TX Reddit Mentions | ChartExchange

\# Bitcoin Mining Profitability Thresholds & What They Imply for BTC Price — A Deep Dive (Feb 2026)
\*\*TL;DR:\*\* Post-halving mining costs have roughly doubled. The industry average all-in cost per BTC is \~$75K–$87K, while the most efficient miners (MARA, CleanSpark) produce at \~$34K–$43K. BTC is currently trading \*at or below\* average production cost — historically a generational bottom signal. The “death spiral” is a myth thanks to difficulty adjustments. The real risk is financial contagion from overleveraged miners and AI datacenters outbidding miners for cheap power. By the 2028 halving, BTC likely needs to be $90K–$160K minimum to sustain current hashrate. By 2032, either BTC is $200K+ or transaction fees must grow dramatically — and right now fees are at 12-month lows (\~1% of miner revenue).
\-----
\## 1. Current Mining Economics (Post-April 2024 Halving)
The April 2024 halving cut block rewards from 6.25 → 3.125 BTC, roughly doubling production costs overnight.
\*\*Big 3 US Miners — Direct Cost per BTC:\*\*
\- \*\*MARA Holdings:\*\* \~$33,735/BTC (Q2 2025) — 18.3 J/TH efficiency, 60.4 EH/s deployed. Benefits from 70% owned fleet, gas-to-power ops, and a 114 MW wind farm acquisition.
\- \*\*CleanSpark:\*\* \~$34,000–$42,700/BTC (FQ1–FQ2 2025) — Industry-leading 16.15 J/TH efficiency, 50+ EH/s. Their CEO literally said: “Why buy bitcoin at current prices when we can mine it for $34,000?”
\- \*\*Riot Platforms:\*\* \~$46,324/BTC (Q3 2025) — 20.5 J/TH, 36.5 EH/s. Costs jumped from $7,539 in FY2023 partly because ERCOT power curtailment credits collapsed 53%.
\*\*Industry-wide (CoinShares estimates):\*\*
\- Direct cash cost (median public miner): \*\*\~$74,600/BTC\*\* (Q2 2025)
\- All-in cost including depreciation & SBC: \*\*\~$137,800/BTC\*\*
\- CoinDesk reported in Feb 2026 that BTC was trading \*\*\~20% below average production cost\*\* ($70K price vs $87K production cost)
These are from actual earnings reports and SEC filings, not estimates.
\*\*Regional Electricity Costs for Mining:\*\*
\- Flared gas (on-site): $0.01–0.025/kWh
\- Northern Norway/Iceland: $0.02–0.04/kWh (Norway banned new mining 2025)
\- Ethiopia: $0.03–0.04/kWh (GERD hydro — 18% of national utility revenue now from mining)
\- Russia/Siberia: $0.03–0.04/kWh (legalized Aug 2024, but 10 regional bans + 15% tax)
\- Texas (stranded): $0.028–0.05/kWh (but 226 GW of AI load now in ERCOT queue)
\- Kazakhstan: $0.03–0.05/kWh (coal-based, 15% tax)
\- Global weighted average for mining: \*\*\~$0.05–0.07/kWh\*\*
\-----
\## 2. Hashrate & Difficulty — The Rollercoaster
\*\*Timeline since halving:\*\*
\- Pre-halving (April 2024): \~620–650 EH/s
\- Post-halving dip (May 2024): \~581 EH/s (hashprice hit ATL below $45/PH/s)
\- Jan 2025: \~800 EH/s
\- Aug 2025: Crossed \*\*1 ZH/s\*\* (1,000 EH/s) — historic milestone
\- Oct 2025 ATH: \~1,150 EH/s (coincided with BTC \~$126K peak)
\- Feb 2026 (now): \~950–1,005 EH/s (\*\*\~20% drop from peak\*\*)
\*\*Difficulty:\*\*
\- ATH: 155.98T (November 2025)
\- Current: \~125.86T (February 2026)
\- Just recorded \*\*largest single-period drop since China’s 2021 mining ban\*\*
\*\*What caused the crash?\*\* BTC falling 47% from ATH to \~$70K, China shutting down \~400K rigs in Xinjiang, US tariff concerns on mining equipment, and winter energy cost spikes.
\*\*Key stat:\*\* CoinMetrics estimates S19-series ASICs still account for \~50% of network hashrate despite being marginally profitable or at a loss. This is “zombie hashrate” — a massive capitulation overhang.
\*\*Forward projections:\*\*
\- Hashlabs: \~1,727 EH/s by end 2026 (assumes price recovery)
\- CoinShares: 2 ZH/s by early 2027
\- 2028 halving range: 1,800–3,000 EH/s (heavily dependent on price + AI diversion)
\-----
\## 3. ASIC Profitability Thresholds
At current conditions (BTC \~$70K, difficulty \~126T), here’s what each generation needs to break even:
\- \*\*Antminer S19 (34 J/TH):\*\* Needs power below $0.053/kWh → \*\*Unprofitable for most\*\*
\- \*\*S19j Pro (29.5 J/TH):\*\* Needs below $0.062/kWh → \*\*Marginal, stranded power only\*\*
\- \*\*S19 XP (21.5 J/TH):\*\* Needs below \~$0.08/kWh → \*\*Viable with cheap power\*\*
\- \*\*S21 (17.5 J/TH):\*\* Needs below \~$0.10/kWh → \*\*Profitable at most mining rates\*\*
\- \*\*S21 Pro (15 J/TH):\*\* Needs below \~$0.12/kWh → \*\*Comfortably profitable\*\*
\- \*\*S21 XP Hyd (12 J/TH):\*\* Needs below \~$0.15/kWh → \*\*Best available production unit\*\*
\*\*Next-gen hardware coming:\*\*
\- Auradine Teraflux: targeting \*\*9.8 J/TH\*\* (volume production Q3 2026)
\- Bitmain S23 Hyd: targeting \~9.5 J/TH
\- Bitdeer SEAL04: targeting \*\*sub-5 J/TH\*\* (aspirational)
\*\*ASIC market signals distress:\*\* Bitmain is running fire sales — S19 XP+ Hyd units at $3–4/TH (compared to $25–27/TH at peak). Payback periods for new rigs now exceed \*\*1,000 days\*\*, uncomfortably close to the \~1,460 days until the next halving.
\-----
\## 4. The “Mining Death Spiral” — Why It’s a Myth
The theory: falling prices → miner shutdowns → slow blocks → panic → more selling → death.
\*\*It has never happened. Here’s why it can’t:\*\*
\*\*a) Difficulty adjustment.\*\* Every \~2,016 blocks (\~2 weeks), difficulty recalibrates. When hashrate drops, difficulty falls, making remaining miners \*more\* profitable. Even a 75% hashrate loss only slows blocks to \~40-minute intervals for \~6.5 weeks before auto-correction.
\*\*b) Heterogeneous costs.\*\* Miners pay anywhere from $0.00/kWh (flared gas) to $0.10+/kWh. At ANY BTC price, some operators remain profitable. The network literally cannot become unprofitable for all miners simultaneously.
\*\*c) Fee market backstop.\*\* When blocks slow, transaction fees spike as users bid for scarce space, automatically increasing miner revenue.
\*\*The ultimate stress test was already passed:\*\* China’s 2021 ban wiped out \*\*\~50% of global hashrate\*\* practically overnight (180 → 58 EH/s). The network adapted perfectly. Difficulty adjusted. Miners relocated. Hashrate fully recovered in 5–7 months. BTC hit $69K ATH by November 2021.
\*\*Halving capitulation history:\*\*
\- 2016: Negligible hashrate impact
\- 2020: 5–10% dip, cushioned by COVID pre-purge of weak miners
\- 2024: 7.7% decline, recovery in 2–3 months as BTC surged past $100K
\*\*Post-halving cycle returns are diminishing sharply though:\*\* \~2,977% (2016), \~705% (2020), \~97% (2024 to Oct 2025 peak)
\*\*⚠️ What IS a real risk:\*\* Not a protocol death spiral but \*\*financial contagion\*\*. Miners are now heavily leveraged:
\- MARA: $1.9B equity + $950M convertible notes, holds 52,850 BTC
\- Riot: $1B in convertibles, holds \~18,000 BTC
\- CleanSpark: raised $1.8B, holds \~13,000 BTC
A prolonged bear market could force treasury liquidations, adding sell pressure at the worst time. This is what Michael Burry’s early-2026 “death spiral” warning is actually about — corporate reflexivity, not the protocol.
\-----
\## 5. Energy Cost Projections vs. BTC Price Requirements
\*\*The AI elephant in the room:\*\*
The IEA projects global datacenter electricity consumption \*\*doubling from 415 TWh (2024) to 945 TWh by 2030\*\*, with AI-optimized facilities quadrupling. AI workloads generate approximately \*\*25x higher revenue per megawatt\*\* than Bitcoin mining (per VanEck). AI companies can systematically outbid miners for the cheapest power.
\*\*This is already happening:\*\*
\- ERCOT queue: \*\*226 GW\*\* of new large-load requests (up from 63 GW end-2024), 73% from datacenters
\- PJM capacity auction saw \~$9.3B price increase partly from datacenter demand
\- Carnegie Mellon estimates datacenters + crypto could raise average US electricity bills \*\*8% by 2030\*\*, 25%+ in Virginia
\*\*The “mullet strategy” — Bitcoin in the back, AI in the front:\*\*
\- Core Scientific: $10.2B, 12-year CoreWeave hosting deal
\- IREN: $9.7B Microsoft AI cloud deal
\- Hut 8: $7B Google-backed Fluidstack lease
\- Riot: redirecting 600 MW at Corsicana, TX from mining to AI/HPC
\- AI-pivoted miners now trade at \*\*\~2x valuation per MW\*\* vs pure-play BTC miners
\*\*Implied minimum BTC price trajectory:\*\*
|Halving |Block reward|Est. breakeven (optimistic)|Est. breakeven (AI energy competition)|
|--------------|------------|---------------------------|--------------------------------------|
|Current (2024)|3.125 BTC |$70K–$75K |$75K–$90K |
|2028 |1.5625 BTC |$90K–$120K |$120K–$160K |
|2032 |0.78125 BTC |$200K+ |$300K–$400K+ |
These assume fleet efficiency improving from \~17–20 J/TH → \~10 J/TH by 2028, and \~7 J/TH by 2032.
\-----
\## 6. Transaction Fees — The Elephant Nobody Talks About
Bitcoin’s long-term security model \*requires\* transaction fees to replace declining block subsidies. Current reality:
\- Fees hit \*\*12-month lows below 1% of total miner revenue\*\* in early 2026
\- \~$300K/day in fees vs \~$45M/day in block subsidies
\- After briefly reaching \~20% during the 2024 Ordinals/Runes boom, fee share collapsed
For context, in December 2017 fees briefly constituted \*\*78% of block rewards\*\* during peak congestion. So the capacity exists — but sustained high fees haven’t materialized.
By the 2032 halving, if fees haven’t grown meaningfully, miners face an impossible math: block subsidies at \~112.5 BTC/day simply cannot sustain current-level security without either 5-figure BTC prices or a dramatic fee market expansion.
\*\*Potential fee growth vectors:\*\* Lightning Network, Ordinals/Runes ecosystem, cross-chain bridging demand. None have demonstrated sustained revenue at scale yet.
\-----
\## 7. Regulatory & Geopolitical Landscape
\*\*Bullish:\*\*
\- US: Strategic Bitcoin Reserve (\~198,012 BTC held by govt), SEC clarified PoW mining ≠ securities, GENIUS Act passed, Texas created state BTC reserve
\- Ethiopia: monetizing surplus hydro, 18% of utility revenue from mining
\- El Salvador, Paraguay: active mining jurisdictions
\*\*Bearish / Mixed:\*\*
\- China: Hardened mining ban Feb 2026, but still \~14% of global hashrate underground
\- Russia: Legalized then imposed 10 regional bans + criminal penalties for unregistered ops
\- EU MiCA: Mandatory sustainability disclosures, narrowly avoided PoW ban
\- Norway: Banned new mining datacenters (late 2025)
\*\*Wildcard:\*\* Quantum computing — expert consensus places earliest viable attacks at 2028–2033. BIP-360 outlines migration to quantum-resistant cryptography, but the timeline is tight.
\-----
\## 8. Key Risk Factors & Research Agenda
\*\*For bulls:\*\*
\- ✅ Rising production cost floor historically marks price bottoms
\- ✅ Diminishing new supply (only 450 BTC/day mined)
\- ✅ Institutional ETF adoption (68% of institutions allocated or planning to)
\- ✅ AI-pivot optionality embedded in mining infrastructure
\- ✅ US government alignment (Strategic Reserve, favorable regulation)
\*\*For bears:\*\*
\- ⚠️ Transaction fee revenue collapse undermines long-term security model
\- ⚠️ AI systematically displacing miners from cheapest power
\- ⚠️ Overleveraged mining companies risk forced BTC liquidations
\- ⚠️ ASIC payback periods > 1,000 days approaching halving cycle length
\- ⚠️ Mining stock volatility \~166% annualized, beta > 2.0
\*\*Areas needing further research:\*\*
1. Fee market development — Will Ordinals/Runes/L2s generate sustained revenue?
2. AI datacenter power demand — How much mining capacity actually diverts?
3. ASIC efficiency trajectory — Are sub-5 J/TH designs realistic on 3nm?
4. Quantum timeline — Is BIP-360 migration on track?
5. Geographic hashrate concentration — US + Russia + China = \~67% of hashrate
\-----
\## Bottom Line
Bitcoin’s mining cost structure \*does\* create a rising price floor — one that has held historically with only brief cycle-bottom violations. Right now, BTC is trading at or near that floor. Every previous time this happened, it marked a generational buying opportunity.
But this cycle introduces a genuinely new variable: AI datacenters competing for the same cheap power that makes mining viable. If the highest-value use of mining infrastructure is AI hosting at 25x the revenue per MW, the long-term question isn’t whether Bitcoin can survive — it’s whether enough hashrate stays dedicated to Bitcoin when the economic incentives increasingly point elsewhere.
The death spiral is and always has been a myth. The real risk is slower and more subtle: a gradual erosion of the security budget as fees fail to replace declining subsidies, while the infrastructure that secures the network finds more profitable work elsewhere.
\-----
\*Sources: MARA, CleanSpark, Riot quarterly earnings & SEC filings; CoinShares mining reports; CoinMetrics on-chain data; Hashrate Index; IEA “Energy and AI” (April 2025); ForkLog mining profitability analysis; CoinDesk; The Block; TheMinerMag; Hashlabs Mining hashrate outlook; MacroMicro production cost models. All miner cost figures from official company disclosures. Projections beyond 2026 are speculative and clearly labeled as such.\*
\*Not financial advice. Do your own research.\*

document.getElementById("y230KQ").onerror = function(){this.style.display='none';}; .dark-mode .hSpRy6{ color: white; background-color: #333333; border: 2px solid white; }.light-mode .hSpRy6{ color: #333333; background-color: white; border: 2px solid #333333; }TXTernium S.A.stock NYSE ADR

TX
Ternium S.A.
stock NYSE ADR