is the part most privacy protocols ignore. When you withdraw from a mixer, your funds carry a taint score. Chainalysis and similar firms flag the withdrawal address. Exchanges freeze assets or ask you to explain your transaction history. Your ETH is no longer equal to every other ETH.
BlackBox addresses this with what they call Federated Confidentiality. The protocol maintains a clean withdrawal pool standard. Threshold de-anonymization is possible for illicit funds when 3 of 5 nodes agree, which keeps the pool clean for everyone else. Your withdrawn assets remain fungible and accepted on standard exchanges and DApps.
This is the only approach I have seen that solves confidentiality and compliance simultaneously at the protocol level rather than through a terms-of-service clause.
WHY THIS MATTERS BEFORE TOKEN LAUNCH
No token exists yet. This is a testnet. That means you are looking at a project before any price discovery, before any exchange listing, before any market cap exists to evaluate.
What exists right now is working code, open-source contracts, a published technical whitepaper, and a live testnet across six chains.
The use cases are concrete and addressable today: whale traders getting front-run on DEXs, funds whose arbitrage strategies get copied by on-chain watchers, businesses paying salaries in crypto with full payroll visibility, NFT collectors with exposed wallet histories, and any entity that needs GDPR compliance on a public blockchain.
The quantum resistance angle is worth noting too. Most ZK-based privacy protocols rely on elliptic curve cryptography that a sufficiently advanced quantum computer breaks. OTS schemes rely on hash functions, which are considered quantum-resistant. This is an architecture decision that most competitors have not made.
RISKS TO ASSESS
* No token yet means no liquidity event and no price to evaluate. This is pre-launch speculation entirely.
* Privacy protocols face regulatory scrutiny. Tornado Cash is the obvious reference point. BlackBox's compliance mechanism is designed to address this, but regulatory risk in this category is real and ongoing.
* Testnet code is not audited mainnet code. Smart contract risk exists until a full audit is published.
* The threshold node network requires trust in the node operator selection and geographic distribution until fully decentralized.
DYOR STARTING POINTS
Full technical documentation: [theblackbox.network/docs](http://theblackbox.network/docs)
Testnet: [https://theblackbox.network/deposit](https://theblackbox.network/deposit)

I have used Garden Finance as well, they were really fast, I thinko they are the only zero trust bridge who have figured going from BTC to other L1 like Solana, Starknet, HyperEVM, MegaETH, Tron, BNB etc.
Most of the available options in the market are either custodial and centralized or cluttered and multip step, where user have to do multipl processes manually.
They are the only ones I think who have used where they are trustless and have optimized for speed for all the routes, + UI is so aesthetic and simple that my grandma can use it.

Yup. Read the update on Google News. Solana whales dominante but a BNB Whale is DCAing into the project.
First round could end within 14 days and then thinigs will get interesting in terms of daily buying averages when people see it's progressing rounds

Stacking up coins that I see as long term investment like SOL, AIOZ, SUI and BNB.

Binancians vs the Flock: Searching for the next 100x Gem, between BNB and Patos on Solana

Just buy the exchange platform tokens such as BNB , BGB etc.

Olá u/brunocosta1988 Bom dia!
O Binance Card Brasil utiliza para pagamentos as criptomoedas que você selecionou e organizou na lista de prioridades no Painel do Cartão. Ou seja, o cartão não utiliza diretamente seu saldo em BRL para as compras, mas sim converte as criptos da sua Conta Spot ou Conta de Fundos conforme a ordem de prioridade que você definiu.
Atualmente, você deve ter pelo menos 3 criptomoedas na lista de prioridades (até 12 no máximo) e o sistema vai deduzir os fundos dessas criptos na ordem que você configurou. Se o saldo da criptomoeda priorizada for insuficiente, o cartão tentará usar a próxima criptomoeda da lista para concluir a compra. No momento, o Binance Card Brasil suporta 10 criptomoedas, incluindo USDT, USDC, FDUSD, BNB, BTC, ETH, SOL, ADA, LINK e XRP.
Portanto, para usar o cartão, é necessário ter saldo nas criptomoedas selecionadas na sua lista de prioridades. O saldo em BRL não é usado diretamente para pagamentos.
Para mais detalhes, você pode consultar o FAQ oficial da Binance sobre o Binance Card Brasil:
[https://www.binance.com/pt-BR/support/faq/detail/24866a142df34b6a8c1a038dedb5ed8b](https://www.binance.com/pt-BR/support/faq/detail/24866a142df34b6a8c1a038dedb5ed8b)
Ah, como essa pergunta é relacionada a suporte, ela deveria ter sido postada na [thread semanal de Suporte aqui](https://www.reddit.com/r/binance/comments/1r60jgz/binance_support_thread/) no Reddit. Se tiver mais dúvidas para nossa equipe de suporte, por favor, prossiga por lá. Obrigado! ˆLP

read and learn impermeant loss bro. Ive had 5k staked in a mix of BNB@700 and PEPE at about .600 at that time it was attractive, but once they move apart? no more BNB and no return on capital until they come together in price again. its sick. that money is most probably gone at this point. it was 5-7k at the time

You can see how real-world asset tokenization is going on [this website](https://app.rwa.xyz/). If you are clicking on "Distributed" Ethereum is on top with $14.7 billion followed by BNB Chain with just $2.3 billion and Solana with only $1.7 billion.
"Distributed" is what we would call an actual decentralized blockchain based tokenization attempt. However, there is the option "Represented" where the description includes
>[...] using the blockchain as a recordkeeping layer [...] without enabling onchain investor transfer or distribution.
In this category Canton wins with $341 billion.
But seriously ... What is the point of that? Without onchain transfers and distributions this whole concept doesn't make sense (?) Which smart contracts are I supposed to use if onchain transfers and distributions aren't allowed? This sounds like a bad joke ...